Interdisciplinary epistemology
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 85, Heft 2, S. 185-197
ISSN: 1573-0964
435 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 85, Heft 2, S. 185-197
ISSN: 1573-0964
Este trabajo tiene por objetivo proponer un concepto complejo de interdisciplina que sea a la vez epistemológicamente riguroso, metodológicamente factible y políticamente crítico. Esto implica una toma de posición ideológica explícita que involucra una determinada concepción de la relación entre la ciencia y la sociedad: el conocimiento interdisciplinario es necesario para una política transformadora de los problemas complejos que afectan la vida de los pueblos en América Latina ; The goal of this article is to propound a complex concept of interdiscipline, one that should be epistemologically rigorous, methodologically viable and politically critical. This implies to assume an explicit ideological position that involves a particular conception of the relation between science and society: interdisciplinary knowledge is necessary for a politics being able to intervene in complex problems affecting people life in Latin America
BASE
Este trabajo tiene por objetivo proponer un concepto complejo de interdisciplina que sea a la vez epistemológicamente riguroso, metodológicamente factible y políticamente crítico. Esto implica una toma de posición ideológica explícita que involucra una determinada concepción de la relación entre la ciencia y la sociedad: el conocimiento interdisciplinario es necesario para una política transformadora de los problemas complejos que afectan la vida de los pueblos en América Latina ; The goal of this article is to propound a complex concept of interdiscipline, one that should be epistemologically rigorous, methodologically viable and politically critical. This implies to assume an explicit ideological position that involves a particular conception of the relation between science and society: interdisciplinary knowledge is necessary for a politics being able to intervene in complex problems affecting people life in Latin America
BASE
Este trabajo tiene por objetivo proponer un concepto complejo de interdisciplina que sea a la vez epistemológicamente riguroso, metodológicamente factible y políticamente crítico. Esto implica una toma de posición ideológica explícita que involucra una determinada concepción de la relación entre la ciencia y la sociedad: el conocimiento interdisciplinario es necesario para una política transformadora de los problemas complejos que afectan la vida de los pueblos en América Latina ; The goal of this article is to propound a complex concept of interdiscipline, one that should be epistemologically rigorous, methodologically viable and politically critical. This implies to assume an explicit ideological position that involves a particular conception of the relation between science and society: interdisciplinary knowledge is necessary for a politics being able to intervene in complex problems affecting people life in Latin America
BASE
The goal of this article is to propound a complex concept of interdiscipline, one that should be epistemologically rigorous, methodologically viable and politically critical. This implies to assume an explicit ideological position that involves a particular conception of the relation between science and society: interdisciplinary knowledge is necessary for a politics being able to intervene in complex problems affecting people life in Latin America. ; Este trabajo tiene por objetivo proponer un concepto complejo de interdisciplina que sea a la vez epistemológicamente riguroso, metodológicamente factible y políticamente crítico. Esto implica una toma de posición ideológica explícita que involucra una determinada concepción de la relación entre la ciencia y la sociedad: el conocimiento interdisciplinario es necesario para una política transformadora de los problemas complejos que afectan la vida de los pueblos en América Latina.
BASE
In: Inquiry: an interdisciplinary journal of philosophy and the social sciences, Band 31, Heft 1, S. 53-78
ISSN: 1502-3923
In: Critical review: an interdisciplinary journal of politics and society, Band 2, Heft 1, S. 92-102
ISSN: 0891-3811
A review essay on a book edited by Gerard Radnitzky & W. W. Bartley, III, Evolutionary Epistemology, Theory of Rationality, and the Sociology of Knowledge (La Salle, Ill: Open Court, 1987 [see listing in IRPS No. 51]). Karl Popper conceived of evolutionary epistemology as a generalization of his theory that all learning is by trial & error, error being the selective impact of experience on our trials. The biological implications & the self-consistency of this conception, & rival views of knowledge are considered in this book. Attention is drawn to the divergent character & levels of difficulty of the work's three parts. Of most importance is the hypothesis of a real world as part of biological explanation. It is suggested here that this leaves the question of "what the real world is like" underdetermined. Like evolutionary anthropology, selection pressures explain general features, but not the detail, in evolutionary epistemology. AA
In: Critical review: an interdisciplinary journal of politics and society, Band 26, Heft 1, S. i
ISSN: 0891-3811
Este trabajo tiene por objetivo proponer un concepto complejo de interdisciplina que sea a la vez epistemológicamente riguroso, metodológicamente factible y políticamente crítico. Esto implica una toma de posición ideológica explícita que involucra una determinada concepción de la relación entre la ciencia y la sociedad: el conocimiento interdisciplinario es necesario para una política transformadora de los problemas complejos que afectan la vida de los pueblos en América Latina. ; The goal of this article is to propound a complex concept of interdiscipline, one that should be epistemologically rigorous, methodologically viable and politically critical. This implies to assume an explicit ideological position that involves a particular conception of the relation between science and society: interdisciplinary knowledge is necessary for a politics being able to intervene in complex problems affecting people life in Latin America. ; Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales
BASE
Este trabajo tiene por objetivo proponer un concepto complejo de interdisciplina que sea a la vez epistemológicamente riguroso, metodológicamente factible y políticamente crítico. Esto implica una toma de posición ideológica explícita que involucra una determinada concepción de la relación entre la ciencia y la sociedad: el conocimiento interdisciplinario es necesario para una política transformadora de los problemas complejos que afectan la vida de los pueblos en América Latina. ; The goal of this article is to propound a complex concept of interdiscipline, one that should be epistemologically rigorous, methodologically viable and politically critical. This implies to assume an explicit ideological position that involves a particular conception of the relation between science and society: interdisciplinary knowledge is necessary for a politics being able to intervene in complex problems affecting people life in Latin America. ; Fil: Rodriguez Zoya, Leonardo Gabriel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Instituto de Investigaciones ; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
BASE
In: Critical review: a journal of politics and society, Band 26, Heft 1-2, S. i-xiv
ISSN: 1933-8007
In: Critical review: a journal of politics and society, Band 2, Heft 1, S. 92-102
ISSN: 1933-8007
In: Inquiry: an interdisciplinary journal of philosophy and the social sciences, Band 58, Heft 7-8, S. 755-779
ISSN: 1502-3923
The Platonic legacy of Western epistemology has been severely attacked for its dominant exclusivist and coercive rationality in the discourses of anti-foundationalism and anti-representationalism, which have also given rise to several alternative epistemologies. The feminist discourse challenges the exclusivist and appropriationist logic of Western epistemology, or science, for being highly gender-biased and oppressive. Weininger's remark that 'No woman is really interested in science, she may deceive herself and many good men, but bad psychologists, by thinking so' is one of such silencing masculine diktats that have deeper roots in the sexist, racist and classist biases. The feminists' revolts against the power/knowledge dynamics and subsequent epistemological directions emerge from a reflexive undertaking into the nature and production of knowledge. The paper examines the objectivity debates within the feminist science circles in this regard and explores the space between the oppressive dichotomies of nature/culture, core/peripheral, absolute/historical to articulate an alternative epistemology in the feminists' larger political program of social justice.
BASE
In: Critical review: an interdisciplinary journal of politics and society, S. 1-21
ISSN: 0891-3811