Prioriteti vanjske politike Republike Hrvatske
In: Politička misao, Band 38, Heft 2, S. 185-195
201 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Politička misao, Band 38, Heft 2, S. 185-195
World Affairs Online
In: Politička misao, Band 31, Heft 1, S. 78-86
World Affairs Online
World Affairs Online
In: Međunarodni problemi: Meždunarodnye problemy, Band 54, Heft 1-2, S. 115-130
ISSN: 0025-8555
World Affairs Online
In: Politička misao, Band 39, Heft 2, S. 92-105
World Affairs Online
In: Politička misao, Band 36, Heft 4, S. 118-133
Henry Kissinger is one of the most eminent and influential intellectuals in American foreign policy. His work and achievements may be divided into three phases of his participation in the creation of American foreign policy. In the first - scholarly - phase of his career, he criticized US foreign polic His works from that period clearly reflect his "realpolitik" outlook. Particularly important for his life and work is the second phase when he was able, as a national security adviser and later as Secretary of State for presidents Nixon and Ford, to use his remarkable intellectual capital and successfully practice realpolitik as the creator and proponent of American foreign policy. After his retirement from foreign policy administration, Kissinger did not cease to use his clout in the field of international relations and American foreign policy. He has been one of the most significant American intellectuals who have exerted an influence on American foreign policy. (SOI : SOEU: S. 133)
World Affairs Online
In: Biblioteka liber memorabilium
World Affairs Online
In: Politička misao, Band 35, Heft 4, S. 177-192
American and international public looks up to American presidents as the chief creators of American foreign policy. A review of the contemporary history of US foreign policy is mostly a review of foreign policy platforms and initiatives of American presidents. Although fundamental prerequisites exist - constitutional powers, executive office of the President as support in the creation and implementation of certain decisions, the expectations of the Congress and the public that President should lead the nation in the foreign policy arena - not all American presidents have taken an equal interest in foreign policy decision-making and the creation of American foreign policy; this has depended on their personal interests and experiences. Despite significant constitutional restrictions of the president's autonomous action in foreign policy and occasionally successful attempts of the legislature to assume control over foreign policy, as well as frequent challenges to presidential powers and numerous actions by the public, we can conclude that American presidents are nevertheless dominant figures in the field of American foreign policy. (SOI : PM: S. 192)
World Affairs Online
In: Politička misao, Band 35, Heft 4, S. 60-89
The process of European integrations, with a growing political, economic, and security interdependence of member states is designed in such a way that, among other things, it can eventually result in developing a collective approach to defense, whose features would be a far cry from any other form of traditional alliances. The signatories of the Maastricht Agreement vowed to shape a common defense policy which would in time lead to the common defense. The common defense policy, whose structure would be built on the basis of the models and trends of the defense policies of the leading West-European countries, should evolve as an integral part of EU's common foreign and security policy. It should address all the aspects of the use of military power, and it will require an analysis of a broad spectrum of possible scenarios which may pose a threat to EU's security. EU countries have demonstrated certain shortcomings in their military capacities e.g. transport equipment and other capacities for deployment. Although in the economic field they have achieved consensus on numerous issues, it is obvious that defense issues such as nuclear weapons, professionalization of the military and the policies of defense industry are still a major bone of contention for EU members. Though EU, WEU, and NATO represent only a segment of the European security architecture, they will most probably serve as the key institutional framework for the development of a common defense policy and common defense. Further expansion of this triangular institutional framework is going to be interdependent, mutually supportive and parallel. (SOI : PM: S. 89)
World Affairs Online
In: Međunarodni problemi: Meždunarodnye problemy, Band 43, Heft 3/4, S. 402-413
ISSN: 0025-8555
World Affairs Online
In: Časopis za suvremenu povijest: Journal of contemporary history, Band 28, Heft 1-2, S. 239-243
ISSN: 0590-9597
World Affairs Online
In: Politička misao, Band 37, Heft 2, S. 220-220
World Affairs Online
World Affairs Online