Blockchain and Intellectual Property
In: les Nouvelles - Journal of the Licensing Executives Society, Band LIV No. 1
18080 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: les Nouvelles - Journal of the Licensing Executives Society, Band LIV No. 1
SSRN
In: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Ann Peters ed.) (Oxford, update 2022)
SSRN
In: Coombe, Rosemary J. 2015. "Foreword: Diversifying Intellectual Property". In Diversity in Intellectual Property: Identities, Interests and Intersections, edited by Irene Calboli and Srividhya Ragavan, xvii-xix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-1107065529
SSRN
In: Max Planck series on Asian intellectual property law 2
In: World Intellectual Property Report
In: Forthcoming, Competition Law and Intellectual Property in China and the ASEAN, edited by Spyros Maniatis, Ioannis Kokkoris and Wang Xiaoye, Oxford University Press, 2017.
SSRN
In: Colorado Technology Law Journal
SSRN
In: Max Planck series on Asian intellectual property law 5
World Affairs Online
In: London/New York: Routledge, 2011
SSRN
Working paper
In: 23 Stanford Law & Policy Review 119 (2012)
SSRN
In: Critical concepts in intellectual property law 7
In: Overlapping Intellectual Property Rights, 2012
SSRN
In: Global policy: gp, Band 8, Heft 2, S. 149-158
ISSN: 1758-5899
AbstractThis article discusses Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and in particular global IPR expansion. That globally protected intellectual property (IP) is more valuable than ever must be set against the fact that today's global network capitalism, in which IP is so valuable, also enables information to circulate beyond IP control. Similarly, global IP expansion and its resistance go hand in hand, as global IP expansionist policy contains but also encourages infringement. We document this conflict, the paradoxical space affording it, the boundary disputes that manifest it, and the global IP expansionist policy 'ratchet' designed, but which fails, to contain it. We then evaluate global IPRs and the case for extensions, as manifested in treaties such as ACTA, TPP and TTIP. This evaluation is undertaken though specific examinations of copyright, patent and trademark laws. Claims for the overall social benefit of global IP harmonisation and expansion policies are rejected.
In: Max Planck series on Asian intellectual property law 7