The authors examine the peculiarities of the legal regulation of the tasks of the Internal Security Agency of the Republic of Poland. A comparative analysis was conducted with domestic legislation, which defines the tasks of the Security Service of Ukraine, the advantages of the editorial staff of the Polish law "On the Agency of Internal Security and the Intelligence Agency" as well as the tasks of countering threats to the internal security of the state, among other things, are highlighted; neutralize the threats to the international authority of the state; the pre-trial investigation of crimes not only on the criterion of their belonging to the subject matter of the investigators of the Internal Security Agency of the Republic of Poland, but also on the criterion of their becoming a threat to the security of the state. It is concluded that such an approach of the Polish legislator allows more fully to define the competence of the state internal security authority than the approach used by the domestic legislator.According to the results of the analysis of legislative acts of Ukraine, which defines the tasks of the Security Service of Ukraine, attention was drawn to a certain inconsistency of the provisions of the Law of Ukraine "On the Security Service of Ukraine" in this part of the provisions of other normative legal acts of Ukraine. It also became clear that the tasks of the Security Service of Ukraine, formulated in the Law of Ukraine "On National Security of Ukraine" formulated in its competence, do not fully cover its main purpose in ensuring the state security of Ukraine. It is proposed to clarify the competence of the national intelligence service in the Law of Ukraine "On the Security Service of Ukraine" with the help of such components of its competence as functions and powers.In addition, taking into account the experience of legal regulation of the activities of the Internal Security Agency of the Republic of Poland, amendments were also proposed to the provisions of the Law of Ukraine "On the Security Service of Ukraine" defining the competence of the national intelligence service, in particular regarding the separation: counteraction of the Security Service of Ukraine to threats to the state security of Ukraine, in including - and countering threats to the international authority of the state; participation of the Security Service of Ukraine in the formation and implementation of state policy in the sphere of ensuring national security and direct provision of formation and implementation of state policy in the field of state security. ; Исследуются особенности правовой регламентации задач Агентства внутренней безопасности Республики Польша. Проведен сравнительный анализ с отечественным законодательством, которое определяет задачи Службы безопасности Украины. Обращено внимание на отдельные недостатки правовой регламентации задач Службы безопасности Украины, в том числе в Законе Украины «О национальной безопасности Украины». Предложено внесение изменений в положения Закона Украины «О Службе безопасности Украины», определяющие компетенцию отечественной спецслужбы с учетом опыта правовой регламентации деятельности Агентства внутренней безопасности Республики Польша. ; Окреслено особливості правової регламентації завдань Агентства внутрішньої безпеки Республіки Польща. Проведено порівняльний аналіз з вітчизняним законодавством, яке визначає завдання Служби безпеки України. Звернуто увагу на окремі недоліки правової регламентації завдань Служби безпеки України, у тому числі і в Законі України «Про національну безпеку». Запропоновано внесення змін до положень Закону України «Про Службу безпеки України», які визначають компетенцію вітчизняної спецслужби з урахуванням досвіду правової регламентації діяльності Агентства внутрішньої безпеки Республіки Польща.
The authors examine the peculiarities of the legal regulation of the tasks of the Internal Security Agency of the Republic of Poland. A comparative analysis was conducted with domestic legislation, which defines the tasks of the Security Service of Ukraine, the advantages of the editorial staff of the Polish law "On the Agency of Internal Security and the Intelligence Agency" as well as the tasks of countering threats to the internal security of the state, among other things, are highlighted; neutralize the threats to the international authority of the state; the pre-trial investigation of crimes not only on the criterion of their belonging to the subject matter of the investigators of the Internal Security Agency of the Republic of Poland, but also on the criterion of their becoming a threat to the security of the state. It is concluded that such an approach of the Polish legislator allows more fully to define the competence of the state internal security authority than the approach used by the domestic legislator.According to the results of the analysis of legislative acts of Ukraine, which defines the tasks of the Security Service of Ukraine, attention was drawn to a certain inconsistency of the provisions of the Law of Ukraine "On the Security Service of Ukraine" in this part of the provisions of other normative legal acts of Ukraine. It also became clear that the tasks of the Security Service of Ukraine, formulated in the Law of Ukraine "On National Security of Ukraine" formulated in its competence, do not fully cover its main purpose in ensuring the state security of Ukraine. It is proposed to clarify the competence of the national intelligence service in the Law of Ukraine "On the Security Service of Ukraine" with the help of such components of its competence as functions and powers.In addition, taking into account the experience of legal regulation of the activities of the Internal Security Agency of the Republic of Poland, amendments were also proposed to the provisions of the Law of Ukraine "On the Security Service of Ukraine" defining the competence of the national intelligence service, in particular regarding the separation: counteraction of the Security Service of Ukraine to threats to the state security of Ukraine, in including - and countering threats to the international authority of the state; participation of the Security Service of Ukraine in the formation and implementation of state policy in the sphere of ensuring national security and direct provision of formation and implementation of state policy in the field of state security. ; Исследуются особенности правовой регламентации задач Агентства внутренней безопасности Республики Польша. Проведен сравнительный анализ с отечественным законодательством, которое определяет задачи Службы безопасности Украины. Обращено внимание на отдельные недостатки правовой регламентации задач Службы безопасности Украины, в том числе в Законе Украины «О национальной безопасности Украины». Предложено внесение изменений в положения Закона Украины «О Службе безопасности Украины», определяющие компетенцию отечественной спецслужбы с учетом опыта правовой регламентации деятельности Агентства внутренней безопасности Республики Польша. ; Окреслено особливості правової регламентації завдань Агентства внутрішньої безпеки Республіки Польща. Проведено порівняльний аналіз з вітчизняним законодавством, яке визначає завдання Служби безпеки України. Звернуто увагу на окремі недоліки правової регламентації завдань Служби безпеки України, у тому числі і в Законі України «Про національну безпеку». Запропоновано внесення змін до положень Закону України «Про Службу безпеки України», які визначають компетенцію вітчизняної спецслужби з урахуванням досвіду правової регламентації діяльності Агентства внутрішньої безпеки Республіки Польща.
The authors examine the peculiarities of the legal regulation of the tasks of the Internal Security Agency of the Republic of Poland. A comparative analysis was conducted with domestic legislation, which defines the tasks of the Security Service of Ukraine, the advantages of the editorial staff of the Polish law "On the Agency of Internal Security and the Intelligence Agency" as well as the tasks of countering threats to the internal security of the state, among other things, are highlighted; neutralize the threats to the international authority of the state; the pre-trial investigation of crimes not only on the criterion of their belonging to the subject matter of the investigators of the Internal Security Agency of the Republic of Poland, but also on the criterion of their becoming a threat to the security of the state. It is concluded that such an approach of the Polish legislator allows more fully to define the competence of the state internal security authority than the approach used by the domestic legislator.According to the results of the analysis of legislative acts of Ukraine, which defines the tasks of the Security Service of Ukraine, attention was drawn to a certain inconsistency of the provisions of the Law of Ukraine "On the Security Service of Ukraine" in this part of the provisions of other normative legal acts of Ukraine. It also became clear that the tasks of the Security Service of Ukraine, formulated in the Law of Ukraine "On National Security of Ukraine" formulated in its competence, do not fully cover its main purpose in ensuring the state security of Ukraine. It is proposed to clarify the competence of the national intelligence service in the Law of Ukraine "On the Security Service of Ukraine" with the help of such components of its competence as functions and powers.In addition, taking into account the experience of legal regulation of the activities of the Internal Security Agency of the Republic of Poland, amendments were also proposed to the provisions of the Law of Ukraine "On the Security Service of Ukraine" defining the competence of the national intelligence service, in particular regarding the separation: counteraction of the Security Service of Ukraine to threats to the state security of Ukraine, in including - and countering threats to the international authority of the state; participation of the Security Service of Ukraine in the formation and implementation of state policy in the sphere of ensuring national security and direct provision of formation and implementation of state policy in the field of state security. ; Исследуются особенности правовой регламентации задач Агентства внутренней безопасности Республики Польша. Проведен сравнительный анализ с отечественным законодательством, которое определяет задачи Службы безопасности Украины. Обращено внимание на отдельные недостатки правовой регламентации задач Службы безопасности Украины, в том числе в Законе Украины «О национальной безопасности Украины». Предложено внесение изменений в положения Закона Украины «О Службе безопасности Украины», определяющие компетенцию отечественной спецслужбы с учетом опыта правовой регламентации деятельности Агентства внутренней безопасности Республики Польша. ; Окреслено особливості правової регламентації завдань Агентства внутрішньої безпеки Республіки Польща. Проведено порівняльний аналіз з вітчизняним законодавством, яке визначає завдання Служби безпеки України. Звернуто увагу на окремі недоліки правової регламентації завдань Служби безпеки України, у тому числі і в Законі України «Про національну безпеку». Запропоновано внесення змін до положень Закону України «Про Службу безпеки України», які визначають компетенцію вітчизняної спецслужби з урахуванням досвіду правової регламентації діяльності Агентства внутрішньої безпеки Республіки Польща.
The combination of military and non-military means of power struggle in interstate relations faced in recent years by countries such as Georgia, Moldova, Syria, Ukraine, Montenegro and others can not be considered entirely new phenomenon in world history, but with the development of information technology and the globalization of the financial and economic system has brought new opportunities for the use of economic, informational, political and military means of pressure.Positively evaluating the achievements of Ukrainian researchers in disclosing the institutional and procedural principles of the state system functioning and political provision of national security of Ukraine, it should be pointed out that the problem of conceptualization and response to internal political risks for its national security remains unresolved in the context of the continuation of wide-ranging implementation by Russia of theoretical and methodological and applied aspects. Hybrid war combined forces and means, including in the political sphere of Ukrainian society. Some aspects of this problem were presented by the author in Polish scientific publications.The work hypothesis found that the degree and nature of the destructive influence of individual events, phenomena and processes in the domestic political sphere, the economy, the social sphere, information activities, the fight against organized crime and corruption in Ukraine are not only conditioned by the corresponding undisguised intervention of the aggressor country, but also have an intra-Ukrainian nature, caused by the implementation of the latent interests of prominent representatives of the post-war political ruling class in Ukraine (Petro Poroshenko Bloc / People's Front A. Yatsenyuk, A. Avakov and O. Turchinov / «Vinnytsia» group of Prime Minister of Ukraine V. Groysman).The main components of Ukraine's internal security at the present stage in confronting the hybrid aggression of the Russian Federation are considered: the system of ensuring political security and its subjects, internal political and interconfessional stability, public accord, civil society and political power, political regime and political security, state security, political elites and leaders, political movements, state-church relations, religious organizations, constitutional order, territorial integrity of Ukraine.It is necessary to take into account the fact that the special organs and advocacy machine of the aggressor country in the process of information war against Ukraine attaches the highest priority to the demoralization and disintegration of Ukrainian society and discretisation of the security and defense sector. Russian propaganda for destabilizing the situation in Ukraine is actively used by the growth of negative attitudes among Ukrainian citizens.An important problem that has emerged since the onset of hybrid aggression against Ukraine is the activity of Russian agents of influence in the parliament, political parties, local authorities and civic organizations.The simulated nature of the overwhelming majority of institutional and procedural components of the reform of the social life of the Ukrainian state while simultaneously marginalizing social protest actions in the short term create the illusion of social stability of the new / old dominant political and business groups as a collective embodiment of kleptocracy, clientism and corruption. hybrid political regime in post-war Ukraine.The ruling from 2014, based on client-patronage ties and faith through informal political practices, the consolidated power groups of the Bloc of Petro Poroshenko and the People's Front are not able to overcome the crisis of confidence in power as an integral institutional and procedural system. They explain the growing internal protest potential of the Kremlin's influence.The potential of the ruling political class of Ukraine is also aggravated by the fact that in its hands the most powerful material resources, administrative and technical-organizational means, funds, sources and means of information transmission, ideological and legal mechanisms, etc., are concentrated. The specifics of the ruling political class of Ukraine are manifested in the implementation of strategies for self-enrichment, which obviously leads to neglect of public interests and uncontrolled and permissiveness.Taking into account the growing scope of domestic political risk potential of national security in the projection of the presidential and parliamentary elections in 2019, a process of political consolidation of the most active part of Ukrainian citizens around common values and interests, overcoming of existing political contradictions and achieving socially acceptable standards of living may be worthy of scientific analysis, consequently, ensuring the security of the individual, society and the state, preserving its independence, territorial integrity, sovereignty and file progressive development of Ukraine. ; The combination of military and non-military means of power struggle in interstate relations faced in recent years by countries such as Georgia, Moldova, Syria, Ukraine, Montenegro and others can not be considered entirely new phenomenon in world history, but with the development of information technology and the globalization of the financial and economic system has brought new opportunities for the use of economic, informational, political and military means of pressure.Positively evaluating the achievements of Ukrainian researchers in disclosing the institutional and procedural principles of the state system functioning and political provision of national security of Ukraine, it should be pointed out that the problem of conceptualization and response to internal political risks for its national security remains unresolved in the context of the continuation of wide-ranging implementation by Russia of theoretical and methodological and applied aspects. Hybrid war combined forces and means, including in the political sphere of Ukrainian society. Some aspects of this problem were presented by the author in Polish scientific publications.The work hypothesis found that the degree and nature of the destructive influence of individual events, phenomena and processes in the domestic political sphere, the economy, the social sphere, information activities, the fight against organized crime and corruption in Ukraine are not only conditioned by the corresponding undisguised intervention of the aggressor country, but also have an intra-Ukrainian nature, caused by the implementation of the latent interests of prominent representatives of the post-war political ruling class in Ukraine (Petro Poroshenko Bloc / People's Front A. Yatsenyuk, A. Avakov and O. Turchinov / «Vinnytsia» group of Prime Minister of Ukraine V. Groysman).The main components of Ukraine's internal security at the present stage in confronting the hybrid aggression of the Russian Federation are considered: the system of ensuring political security and its subjects, internal political and interconfessional stability, public accord, civil society and political power, political regime and political security, state security, political elites and leaders, political movements, state-church relations, religious organizations, constitutional order, territorial integrity of Ukraine.It is necessary to take into account the fact that the special organs and advocacy machine of the aggressor country in the process of information war against Ukraine attaches the highest priority to the demoralization and disintegration of Ukrainian society and discretisation of the security and defense sector. Russian propaganda for destabilizing the situation in Ukraine is actively used by the growth of negative attitudes among Ukrainian citizens.An important problem that has emerged since the onset of hybrid aggression against Ukraine is the activity of Russian agents of influence in the parliament, political parties, local authorities and civic organizations.The simulated nature of the overwhelming majority of institutional and procedural components of the reform of the social life of the Ukrainian state while simultaneously marginalizing social protest actions in the short term create the illusion of social stability of the new / old dominant political and business groups as a collective embodiment of kleptocracy, clientism and corruption. hybrid political regime in post-war Ukraine.The ruling from 2014, based on client-patronage ties and faith through informal political practices, the consolidated power groups of the Bloc of Petro Poroshenko and the People's Front are not able to overcome the crisis of confidence in power as an integral institutional and procedural system. They explain the growing internal protest potential of the Kremlin's influence.The potential of the ruling political class of Ukraine is also aggravated by the fact that in its hands the most powerful material resources, administrative and technical-organizational means, funds, sources and means of information transmission, ideological and legal mechanisms, etc., are concentrated. The specifics of the ruling political class of Ukraine are manifested in the implementation of strategies for self-enrichment, which obviously leads to neglect of public interests and uncontrolled and permissiveness.Taking into account the growing scope of domestic political risk potential of national security in the projection of the presidential and parliamentary elections in 2019, a process of political consolidation of the most active part of Ukrainian citizens around common values and interests, overcoming of existing political contradictions and achieving socially acceptable standards of living may be worthy of scientific analysis, consequently, ensuring the security of the individual, society and the state, preserving its independence, territorial integrity, sovereignty and file progressive development of Ukraine.
The combination of military and non-military means of power struggle in interstate relations faced in recent years by countries such as Georgia, Moldova, Syria, Ukraine, Montenegro and others can not be considered entirely new phenomenon in world history, but with the development of information technology and the globalization of the financial and economic system has brought new opportunities for the use of economic, informational, political and military means of pressure.Positively evaluating the achievements of Ukrainian researchers in disclosing the institutional and procedural principles of the state system functioning and political provision of national security of Ukraine, it should be pointed out that the problem of conceptualization and response to internal political risks for its national security remains unresolved in the context of the continuation of wide-ranging implementation by Russia of theoretical and methodological and applied aspects. Hybrid war combined forces and means, including in the political sphere of Ukrainian society. Some aspects of this problem were presented by the author in Polish scientific publications.The work hypothesis found that the degree and nature of the destructive influence of individual events, phenomena and processes in the domestic political sphere, the economy, the social sphere, information activities, the fight against organized crime and corruption in Ukraine are not only conditioned by the corresponding undisguised intervention of the aggressor country, but also have an intra-Ukrainian nature, caused by the implementation of the latent interests of prominent representatives of the post-war political ruling class in Ukraine (Petro Poroshenko Bloc / People's Front A. Yatsenyuk, A. Avakov and O. Turchinov / «Vinnytsia» group of Prime Minister of Ukraine V. Groysman).The main components of Ukraine's internal security at the present stage in confronting the hybrid aggression of the Russian Federation are considered: the system of ensuring political security and its subjects, internal political and interconfessional stability, public accord, civil society and political power, political regime and political security, state security, political elites and leaders, political movements, state-church relations, religious organizations, constitutional order, territorial integrity of Ukraine.It is necessary to take into account the fact that the special organs and advocacy machine of the aggressor country in the process of information war against Ukraine attaches the highest priority to the demoralization and disintegration of Ukrainian society and discretisation of the security and defense sector. Russian propaganda for destabilizing the situation in Ukraine is actively used by the growth of negative attitudes among Ukrainian citizens.An important problem that has emerged since the onset of hybrid aggression against Ukraine is the activity of Russian agents of influence in the parliament, political parties, local authorities and civic organizations.The simulated nature of the overwhelming majority of institutional and procedural components of the reform of the social life of the Ukrainian state while simultaneously marginalizing social protest actions in the short term create the illusion of social stability of the new / old dominant political and business groups as a collective embodiment of kleptocracy, clientism and corruption. hybrid political regime in post-war Ukraine.The ruling from 2014, based on client-patronage ties and faith through informal political practices, the consolidated power groups of the Bloc of Petro Poroshenko and the People's Front are not able to overcome the crisis of confidence in power as an integral institutional and procedural system. They explain the growing internal protest potential of the Kremlin's influence.The potential of the ruling political class of Ukraine is also aggravated by the fact that in its hands the most powerful material resources, administrative and technical-organizational means, funds, sources and means of information transmission, ideological and legal mechanisms, etc., are concentrated. The specifics of the ruling political class of Ukraine are manifested in the implementation of strategies for self-enrichment, which obviously leads to neglect of public interests and uncontrolled and permissiveness.Taking into account the growing scope of domestic political risk potential of national security in the projection of the presidential and parliamentary elections in 2019, a process of political consolidation of the most active part of Ukrainian citizens around common values and interests, overcoming of existing political contradictions and achieving socially acceptable standards of living may be worthy of scientific analysis, consequently, ensuring the security of the individual, society and the state, preserving its independence, territorial integrity, sovereignty and file progressive development of Ukraine. ; The combination of military and non-military means of power struggle in interstate relations faced in recent years by countries such as Georgia, Moldova, Syria, Ukraine, Montenegro and others can not be considered entirely new phenomenon in world history, but with the development of information technology and the globalization of the financial and economic system has brought new opportunities for the use of economic, informational, political and military means of pressure.Positively evaluating the achievements of Ukrainian researchers in disclosing the institutional and procedural principles of the state system functioning and political provision of national security of Ukraine, it should be pointed out that the problem of conceptualization and response to internal political risks for its national security remains unresolved in the context of the continuation of wide-ranging implementation by Russia of theoretical and methodological and applied aspects. Hybrid war combined forces and means, including in the political sphere of Ukrainian society. Some aspects of this problem were presented by the author in Polish scientific publications.The work hypothesis found that the degree and nature of the destructive influence of individual events, phenomena and processes in the domestic political sphere, the economy, the social sphere, information activities, the fight against organized crime and corruption in Ukraine are not only conditioned by the corresponding undisguised intervention of the aggressor country, but also have an intra-Ukrainian nature, caused by the implementation of the latent interests of prominent representatives of the post-war political ruling class in Ukraine (Petro Poroshenko Bloc / People's Front A. Yatsenyuk, A. Avakov and O. Turchinov / «Vinnytsia» group of Prime Minister of Ukraine V. Groysman).The main components of Ukraine's internal security at the present stage in confronting the hybrid aggression of the Russian Federation are considered: the system of ensuring political security and its subjects, internal political and interconfessional stability, public accord, civil society and political power, political regime and political security, state security, political elites and leaders, political movements, state-church relations, religious organizations, constitutional order, territorial integrity of Ukraine.It is necessary to take into account the fact that the special organs and advocacy machine of the aggressor country in the process of information war against Ukraine attaches the highest priority to the demoralization and disintegration of Ukrainian society and discretisation of the security and defense sector. Russian propaganda for destabilizing the situation in Ukraine is actively used by the growth of negative attitudes among Ukrainian citizens.An important problem that has emerged since the onset of hybrid aggression against Ukraine is the activity of Russian agents of influence in the parliament, political parties, local authorities and civic organizations.The simulated nature of the overwhelming majority of institutional and procedural components of the reform of the social life of the Ukrainian state while simultaneously marginalizing social protest actions in the short term create the illusion of social stability of the new / old dominant political and business groups as a collective embodiment of kleptocracy, clientism and corruption. hybrid political regime in post-war Ukraine.The ruling from 2014, based on client-patronage ties and faith through informal political practices, the consolidated power groups of the Bloc of Petro Poroshenko and the People's Front are not able to overcome the crisis of confidence in power as an integral institutional and procedural system. They explain the growing internal protest potential of the Kremlin's influence.The potential of the ruling political class of Ukraine is also aggravated by the fact that in its hands the most powerful material resources, administrative and technical-organizational means, funds, sources and means of information transmission, ideological and legal mechanisms, etc., are concentrated. The specifics of the ruling political class of Ukraine are manifested in the implementation of strategies for self-enrichment, which obviously leads to neglect of public interests and uncontrolled and permissiveness.Taking into account the growing scope of domestic political risk potential of national security in the projection of the presidential and parliamentary elections in 2019, a process of political consolidation of the most active part of Ukrainian citizens around common values and interests, overcoming of existing political contradictions and achieving socially acceptable standards of living may be worthy of scientific analysis, consequently, ensuring the security of the individual, society and the state, preserving its independence, territorial integrity, sovereignty and file progressive development of Ukraine.
Наведено аргументи на користь налагоджування військово-наукового співробітництва внутрішніх військ України з відповідними структурами країн Європи та Співдружності Незалежних Держав для сумісного вирішення схожих проблемних питань внутрішньої безпеки. Запропоновано напрями, принципи та форми такого співробітництва із Францією, з якою Україну об'єднують договірні відносини щодо вдосконалювання процесу розвитку її внутрішніх військ, та з Російською Федерацією, яка має з Україною єдині історичні витоки з утворення внутрішніх військ, схожі їх структури та завдання, а також проблемні питання, що виникали на шляхах їх розвитку. ; Arguments over are brought in behalf of adjusting of military-scientific collaboration of internal troops of Ukraine with the proper structures of the European countries and countries of the newly independent States for the compatible decision of alike problem questions of internal safety. Directions, principles and forms of such collaboration, are offered with France with which Ukraine is united by contractual relations that to perfection of process of development of it internal troops, and also with Russian Federation which has with Ukraine.
Наведено аргументи на користь налагоджування військово-наукового співробітництва внутрішніх військ України з відповідними структурами країн Європи та Співдружності Незалежних Держав для сумісного вирішення схожих проблемних питань внутрішньої безпеки. Запропоновано напрями, принципи та форми такого співробітництва із Францією, з якою Україну об'єднують договірні відносини щодо вдосконалювання процесу розвитку її внутрішніх військ, та з Російською Федерацією, яка має з Україною єдині історичні витоки з утворення внутрішніх військ, схожі їх структури та завдання, а також проблемні питання, що виникали на шляхах їх розвитку. ; Arguments over are brought in behalf of adjusting of military-scientific collaboration of internal troops of Ukraine with the proper structures of the European countries and countries of the newly independent States for the compatible decision of alike problem questions of internal safety. Directions, principles and forms of such collaboration, are offered with France with which Ukraine is united by contractual relations that to perfection of process of development of it internal troops, and also with Russian Federation which has with Ukraine.
Introduction. In a globalized world economy the most important function of the state is to ensure its economic security. To address this complex problem are the appropriate state institutions, legal framework, trained personnel, technology, administrative, intellectual, informational, financial and other material resources. In turn, non-state security actors also have significant resources to ensure economic security business. These resources primarily include well-trained professionals, experience in business security specific conditions of the domestic economy, as well as organizational structure, finance business entities and knowledge of employees, and available technologies, means, methods and techniques of counteracting factors threats external and internal environment. It is also necessary to unite together all the company's resources and resources of external organizations in order to obtain a synergistic effect in the system of economic security. Purpose. Research conditions to create a synergistic effect in the system of economic security. Methods. Theoretical generalization, logical analysis, induction are used to determine the main methods for evaluation of industrial enterprises managers; to determine scientific approach that must be used for research and study of the evaluation process of managers of industrial enterprises. Results. Nowadays provision of economic security of enterprise is possible only if the operation activity of its economic security system is effective. This requires constant and close cooperation of all its internal and external entities that can provide a synergetic effect in countering external and internal threats to economic security. Originality. All elements of economic security based on a single concept, policies should be integrated into the overall strategy of economic security that can give a synergistic protective effect. The model of forming synergistic effect in the system of economic security offered in the article. Considering the need to achieve a synergistic effect of a system of economic security must take into account not only the intellectual and professional capabilities of its staff. It is important to use this complex process and available material resources that include: finance, law, and other hardware. Only the union of "human capital" of the enterprise and its resources can provide a synergistic protective effect, will withstand adverse factors external and internal environment. Conclusion. In an unstable economy and high level of uncertainty processes that occur in it, to ensure economic security is possible only on condition of close interaction and partnership of government and business. This will fully and optimally a single algorithm to use all their resources to counter internal and external threats to the economy, ie a synergistic protective effect at securing domestic business.
Introduction. In modern conditions of political and economic crisis in the country to guarantee the safety system of economic entities requires new scientific approaches and tools. One of these tools can be a simulation. Today, not many domestic and foreign scientists working on this problem. One reason for this is the fact that the very system of economic security is a complex dynamic system, its condition affects many internal and external factors. The need to predict the level of risk and threats complicate the task. However, modern methods of simulation can solve such complex problems. Purpose. The purpose and objectives of the article is to study the possibility of using and adapting different types of models that have been successfully applied in various fields, to build an effective model of economic security. Methods. Generalization, ordering, causal method, expert method. Results. Effective functioning of a system of economic security is a vital issue for any company. The possibility of adaptation of well-known and well-functioning models from other spheres to development of the effective model of economic security of a company is examined in the paper. The advantages and disadvantages of these models are analyzed. Originality. V-model proposed building a system of economic security. As each model V-model has its advantages and disadvantages. The main advantage of the model experts call the possibility of achieving high quality results. The advantage of this model is also the possibility of precise planning under conditions of limited resources, especially financial. As the practice of the V-model, it will be particularly effective for those companies that are just starting to create its system of economic security and should do so in clearly defined terms. The more the company, the harder it will be the model, the more contingencies may arise during its implementation. Therefore, this type of model is best suited for small businesses. Conclusion. Building an effective model of economic security is a challenge. Any model is not universal and may not provide an accurate prediction of the system under the influence of external and internal factors. However, the adaptation of V-model for modeling of economic security makes it possible to build efficient system and achieve their maximum results clearly planning the necessary time and resources.
The necessity of the mechanism of economic security system management of financial institutions development is grounded. There are revealed the following features of the formation and operation of modern systems of economic security of domestic financial institutions as a complex block structure, complexity, individuality, dependence on external guidance and instructions, that perform a wide range of different tasks, whose number grows in proportion to the number of internal and external dangers and threats to the institution, proving the need to manage such a system and its elements and feasibility for the development of a separate administrative mechanism within the overall management system of the financial institution. The author offered the definition of the mechanism of economic security system management in common and for the financial institution in particular. Under the mechanism of economic security system management it is offered to understand the process of applying the totality of methods and procedures to optimize the protection of the elements of the entity to achieve its highest level of economic security. Under the mechanism of economic security system management of the financial institution it is offered to understand the complex process of management procedures using its corporate resources, both their own and borrowed in order to achieve high financial results in the optimum state of protection from external and internal dangers and threats. The main elements of the mechanism of economic security system management and bases of its construction is offered.
Introduction. If the preservation of personal finances and resources of business entities can be considered as the task of their owners and users, then securing the entire financial system, minimizing at least internal threats to the proper functioning of all its participants, is a national-level mission. That is why the task of ensuring a high level of financial security of the state at the applied level requires, in the current non-trivial conditions of economic and political troubles, a proper scientific and methodological basis, which makes the topic chosen for research relevant and time-consuming.Purpose. The purpose of the article is to determine the peculiarities of the state regulation of the financial security of Ukraine and of economic security of financial institutions as subjects of its supply.Methods. Formal-logical method is used to determine basic concepts; Monographic and comparative methods; Method of theoretical generalization.Results Under the financial security of the state, we offer to understand the state of financial resources and capabilities of the country that are formed in its financial system or attracted to it from the outside, which allows to ensure the realization of financial interests of its participants and the state as a whole by guaranteeing protection against external and internal threats that can interfere this process of their (resources and opportunities) effective use in different segments of the financial system. The peculiarities of the state regulation of Ukraine's financial security are deficiencies in the lack of regulatory framework, duplication of functions and ineffective work of financial regulators in ensuring the country's financial security and economic security of the most active professional participants in the financial market - financial institutions.Originality The essence and meaningful content of the notion of financial security of the state are specified. The list of state bodies and structures that directly or indirectly influences the state of financial security of the state is specified and their role and significance in the process of ensuring financial security of Ukraine is established. The principles of regulation of financial security of Ukraine are offered through control of the activities of financial institutions. The list of features of the current state of state regulation of financial security of Ukraine is given.Conclusion The peculiarities of the state regulation of financial security of Ukraine include: lack of legal and regulatory framework for regulating financial security; the absence of strategic landmarks enshrined in long-term documents for ensuring the country's financial security; the presence of several regulators of the state of the financial system at once; absence of periodic monitoring of the state of financial security of Ukraine with its obligatory assessment in dynamics; informational closure of financial market regulators and the financial system regarding the results of their work on financial security. The shortcomings of the process of regulating financial security in Ukraine through the control of the activities of financial institutions include: the lack of legally established requirements for the transparency of financial institutions and the establishment of economic security services in their structures, lack of methodical tools for assessing the level of economic security and requirements for the system of economic security; low level of interaction between government agencies for the task of ensuring the economic security of financial institutions; absence in the staff of institutions the persons possessing professional skills in ensuring economic security; bureaucracy and long-term resolution of complaints and disputes, etc. It is recommended to introduce financial institutions and their economic security as one of the objects of protection in the normative-legal acts, and to put the economic interests of financial institutions in the Development Strategies of Ukraine.
The article deals with current challenges for regional development and their impact as causes of threats to economic security. Economic security is seen as a complex multilevel system, the formation of which occurs at various levels of economy's hierarchy: the state level, an economic sector, an industry (economic activity), a region, a business enterprise, a city, a town, a village, a local territorial community, a person. It is determined that a region's internal and external environment is the key factor of its economic security. The assessment, which was carried out, enables to establish the following characteristics: structural imbalances, a gap between regional investing priorities and determined priorities, a break in the production chain, an asymmetry in technological development of regional industries, expansion of foreign companies on the domestic market, incompatibility between the system of institutions and the aims of social and economic development of regions.The research paper describes the current challenges for regional development, such as deepening of regional differences in creating tensions in regional labour markets; intensification of migration processes; growing differences in the intensity of structural changes; reducing foreign investment; institutional and fiscal decentralization; growing problems in organizing and financing social services; deepening asymmetry in the development of cross-border infrastructure, which requires a system of protection against increasing threats to economic security.A range of methodological approaches to assessing the level of economic security is generalized. A set of quantitative and qualitative indicators is suggested for evaluating the results of security assurance activities at all levels of the hierarchy: a region, a territorial community, a business enterprise, a person.The priority areas of administrative activity designed to prevent threats to economic security are identified. Given the current challenges, these priority areas include: structural reform of the economy, an increasing backbone role of state-owned entrepreneurship, inter-regional and inter-municipal cooperation, modernization of social safety in terms of personal security, strengthening safety of entrepreneurship, reinforcement of security of local communities under conditions of political, administrative, financial, fiscal, economic and environmental decentralization.The main characteristics of each area are pointed out. Further research studies are to be undertaken to empirically examine the results of these measures and identify barriers for institutional assurance of economic security.
Ukraine's energy security is part of its national security. Nuclear power plays the largest role in Ukraine among the four components of the electric power industry, which accounts for almost 60% of all electricity generated. Ukraine belongs to the countries that advocate further development of nuclear energy. An important task for Ukraine is to increase the share of renewable energy. The sun and the wind must work for the economy. Energy saving remains a problem for Ukraine. Ukraine has enormous potential in energy efficiency, so it (energy efficiency) needs to be strengthened.There are huge reserves here. So, if Ukraine raises the level of energy efficiency to the average European, it will save gas as much as a country like Spain consumes it per year. After satisfying internal needs, gas can be sold abroad. According to other sources, in 2030, energy savings in Ukraine could reach as much as the amount consumed per year by a country like the United Kingdom. Therefore, the reduction of energy consumption remains relevant both in industrial production and in the residential sector. ; Bezpieczeństwo energetyczne Ukrainy jest częścią bezpieczeństwa narodowego. Energia jądrowa odgrywa największą rolę na Ukrainie spośród czterech komponentów elektroenergetyki. Ona stanowi prawie 60% całej wytworzonej energii elektrycznej.Ukraina należy do krajów popierających dalszy rozwój energetyki jądrowej. Ważnym zadaniem dla Ukrainy jest zwiększenie udziału energii odnawialnej. Słońce i wiatr muszą działać dla gospodarki. Oszczędność energii pozostaje problemem dla Ukrainy. Ukraina ma olbrzymi potencjał w zakresie efektywności energetycznej, dlatego jej (efektywność energetyczna) wymaga wzmocnienia. ; Найбільшу роль в Україні серед чотирьох складових електроенергетики відіграє атомна енергетика, на яку припадає майже 60 % від усієї виробленої електроенергії. Україна належить до країн, які виступають за подальший розвиток ядерної енергетики. Важливе завдання для України – збільшення частки відновлюваної енергетики. Сонце й вітер повинні працювати на економіку. Проблемою проблем для України залишається енергозбереження. У енергоефективності Україна має величезний потенціал, тому її (енергоефективність) потрібно посилювати.
Globalization has a dual effect on the world financial system, contributing to its development and simultaneous occurrence of potential threats to financial security of states. Despite their rapid escalation to the real ones, most countries in the world do not perceive these threats as serious. Enhancement of the latter necessitates studying the problems of providing for the budget safety under conditions of world globalization, redefining directions when forming effective budgetary system in terms of secure development, strengthening the fiscal security of state. It is necessary to explore in detail the drivers that influence the level of budget safety and its interrelations with other components of economic security. The aim of present work is to examine relationships of budget safety taking into account effect of the process of financial globalization and to assess its level by the principles of retrospective analysis. We proposed our own interpretation of the concept of budget safety as the level of capability of a budgetary system to ensure solvency and financial stability of the state, effective use of budget funds taking into account strategic development priorities of budgetary relations and potential capability to resist and predict the threats of internal and external origin. Results of analysis of economic security indicate the highest rate of decline in financial security in 2015 by 14.1 percentage points to the level of 36.7 % among all the components of economic security. It was established that this situation is due to a decrease in revenues from basic budget-forming taxes with strengthening fiscal pressure on the economy, a sharp devaluation of the national currency, a significant growth of the state and the state-guaranteed debt with increased risk of default, illiquidity and insolvency of financial institutions, shrinking resource base of banks, problems with their capitalization. This determined critical and close to critical state of almost all the components of financial security. We ...
