Search results

Abstract
This article revisits the discussion on the rationales for intellectual property (IP) protection by addressing a particular justificatory theory for IP that had come to the forefront of legal discussions in recent years – the theory based on freedom of expression and information. This modern vision of IP focuses on the communicative nature of IP subject-matter and of IP as a legal regime. Firstly, this article reviews the Kantian theory of copyright that lies at the origins of any modern discussions on the communicative nature of IP regulation with the aim of answering whether IP should be more properly conceived as the system for regulating communication. It then looks at the readings of this theory by contemporary copyright scholars and considers applicability of the communicative theory to other areas of IP such as trademarks and patents. The analysis then proceeds towards looking at the freedom of expression dimension of the 'classic' IP theories. Reflecting on this matter is important as the rationales for IP protection influence virtually all spheres of IP's legal regulation, including – first and foremost – the reach of IP holders' entitlements.

Desde los comienzos de la Internet ha sido muy rápida la evolución de este medio de comunicación de masas hasta llegar a la popularidad con que cuenta hoy en día. Lo que comenzó como una red sobre todo, con fines experimentales, científico-técnicos y, por supuesto, con objetivos militares en los Estados Unidos, ha terminado convirtiéndose en uno de los más populares sistemas de comunicación en el ámbito mundial del momento. Esto ha creado una serie de nuevos desafíos que la comunidad tecnofila ha tenido que afrontar.