Suchergebnisse

International audience ; The interactions between economics and security are complicated because economics and politics each have distinct logics, with different dynamics operating at independent speeds. The credit crisis is having a significant time-dependent impact on international security. States are forced to run budget deficits to maintain the balance of the financial system, while at the same time addressing oil and environmental issues. The alternative to global organisation by a dominant power is the creation of international public or non-governmental institutions. The moral imperative to maintain peace may be universally accepted, but a country's decision to participate is also based on national interest and the geostrategic dimension. The main strategic danger is that politicians, still preoccupied with national budgetary and financial crises, do not respond to potentially explosive international issues with the necessary speed and interest. ; Les interactions entre l'économie et la sécurité sont compliquées parce que l'économie et la politique ont chacune des logiques distinctes, avec des dynamiques différentes opérant à des vitesses indépendantes. La crise du crédit exerce des effets importants dé »calés dans le temps sur la sécurité internationale. Les Etats sont contraints d'engager un déficit budgétaire pour maintenir l'équilibre du système financier, tout en s'interrogeant sur les questions pétrolières et environnementales. L'alternative à l'organisation mondiale par une puissance dominante réside dans la création d'institutions internationales publiques ou non gouvernementales. L'impératif moral pour le maintien de la paix peut être universellement accepté mais la décision d'un pays de participer est aussi basée sur l'intérêt national et sur la dimension géostratégique. Le principal danger stratégique réside sans le fait que les hommes politiques, toujours préoccupés par les crises budgétaires et financières nationales, ne répondent pas aux questions internationales potentiellement explosives ...

The collective work led by Franck Petiteville and Delphine Placidi-Frot, with a preface by Bertrand Badie, makes a unique contribution to the analysis of multilateral international negotiations. Political scientists and French internationalists - shoulders by some historians of international relations - are presented in a clear and well structured way their research, they often already published some results elsewhere. This book will interest all researchers in international relations, and more particularly the specialists in diplomatic studies, international organizations and conflict resolution. Because it offers syntheses to date on the major issues of contemporary international relations, it could also be used as a textbook in the introduction to international relations framework of a course. Adapted from the source document.

This last paper in the volume tries to pull the threads together and to detect trends of evolution in the analysis of international relations. The discussion is limited to three issues deemed basic to this evolution: 1) the increasing g importance of technology and its impact on the world System, and especially on one of its basic components: the nation-state ; 2) contents and characteristics of the new industry of futurology ; and 3) the rise of political economy as a basic approach to the study of international relations. It is suggested that we are growing beyond such simplistic divisions as "High" and "Low Politics", and obsession with methodologism per se, and that we are increasingly putting rigor and interdisciplinarity in the service of analysing "substantial" issues of international relations.

Cet article a pour objectif de proposer une étude sur le concept de gouvernance internationale. Ce dernier fait partie de nouveaux paradigmes utilisés en politique internationale dans le cadre de la mondialisation des droits de l'homme et de la démocratie. Dans un premier temps, nous étudions le terme de gouvernance et ses nuances avec le terme de gouvernement. Dans un deuxième temps, nous nous penchons sur l'usage du concept de gouvernance internationale. Enfin, dans un troisième temps, nous évoquons la question de savoir comment concevoir une bonne gouvernance internationale.

The arbitration is a method of resolving disputes through an arbitration tribunal composed of one or several arbitrators. He allows resolving a dispute under a sentence delivered after an arbitration procedure in which all parties have to prove what they adduce to convince the tribunal. It is by using various modes of proof inspired specially from the system of Common Law and the system of Civil Law that parties can achieve this purpose.On the other hand, because the international arbitration has neither a territory nor legislation, it was created a system which combines between best practices of Common Law and Civil Law. So, the written evidence is produced according to the practice of Civil Law which gives primacy to a proof written in advance. But for the oral testimony, it is the common Law which dominates the administration of this proof by giving parties the right to nominate and interrogate witnesses. This is also what happens when arbitrators decide to use an expertise in which the parties have the power to nominate experts and interrogate them as witnesses. So, the evidence in international arbitration can be divided into written evidence made up by the writing on paper medium and electronic medium and oral evidence formed by proof by witness and proof by expertise. ; L'arbitrage est un mode de résolution des litiges par l'intermédiaire d'un tribunal arbitral composé d'un ou plusieurs arbitres. Il permet, comme devant les tribunaux étatiques, de régler un litige en vertu d'une sentence rendue à l'issue d'une procédure arbitrale dans laquelle chacune des parties doit prouver ce qu'elle allègue afin d'établir la conviction des arbitres. C'est par le recours aux divers modes de preuve inspirés des différents systèmes juridiques notamment du système de Common Law et du système de droit civil que les plaideurs pourront atteindre cette finalité.En revanche, parce que l'arbitrage international ne possède ni for ni législation spéciaux, l'administration des preuves dans une instance arbitrale internationale ...

The arbitration is a method of resolving disputes through an arbitration tribunal composed of one or several arbitrators. He allows resolving a dispute under a sentence delivered after an arbitration procedure in which all parties have to prove what they adduce to convince the tribunal. It is by using various modes of proof inspired specially from the system of Common Law and the system of Civil Law that parties can achieve this purpose.On the other hand, because the international arbitration has neither a territory nor legislation, it was created a system which combines between best practices of Common Law and Civil Law. So, the written evidence is produced according to the practice of Civil Law which gives primacy to a proof written in advance. But for the oral testimony, it is the common Law which dominates the administration of this proof by giving parties the right to nominate and interrogate witnesses. This is also what happens when arbitrators decide to use an expertise in which the parties have the power to nominate experts and interrogate them as witnesses. So, the evidence in international arbitration can be divided into written evidence made up by the writing on paper medium and electronic medium and oral evidence formed by proof by witness and proof by expertise. ; L'arbitrage est un mode de résolution des litiges par l'intermédiaire d'un tribunal arbitral composé d'un ou plusieurs arbitres. Il permet, comme devant les tribunaux étatiques, de régler un litige en vertu d'une sentence rendue à l'issue d'une procédure arbitrale dans laquelle chacune des parties doit prouver ce qu'elle allègue afin d'établir la conviction des arbitres. C'est par le recours aux divers modes de preuve inspirés des différents systèmes juridiques notamment du système de Common Law et du système de droit civil que les plaideurs pourront atteindre cette finalité.En revanche, parce que l'arbitrage international ne possède ni for ni législation spéciaux, l'administration des preuves dans une instance arbitrale internationale revêt un caractère sui generis de fait que l'arbitrage international a reconnu un système de preuve qui a utilisé les avantages des divers systèmes juridiques. Ainsi, on retrouve que la preuve écrite, qu'elle soit sur support papier ou sur support électronique, est administrée selon le model civiliste qui donne la primauté à une preuve préconstituée à l'avance. Mais, en ce qui concerne la preuve par témoin, l'influence des droits de Common Law paraît claire surtout que dans la plupart des cas, le pouvoir de nommer et d'interroger les témoins revient aux plaideurs qui utilisent la méthode d'Examination lors de l'interrogation des témoins. C'est aussi le cas de l'expertise qui est souvent considérée comme une preuve orale dans laquelle il revient aux parties le pouvoir de désigner les experts et de les interroger suivant l'interrogatoire direct et le contre interrogatoire tout comme des témoins. Ainsi, les preuves dans l'arbitrage international peuvent être reparties en preuves écrites et preuves orales dont les premières sont constituées de l'écrit sur support papier ou sur support électronique et les secondes sont formées par la preuve par témoin et la preuve par expertise.

This paper gives an overview of the new rules introduced by the Code of Private International Law (Act of 16 July 2004) in the field of jurisdiction (when do Belgian courts have jurisdiction) and recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. ; Cette contribution fait le point sur les règles introduites par le Code de droit international privé (Loi du 16 juillet 2004) à propos des règles de compétence internationale (tant générales que spéciales) et du statut des jugements étrangers (reconnaissance et exécution des jugements étrangers)

Cet article vise à questionner le diagnostic fréquemment avancé de « dépolitisation » de la régulation internationale assurée par les organisations internationales (OI), thème qui a rarement fait l'objet d'une réflexion approfondie. Basée sur une revue de la littérature de sociologie, de science politique et d'anthropologie relative aux OI, la démarche consiste donc à systématiser la réflexion sur la dialectique politisation/dépolitisation dans les OI. Les principaux vecteurs de la dépolitisation sont identifiés : le recours au registre éthique et normatif, la neutralisation politique de leur discours, et la mobilisation d'une expertise multiforme à des fins d'autolégitimation apolitique. Sont également analysées les contraintes qui jouent en faveur de la dépolitisation de l'action des OI : contraintes décisionnelles et diplomatiques liées à la structure intergouvernementale de leurs instances de décision, contraintes administratives et culturelles inhérentes à la bureaucratie des OI. Enfin, le concept de dépolitisation est discuté pour ses insuffisances : son incapacité à rendre compte du discours politisé de certaines OI et des effets de politisation ou de repolitisation induits aussi bien par les normes éthiques véhiculées que par l'expertise mobilisée.

Insists both on the unavoidable interrelation of the disciplines of International Law & International Relations & the problematic nature of combining a critical standpoint with the necessity of decompartmentalizing these fields of study heretofore regarded as separate. The idea of a 'constituent relationship' between the two is presented is presented as the basis of a future reconceptualization for researchers. This new approach would be both critical & holistic. In addition, suggests theories of problem resolution may indicate modes of emancipating these disciplines from familiar restraints, although states an awareness that problem solving techniques themselves are misleadingly presented as simple tools when they involve unexamined assumptions of their own. Due to current statistical methods, the tendency is to do a cost-benefit analysis of the growing institutionalization of international law, focusing on what this or that agent can gain in the way of information or conflict resolution. Some limit this analysis to states; others factor in special interest groups. But the big, unanswered question in research is the two disciplines' interrelation in the problematics of international dynamics. In this regard, a major problem is the predetermined, often binary, rational categories because they make it difficult to deal with the specificity of contemporary problems. Examples given include such oppositions as legal/illegal, stable/anarchic, economic/political, public/private, all categories that do not allow for all possible variables. Two important heuristic dimensions in the future: recognizing that structures & dynamics of international power do not exist apart from the judicial relationships that crystallize & institutionalize them. Law in general & international law in particular cannot be reduced to the 'will' of nations or the idea of 'national interests.' Neither can economics be factored out. Terminology is also an issue because new categories of analysis are needed. References. R. Ruffin

This text gives a general overview of the Code of Private International Law (Act of 16 July 2004, published in the Official Gazette on 27th July 2004), which entered into force on 1st of October 2004. The text focuses primarily on the aspects of the Code which are useful for notaries, such the law of estate and the law of matrimonial property. The text also gives an overview of the general rules of the Code of Private International law, with specific attention to the innovations (such as the escape clause to be found in Article 19).

Publié sous le titre "L'invention des relations internationales" ; National audience ; Issue de la science politique, la récente discipline Relations internationale s'est constituée dès la fin de la Première Guerre mondiale dans un but noble : favoriser la paix, avant de privilégier des objectifs de connaissance. Elle intégre progressivement des théories et des éléments d'analyse issus d'autres sciences sociales, qui pevent introduire un danger de dissolution. Mais ce dynamisme est le signe d'une grande vitalité de la part d'une discipline cruciale afin de comprendre le monde.

I. Državni savjet vrši međunarodno djelovanje na unutarnje pravo kako bi se uskladilo s međunarodnom normom i kako bi vodilo računa o stranim pravima. A. Državni savjet kontrolira sukladnost francuskog prava s međunarodnom normom u skladu s modalitetima koji se dalje razvijaju. 1. Državni savjet kontrolira suglasnost nacionalnog prava s međunarodnom normom u preventivnom i kurativnom smislu. 2. Modaliteti kontrole se dalje razvijaju. B. Državni savjet promiče uključivanje stranih prava u nacionalno pravo, što može proizlaziti iz imperativa u pogledu sukladnosti s međunarodnom normom, ali i nadilaziti ga. 1. Državni savjet uzima u obzir strana prava u nastavku kontrole konvencionalnosti koju provodi. 2. Državni savjet promiče otvorenost prema stranim pravima što nadilazi zahtjeve u pogledu konvencionalnosti. II. Državni savjet širi ambiciju međunarodnog utjecaja tako obnovljenog francuskog prava i promiče uvođenje značajnih akcijskih sredstava. A. Državni savjet treba osigurati vlastiti utjecaj, ali naročito, namjerava pridonijeti utjecaju Francuske na međunarodnoj pravnoj sceni. 1. Državni savjet treba osigurati vlastiti utjecaj na međunarodnoj pravnoj sceni. 2. Državni savjet namjerava pridonijeti utjecaju Francuske na međunarodnoj pravnoj sceni. B. Državni savjet promiče uvođenje akcijskih sredstava na međunarodnoj pravnoj sceni koji se odnose na kvalitete nacionalnog prava i njihovog promicanja u drugim pravnim sustavima. 1. Državni savjet djeluje u korist poboljšanja kvalitetâ nacionalnog prava. 2. Državni savjet podržava promicanje nacionalnog prava u drugim pravnim sustavima. Međunarodno djelovanje Državnog savjeta temelji se na jasnoj svijesti o njegovom ulogu: doprinos dijalogu između pravnih sustava, odnosno o učenju od drugih i o prepoznatljivosti. Ovi "Dani" su plod suradnje između političkih vlasti, upravnih sudova i sveučilišta, koja je potrebna našim dvjema zemljama i koja je, općenito, toliko potrebna svijetu. Ovih prvih deset godina postavilo je temelje bogatog i plodnog odnosa kojeg sada trebamo njegovati. ; The State Council acts internationally on domestic law in order to harmonise with international norms in order to take into account foreign laws. The State Council controls the harmonisation of French Law with international norms pursuant to the modalities which are still developing. 1. The State Council controls the consent of national law with international norms in the preventative and curative sense 2. Modalities of control are still developing. B. The State Council promotes including foreign law in national law which can emerge from the imperative regarding harmonisation with international norms and also surpass it. 1. The Sate Council takes into account foreign law in continuing to control the conventionalities it implements. 2. The State Council promotes openness towards foreign laws which surpasses demands regarding conventionality. II. The State Council spreads both the ambition of international influence of revised French Law and promotes the introduction of more significant action means. A. The State Council must ensure its own influence and especially intends to contribute to the influence of France on the international legal scene 1. The State Council needs to ensure its own influence on the international legal scene. 2. The State Council intends to contribute to the influence of France on the international legal scene. B. The State Council promotes the introduction of action means into the international legal scene which relate to the quality of national law and their promotion in other legal systems 1. The State Council acts to improve the quality of national law. 2. The State Council supports the promotion of national law in other legal systems. International activity of the State Council is founded on a clear consciousness of its contribution: contribution to dialogue between legal systems, that is, on learning from others and on recognisability. These "Days" are the fruit of cooperation between political powers, administrative courts and universities which are necessary for our two countries and which in general are necessary to the world. These first ten years have established the foundation for a rich and fruitful relationship which we today must nurture