Suchergebnisse

Intro -- Contents -- A Preface to Rancière / Dilip Gaonkar -- Acknowledgments -- Editors' Note -- Introduction: Between Two Equalities / Scott Durham -- Jacques Rancière's Politics of the Ordinary / Jason Frank -- Fidelity to Disagreement: Jacques Rancière's Politics without Ontology / Benjamin Arditi -- Which Politics of Aesthetics? / Joseph J. Tanke -- Equality Must Be Defended!" Cinephilia and Democracy / Codruţa Morari -- The Aesthetics of Displacement: Dissonance and Dissensus in Adorno and Rancière / Sudeep Dasgupta -- The Politics of the Aesthetics of Theory / Nico Baumbach -- Who's the Subject of Politics? Language in Jacques Rancière / Giuseppina Mecchia -- Emergence: Dissensus in a Global Field of Instrumentality / Pheng Cheah -- Plunge into Terrible Readings": Rancière, Badiou, and the Thought of Libidinal Economy / Eleanor Kaufman -- All Affects Equal / Tom Conley -- Afterword: Rethinking Theory and Practice / Jacques Rancière -- Contributors -- Index.

Cover -- Half-Title -- Also available -- Title -- Imprint -- Contents -- Acknowledgements -- List of Abbreviations -- Foreword to the English Edition -- Preface -- 1. A Lesson in Orthodoxy: M-L Teaches John Lewis That It Is the Masses Which Make History -- 2. A Lesson in Politics: Philosophers Did Not Become Kings -- 3. A Lesson in Self-Criticism: Class Struggle Rages in Theory Appendix: On Class Struggle in Texts -- 4. A Lesson in History: The Damages of Humanism -- 5. A Discourse in Its Place -- Appendix: On the Theory of Ideology: Althusser's Politics -- Notes -- Index.

Throughout his career, shaped by a notable collaboration with Louis Althusser, Jacques Rancière has continually unsettled political discourse, particularly by examining its relationship to aesthetics. Like Michel Foucault, he broke with his many of his predecessors to upend dominant twentieth-century historical narratives and critical theories. Often overlooked in the canon of his works, Mute Speech contains the critical seeds of Rancière's most provocative assertions, challenging the intellectual orthodoxy that had come to define the nature of art and representation.Arguing that art is neithe