Imagination constrained, imagination constructed
In: Inquiry: an interdisciplinary journal of philosophy and the social sciences, Band 67, Heft 1, S. 485-512
ISSN: 1502-3923
16865 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Inquiry: an interdisciplinary journal of philosophy and the social sciences, Band 67, Heft 1, S. 485-512
ISSN: 1502-3923
In: History workshop journal: HWJ, Band 45, Heft 1, S. 199-222
ISSN: 1477-4569
In: Dialektik des Globalen. Kernbegriffe
In the 18th century, the power of the imagination, which had previously been regarded as problematic, experienced a radical upsurge in esteem. In the modern era, imagination has been viewed as an essential moment in processes of planning, designing, and organizing the world. The creative capacity to place things in relation to each other in time and space has since been considered a vital force in history.
In: From Armed Struggle to Political Struggle : Republican tradition and transformation in Northern Ireland
Moral imagination provides leaders with insight into others and the world and helps them make moral decisions and form visions. Leaders need imagination to determine the values they embrace and the feelings that these values engender in themselves and others. Leaders use imagination to animate values, apply moral principles to particular situations, and understand the moral aspects of situations. Imagination and moral values are the fundamental components of a vision.
BASE
In: Evolutionary studies in imaginative culture, Band 6, Heft 2, S. 137-140
ISSN: 2472-9876
In: Evolutionary studies in imaginative culture, Band 6, Heft 1, S. 127-130
ISSN: 2472-9876
In: Evolutionary studies in imaginative culture, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 121-124
ISSN: 2472-9876
In: Women's studies quarterly: WSQ, Band 38, Heft 3-4, S. 231-232
ISSN: 1934-1520
In: Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, Band 43, Heft 7, S. 189-192
ISSN: 1559-1476
Imagination will remain a mystery—we will not be able to explain imagination—until we can break it into simpler parts that are more easily understood. Explaining Imagination is a guidebook for doing just that, where the simpler parts are other familiar mental states like beliefs, desires, judgments, decisions, and intentions. In different combinations and contexts, these states constitute cases of imagining. This reductive approach to imagination is at direct odds with the current orthodoxy, which sees imagination as an irreducible, sui generis mental state or process—one that influences our judgments, beliefs, desires, and so on, without being constituted by them. Explaining Imagination looks closely at the main contexts where imagination is thought to be at work and argues that, in each case, the capacity is best explained by appeal to a person's beliefs, judgments, desires, intentions, or decisions. The proper conclusion is not that there are no imaginings after all, but that these other states simply constitute the relevant cases of imagining. Contexts explored in depth include: hypothetical and counterfactual reasoning, engaging in pretense, appreciating fictions, and generating creative works. The special role of mental imagery within states like beliefs, desires, and judgments is explained in a way that is compatible with reducing imagination to more basic folk psychological states. A significant upshot is that, in order to create an artificial mind with an imagination, we need only give it these more ordinary mental states.
In: https://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/11058
The article is concerned with the current security policy paradigm of precaution, which tries to be prepared for a completely unknown ("unknown unknowns") situation of danger. Within this political security regime, imaginations, both of disruption and security, gain center stage: They enable – at least approximately – the preparative handling with a yet unknown or even unthinkable future catastrophe and simultaneously serve as media of societies self-description. To be able to grasp the political role of imagination analytically, after a short historical and theoretical introduction, the article presents a model that shows the transformation of diffuse anxiety into specific scenarios of fear infused with implications of values and actions to be the central function of collective imaginations of danger. Based on this, a typology of disruption is developed that distinguishes between predetermined disruption, adaptive disruption and overstressing disruption.
BASE