Obtaining International Environmental Protection through Epistemic Consensus
In: Millennium: journal of international studies, Band 19, Heft 3, S. 347
ISSN: 0305-8298
2440709 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Millennium: journal of international studies, Band 19, Heft 3, S. 347
ISSN: 0305-8298
In: Millennium: journal of international studies, Band 19, Heft 3, S. 347-363
ISSN: 1477-9021
In: Global Environmental Change and International Relations, S. 38-59
In: Cornell international law journal, Band 24, S. 65-95
ISSN: 0010-8812
In: Global environmental accords series
In: American journal of international law, Band 90, Heft 4, S. 701-702
ISSN: 0002-9300
In: https://doi.org/10.7916/D8FB52M9
This opinion piece addresses concerns about the suitability of the continuing use of sustainable development as a concept around which to organize international environmental protection. Despite advances made in international environmental law over the last 40 years, progress in abating global greenhouse gas continues to be slow, and predictions about global average temperature increases remain disturbing. The upcoming GEO5 publication based on the United Nations Environment Programme's Global Environmental Outlook data portal reveals that prospects for improvements in global environmental standards are grim. Some of the challenges facing the advancement of international environmental law can be largely attributed to inefficiencies associated with treaty congestion; however, there is a more fundamental reason why international environmental law remains ineffective. There has been little, if any, progress because we have been focusing solely on the concept of sustainable development for the last quarter century. It is clear that 'sustainable development' has become too malleable a theory to serve its vital purpose. Consequently, it needs to be replaced with a straightforward title for the environmental movement. The international community needs to reconsider its approach in dealing with today's pressing environmental concerns.
BASE
SSRN
Working paper
On May 31, 1989, four Representatives introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives the Waste Export Control Act'("WECA"). According to the bill's bipartisan sponsors, its purpose is to regulate the export of solid waste from the United States to foreign countries more stringently than existing federal laws and regulations. Three House sub- committees have held hearings in 1988 and 1989 on exports of solid wastes-in advance of, and since, introduction of the legislation discussed in this Article.
BASE
In: International journal of legal information: IJLI ; the official journal of the International Association of Law Libraries, Band 20, Heft 1, S. 1-17
ISSN: 2331-4117
Airborne pollution of the marine environment has not received great attention in the literature. This is certainly a reflection of the fact that, for the longest time, this type of pollution was neglected in international efforts to cooperate for the protection of the marine environment. However, the last few years have witnessed considerable activity in this area and some stock-taking is in order.
Climate change has become the scourge environmental concern and mobilizes more theinternational community. The outcome of this mobilization remains probably the implementation ofinternational climate change regime for which the Climate Convention and the Kyoto Protocol are the legalbases. This system is innovative in that it sets quantified emission reduction commitments for greenhouse gasemissions (GHG) for polluters States, but also in that it establishes mechanisms known as of "flexibility"whose implementation is accompanied by a control based on a Committee known as of "compliance". Butdespite all this normative production, it is regrettable that today the international climate regime is a realfailure. Indeed, if the mobilization of states is no doubt, however, the same states that have voluntarily agreedto engage deliberately refuse to honour their commitments for essentially political, economic and strategicreasons. This work therefore aims to shed light on the causes of this failure by developing a mixed record ofthe first Kyoto commitment ended period in 2012, and offers prospects for a legal regime of the post-Kyotoclimate and efficient, able to be up to the challenges. ; Le changement climatique est devenu aujourd'hui le fléau environnemental qui préoccupe etmobilise le plus la communauté internationale. L'aboutissement de cette mobilisation générale reste sansdoute la mise en place du régime international de lutte contre le changement climatique dont la Conventioncadredes Nations Unies sur le changement climatique et le Protocole de Kyoto constituent les basesjuridiques. Ce régime innove en ce qu'il fixe des engagements quantifiés de réduction des émissions de gaz àeffet de serre pour les États pollueurs, mais aussi en ce qu'il instaure des mécanismes dits de « flexibilité »dont la mise en oeuvre est assortie d'un contrôle original basé sur un Comité dit de « l'observance ». Mais, endépit de toute cette production normative, il est regrettable de constater aujourd'hui que le régimeinternational du ...
BASE
Shipping list no.: 2009-0164-P. ; Includes bibliographical references. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
Shipping list no.: 2009-0164-P. ; Includes bibliographical references. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
Shipping list no.: 2008-0228-P. ; Distributed to some depository libraries in microfiche. ; Includes bibliographical references. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
Shipping list no.: 2009-0106-P. ; Distributed to some depository libraries in microfiche. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE