Suchergebnisse

Tunda, D.: Israel: Financial services in the context of participation in the Europan single market. - S. 24-53 Munin, N.: Israeli-European cooperation under the Galileo Programme. - S. 54-71 Escribano, G.: Promotin EU-Israel trade integration. - S. 72-95 Mor, A.; Seroussi, S.: Prospects for regional cooperation in the energy sector in the East Mediterranean rim. - S. 98-103 Dovrat, M.: Industrial cooperation between the European Union and Israel. - S. 104-108Zemer, L. H.; Pardo, S.: The European Neighbourhood Policy and Israel. - S. 116-134 Shpiro, S.: EU-Israel security, justice and home affairs cooperation. - S. 135-185 Kahn, Y.: Integration of European and Israeli labour markets. - S. 190-211 Del Sarto, R. A.: The EU and Israel : an enhanced political cooperation? An assessment of the bilateral ENP Action Plan. - S. 220-245 Touval, Y.: Combating anti-Semitism. - S. 246-259 Musu, C.: The Madrid Quartet : an effective instrument of multilateralism? - S. 260-281 Münster, K.: With a stroke of a pen: Israel's image in the European media. - S. 282-306 Enthält außerdem: Zusammenfassung in hebräischer Sprache

"Israel faces economic and social challenges. The government has not routinely developed and successfully implemented strategic responses to socioeconomic problems that demand longer-term, coordinated policy action. Effective means to respond to such longer-term challenges may require a more systematic government approach to policymaking. Researchers developed detailed recommendations related to institutions, processes, supporting information, outputs, and implementation for the Israeli government to apply a strategic perspective toward socioeconomic issues and develop a formal socioeconomic strategy for Israel should the government desire to do so. They mapped the institutions and processes in the formation of socioeconomic strategy in the state of Israel as they existed at the time of the project in 2011; described the information used to support strategy formation; analyzed the evaluation and monitoring processes in current strategy formation; identified the gaps in current strategy formation institutions, processes, information, and evaluation and monitoring; conducted international case studies of strategy formation; and compared Israeli practices with international practices"--Publisher's description

- ; In critically important parts of the cold war era the Democratic Party was the steward of American foreign policy. But since September 11. 2001, the party has, however, mostly been a bystander to the major transformation of U.S. foreign policy carried out by the Bush administration. Will the party continue to play such a passive and reactive role or will it be able to formulate a coherent and realistic alternative the Bush foreign policy? Both the U.S. international behavior and world politics will be greatly affected by the outcome of the ongoing internal debate in the party. This paper takes a closer look at this debate and the various fractions that now compete for being the foreign policy face of the party. It is still too early to tell the outcome of this jockeying for power, and consequently the Bush administration will most likely continue as the dominant force behind American foreign policy.