Kinas vekst - implikasjoner for Norge
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 69, Heft 3, S. 526-534
ISSN: 0020-577X
91 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 69, Heft 3, S. 526-534
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 69, Heft 2, S. 272-281
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 69, Heft 4, S. 710-715
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 69, Heft 2, S. 308-310
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 69, Heft 2, S. 282-292
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 69, Heft 4, S. 687-694
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 71, Heft 4, S. 533-560
ISSN: 0020-577X
It is well known that the US-Russian dialogue was 'reset' in 2009 under US President Obama and his Russian counterpart Medvedev although it is doubtful whether this symbolic commitment really created conditions for better, or closer, intergovernmental relations. In the following, I analyse how signs of renewed cooperation emitted by the respective political leaderships reflected on multilateral fora in which both the United States and Russia are represented, with a particular emphasis on the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and the UN Security Council. The overall impression is that US-Russian diplomatic collaboration in 2009-2011 remained limited and focused on fewer issues, but that both sides deliberately avoided 'disturbing' each other's priority interests. A specific observation from the OSCE is that Russia's diplomatic initiatives were better prepared than previously and in the future may carry greater weight, at least on the European mainland. Unlike the United States, which acts through the Security Council when it believes that it can forge a coalition to pursue a particular objective, in 2009-2011 Russia's UN diplomacy still remained defensive. Adapted from the source document.
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 69, Heft 2, S. 183-204
ISSN: 0020-577X
Decision-making processes during Norway's membership of the UNSC 2001-2002 are the empirical focus of this article. Based on anthropological fieldwork in the period, I discuss why it was necessary for practice and informal processes to be included when international organizations were being studied, but also how Norwegian UN policy was determined during the period. Furthermore, I show how formal structures are a marginalization of practical realities and how informal processes overlap formal structures on the way to consensus being achieved between member states in the UNSC. I investigate how this overlap has implications for policy-making in small states such as Norway when represented in international organizations like the UNSC. It is important to examine how formal instructions are being interpreted, adapted and reformulated through practice and informal action, and, when studying these effects, to illuminate the power relations in international politics. Adapted from the source document.
World Affairs Online
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 69, Heft 2, S. 313-315
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 69, Heft 2, S. 303-303
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 69, Heft 2, S. 242-253
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 69, Heft 2, S. 221-230
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 69, Heft 2, S. 304-306
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 69, Heft 2, S. 293-302
ISSN: 0020-577X