Suchergebnisse

Раздел - "Международное право" ; The present paper considers some issues of regulating of a quite complex legal institution, that of multiple nationality. Currently, European integration in general and the phenomenon of multiple nationality in particular are arousing a lot of interest. This is caused to a large extent b y both the relative stability of economic and political guarantees of rights and liberties of the citizens of Western Europe and by the search of Eastern European countries for their place and their road in the united Europe, b y the necessity to overcome cultural and economic disunity of European states and also b y the unabated interest in the structural elements of diverse and variously speeded integration in this region. In this regard the institution of multiple nationality stands out against the background of all-European integration. It has been in existence in this region for many millenia and embraces practically all states of the continent. Multiplenationality creates at the same time both real possibilities and prerequisites for integration and real problems, causing sometimes protracted conflicts between states and peoples and separating their political interests. The author sees multiple nationality to be a complex legal state expressed through a complicated legal relationship, which lends form to a multistructured social political, economic, cultural and moral relationship between states (representations of citizenship/nationality) and the person as regards responsible possession by a person of the complete or the basic set of rights and duties of nationality equal to the persons of his/her category of nationality in more than one state formation. With this assumption the paper shows in general terms the causes for the emergence of multiple nationality and the ways of settling its problems. The citizenship of the European Union, which the author refers to a kind of multiple nationality, is a particular legal institution which could serve as a source for forming all-European and global citizenship. Alongside with the study of the citizenship of the European Union the paper considers the institution of multiple nationality within the framework of the Council of Europe. The European region has accumulated abundant experience of regulating multiple nationality; part of which experience was embodied in the provisions of various international treaties concluded by the member-states of the Council of Europe. It would be effective to use in the countries of Eastern Europe and Asia. The European Convention on Nationality from November 6, 1997 was a progressive step in the realm of developing nationality and multiple nationality, though it has a number of drawbacks and as a whole does not adequately take into consideration the existing needs in this sphere. A number of norms, for instance, the right of the state to terminate citizenship, declared in article 7 and other provisions of the Convention have not been specified. The drawbacks of legal regulation of these issues and the issues of state succession and nationality (article 16) arouse doubts in the compliance of provisions of the abovementioned convention with the requirements of articles 15 and 29 of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights. Unfortunately, the European Convention on Nationality is trying to unite disparate points of v i ew into one, there arising as a result some apprehension as to the possibility of its arbitrary application. The citizenship, being established within the framework of integration of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation, is also a peculiar institution which could be transformed into a different type of citizenship. The author considers that reasonable application of the institution of multiple nationality could facilitate the solution of a number of problems of contemporary international law, including the problems of international cooperation, human rights protection and development of integrational process. This experience could be promoted b y all states and especially the former USSR countries who have various directions of solving the issues of multiple nationality.

Die Verfasser zeichnen die Grundzüge des gegenwärtigen Globalisierungsprozesses nach, beleuchten die Schwerpunkte der aktuellen internationalen Diskussion dieses Phänomens und skizzieren in diesem Zusammenhang die wichtigsten Argumente der Gegner des Globalisierungsprozesses. (BIOst-Mrk)

Der Beitrag informiert über die Ergebnisse einiger theoretischer Arbeiten zu grundlegenden Aspekten der Globalisierung und gibt auf dieser Basis eine Einschätzung der zukünftigen Kräfteverschiebungen im Bereich der internationalen Beziehungen. Verschiedene Entwicklungsmodelle werden skizziert. Abschließend wird die Rolle der USA im Globalisierungsprozeß und ihre zukünftige Stellung im Bereich der internationalen Beziehungen analysiert. (BIOst-Mrk)

Der Verfasser nimmt den fünften Jahrestag der Aufnahme diplomatischer Beziehungen zwischen Rußland und Liechtenstein (1994) zum Anlaß, einen historischen Überblick über die Entwicklung Liechtensteins zu geben und die Rolle dieses Staates im internationalen System sowie den Verlauf der bilateralen Beziehungen zwischen Rußland und Liechtenstein nach 1994 zu beleuchten. (BIOst-Mrk)

Der Autor betont die prioritäre Stellung Indiens für die russische Außenpolitik, insbesondere im Hinblick auf Asien. Beide Staaten streben eine multipolare Welt an. Der Verfasser führt weitere Beispiele für die Übereinstimmung beider Länder in internationalen Fragen an, geht aber auch auf das Problem der indischen Nuklearversuche ein. Er betont die Perspektive einer langfristigen strategischen Partnerschaft zwischen Rußland, Indien und China. Abschließend wird ein Überblick über die Entwicklung der bilateralen diplomatischen Beziehungen und die Entwicklung der wirtschaftlichen und wissenschaftlich-technischen Zusammenarbeit gegeben. (BIOst-Mrk)