The authors examine the peculiarities of the legal regulation of the tasks of the Internal Security Agency of the Republic of Poland. A comparative analysis was conducted with domestic legislation, which defines the tasks of the Security Service of Ukraine, the advantages of the editorial staff of the Polish law "On the Agency of Internal Security and the Intelligence Agency" as well as the tasks of countering threats to the internal security of the state, among other things, are highlighted; neutralize the threats to the international authority of the state; the pre-trial investigation of crimes not only on the criterion of their belonging to the subject matter of the investigators of the Internal Security Agency of the Republic of Poland, but also on the criterion of their becoming a threat to the security of the state. It is concluded that such an approach of the Polish legislator allows more fully to define the competence of the state internal security authority than the approach used by the domestic legislator.According to the results of the analysis of legislative acts of Ukraine, which defines the tasks of the Security Service of Ukraine, attention was drawn to a certain inconsistency of the provisions of the Law of Ukraine "On the Security Service of Ukraine" in this part of the provisions of other normative legal acts of Ukraine. It also became clear that the tasks of the Security Service of Ukraine, formulated in the Law of Ukraine "On National Security of Ukraine" formulated in its competence, do not fully cover its main purpose in ensuring the state security of Ukraine. It is proposed to clarify the competence of the national intelligence service in the Law of Ukraine "On the Security Service of Ukraine" with the help of such components of its competence as functions and powers.In addition, taking into account the experience of legal regulation of the activities of the Internal Security Agency of the Republic of Poland, amendments were also proposed to the provisions of the Law of Ukraine "On the Security Service of Ukraine" defining the competence of the national intelligence service, in particular regarding the separation: counteraction of the Security Service of Ukraine to threats to the state security of Ukraine, in including - and countering threats to the international authority of the state; participation of the Security Service of Ukraine in the formation and implementation of state policy in the sphere of ensuring national security and direct provision of formation and implementation of state policy in the field of state security. ; Исследуются особенности правовой регламентации задач Агентства внутренней безопасности Республики Польша. Проведен сравнительный анализ с отечественным законодательством, которое определяет задачи Службы безопасности Украины. Обращено внимание на отдельные недостатки правовой регламентации задач Службы безопасности Украины, в том числе в Законе Украины «О национальной безопасности Украины». Предложено внесение изменений в положения Закона Украины «О Службе безопасности Украины», определяющие компетенцию отечественной спецслужбы с учетом опыта правовой регламентации деятельности Агентства внутренней безопасности Республики Польша. ; Окреслено особливості правової регламентації завдань Агентства внутрішньої безпеки Республіки Польща. Проведено порівняльний аналіз з вітчизняним законодавством, яке визначає завдання Служби безпеки України. Звернуто увагу на окремі недоліки правової регламентації завдань Служби безпеки України, у тому числі і в Законі України «Про національну безпеку». Запропоновано внесення змін до положень Закону України «Про Службу безпеки України», які визначають компетенцію вітчизняної спецслужби з урахуванням досвіду правової регламентації діяльності Агентства внутрішньої безпеки Республіки Польща.
The authors examine the peculiarities of the legal regulation of the tasks of the Internal Security Agency of the Republic of Poland. A comparative analysis was conducted with domestic legislation, which defines the tasks of the Security Service of Ukraine, the advantages of the editorial staff of the Polish law "On the Agency of Internal Security and the Intelligence Agency" as well as the tasks of countering threats to the internal security of the state, among other things, are highlighted; neutralize the threats to the international authority of the state; the pre-trial investigation of crimes not only on the criterion of their belonging to the subject matter of the investigators of the Internal Security Agency of the Republic of Poland, but also on the criterion of their becoming a threat to the security of the state. It is concluded that such an approach of the Polish legislator allows more fully to define the competence of the state internal security authority than the approach used by the domestic legislator.According to the results of the analysis of legislative acts of Ukraine, which defines the tasks of the Security Service of Ukraine, attention was drawn to a certain inconsistency of the provisions of the Law of Ukraine "On the Security Service of Ukraine" in this part of the provisions of other normative legal acts of Ukraine. It also became clear that the tasks of the Security Service of Ukraine, formulated in the Law of Ukraine "On National Security of Ukraine" formulated in its competence, do not fully cover its main purpose in ensuring the state security of Ukraine. It is proposed to clarify the competence of the national intelligence service in the Law of Ukraine "On the Security Service of Ukraine" with the help of such components of its competence as functions and powers.In addition, taking into account the experience of legal regulation of the activities of the Internal Security Agency of the Republic of Poland, amendments were also proposed to the provisions of the Law of Ukraine "On the Security Service of Ukraine" defining the competence of the national intelligence service, in particular regarding the separation: counteraction of the Security Service of Ukraine to threats to the state security of Ukraine, in including - and countering threats to the international authority of the state; participation of the Security Service of Ukraine in the formation and implementation of state policy in the sphere of ensuring national security and direct provision of formation and implementation of state policy in the field of state security. ; Исследуются особенности правовой регламентации задач Агентства внутренней безопасности Республики Польша. Проведен сравнительный анализ с отечественным законодательством, которое определяет задачи Службы безопасности Украины. Обращено внимание на отдельные недостатки правовой регламентации задач Службы безопасности Украины, в том числе в Законе Украины «О национальной безопасности Украины». Предложено внесение изменений в положения Закона Украины «О Службе безопасности Украины», определяющие компетенцию отечественной спецслужбы с учетом опыта правовой регламентации деятельности Агентства внутренней безопасности Республики Польша. ; Окреслено особливості правової регламентації завдань Агентства внутрішньої безпеки Республіки Польща. Проведено порівняльний аналіз з вітчизняним законодавством, яке визначає завдання Служби безпеки України. Звернуто увагу на окремі недоліки правової регламентації завдань Служби безпеки України, у тому числі і в Законі України «Про національну безпеку». Запропоновано внесення змін до положень Закону України «Про Службу безпеки України», які визначають компетенцію вітчизняної спецслужби з урахуванням досвіду правової регламентації діяльності Агентства внутрішньої безпеки Республіки Польща.
The authors examine the peculiarities of the legal regulation of the tasks of the Internal Security Agency of the Republic of Poland. A comparative analysis was conducted with domestic legislation, which defines the tasks of the Security Service of Ukraine, the advantages of the editorial staff of the Polish law "On the Agency of Internal Security and the Intelligence Agency" as well as the tasks of countering threats to the internal security of the state, among other things, are highlighted; neutralize the threats to the international authority of the state; the pre-trial investigation of crimes not only on the criterion of their belonging to the subject matter of the investigators of the Internal Security Agency of the Republic of Poland, but also on the criterion of their becoming a threat to the security of the state. It is concluded that such an approach of the Polish legislator allows more fully to define the competence of the state internal security authority than the approach used by the domestic legislator.According to the results of the analysis of legislative acts of Ukraine, which defines the tasks of the Security Service of Ukraine, attention was drawn to a certain inconsistency of the provisions of the Law of Ukraine "On the Security Service of Ukraine" in this part of the provisions of other normative legal acts of Ukraine. It also became clear that the tasks of the Security Service of Ukraine, formulated in the Law of Ukraine "On National Security of Ukraine" formulated in its competence, do not fully cover its main purpose in ensuring the state security of Ukraine. It is proposed to clarify the competence of the national intelligence service in the Law of Ukraine "On the Security Service of Ukraine" with the help of such components of its competence as functions and powers.In addition, taking into account the experience of legal regulation of the activities of the Internal Security Agency of the Republic of Poland, amendments were also proposed to the provisions of the Law of Ukraine "On the Security Service of Ukraine" defining the competence of the national intelligence service, in particular regarding the separation: counteraction of the Security Service of Ukraine to threats to the state security of Ukraine, in including - and countering threats to the international authority of the state; participation of the Security Service of Ukraine in the formation and implementation of state policy in the sphere of ensuring national security and direct provision of formation and implementation of state policy in the field of state security. ; Исследуются особенности правовой регламентации задач Агентства внутренней безопасности Республики Польша. Проведен сравнительный анализ с отечественным законодательством, которое определяет задачи Службы безопасности Украины. Обращено внимание на отдельные недостатки правовой регламентации задач Службы безопасности Украины, в том числе в Законе Украины «О национальной безопасности Украины». Предложено внесение изменений в положения Закона Украины «О Службе безопасности Украины», определяющие компетенцию отечественной спецслужбы с учетом опыта правовой регламентации деятельности Агентства внутренней безопасности Республики Польша. ; Окреслено особливості правової регламентації завдань Агентства внутрішньої безпеки Республіки Польща. Проведено порівняльний аналіз з вітчизняним законодавством, яке визначає завдання Служби безпеки України. Звернуто увагу на окремі недоліки правової регламентації завдань Служби безпеки України, у тому числі і в Законі України «Про національну безпеку». Запропоновано внесення змін до положень Закону України «Про Службу безпеки України», які визначають компетенцію вітчизняної спецслужби з урахуванням досвіду правової регламентації діяльності Агентства внутрішньої безпеки Республіки Польща.
The combination of military and non-military means of power struggle in interstate relations faced in recent years by countries such as Georgia, Moldova, Syria, Ukraine, Montenegro and others can not be considered entirely new phenomenon in world history, but with the development of information technology and the globalization of the financial and economic system has brought new opportunities for the use of economic, informational, political and military means of pressure.Positively evaluating the achievements of Ukrainian researchers in disclosing the institutional and procedural principles of the state system functioning and political provision of national security of Ukraine, it should be pointed out that the problem of conceptualization and response to internal political risks for its national security remains unresolved in the context of the continuation of wide-ranging implementation by Russia of theoretical and methodological and applied aspects. Hybrid war combined forces and means, including in the political sphere of Ukrainian society. Some aspects of this problem were presented by the author in Polish scientific publications.The work hypothesis found that the degree and nature of the destructive influence of individual events, phenomena and processes in the domestic political sphere, the economy, the social sphere, information activities, the fight against organized crime and corruption in Ukraine are not only conditioned by the corresponding undisguised intervention of the aggressor country, but also have an intra-Ukrainian nature, caused by the implementation of the latent interests of prominent representatives of the post-war political ruling class in Ukraine (Petro Poroshenko Bloc / People's Front A. Yatsenyuk, A. Avakov and O. Turchinov / «Vinnytsia» group of Prime Minister of Ukraine V. Groysman).The main components of Ukraine's internal security at the present stage in confronting the hybrid aggression of the Russian Federation are considered: the system of ensuring political security and its subjects, internal political and interconfessional stability, public accord, civil society and political power, political regime and political security, state security, political elites and leaders, political movements, state-church relations, religious organizations, constitutional order, territorial integrity of Ukraine.It is necessary to take into account the fact that the special organs and advocacy machine of the aggressor country in the process of information war against Ukraine attaches the highest priority to the demoralization and disintegration of Ukrainian society and discretisation of the security and defense sector. Russian propaganda for destabilizing the situation in Ukraine is actively used by the growth of negative attitudes among Ukrainian citizens.An important problem that has emerged since the onset of hybrid aggression against Ukraine is the activity of Russian agents of influence in the parliament, political parties, local authorities and civic organizations.The simulated nature of the overwhelming majority of institutional and procedural components of the reform of the social life of the Ukrainian state while simultaneously marginalizing social protest actions in the short term create the illusion of social stability of the new / old dominant political and business groups as a collective embodiment of kleptocracy, clientism and corruption. hybrid political regime in post-war Ukraine.The ruling from 2014, based on client-patronage ties and faith through informal political practices, the consolidated power groups of the Bloc of Petro Poroshenko and the People's Front are not able to overcome the crisis of confidence in power as an integral institutional and procedural system. They explain the growing internal protest potential of the Kremlin's influence.The potential of the ruling political class of Ukraine is also aggravated by the fact that in its hands the most powerful material resources, administrative and technical-organizational means, funds, sources and means of information transmission, ideological and legal mechanisms, etc., are concentrated. The specifics of the ruling political class of Ukraine are manifested in the implementation of strategies for self-enrichment, which obviously leads to neglect of public interests and uncontrolled and permissiveness.Taking into account the growing scope of domestic political risk potential of national security in the projection of the presidential and parliamentary elections in 2019, a process of political consolidation of the most active part of Ukrainian citizens around common values and interests, overcoming of existing political contradictions and achieving socially acceptable standards of living may be worthy of scientific analysis, consequently, ensuring the security of the individual, society and the state, preserving its independence, territorial integrity, sovereignty and file progressive development of Ukraine. ; The combination of military and non-military means of power struggle in interstate relations faced in recent years by countries such as Georgia, Moldova, Syria, Ukraine, Montenegro and others can not be considered entirely new phenomenon in world history, but with the development of information technology and the globalization of the financial and economic system has brought new opportunities for the use of economic, informational, political and military means of pressure.Positively evaluating the achievements of Ukrainian researchers in disclosing the institutional and procedural principles of the state system functioning and political provision of national security of Ukraine, it should be pointed out that the problem of conceptualization and response to internal political risks for its national security remains unresolved in the context of the continuation of wide-ranging implementation by Russia of theoretical and methodological and applied aspects. Hybrid war combined forces and means, including in the political sphere of Ukrainian society. Some aspects of this problem were presented by the author in Polish scientific publications.The work hypothesis found that the degree and nature of the destructive influence of individual events, phenomena and processes in the domestic political sphere, the economy, the social sphere, information activities, the fight against organized crime and corruption in Ukraine are not only conditioned by the corresponding undisguised intervention of the aggressor country, but also have an intra-Ukrainian nature, caused by the implementation of the latent interests of prominent representatives of the post-war political ruling class in Ukraine (Petro Poroshenko Bloc / People's Front A. Yatsenyuk, A. Avakov and O. Turchinov / «Vinnytsia» group of Prime Minister of Ukraine V. Groysman).The main components of Ukraine's internal security at the present stage in confronting the hybrid aggression of the Russian Federation are considered: the system of ensuring political security and its subjects, internal political and interconfessional stability, public accord, civil society and political power, political regime and political security, state security, political elites and leaders, political movements, state-church relations, religious organizations, constitutional order, territorial integrity of Ukraine.It is necessary to take into account the fact that the special organs and advocacy machine of the aggressor country in the process of information war against Ukraine attaches the highest priority to the demoralization and disintegration of Ukrainian society and discretisation of the security and defense sector. Russian propaganda for destabilizing the situation in Ukraine is actively used by the growth of negative attitudes among Ukrainian citizens.An important problem that has emerged since the onset of hybrid aggression against Ukraine is the activity of Russian agents of influence in the parliament, political parties, local authorities and civic organizations.The simulated nature of the overwhelming majority of institutional and procedural components of the reform of the social life of the Ukrainian state while simultaneously marginalizing social protest actions in the short term create the illusion of social stability of the new / old dominant political and business groups as a collective embodiment of kleptocracy, clientism and corruption. hybrid political regime in post-war Ukraine.The ruling from 2014, based on client-patronage ties and faith through informal political practices, the consolidated power groups of the Bloc of Petro Poroshenko and the People's Front are not able to overcome the crisis of confidence in power as an integral institutional and procedural system. They explain the growing internal protest potential of the Kremlin's influence.The potential of the ruling political class of Ukraine is also aggravated by the fact that in its hands the most powerful material resources, administrative and technical-organizational means, funds, sources and means of information transmission, ideological and legal mechanisms, etc., are concentrated. The specifics of the ruling political class of Ukraine are manifested in the implementation of strategies for self-enrichment, which obviously leads to neglect of public interests and uncontrolled and permissiveness.Taking into account the growing scope of domestic political risk potential of national security in the projection of the presidential and parliamentary elections in 2019, a process of political consolidation of the most active part of Ukrainian citizens around common values and interests, overcoming of existing political contradictions and achieving socially acceptable standards of living may be worthy of scientific analysis, consequently, ensuring the security of the individual, society and the state, preserving its independence, territorial integrity, sovereignty and file progressive development of Ukraine.
The combination of military and non-military means of power struggle in interstate relations faced in recent years by countries such as Georgia, Moldova, Syria, Ukraine, Montenegro and others can not be considered entirely new phenomenon in world history, but with the development of information technology and the globalization of the financial and economic system has brought new opportunities for the use of economic, informational, political and military means of pressure.Positively evaluating the achievements of Ukrainian researchers in disclosing the institutional and procedural principles of the state system functioning and political provision of national security of Ukraine, it should be pointed out that the problem of conceptualization and response to internal political risks for its national security remains unresolved in the context of the continuation of wide-ranging implementation by Russia of theoretical and methodological and applied aspects. Hybrid war combined forces and means, including in the political sphere of Ukrainian society. Some aspects of this problem were presented by the author in Polish scientific publications.The work hypothesis found that the degree and nature of the destructive influence of individual events, phenomena and processes in the domestic political sphere, the economy, the social sphere, information activities, the fight against organized crime and corruption in Ukraine are not only conditioned by the corresponding undisguised intervention of the aggressor country, but also have an intra-Ukrainian nature, caused by the implementation of the latent interests of prominent representatives of the post-war political ruling class in Ukraine (Petro Poroshenko Bloc / People's Front A. Yatsenyuk, A. Avakov and O. Turchinov / «Vinnytsia» group of Prime Minister of Ukraine V. Groysman).The main components of Ukraine's internal security at the present stage in confronting the hybrid aggression of the Russian Federation are considered: the system of ensuring political security and its subjects, internal political and interconfessional stability, public accord, civil society and political power, political regime and political security, state security, political elites and leaders, political movements, state-church relations, religious organizations, constitutional order, territorial integrity of Ukraine.It is necessary to take into account the fact that the special organs and advocacy machine of the aggressor country in the process of information war against Ukraine attaches the highest priority to the demoralization and disintegration of Ukrainian society and discretisation of the security and defense sector. Russian propaganda for destabilizing the situation in Ukraine is actively used by the growth of negative attitudes among Ukrainian citizens.An important problem that has emerged since the onset of hybrid aggression against Ukraine is the activity of Russian agents of influence in the parliament, political parties, local authorities and civic organizations.The simulated nature of the overwhelming majority of institutional and procedural components of the reform of the social life of the Ukrainian state while simultaneously marginalizing social protest actions in the short term create the illusion of social stability of the new / old dominant political and business groups as a collective embodiment of kleptocracy, clientism and corruption. hybrid political regime in post-war Ukraine.The ruling from 2014, based on client-patronage ties and faith through informal political practices, the consolidated power groups of the Bloc of Petro Poroshenko and the People's Front are not able to overcome the crisis of confidence in power as an integral institutional and procedural system. They explain the growing internal protest potential of the Kremlin's influence.The potential of the ruling political class of Ukraine is also aggravated by the fact that in its hands the most powerful material resources, administrative and technical-organizational means, funds, sources and means of information transmission, ideological and legal mechanisms, etc., are concentrated. The specifics of the ruling political class of Ukraine are manifested in the implementation of strategies for self-enrichment, which obviously leads to neglect of public interests and uncontrolled and permissiveness.Taking into account the growing scope of domestic political risk potential of national security in the projection of the presidential and parliamentary elections in 2019, a process of political consolidation of the most active part of Ukrainian citizens around common values and interests, overcoming of existing political contradictions and achieving socially acceptable standards of living may be worthy of scientific analysis, consequently, ensuring the security of the individual, society and the state, preserving its independence, territorial integrity, sovereignty and file progressive development of Ukraine. ; The combination of military and non-military means of power struggle in interstate relations faced in recent years by countries such as Georgia, Moldova, Syria, Ukraine, Montenegro and others can not be considered entirely new phenomenon in world history, but with the development of information technology and the globalization of the financial and economic system has brought new opportunities for the use of economic, informational, political and military means of pressure.Positively evaluating the achievements of Ukrainian researchers in disclosing the institutional and procedural principles of the state system functioning and political provision of national security of Ukraine, it should be pointed out that the problem of conceptualization and response to internal political risks for its national security remains unresolved in the context of the continuation of wide-ranging implementation by Russia of theoretical and methodological and applied aspects. Hybrid war combined forces and means, including in the political sphere of Ukrainian society. Some aspects of this problem were presented by the author in Polish scientific publications.The work hypothesis found that the degree and nature of the destructive influence of individual events, phenomena and processes in the domestic political sphere, the economy, the social sphere, information activities, the fight against organized crime and corruption in Ukraine are not only conditioned by the corresponding undisguised intervention of the aggressor country, but also have an intra-Ukrainian nature, caused by the implementation of the latent interests of prominent representatives of the post-war political ruling class in Ukraine (Petro Poroshenko Bloc / People's Front A. Yatsenyuk, A. Avakov and O. Turchinov / «Vinnytsia» group of Prime Minister of Ukraine V. Groysman).The main components of Ukraine's internal security at the present stage in confronting the hybrid aggression of the Russian Federation are considered: the system of ensuring political security and its subjects, internal political and interconfessional stability, public accord, civil society and political power, political regime and political security, state security, political elites and leaders, political movements, state-church relations, religious organizations, constitutional order, territorial integrity of Ukraine.It is necessary to take into account the fact that the special organs and advocacy machine of the aggressor country in the process of information war against Ukraine attaches the highest priority to the demoralization and disintegration of Ukrainian society and discretisation of the security and defense sector. Russian propaganda for destabilizing the situation in Ukraine is actively used by the growth of negative attitudes among Ukrainian citizens.An important problem that has emerged since the onset of hybrid aggression against Ukraine is the activity of Russian agents of influence in the parliament, political parties, local authorities and civic organizations.The simulated nature of the overwhelming majority of institutional and procedural components of the reform of the social life of the Ukrainian state while simultaneously marginalizing social protest actions in the short term create the illusion of social stability of the new / old dominant political and business groups as a collective embodiment of kleptocracy, clientism and corruption. hybrid political regime in post-war Ukraine.The ruling from 2014, based on client-patronage ties and faith through informal political practices, the consolidated power groups of the Bloc of Petro Poroshenko and the People's Front are not able to overcome the crisis of confidence in power as an integral institutional and procedural system. They explain the growing internal protest potential of the Kremlin's influence.The potential of the ruling political class of Ukraine is also aggravated by the fact that in its hands the most powerful material resources, administrative and technical-organizational means, funds, sources and means of information transmission, ideological and legal mechanisms, etc., are concentrated. The specifics of the ruling political class of Ukraine are manifested in the implementation of strategies for self-enrichment, which obviously leads to neglect of public interests and uncontrolled and permissiveness.Taking into account the growing scope of domestic political risk potential of national security in the projection of the presidential and parliamentary elections in 2019, a process of political consolidation of the most active part of Ukrainian citizens around common values and interests, overcoming of existing political contradictions and achieving socially acceptable standards of living may be worthy of scientific analysis, consequently, ensuring the security of the individual, society and the state, preserving its independence, territorial integrity, sovereignty and file progressive development of Ukraine.
Наведено аргументи на користь налагоджування військово-наукового співробітництва внутрішніх військ України з відповідними структурами країн Європи та Співдружності Незалежних Держав для сумісного вирішення схожих проблемних питань внутрішньої безпеки. Запропоновано напрями, принципи та форми такого співробітництва із Францією, з якою Україну об'єднують договірні відносини щодо вдосконалювання процесу розвитку її внутрішніх військ, та з Російською Федерацією, яка має з Україною єдині історичні витоки з утворення внутрішніх військ, схожі їх структури та завдання, а також проблемні питання, що виникали на шляхах їх розвитку. ; Arguments over are brought in behalf of adjusting of military-scientific collaboration of internal troops of Ukraine with the proper structures of the European countries and countries of the newly independent States for the compatible decision of alike problem questions of internal safety. Directions, principles and forms of such collaboration, are offered with France with which Ukraine is united by contractual relations that to perfection of process of development of it internal troops, and also with Russian Federation which has with Ukraine.
Наведено аргументи на користь налагоджування військово-наукового співробітництва внутрішніх військ України з відповідними структурами країн Європи та Співдружності Незалежних Держав для сумісного вирішення схожих проблемних питань внутрішньої безпеки. Запропоновано напрями, принципи та форми такого співробітництва із Францією, з якою Україну об'єднують договірні відносини щодо вдосконалювання процесу розвитку її внутрішніх військ, та з Російською Федерацією, яка має з Україною єдині історичні витоки з утворення внутрішніх військ, схожі їх структури та завдання, а також проблемні питання, що виникали на шляхах їх розвитку. ; Arguments over are brought in behalf of adjusting of military-scientific collaboration of internal troops of Ukraine with the proper structures of the European countries and countries of the newly independent States for the compatible decision of alike problem questions of internal safety. Directions, principles and forms of such collaboration, are offered with France with which Ukraine is united by contractual relations that to perfection of process of development of it internal troops, and also with Russian Federation which has with Ukraine.
The article considers the problem of the place and role of economic security in the system of state security. The constituent elements of economic security are determined, specific features of economic security are given. The place and role of legislation in ensuring the economic security of the state is revealed. Signs of investment and financial security as a component of economic security of the state are given. The article defines the category of administration of economic security of the state as a kind of activity of executive bodies. The paradigm of economic security is established from the standpoint of the theory of potential conflicts in the system of state security. The urgency of the research topic is due to the fact that with the rapid development of society every day there are new threats to the security of law enforcement in terms of corruption and illegal actions, and law enforcement officers are imperfect in regulating their actions in law and management. The scientific novelty of the article is that the activity of law enforcement agencies is considered in the prism of counteracting internal threats to the structure of internal affairs bodies of Ukraine, with simultaneous legal analysis of such and practical areas of improving economic security of internal affairs bodies of Ukraine. The purpose of the article is to identify the existing problems in the legal field regarding the economic security of the internal affairs bodies of Ukraine. The task of the article is to establish ways to overcome the existing legal and administrative problems and to outline ways to improve the activities of law enforcement agencies to overcome corruption and violations of the law among law enforcement officers of Ukraine. In determining the economic security of the national economy should distinguish between the concepts of national security, economic security and economic security of the state.
Research on inventory audit issues is receiving particular attention in the rapidly changing environ-ment that impacts and processes audits. It has the important role of inventories for any enterprise. The audit establishes the timeliness and correctness of the documentary inventory of production stocks, checks the correctness of the accounting receipts, storage in warehouses and release the production inventories, their recording in accounting and financial statements.The authors of the article substantiate the goal and objectives of the internal audit inventory, a pro-gramme of internal inventory audit for improving financial security.The purpose of internal audit of inventories is to investigate the legality, reliability, correctness, time-liness of accounting of production reserves themselves and display them in the accounts.The general plan of internal audit of inventories consists of stages: 1) Preliminary - familiarization with the activity of the enterprise; 2) Actual - carrying out the inventory, checking the inventory de-scriptions for compliance, checking the correctness of the inventory results; 3) The main one is revivi-fication of compliance of accounting policies with the requirements of the legislation, verification of the correctness of the formation of the initial inventories, cost verification of costs not included in the original cost of inventories; check re-inventory of stocks, check stocks that are (transferred) on appro-priate storage, check stocks that are in transit, check movement of power of attorney; 4) Final - prepa-ration of the audit report.In this work authors developed the internal audit programme of inventory to improve financial secu-rity at the enterprise, which includes: the overall internal audit plan, internal audit programme, work-ing papers, which are used to verify.The proposed methodology of the audit will allow the controller reaching the all aspects of inventory accounting at the enterprise, to analyze the correctness, timeliness end legality accounting of inven-tory, to detect breaks, to internal control qualitatively and to rise up the financial security of the enter-prise. ; Дослідження проблем аудиту виробничих запасів набувають особливої уваги в швидко змінюю-чому навколишньому середовищі, що впливає на процес аудиту. Важлива роль виробничих запасів для будь-якого підприємства. Під час аудиту встановлюється своєчасність та правильність документального оформлення виробничих запасів, здійснюється перевірка правильності ведення обліку надходження, збереження на складах та відпуск у виробництво виробничих за-пасів, їх відображення в обліку та у фінансовій звітності.Авторами статті обґрунтовано мета та завдання проведення внутрішнього аудиту виробни-чих запасів, розроблена програма внутрішнього аудиту виробничих запасів для підвищення фінансової безпеки підприємства. Метою внутрішнього аудиту виробничих запасів є дослідження законності, достовірності, правильності, своєчасності ведення обліку виробничими запаса-ми та відображення їх в звітності.Загальний план внутрішнього аудиту виробничих запасів складається з етапів: 1) Попередній – ознайомлення з діяльністю підприємства; 2) Фактичний - проведення інвентаризації, перевірка інвентаризаційних описів на відповідність, перевірка правильності результатів інвентаризації; 3) Основний – перевірка відповідності облікової політики вимогам законодавства, перевірка правильності формування вартості виробничих запасів, перевірка витрат, не включених до вартості запасів; перевірка повторної переоцінки запасів, перевірка запасів, які знаходять-ся (передані) на відповідному зберіганні, перевірка запасів, які знаходяться в дорозі, перевірка руху довіреностей; 4) Заключний - складання аудиторського звіту.У роботі розроблена програма внутрішнього аудиту виробничих запасів для підвищення фінан-сової безпеки підприємства, яка включає: загальний план внутрішнього аудиту, програму внутрішнього аудиту, робочі документи. Запропонована методика проведення перевірки надасть змогу контролеру охопити всі аспекти обліку виробничих запасів на підприємстві, досліди-ти правильність, своєчасність, законність відображення в обліку виробничих запасів, вчасно виявити порушення, провести якісний внутрішній аудит та підвищити фінансову безпеку підприємства.
The article deals with the status and functions of the Security Service of Ukraine. A systematic analysis of the Ukrainian legislation has been carried out and its conformity with the Recommendation PACE 1402 (1999) Control of internal security services in the Council of Europe member states has been determined. The purpose of reforming the Security Service of Ukraine is to transform it into a special service capable of effectively protecting state sovereignty, constitutional order and territorial integrity of Ukraine. Usually there are three basic - "classic" powers of the intelligence services: information gathering, analysis of collected information and counterintelligence. But current Ukrainian legislation, along with "classic" counterintelligence functions, entrusts the Security Service of Ukraine with the functions of fight against corruption and organized crime, as well as economic crimes. The author considers that the presence of such powers by the Security Service of Ukraine does not contradict Recommendation PACE 1402. Firstly, the jurisdiction of the Security Service of Ukraine is rather limited. Secondly, the risk of abuse of authority and therefore the risk of human rights violations are directly related to the form of organization and the presence of certain powers in the special services, the PACE Recommendation suggests that domestic security services do not allow criminal investigations, arrests or detentions of persons, and that they do not participate in the fight against organized crime, except in very specific cases where organized crime is a clear danger to a free democratic state. The second issue is the demilitarization of the special service. Most of the staff of the Security Service of Ukraine are military personnel. According to the author, this is not in direct contradiction with the Recommendation PACE 1402, because the Recommendation PACE 1402 states that they internal security services should preferably not be organized within a military structure. Nor should civilian security ...
Introduction. In a globalized world economy the most important function of the state is to ensure its economic security. To address this complex problem are the appropriate state institutions, legal framework, trained personnel, technology, administrative, intellectual, informational, financial and other material resources. In turn, non-state security actors also have significant resources to ensure economic security business. These resources primarily include well-trained professionals, experience in business security specific conditions of the domestic economy, as well as organizational structure, finance business entities and knowledge of employees, and available technologies, means, methods and techniques of counteracting factors threats external and internal environment. It is also necessary to unite together all the company's resources and resources of external organizations in order to obtain a synergistic effect in the system of economic security. Purpose. Research conditions to create a synergistic effect in the system of economic security. Methods. Theoretical generalization, logical analysis, induction are used to determine the main methods for evaluation of industrial enterprises managers; to determine scientific approach that must be used for research and study of the evaluation process of managers of industrial enterprises. Results. Nowadays provision of economic security of enterprise is possible only if the operation activity of its economic security system is effective. This requires constant and close cooperation of all its internal and external entities that can provide a synergetic effect in countering external and internal threats to economic security. Originality. All elements of economic security based on a single concept, policies should be integrated into the overall strategy of economic security that can give a synergistic protective effect. The model of forming synergistic effect in the system of economic security offered in the article. Considering the need to achieve a synergistic effect of a system of economic security must take into account not only the intellectual and professional capabilities of its staff. It is important to use this complex process and available material resources that include: finance, law, and other hardware. Only the union of "human capital" of the enterprise and its resources can provide a synergistic protective effect, will withstand adverse factors external and internal environment. Conclusion. In an unstable economy and high level of uncertainty processes that occur in it, to ensure economic security is possible only on condition of close interaction and partnership of government and business. This will fully and optimally a single algorithm to use all their resources to counter internal and external threats to the economy, ie a synergistic protective effect at securing domestic business.
Introduction. In modern conditions of political and economic crisis in the country to guarantee the safety system of economic entities requires new scientific approaches and tools. One of these tools can be a simulation. Today, not many domestic and foreign scientists working on this problem. One reason for this is the fact that the very system of economic security is a complex dynamic system, its condition affects many internal and external factors. The need to predict the level of risk and threats complicate the task. However, modern methods of simulation can solve such complex problems. Purpose. The purpose and objectives of the article is to study the possibility of using and adapting different types of models that have been successfully applied in various fields, to build an effective model of economic security. Methods. Generalization, ordering, causal method, expert method. Results. Effective functioning of a system of economic security is a vital issue for any company. The possibility of adaptation of well-known and well-functioning models from other spheres to development of the effective model of economic security of a company is examined in the paper. The advantages and disadvantages of these models are analyzed. Originality. V-model proposed building a system of economic security. As each model V-model has its advantages and disadvantages. The main advantage of the model experts call the possibility of achieving high quality results. The advantage of this model is also the possibility of precise planning under conditions of limited resources, especially financial. As the practice of the V-model, it will be particularly effective for those companies that are just starting to create its system of economic security and should do so in clearly defined terms. The more the company, the harder it will be the model, the more contingencies may arise during its implementation. Therefore, this type of model is best suited for small businesses. Conclusion. Building an effective model of economic security is a challenge. Any model is not universal and may not provide an accurate prediction of the system under the influence of external and internal factors. However, the adaptation of V-model for modeling of economic security makes it possible to build efficient system and achieve their maximum results clearly planning the necessary time and resources.
The article is devoted to the analysis of threats to national security and democracy in Ukraine, among which key ones are corruption in government bodies and local self-government, as well as reluctance of authorities and impeding Constitution, laws, regulations and international obligations, to provide them with an opportunity to freely access information on the activities of state authorities and local self-government, transparency, openness and transparency of government.The subject of the study is the identification of internal threats to national security and democracy in Ukraine, which require urgent response to the context of bringing national legislation in line with international democratic standards in accordance with their obligations. The purpose of the article is to analyze the internal threats to national security and democracy in Ukraine, including imperfect legislation, corruption problems and a departure from the world's democratic norms and standards, and to determine ways to overcome these phenomena. In the course of the study of the problem, the following methods were used: system, structural-functional, generalization, analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction.It has been proved that to promote the development of civil society and the emergence of Ukraine as a state of law, an urgent need is to establish a constructive dialogue between the authorities and civil society. Public administration should be based on the principles of the rule of law, equality of citizens before the law, honesty and transparency of power, and its priority should be to protect the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of citizens, national interests of Ukraine, one of the most important among them is the fight against corruption in public authorities. Effective public administration requires a consistent anti-corruption policy, which should be implemented through: compliance with legislation, limiting the control and regulatory functions of the state, motivating state employees to work conscientiously, ensuring the inevitability of punishment for corruption offenses. Ukraine must adhere to international obligations and inherit the best international practices for carrying out democratic reforms. ; Статья посвящена анализу угроз национальной безопасности и демократии в Украине, среди которых ключевыми яв-ляются коррупция в органах государственной власти и местного самоуправления, а также нежелание власти и препятствование, вопреки Конституции, законам, нормативным правовым актам и международным обязательствам, привлечению граждан к участию в управлении государственными делами, предоставление им возможности для свободного доступа к информации о деятельности органов государственной власти и местного самоуправления, обеспечения гласности, открытости и прозрачности деятельности органов власти.Предметом исследования является определение внутренних угроз национальной безопасности и демократии в Украине, требующих неотложного реагирования в контексте приведения национального законодательства в соответствие с международными демократическими стандартами согласно взятым на себя обязательствам. Цель статьи – проанализировать внутренние угрозы национальной безопасности и демократии в Украине, среди которых несовершенство законодательства, проблемы коррупции и отход от мировых демократических норм и стандартов, и определить пути преодоления этих явлений. В ходе исследования проблемы были использованы следующие методы: системный, структурно-функциональный, метод обобщения, анализа и синтеза, индукции и дедукции.Научная новизна исследования заключается в попытке комплексного анализа стратегических ориентиров государства для проведения системных политических и социально-экономических реформ в Украине и широкомасштабной адаптации законодательства Украины к нормам и правилам ЕС, что определяет «Соглашение об ассоциации между Украиной, с одной стороны, и Европейским Союзом, европейским сообществом по атомной энергии и их государствами-членами, с другой стороны».Доказано, что для содействия развитию гражданского общества и становления Украины как правового государства, насущной необходимостью является налаживание конструктивного диалога между властью и гражданским обществом. Государственное управление должно основываться на принципах верховенства права, равенства граждан перед законом, честности и прозрачности власти, а его приоритетом должна стать защита прав, свобод и законных интересов граждан, национальных интересов Украины, одним из важнейших среди которых является борьба с коррупцией в органах государственной власти. Эффективное государственное управление требует последовательной антикоррупционной политики, которая должна осуществляться таким путем: соблюдение законодательства, ограничение контрольно-регуляторных функций государства, мотивация работников государственных органов к добросовестному труду, обеспечение неотвратимости наказания за коррупционные правонарушения. Украина должна придерживаться международных обязательств и наследовать лучшие международные практики по проведению демократических реформ. ; Стаття присвячена аналізу внутрішніх загроз національній безпеці та демократії в Україні, серед яких ключовими є корупція в органах державної влади та місцевого самоврядування та небажання влади і перешкоджання, всупереч Конституції, законам, нор-мативно-правовим актам та міжнародним зобов'язанням, залученню громадян до участі в управлінні державними справами, надання їм можливості для вільного доступу до інформації про діяльність органів державної влади та місцевого самоврядування, забезпечення гласності, відкритості та прозорості діяльності органів влади. Державне управління повинно ґрунтуватися на принципах верховенства права, рівності громадян перед законом, чесності та прозорості влади, а його пріоритетом повинен стати захист прав, свобод і законних інтересів громадян, національних інтересів України, одним з найважливіших серед яких є боротьба з такою потужною внутрішньою загрозою як корупція в органах державної влади. Також нагальною потребою є дотримання стратегічних орієнтирів для проведення системних політичних і соціально-економічних реформ в Україні та широкомасштабної адаптації законодавства України до норм і правил ЄС, що визначає «Угода про асоціацію між Україною, з однієї сторони, та Європейським Союзом, Європейським співтовариством з атомної енергії і їхніми державами-членами, з іншої сторони». Це співробітництво спрямоване, зокрема, на зміцнення су-дової влади, підвищення її ефективності, гарантування її незалежності і неупередженості та боротьбу з корупцією.
The article is devoted to the analysis of threats to national security and democracy in Ukraine, among which key ones are corruption in government bodies and local self-government, as well as reluctance of authorities and impeding Constitution, laws, regulations and international obligations, to provide them with an opportunity to freely access information on the activities of state authorities and local self-government, transparency, openness and transparency of government.The subject of the study is the identification of internal threats to national security and democracy in Ukraine, which require urgent response to the context of bringing national legislation in line with international democratic standards in accordance with their obligations. The purpose of the article is to analyze the internal threats to national security and democracy in Ukraine, including imperfect legislation, corruption problems and a departure from the world's democratic norms and standards, and to determine ways to overcome these phenomena. In the course of the study of the problem, the following methods were used: system, structural-functional, generalization, analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction.It has been proved that to promote the development of civil society and the emergence of Ukraine as a state of law, an urgent need is to establish a constructive dialogue between the authorities and civil society. Public administration should be based on the principles of the rule of law, equality of citizens before the law, honesty and transparency of power, and its priority should be to protect the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of citizens, national interests of Ukraine, one of the most important among them is the fight against corruption in public authorities. Effective public administration requires a consistent anti-corruption policy, which should be implemented through: compliance with legislation, limiting the control and regulatory functions of the state, motivating state employees to work conscientiously, ensuring the inevitability of punishment for corruption offenses. Ukraine must adhere to international obligations and inherit the best international practices for carrying out democratic reforms. ; Статья посвящена анализу угроз национальной безопасности и демократии в Украине, среди которых ключевыми яв-ляются коррупция в органах государственной власти и местного самоуправления, а также нежелание власти и препятствование, вопреки Конституции, законам, нормативным правовым актам и международным обязательствам, привлечению граждан к участию в управлении государственными делами, предоставление им возможности для свободного доступа к информации о деятельности органов государственной власти и местного самоуправления, обеспечения гласности, открытости и прозрачности деятельности органов власти.Предметом исследования является определение внутренних угроз национальной безопасности и демократии в Украине, требующих неотложного реагирования в контексте приведения национального законодательства в соответствие с международными демократическими стандартами согласно взятым на себя обязательствам. Цель статьи – проанализировать внутренние угрозы национальной безопасности и демократии в Украине, среди которых несовершенство законодательства, проблемы коррупции и отход от мировых демократических норм и стандартов, и определить пути преодоления этих явлений. В ходе исследования проблемы были использованы следующие методы: системный, структурно-функциональный, метод обобщения, анализа и синтеза, индукции и дедукции.Научная новизна исследования заключается в попытке комплексного анализа стратегических ориентиров государства для проведения системных политических и социально-экономических реформ в Украине и широкомасштабной адаптации законодательства Украины к нормам и правилам ЕС, что определяет «Соглашение об ассоциации между Украиной, с одной стороны, и Европейским Союзом, европейским сообществом по атомной энергии и их государствами-членами, с другой стороны».Доказано, что для содействия развитию гражданского общества и становления Украины как правового государства, насущной необходимостью является налаживание конструктивного диалога между властью и гражданским обществом. Государственное управление должно основываться на принципах верховенства права, равенства граждан перед законом, честности и прозрачности власти, а его приоритетом должна стать защита прав, свобод и законных интересов граждан, национальных интересов Украины, одним из важнейших среди которых является борьба с коррупцией в органах государственной власти. Эффективное государственное управление требует последовательной антикоррупционной политики, которая должна осуществляться таким путем: соблюдение законодательства, ограничение контрольно-регуляторных функций государства, мотивация работников государственных органов к добросовестному труду, обеспечение неотвратимости наказания за коррупционные правонарушения. Украина должна придерживаться международных обязательств и наследовать лучшие международные практики по проведению демократических реформ. ; Стаття присвячена аналізу внутрішніх загроз національній безпеці та демократії в Україні, серед яких ключовими є корупція в органах державної влади та місцевого самоврядування та небажання влади і перешкоджання, всупереч Конституції, законам, нор-мативно-правовим актам та міжнародним зобов'язанням, залученню громадян до участі в управлінні державними справами, надання їм можливості для вільного доступу до інформації про діяльність органів державної влади та місцевого самоврядування, забезпечення гласності, відкритості та прозорості діяльності органів влади. Державне управління повинно ґрунтуватися на принципах верховенства права, рівності громадян перед законом, чесності та прозорості влади, а його пріоритетом повинен стати захист прав, свобод і законних інтересів громадян, національних інтересів України, одним з найважливіших серед яких є боротьба з такою потужною внутрішньою загрозою як корупція в органах державної влади. Також нагальною потребою є дотримання стратегічних орієнтирів для проведення системних політичних і соціально-економічних реформ в Україні та широкомасштабної адаптації законодавства України до норм і правил ЄС, що визначає «Угода про асоціацію між Україною, з однієї сторони, та Європейським Союзом, Європейським співтовариством з атомної енергії і їхніми державами-членами, з іншої сторони». Це співробітництво спрямоване, зокрема, на зміцнення су-дової влади, підвищення її ефективності, гарантування її незалежності і неупередженості та боротьбу з корупцією.
