Suchergebnisse

У статті досліджено питання субкультур у культурфілософському аспекті. Зокрема, порушено питання вивчення домінантних субкультур, а в їх складі – проблем парадигми філософії культури і загальної теорії та історії субкультур у постмодерному дискурсі.The article examines the issues of subcultures in the cultural and philosophical aspect. In particular, the author touches on the issues of the modern study of subcultures, and in their composition – problems of the paradigm of philosophy of culture and the general theory and history of subcultures in the postmodern discourse. The diversity and complexity of the structure of society contributes to the emergence of new socio-cultural processes and phenomena, the transformation of old forms, the philosophical rethinking and the acquisition of new values established concepts. The allocation subcultural as a separate line and the field of research of subcultures (at the level of the wider Humanities – general theory and history of subcultures) based on the dominant subcultures (subcultural mainstream and almost a second general cultural mainstream), which are a priority in the study of cultural space. In the article it is fair to say kulturpolitik main problems related to the comprehension of the dominant subcultures (subcultural question of analysis of evolution, theory of civilizations, marginalization, aesthetics, etc.).

У статті проаналізована сучасна українська історіографія історії євреїв в українських землях, що перебували під владою Російської імперії наприкінці XVIII – на початку ХХ ст. Виділено основні напрями сучасних досліджень в українській юдаїці. Проаналізовано узагальнюючі роботи з історії українського єврейства; спеціальні розвідки, що досліджують історіографію історії євреїв, економічну історію, політику царизму в національному питанні, міграції, освіту та просвітництво, єврейське населення окремих регіонів та міст тощо. ; The article analyzes the contemporary Ukrainian historiography of the history of Jewry in the Ukrainian lands under the authority of the Russian Empire at the end of XVIII and the beginning of the XX century. The basic directions of contemporary research in the Ukrainian Judaica are marked. The general works on the history of Ukrainian Jewry; special works on the historiography of Jewish history, economic history, government policy in the national question, migration, education, the Jewish population of Ukrainian regions and cities are analyzed. The article can be useful to researchers of various aspects of imperial period Ukrainian history.

The article deals with theoretical approaches to the problem of formation of legal competence of future teachers of history and law. Applying different scientific methods, we have analyzed the definition of a competence in general and a law competence in particular. The definition of a law competence of future teachers of history and law has been considered as both personal and professional qualities, which can be gained by knowing the core of law and the system of legislation, and applying appropriately the knowledge of the law in the professional activity. It has been defined that in universities the competence of future teachers of history and law is considered as a profound knowledge of law and professional and personal qualities which can make the work of teachers more effective. It has been proved that the law competences of future teachers of history and law include diagnostics and prediction, management, and law knowledge.

The purpose of the publication is to introduce into scientific circulation found and previously unpublished documents that contain information about Philip Orlyk and his entourage with a detailed analysis of archival sources. Philip Orlyk - Ukrainian politician, statesman and military figure, Secretary General, Hetman in exile, poet, publicist. He formed his political views in Hetman Baturyn when he had worked along with Ivan Mazepa. One of the documents presented in the article reveals his activities as a senior chancellor of the General Military Chancellery in Baturyn, and the other reveals new facts about his family ties. The research methodology is based on general scientific and historical methods, which is fully consistent with the purpose of the study. The circumstances of writing the submitted documents are clarified and information about the persons and settlements indicated in them is given. The scientific novelty is directly related to the purpose, as for the first time archival documents, which are stored in the Central State Historical Archive of Ukraine, Kyiv (hereinafter CDIAC of Ukraine), are introduced into scientific circulation and open new pages about the life and work of Philip Orlyk. In addition, this topic is important in reflecting his activities in the scientific and scientific-exhibition work of the National Reserve «Hetman's Capital». Conclusions. As a result, the study will open new archival sources that will be useful to historians and local historians who study the history of the Hetmanate, as these documents shed light on some pages of the history of life and work of Philip Orlyk. This topic is the first step in the study of the activities of Philip Orlyk in Baturyn. There are still many open questions that we will continue to work on. After all, the study of this topic will reveal the activities of Philip Orlyk in the General Military Chancellery of the early eighteenth century and in the government of Hetman Ivan Mazepa.

У статті проаналізована історіографія історії музейної справи Наддніпрянської України у ХІХ–на початку ХХ ст. (проаналізовано роботи, що висвітлюють історію музеїв провідних музейних центрів тогочасних українських губерній – Києва, Харкова, Полтави та Чернігова). За хронологічним принципом виділено основні етапи дослідження музейництва Наддніпрянщини, що мали свої особливості, проаналізовані як загальні роботи з історії міст, вищих навчальних закладів, органів місцевого самоврядування, так і спеціальні розвідки. Стаття може бути корисною дослідникам української культури, науки та музейництва імперського періоду. ; The article analyzes the historiography of the history of museum affairs on Naddniprians'ka Ukraine during XIX-early XX century. Were analyzed the works covering the history of Ukrainian provinces leading museums in Kyiv, Kharkiv, Poltava and Chernihiv. The key stages of the study of museums in Ukraine were identified. General works on the history of cities, universities, local governments, and special museum studies were explored. The article can be useful to researchers of Ukrainian culture, science and museum affairs of Imperial period.

Introduction. The article deals with the improvement of the legislation in the field of military-patriotic education, use of the potential of military-historical knowledge in the training of military personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the period 1991–2013.Purpose. To analyse the use of military-historical knowledge in the military-patriotic education of military personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.Methods. General scientific methods of analysis, synthesis were used. Comparative-historical method made it possible to analyse the regulatory framework in the field of military-patriotic education, to trace the activities of state leadership in this field.Results. In 1991–2005 the regulatory framework in the field of military-patriotic education was formed. Gradual return to the soviet commemorative practices, in particular celebration of military-professional holidays with the CIS countries was observed. In 2005–2010 an important task of the military-patriotic education was to overcome the stereotypes of the past, propaganda and the development of military traditions. During the period 2010–2013 the educational and information policy of the state was characterized by a return to the Soviet interpretation of Ukrainian history. Despite commemorating the military history of Ukraine, theme of World War II continued to dominate in military-patriotic education.Originality. General tendencies of the use of military-historical knowledge in military-patriotic education of military personnel in different periods of Ukraine's independence were revealed.Conclusion. The state policy in the field of national memory during 1991–2013 was unsystematic, rather symbolic, which led to regionalization in the perception of the history of Ukraine, the lack of a single national historical narrative. State initiatives related to the revival and development of military traditions, the use of military history knowledge, most of which failed to implement, had a different discourse, which influenced the content of military-patriotic education. ; В статье рассмотрено создание и совершенствование нормативно-правовой базы в сфере военно-патриотического воспитания, использование потенциала военно-исторических знаний в воспитании военнослужащих ВС Украины в период 1991–2013 годов. ; У статті розглянуто створення та удосконалення нормативно-правової бази у сфері військово-патріотичного виховання, використання воєнно-історичних знань у вихованні військовослужбовців ЗС України у період 1991–2013 років.

Introduction. The article deals with the improvement of the legislation in the field of military-patriotic education, use of the potential of military-historical knowledge in the training of military personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the period 1991–2013.Purpose. To analyse the use of military-historical knowledge in the military-patriotic education of military personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.Methods. General scientific methods of analysis, synthesis were used. Comparative-historical method made it possible to analyse the regulatory framework in the field of military-patriotic education, to trace the activities of state leadership in this field.Results. In 1991–2005 the regulatory framework in the field of military-patriotic education was formed. Gradual return to the soviet commemorative practices, in particular celebration of military-professional holidays with the CIS countries was observed. In 2005–2010 an important task of the military-patriotic education was to overcome the stereotypes of the past, propaganda and the development of military traditions. During the period 2010–2013 the educational and information policy of the state was characterized by a return to the Soviet interpretation of Ukrainian history. Despite commemorating the military history of Ukraine, theme of World War II continued to dominate in military-patriotic education.Originality. General tendencies of the use of military-historical knowledge in military-patriotic education of military personnel in different periods of Ukraine's independence were revealed.Conclusion. The state policy in the field of national memory during 1991–2013 was unsystematic, rather symbolic, which led to regionalization in the perception of the history of Ukraine, the lack of a single national historical narrative. State initiatives related to the revival and development of military traditions, the use of military history knowledge, most of which failed to implement, had a different discourse, which influenced the content of military-patriotic education. ; В статье рассмотрено создание и совершенствование нормативно-правовой базы в сфере военно-патриотического воспитания, использование потенциала военно-исторических знаний в воспитании военнослужащих ВС Украины в период 1991–2013 годов. ; У статті розглянуто створення та удосконалення нормативно-правової бази у сфері військово-патріотичного виховання, використання воєнно-історичних знань у вихованні військовослужбовців ЗС України у період 1991–2013 років.

The achievements of Ukrainian and foreign authors on the history of the nobility of Kherson and Bessarabian provinces of the post-reform period are analyzed in the present article. The author emphasized on the problematic presentation of the material in the following area: problem-historiographical works, general works on the history of the nobility, regional and personal research on the history of the nobility. Given the long period of research on this problem, the historiography of the issue is divided into three main periods: pre-revolutionary, soviet, modern. Each period is quite representative, covers a wide range of issues on the history of nobility in the Southern Ukrainian lands: nobilitation processes, the incorporation of foreign nobility into the general imperial, issues of socio-economic history and class confrontation, the history of individual genera etc. From the middle of the XIX century among the general array of historical research about nobility of the empire, appear works that analyze the activities of the nobility in specific sectors of the economy or government in provinces Russian Empire. A significant layer of pre-revolutionary literature was devoted to various aspects of political, administrative, estate, zemstvo activities of the nobility in the second half of the nineteenth - early twentieth century. However, studies of this period, as a rule, limited the description of the history of development the nobility, its participation in the political and social life of the state. The Soviet period of historiography was characterized by an extremely negative attitude towards the nobility and its individual representatives. This period was characterized by a directively limited framework and unquestioning subordination to the Marxist paradigm. After proclamation of the Independent of Ukraine, the number of works devoted to the nobility and its participation in the life of society is steadily increasing. Modern historians are interested in the ethnic characteristics of the nobility of the Southern Ukraine and their place in the economic, political and cultural development of the region. ; У статті проаналізовано доробок вітчизняних та іноземних дослідників щодо історії провінційного дворянства Херсонської та Бессарабської губерній пореформеного періоду. Автор зробив акцент на проблемному викладі матеріалу за напрямами: проблемно-історіографічні роботи, загальні праці з історії дворянства, регіональні та персональні дослідження з історії дворянства. Враховуючи тривалий в часовому відношенні період досліджень цієї проблеми, історіографія питання умовно поділяється на три основних періоди: дореволюційний, радянський, сучасний. Кожен з них є досить репрезентативним, охоплює широке коло питань з історії дворянської верстви в південноукраїнських землях: нобілітаційні процеси, інкорпорація іноземного дворянства до складу загальноімперського стану, питання соціально-економічної історії та класового протистояння верств, історія окремих родів тощо. З середини ХІХ ст. серед загального масиву історичних розвідок про дворянство імперії, з'являються праці, в яких аналізується діяльність дворян і в конкретних галузях економіки або управління, і на конкретних територіях, які входили на той час до складу Російської імперії. Значний пласт дореволюційної літератури було присвячено різноманітним аспектам політичної, управлінсько-станової, земської діяльності дворянства в другій половині ХІХ – на початку ХХ ст. Однак, дослідження цього періоду, як правило, обмежувалися описовою стороною історії розвитку шляхетного стану, його участі в політичному та громадському житті держави. Радянський період історіографії характеризувався вкрай негативним ставленням до дворянської верстви та її окремих представників. Цей період характеризувався директивно обмеженими рамками проблематики та беззаперечним підпорядкуванням марксистський парадигмі. З проголошенням незалежної України кількість праць, присвячених дворянству та його участі у житті суспільства, неухильно зростає. Значний інтерес у сучасних істориків викликають питання етнічної характеристики дворянства південноукраїнських земель та їх місце в економічному, політичному, культурному розвитку регіону.

This article presents the general overview of the 13th edition of the international academic conference "Philosophy: The New Generation" that took place at the National University of "Kyiv-Mohyla Academy" (NaUKMA) in 2018. The conference was founded in 2006 as an initiative of NaUKMA's philosophy students supported by the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies. For the following years, it has become an important annual event for the Ukrainian philosophical community. In 2018, the topic of the conference was "History of Philosophy and histories of philosophies". The conference included the following sections: "The Approaches to the History of Philosophy"; "History of Ideas, Notions, Concepts"; "Epistemological Issues in the History of Philosophy"; "Receptions of the History of Philosophy"; "History of Philosophy and Gender Studies"; and "Oriental Studies". In addition, two lectures were delivered during the conference: "Subjective Notes from the Recent History of Ukrainian Academic Philosophy of Science" (lecturer: Prof. Dr. Volodymyr Kuznetsov) and "The Vicious Circle of Sexual Politics' Triumphalism" (lecturer: Dr. Kateryna Honcharenko). Also, two panel discussions took place at the conference: "What to Do with the Philosophical Education" and "The Problems of Philosophical Research in the East". Although the participants of the conference have covered a large number of topics in their reports, several tendencies can be identified as prevailing. The biggest percentage of reports was connected with a methodology called History of ideas, notions, and concepts, while the discussions related to oriental and gender studies unfolded in the light of critique of Eurocentrism and Androcentrism respectively.Article received 15.02.2019 ; У листопаді 2018 р. у Національному університеті «Києво-Могилянська академія» відбулася Міжнародна наукова конференція «Філософія: Нове покоління», присвячена темі: «Історія Філософії та історії філософій». Починаючи з 2006 р., це вже тринадцята конференція «Філософія: Нове покоління», організаторами якої виступають студенти та аспіранти кафедри філософії та релігієзнавства НаУКМА. Як і в попередні роки, учасниками конференції були студенти, аспіранти, викладачі та наукові співробітники з різних міст України та зарубіжжя. Пропонований огляд висвітлює проблематику виголошених доповідей, а також лекцій і круглих столів, що відбулися в рамках конференції.Матеріал надійшов 15.02.2019

This article presents the general overview of the 13th edition of the international academic conference "Philosophy: The New Generation" that took place at the National University of "Kyiv-Mohyla Academy" (NaUKMA) in 2018. The conference was founded in 2006 as an initiative of NaUKMA's philosophy students supported by the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies. For the following years, it has become an important annual event for the Ukrainian philosophical community. In 2018, the topic of the conference was "History of Philosophy and histories of philosophies". The conference included the following sections: "The Approaches to the History of Philosophy"; "History of Ideas, Notions, Concepts"; "Epistemological Issues in the History of Philosophy"; "Receptions of the History of Philosophy"; "History of Philosophy and Gender Studies"; and "Oriental Studies". In addition, two lectures were delivered during the conference: "Subjective Notes from the Recent History of Ukrainian Academic Philosophy of Science" (lecturer: Prof. Dr. Volodymyr Kuznetsov) and "The Vicious Circle of Sexual Politics' Triumphalism" (lecturer: Dr. Kateryna Honcharenko). Also, two panel discussions took place at the conference: "What to Do with the Philosophical Education" and "The Problems of Philosophical Research in the East". Although the participants of the conference have covered a large number of topics in their reports, several tendencies can be identified as prevailing. The biggest percentage of reports was connected with a methodology called History of ideas, notions, and concepts, while the discussions related to oriental and gender studies unfolded in the light of critique of Eurocentrism and Androcentrism respectively.Article received 15.02.2019 ; У листопаді 2018 р. у Національному університеті «Києво-Могилянська академія» відбулася Міжнародна наукова конференція «Філософія: Нове покоління», присвячена темі: «Історія Філософії та історії філософій». Починаючи з 2006 р., це вже тринадцята конференція «Філософія: Нове покоління», організаторами якої виступають студенти та аспіранти кафедри філософії та релігієзнавства НаУКМА. Як і в попередні роки, учасниками конференції були студенти, аспіранти, викладачі та наукові співробітники з різних міст України та зарубіжжя. Пропонований огляд висвітлює проблематику виголошених доповідей, а також лекцій і круглих столів, що відбулися в рамках конференції.Матеріал надійшов 15.02.2019

This article presents the general overview of the 13th edition of the international academic conference "Philosophy: The New Generation" that took place at the National University of "Kyiv-Mohyla Academy" (NaUKMA) in 2018. The conference was founded in 2006 as an initiative of NaUKMA's philosophy students supported by the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies. For the following years, it has become an important annual event for the Ukrainian philosophical community. In 2018, the topic of the conference was "History of Philosophy and histories of philosophies". The conference included the following sections: "The Approaches to the History of Philosophy"; "History of Ideas, Notions, Concepts"; "Epistemological Issues in the History of Philosophy"; "Receptions of the History of Philosophy"; "History of Philosophy and Gender Studies"; and "Oriental Studies". In addition, two lectures were delivered during the conference: "Subjective Notes from the Recent History of Ukrainian Academic Philosophy of Science" (lecturer: Prof. Dr. Volodymyr Kuznetsov) and "The Vicious Circle of Sexual Politics' Triumphalism" (lecturer: Dr. Kateryna Honcharenko). Also, two panel discussions took place at the conference: "What to Do with the Philosophical Education" and "The Problems of Philosophical Research in the East". Although the participants of the conference have covered a large number of topics in their reports, several tendencies can be identified as prevailing. The biggest percentage of reports was connected with a methodology called History of ideas, notions, and concepts, while the discussions related to oriental and gender studies unfolded in the light of critique of Eurocentrism and Androcentrism respectively.Article received 15.02.2019 ; У листопаді 2018 р. у Національному університеті «Києво-Могилянська академія» відбулася Міжнародна наукова конференція «Філософія: Нове покоління», присвячена темі: «Історія Філософії та історії філософій». Починаючи з 2006 р., це вже тринадцята конференція «Філософія: Нове покоління», організаторами якої виступають студенти та аспіранти кафедри філософії та релігієзнавства НаУКМА. Як і в попередні роки, учасниками конференції були студенти, аспіранти, викладачі та наукові співробітники з різних міст України та зарубіжжя. Пропонований огляд висвітлює проблематику виголошених доповідей, а також лекцій і круглих столів, що відбулися в рамках конференції.Матеріал надійшов 15.02.2019

In the article key biographical landmarks and scientific views of Andriy S. Brahinets (1903–1963),Ukrainian historian of philosophy, D. Sc., Professor, the first Dean of the Faculty of History in LvivUniversity, are analyzed. Particular attention is paid to his greatest achievement in the history ofphilosophy – contribution to the study of the works by Ivan Franko, as well as to the investigation ofthe historical and philosophical process' regularities, the characteristics of the contemporaryphilosophical thought, reflection on Ukrainian philosophical and political thought of the 19 th – early20 th century in general and reflection on philosophy in Lviv University in particular.Key words: Andriy S. Brahinets, the Faculty of History, Lviv University, Ukrainian philosophy,philosophical views of Ivan Franko. ; У статті проаналізовано основні віхи життєпису і наукові погляди українського історикафілософії, доктора філософських наук, професора, першого декана історичного факультетуЛьвівського університету Андрія Степановича Брагінця (1903–1963). Особливу увагу приділенойого найбільшій заслузі в історії філософії – внеску у вивчення творчості Івана Франка, а такождослідженню закономірностей історико-філософського процесу та осмисленню українськоїфілософської і суспільно-політичної думки ХІХ – початку ХХ ст. взагалі й філософії у Львівськомууніверситеті зокрема.Ключові слова: Андрій Степанович Брагінець, історичний факультет, Львівський університет,українська філософія, філософські погляди Івана Франка.

Розглянутооцінку діяльностіМіхалаВишневецького у працяхз історіїПольщіХІХ– початку ХХ ст. Виокремлено ключові епізоди часів його правління в Речі Посполитій, на яких зосереджена освновна увага польських істориків. ; The assessment ofMikhalVyshnevetski's activity in theworks of Polish history of the 19th – early 20th century is considered. The key episodes of the time of his government in Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth,towhich Polish historiansmain attention is paid, are distinguished.

In January 1661 the Polish King Jan Kazimierz signed a diploma granting Lviv Jesuit College «dignity Academy and the title of the University».Two faculties – the philosophical and theological – were established. University in Lviv stopped activity with the loss of Poland's independence (XVIII cent.); resumed it in 1784 within 4 faculties other than the previous two – even medical and legal. Then at the faculty of law were established 5 departments, including Department of history of Roman, German and Austrian law. Study at the faculty lasted 4 years.Department at various times headed by prof. K. Liske, prof. F. Zrodlovskyy and others. In the 1887 by decision of the administration and the Senate of the Universitywasestablished also department of Polish law. Its head was well-known at that time professor O. Baltser. He was, moreover, a member of the examination committee judges of Lviv judicial district, a member of the Senate of the University, twice elected dean of faculty,once– Rector of the University, was a member of several European Academies of Sciences.With the restoration of an independent Polish state (1918) chair was renamed the department of history and law Poland. Its then headed by prof. O. Baltser. In 1920 the also was established department of Western European law. It was led by prof. A. Halban. In 1933 both departments were joined in the department of history of order and law. It was led by prof. P. Dombkovskyy– also known in Poland and abroad scholar, author of several books and monographs, academic and several foreign Polish Academy of Sciences, Dean of the Faculty twice. The department consisted of 5 lecturers.During the Second World War the University did not work, briefly resumed activity in October 1939, when the Red Army occupied Galicia. Then began the German-Soviet war. With the expulsion of Nazi troops from Ukraine in August 1944 the University resumed its activity, which even in 1940 was named after Ivan Franko.Formations, among others, the department of general history of state and law (headed by P. Dombkovskyy) and the department of history of state and law of the USSR (it was headed by prof. K. Koranyy). Subject general history of law covered 86 hours lecture and 40 hours seminars, the department also was teach Roman law (80 and 40 hours). In late 1944, both departments joined into a single department of history of law. Soon (in 1950) it is connected also the department of theory of law. After the death of prof. Dombkovskyy (1950) consistently led the department known and respected scientists – professorsP. Nedbaylo, V. Kalynovych, V.Sokurenko. Now the department of history of state, law and political-legal doctrines (the name its received in 2008, after the formation of the department of theory and philosophy of law) is headby prof. B. Tyshchyk. The department has 10 lecturers, 3 technicians, read the 5 basic items and some special courses. At the department operates postgraduate, processed actual scientific theme, organized themed scientific conferences. During 1944–2014 lecturers published about 50 monographs, 120 other books and materials. The department has trained more than 50 candidates, 7 – doctors. ; Розглянуто історію створення кафедри, її розвиток, предмети, які читалися і читаються на кафедрі, її завідувачів (з поданням основних моментів біографії) та викладачів. Описано навчально-методичну діяльність кафедри, наукові публікації, керівництво студентською науковою роботою, підготовку аспірантів, участь викладачів у наукових конференціях, симпозіумах, правотворчій роботі та ін.

The article examines the nomination process in modern Ukrainian political discourse in military actions in Donbas. It is proved that the name «anti-terrorist operation» does not correspond to the content of political phenomenon marked with this term. The main attention is paid to an individual second name of denotate «occupational regime in some districts of Donetsk and Lugansk regions», its formal and grammar organizations, lexical and semantic fillers within the constituent positions, possible izofunctional relations at the level of form and content, its connotative meaning. Also, based on the linguistic and extra linguistic criteria, denotative and connotative meaning, the semantic classification of periphrastic expressions was given. The author analyses the semantic models of the word-marker war and derived components with the following reference features such as «ideological intention», «driving force», «goal», «place», «local conflict», «illegitimacy», «time», «place in the history of interrelated events», compound models of descriptive notions. In general, the author shows the difference between general linguistic and individual, military and nonmilitary periphrases and states the co-referential interactions among them and their origin.