Fundamental Principles of International Relations
In: Politicka misao, Band 48, Heft 1, S. 257-262
54 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Politicka misao, Band 48, Heft 1, S. 257-262
In: Politicka misao, Band 46, Heft 4, S. 249-251
In: Međunarodne studije: časopis za međunarodne odnose, vanjsku politiku i diplomaciju, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 5-19
ISSN: 1332-4756
In: Međunarodne studije: časopis za međunarodne odnose, vanjsku politiku i diplomaciju, Band 9, Heft 2, S. 39-58
ISSN: 1332-4756
In: Anali Hrvatskog Politološkog Društva: Annals of the Croatian Political Science Association, Band 9, S. 443-457
ISSN: 1845-6707
In: Međunarodne studije: časopis za međunarodne odnose, vanjsku politiku i diplomaciju, Band 11, Heft 3, S. 9-35
ISSN: 1332-4756
In: Međunarodne studije: časopis za međunarodne odnose, vanjsku politiku i diplomaciju, Band 11, Heft 4, S. 9-31
ISSN: 1332-4756
In: Politicka misao, Band 48, Heft 2, S. 110-139
In this article, the author analyzes the International Relations (IR) liberal theory and its "interdependence" paradigm. The first part presents the liberal "interdependence" paradigm by defining the state and power as the key elements of every political science analysis, including the IR theory. The second part overviews the academic critique of the IR liberalism, as a methodologically outdated and historically disputed theory. Finally, the third part focuses on the contemporary "interdependence" paradigm as crucial for understanding the current international processes in the global society. The goal of this article is to present the reevaluation of the contemporary IR liberal theory in the "real world politics", and indicate the possible directions of its ongoing theoretic development. Adapted from the source document.
In: Međunarodne studije: časopis za međunarodne odnose, vanjsku politiku i diplomaciju, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 61-75
ISSN: 1332-4756
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Band 45, Heft 4, S. 72-87
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
This paper has two objectives. Firstly, I would like to introduce the conceptual framework for foreign policy analysis: the so-called role theory. In order for us to explain & understand the foreign policies of nation-states, the role theory focuses on the reasoning of national political elites, their understanding of the international system & the perceived role of their own states within this larger system. I will introduce the concepts of the role theory, its epistemological underpinning & the most important analytical applications of it. Secondly, I intend to make a contribution to the discussions about the application of social constructivism (as an IR theory) to foreign policy analysis. Thanks to its metatheoretical assumptions & conceptual outfit, the role theory is an appropriate candidate for bridging the gap between constructivist IR theory & FPA. Adapted from the source document.
In: Međunarodne studije: časopis za međunarodne odnose, vanjsku politiku i diplomaciju, Band 12, Heft 2, S. [26]-43
ISSN: 1332-4756
World Affairs Online
In: Polemos: časopis za interdisciplinarna istraživanja rata i mira ; journal of interdisciplinary research on war and peace, Band 12, Heft 23, S. 29-49
ISSN: 1331-5595
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Band 45, Heft 4, S. 50-71
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
The article is an analysis of the metaphor of Munich Agreement in the Czech political & media discourses concerning three foreign policy issues from the last three years: the discord about the diplomatic recognition of Kosovo by the Czech Republic, the discussion of the conflict between Russia & Georgia & the issue of the US radar base in the Czech Republic. The text does not aspire to judge which usage of the analogy with Munich is correct. Instead, it works with it as a specific frame which is intended to mobilize a presupposed national "us" for a specific political agenda. The goal is to depoliticize the political discord -- to solve it by referring to a morally strong precedent & subordinate it to this precedent. Munich is used in this way by the followers of very different political camps. Using the analogy of Munich has two main modalities -- the interventionist modality (it is necessary to intervene against a dictator, not to appease him) & the sovereignist modality (it is necessary to defend the sovereignty of the state against an intervention or against aggressive demands of minorities). The former is more in accord with the use of the Munich analogy by Western politicians, while the latter corresponds more with the Czech context center. Adapted from the source document.
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Band 45, Heft 4, S. 95-98
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Band 45, Heft 4, S. 99-102
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844