BİBLİYOGRAFYA : SELECTIVE TURKISH BIBLIOGRAPHY ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS* 2006
In: Milletlerarası münasebetler türk yıllığı: The Turkish yearbook of international relations, Band 37, Heft 0, S. 1
4615 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Milletlerarası münasebetler türk yıllığı: The Turkish yearbook of international relations, Band 37, Heft 0, S. 1
In: Milletlerarası münasebetler türk yıllığı: The Turkish yearbook of international relations, Band 36, Heft 0, S. 1
In: Milletlerarası münasebetler türk yıllığı: The Turkish yearbook of international relations, Band 35, Heft 0, S. 1
In: Milletlerarası münasebetler türk yıllığı: The Turkish yearbook of international relations, Band 28, Heft 0, S. 1
In: Milletlerarası münasebetler türk yıllığı: The Turkish yearbook of international relations, S. 001-013
In: Milletlerarası münasebetler türk yıllığı: The Turkish yearbook of international relations, Band 22, Heft 0, S. 1
In: Milletlerarası münasebetler türk yıllığı: The Turkish yearbook of international relations, S. 001-036
In: Milletlerarası münasebetler türk yıllığı: The Turkish yearbook of international relations, S. 137-161
In: Milletlerarası münasebetler türk yıllığı: The Turkish yearbook of international relations, Band 19, Heft 0, S. 1
In: Milletlerarası münasebetler türk yıllığı: The Turkish yearbook of international relations, Band 18, Heft 0, S. 1
The twentieth century is an era of pervasive turmoil. There were two cataclysmic full-scale wars and many wars and conflicts of lesser importance in all parts of the world. The term crisis is among the most widely used verbal symbols of turmoil in politics among nations. Scholars and journalists, too, often write about such things as incidents, disputes, riots, and rebellions etc. as crisis. In short, crisis is a pervasive term to describe dis ruption and disorder in the global arena. Many political scientists have been researching this phenomenon of international system but there is still a need for new researches and analysis of crisis in world politics. New technological tools and data-sets enable further development of analytical aspects of crisis theory: eruption of conflictual situations, context and reasons of crisis escalation and de-escalation, decision making process etc. The main reason impelled to write this article is the lack of integral theory on crisis issues. That is why the main objective of this study is to make a quantitative and comparative research of the crisis in the 20th century in order to highlight the main influential factors of this process in different time and space dimensions. A quantitative and comparative analysis in this article was performed using International Crisis Behavior (ICB) data-set of international crisis (by the SPSS 12.0 package). The results of the research confirm the presumption that the analysis of different "levels" provides different outcomes.[.].
BASE
The twentieth century is an era of pervasive turmoil. There were two cataclysmic full-scale wars and many wars and conflicts of lesser importance in all parts of the world. The term crisis is among the most widely used verbal symbols of turmoil in politics among nations. Scholars and journalists, too, often write about such things as incidents, disputes, riots, and rebellions etc. as crisis. In short, crisis is a pervasive term to describe dis ruption and disorder in the global arena. Many political scientists have been researching this phenomenon of international system but there is still a need for new researches and analysis of crisis in world politics. New technological tools and data-sets enable further development of analytical aspects of crisis theory: eruption of conflictual situations, context and reasons of crisis escalation and de-escalation, decision making process etc. The main reason impelled to write this article is the lack of integral theory on crisis issues. That is why the main objective of this study is to make a quantitative and comparative research of the crisis in the 20th century in order to highlight the main influential factors of this process in different time and space dimensions. A quantitative and comparative analysis in this article was performed using International Crisis Behavior (ICB) data-set of international crisis (by the SPSS 12.0 package). The results of the research confirm the presumption that the analysis of different "levels" provides different outcomes.[.].
BASE
The twentieth century is an era of pervasive turmoil. There were two cataclysmic full-scale wars and many wars and conflicts of lesser importance in all parts of the world. The term crisis is among the most widely used verbal symbols of turmoil in politics among nations. Scholars and journalists, too, often write about such things as incidents, disputes, riots, and rebellions etc. as crisis. In short, crisis is a pervasive term to describe dis ruption and disorder in the global arena. Many political scientists have been researching this phenomenon of international system but there is still a need for new researches and analysis of crisis in world politics. New technological tools and data-sets enable further development of analytical aspects of crisis theory: eruption of conflictual situations, context and reasons of crisis escalation and de-escalation, decision making process etc. The main reason impelled to write this article is the lack of integral theory on crisis issues. That is why the main objective of this study is to make a quantitative and comparative research of the crisis in the 20th century in order to highlight the main influential factors of this process in different time and space dimensions. A quantitative and comparative analysis in this article was performed using International Crisis Behavior (ICB) data-set of international crisis (by the SPSS 12.0 package). The results of the research confirm the presumption that the analysis of different "levels" provides different outcomes.[.].
BASE
In: Sosyoloji dergisi: Journal of sociology, Band 43, Heft 1, S. 132-143
ISSN: 2667-6931