Special feature: The health care system
In: OECD economic surveys
In: Belgium/Luxembourg 1998/99,4
144 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: OECD economic surveys
In: Belgium/Luxembourg 1998/99,4
In: Libri idearum
In: The NACA position on ... 21
In: Position papers of the National Advisory Council on Aging 17
In: Position papers of the National Advisory Council on Aging 16
In: Duke Press Policy Studies
Intro -- Contents -- List of Tables -- List of Figures -- Acknowledgments -- Chapter 1. Introduction: Comparing Organized Medicine and Health Policies in France and the United States -- Chapter 2. Unity and Fragmentation of the French State -- Chapter 3. The Fragmentation of the Stateless State: The Effects of Absolute Liberalism on Politics in the United States -- Chapter 4. Cohesion and Fragmentation of Organized Medicine in France and the United States -- Chapter 5. The Continuity of Crisis: Patterns of Making Health Policy in France, 1978-1990 -- Chapter 6. Policy Issues in France: State Reforms and Medical Resistance -- Chapter 7. Public and Private Forces in the American Health Universe -- Chapter 8. Patterns of Making Health Policy in France and the United States -- Chapter 9. Consequences for the Political Activites of Organized Medicine -- Chapter 10. Conclusion -- Appendix A: Glossary of Abbreviations -- Appendix B: Medical Unions and Associations in the French Hospital Sector -- Notes -- References -- Index.
In: Trends in social cohesion 2
World Affairs Online
The principle of precaution, a fundamental, essentially legalistic, rule underpinning health care legislation in France, basically arose from environmental protection policies. This principle became the topic of a good deal of well-publicized debate following the decree concerning HIV contamination rendered in 1993 by the Conseil d'Etat, the supreme jurisdiction on legislative matters in France. This translation of a fundamental principle from one domain to another is not devoid of significance and could have an unexpected impact on the nature and meaning of health care itself. When applied to medicine, the principle of precaution must be confronted with the notion of risk, inherent in all acts of health care. This risk certainly implies patients' rights and informed consent to medical care, but also, in a reasonable search for an acceptable balance between risk and benefit, the freedom of biomedical research from overly-restrictive regulations. Consequently, in accordance with an ethical approach to medical care, legislative and judicial bodies must take into consideration the practical reality of medicine in order to integrate the scientific, economic, social, and psychological aspects of everyday medical practice into health care laws and regulations. Once faced with the reality of health care, the principle of precaution could appear contradictory to the fundamental principles of medicine. Indeed, every physician, every health care worker, makes daily evidence-based decisions that are never devoid of risk. Unrestricted application of the principle of precaution to a growing number of public domains, including medicine, as advocated by a large number of opinion leaders, could lead to an inextricable situation, in total contradiction with the goal of health care itself. In order to develop new truly ethical and adapted health care regulations, we must break down the barriers confining judges and legal representatives to a purely legalistic vision of health care and equally confining physicians to a purely ...
BASE
The principle of precaution, a fundamental, essentially legalistic, rule underpinning health care legislation in France, basically arose from environmental protection policies. This principle became the topic of a good deal of well-publicized debate following the decree concerning HIV contamination rendered in 1993 by the Conseil d'Etat, the supreme jurisdiction on legislative matters in France. This translation of a fundamental principle from one domain to another is not devoid of significance and could have an unexpected impact on the nature and meaning of health care itself. When applied to medicine, the principle of precaution must be confronted with the notion of risk, inherent in all acts of health care. This risk certainly implies patients' rights and informed consent to medical care, but also, in a reasonable search for an acceptable balance between risk and benefit, the freedom of biomedical research from overly-restrictive regulations. Consequently, in accordance with an ethical approach to medical care, legislative and judicial bodies must take into consideration the practical reality of medicine in order to integrate the scientific, economic, social, and psychological aspects of everyday medical practice into health care laws and regulations. Once faced with the reality of health care, the principle of precaution could appear contradictory to the fundamental principles of medicine. Indeed, every physician, every health care worker, makes daily evidence-based decisions that are never devoid of risk. Unrestricted application of the principle of precaution to a growing number of public domains, including medicine, as advocated by a large number of opinion leaders, could lead to an inextricable situation, in total contradiction with the goal of health care itself. In order to develop new truly ethical and adapted health care regulations, we must break down the barriers confining judges and legal representatives to a purely legalistic vision of health care and equally confining physicians to a purely ...
BASE
The principle of precaution, a fundamental, essentially legalistic, rule underpinning health care legislation in France, basically arose from environmental protection policies. This principle became the topic of a good deal of well-publicized debate following the decree concerning HIV contamination rendered in 1993 by the Conseil d'Etat, the supreme jurisdiction on legislative matters in France. This translation of a fundamental principle from one domain to another is not devoid of significance and could have an unexpected impact on the nature and meaning of health care itself. When applied to medicine, the principle of precaution must be confronted with the notion of risk, inherent in all acts of health care. This risk certainly implies patients' rights and informed consent to medical care, but also, in a reasonable search for an acceptable balance between risk and benefit, the freedom of biomedical research from overly-restrictive regulations. Consequently, in accordance with an ethical approach to medical care, legislative and judicial bodies must take into consideration the practical reality of medicine in order to integrate the scientific, economic, social, and psychological aspects of everyday medical practice into health care laws and regulations. Once faced with the reality of health care, the principle of precaution could appear contradictory to the fundamental principles of medicine. Indeed, every physician, every health care worker, makes daily evidence-based decisions that are never devoid of risk. Unrestricted application of the principle of precaution to a growing number of public domains, including medicine, as advocated by a large number of opinion leaders, could lead to an inextricable situation, in total contradiction with the goal of health care itself. In order to develop new truly ethical and adapted health care regulations, we must break down the barriers confining judges and legal representatives to a purely legalistic vision of health care and equally confining physicians to a purely ...
BASE
The principle of precaution, a fundamental, essentially legalistic, rule underpinning health care legislation in France, basically arose from environmental protection policies. This principle became the topic of a good deal of well-publicized debate following the decree concerning HIV contamination rendered in 1993 by the Conseil d'Etat, the supreme jurisdiction on legislative matters in France. This translation of a fundamental principle from one domain to another is not devoid of significance and could have an unexpected impact on the nature and meaning of health care itself. When applied to medicine, the principle of precaution must be confronted with the notion of risk, inherent in all acts of health care. This risk certainly implies patients' rights and informed consent to medical care, but also, in a reasonable search for an acceptable balance between risk and benefit, the freedom of biomedical research from overly-restrictive regulations. Consequently, in accordance with an ethical approach to medical care, legislative and judicial bodies must take into consideration the practical reality of medicine in order to integrate the scientific, economic, social, and psychological aspects of everyday medical practice into health care laws and regulations. Once faced with the reality of health care, the principle of precaution could appear contradictory to the fundamental principles of medicine. Indeed, every physician, every health care worker, makes daily evidence-based decisions that are never devoid of risk. Unrestricted application of the principle of precaution to a growing number of public domains, including medicine, as advocated by a large number of opinion leaders, could lead to an inextricable situation, in total contradiction with the goal of health care itself. In order to develop new truly ethical and adapted health care regulations, we must break down the barriers confining judges and legal representatives to a purely legalistic vision of health care and equally confining physicians to a purely scientific vision of their mission.
BASE
While information technology is essential in complex, cooperative and largely distributed applications like telemedicine or social declarations, it becomes more and more necessary to have a high confidence in the processing and the distribution of data and services. This thesis proposes an approach based on a security policy, for healthcare and social information and communication systems (HSICS). These systems cover the whole of the needs generally found in other fields: interworking of systems, complexity of organizations, sensitivity of information, and diversity of security requirements (confidentiality, integrity, availability and auditability). The aim of the approach is to achieve a good trade-off between respect of the least privilege principle and flexibility of the access control. The first step consists in describing the system, identifying sensitive information and characterizing the threats. Then, the security policy specifies security properties that must be satisfied, and the rules expressing how the protection state of the system may evolve. The identified security policy is original in the way that it takes the context into account, and is flexible enough to manage any improvement, change or update in the system. Besides, a new access control model is presented: the Organization-Based Access Control (Or-BAC). In Or-BAC, the specification of the security policy is completely parameterized by the organization so that it is possible to handle simultaneously several security policies associated with different organizations. The model is not restricted to permissions, but it also includes the possibility to define prohibitions, obligations and recommendations. In this respect, Or-BAC is able to specify policies developed for HSICS, as it can be applied to a large range of complex and distributed applications. Or-BAC is represented by UML diagrams, and by a new logical language based on deontic logic. It is also integrated in a system security UML model. A prototype has been developed to illustrate ...
BASE