Maǧallat ad-dirāsāt ad-duwalīya: Journal of international studies
ISSN: 1992-9250
474 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
ISSN: 1992-9250
ISSN: 1991-8984
Erscheinungsjahre: 2011- (elektronisch)
Erscheinungsjahre: 2012- (elektronisch)
Today few people deny the existence of regional substate diplomacy (Criekemans 2010). But there is still no common agreement on a region's right to do so and, above all, on their scope of action. This question goes against what used to be the dominant approach in international relations, the state-centric approach that leads to the logic of speaking with one voice. Increasingly, a multilevel-governance approach has contested this state-centric view and proposes an alternative logic of multiple actors speaking with their voice, nuancing strongly the seminal distinction between "sovereignty-bound" and "sovereignty-free" actors (Rosenau 1990). From the 1970s, the world has seen the growing presence of sovereignty-free actors in international relations. Among these actors, non-central or, better, substate, governments of federal states have developed intensive foreign relations. These governments are using a range of techniques: from shaping the federal government's foreign policy to establishing themselves directly in the international arena (Blatter et al. 2008). For minority nation governments this is particularly a challenge, as they have to act internally – where they have developed full-fledged legislative powers within a multinational federation – and externally – where international and national laws are often still reluctant to recognise their right of action (Lejeune 2003). Yet some minority nations have thrived in developing their own international relations. Bavaria, Catalonia, Flanders, Quebec, Scotland and Wallonia are often seen as successful international players even if they are not fully sovereignty bound (Michelmann 2009; Criekemans 2010). The international actions of these minority nations have been characterised under the umbrella of "identity paradiplomacy" (Paquin 2003); that is, a willingness to use international relations to foster a nation-building process within a multinational state. This observation was particularly prevalent for minority nations strongly in competition with a federal government about their nationbuilding process, albeit for different reasons, namely Flanders, Quebec and Scotland (Paquin 2004). The case of Wallonia seems to fits less well into the identity paradiplomacy framework, which therefore raises the question of alternative roads to international relations. This is the core question of this chapter: is identity paradiplomacy the only way to go for minority nations? Quebec and Wallonia are both well known for their active foreign relations.
BASE
ISSN: 2790-4911
Intro -- الإهداء -- المحتويات -- تمهيد -- الفصل الأول: ماهية جريمة الإبادة الجماعية -- المبحث الأول :ظهور المصطلح وتعريف جريمة الإبادة الجماعية -- المبحث الثاني : أنواع جريمة الإبادة الجماعية -- الفصل الثاني: أركان جريمة الابادة الجماعية -- المبحث الأول: الركن المعنوي في جريمة الإبادة الجماعية -- المبحث الثاني: الركن المادي -- المبحث الثالث: حالات تطبيقية -- الفصل الثالث: المسؤولية الدولية الناجمة عن ارتكابجريمة الإبادة الجماعية -- المبحث الأول: المسؤولية الدولية الناجمة عن إرتكاب جريمة ا لإبادة الجماعيةعلى الصعيد الدولي -- المبحث الثاني: على الصعيد الوطني -- الخاتمة -- قائمة المراجع
This research attempts to shed light on the role of the international Court of Justice (ICJ) and the significance of its adjudicatory and advisory functions. The theme of this research will initially project a brief introduction of the topic in question, keeping in view the historical and contemporary perspectives of the ICJ. This research also focuses on the organizational structure of the United Nations, keeping in view the position and role of the ICJ within the organization. With practical examples of case laws, the ambit of judicial review in the context of judicial and advisory function of ICJ will also be taken into account. It will also present brief analysis on the intra-organizational relationship between the ICJ and other organs of the UN. ; This research attempts to shed light on the role of the international Court of Justice (ICJ) and the significance of its adjudicatory and advisory functions. The theme of this paper will initially project a brief introduction of the topic in question, keeping in view the historical and contemporary perspectives of the ICJ . This research also focuses on the organizational structure of the United Nations, keeping in view the position and role of the ICJ within the organization. With practical examples of case laws, the ambit of judicial review in the context of judicial and advisory function of ICJ will also be taken into account. It will also present brief analysis on the intra-organizational relationship between the ICJ and other organs of the UN.
BASE
ISSN: 2751-3858