Western Balkans and the Gulf: interregionalism in the making
In: Mediterranean politics, Band 23, Heft 3, S. 340-363
ISSN: 1354-2982, 1362-9395
3 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Mediterranean politics, Band 23, Heft 3, S. 340-363
ISSN: 1354-2982, 1362-9395
World Affairs Online
In: South African journal of international affairs: journal of the South African Institute of International Affairs, Band 25, Heft 4, S. 563-579
ISSN: 1938-0275
In: Asien: the German journal on contemporary Asia, Heft 148, S. 68-77
ISSN: 0721-5231
Regional identity-building has been described within the literature on the European Union (EU)–Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) relationship as a function of interregionalism. While this literature has commonly premised regional identity-building as the direct result of interregional interaction in the sense of regionto-region best practice-sharing and capacity-building, it has also recognized that there have been instances of EU–ASEAN interregional disagreement which have raised levels of regional self-awareness and identity indirectly through processes of self-and-othering. Prominent examples of this kind of ASEAN regional identitybuilding through interregional othering processes have been the EU–ASEAN dispute over human rights and Myanmar in the 1990s. Even though the official EU-ASEAN relationship has come a long way since then, Thailand's recent experience as the coordinator of the official EU–ASEAN dialogue reveals that regional identity-building through interregionalism continues to build on processes of differentiation. Specifically, through Thailand's experience in managing the EU–ASEAN Strategic Partnership talks, as part of its role as the Southeast Asian EU–ASEAN coordinator from 2015 until 2018, this article demonstrates the interplay of differentiation and identification processes within contemporary ASEAN regional identity-building and - affirmation. (Asien/GIGA)
World Affairs Online