Suchergebnisse

now discusses the chronic nature of my particular fragmented and unfinished path by Rancière's work, which I will organise on the basis of some of the images which, in my view, play an important role in his argument. I hope that this image album and the skewed speech from them can be useful for the discussion of the sense or political use of the images and, more generally, for the discussion of aesthetic/political relations. Clella Lacasa, M. (2011). The image policy in Jacques Rancière. RES Publica. 26: 91-109. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/51312 ; 91 109 26 ; now discusses the chronic nature of my particular fragmented and unfinished path by Rancière's work, which I will organise on the basis of some of the images which, in my view, play an important role in his argument. I hope that this image album and the skewed speech from them can be useful for the discussion of the sense or political use of the images and, more generally, for the discussion of aesthetic/political relations. Clella Lacasa, M. (2011). The image policy in Jacques Rancière. RES Publica. 26: 91-109. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/51312 ; Senia ; now discusses the chronic nature of my particular fragmented and unfinished path by Rancière's work, which I will organise on the basis of some of the images which, in my view, play an important role in his argument. I hope that this image album and the skewed speech from them can be useful for the discussion of the sense or political use of the images and, more generally, for the discussion of aesthetic/political relations. Clella Lacasa, M. (2011). The image policy in Jacques Rancière. RES Publica. 26: 91-109. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/51312 ; Someto hoy a discusión la crónica de mi particular recorrido fragmentario e inacabado por la obra de Rancière, que organizaré a partir algunas de las imágenes que, en mi opinión, juegan un papel importante en su argumenta ción. Espero que este álbum de imágenes y el discurso tramado a partir de ellas puedan ser de alguna utilidad para el debate acerca del sentido ...

The French philosopher Jacques Rancière has influenced disciplines from history and philosophy to political theory, literature, art history, and film studies. His research into nineteenth-century workers' archives, reflections on political equality, critique of the traditional division between intellectual and manual labor, and analysis of the place of literature, film, and art in modern society have all constituted major contributions to contemporary thought. In this collection, leading scholars in the fields of philosophy, literary theory, and cultural criticism engage Rancière's work, illuminating its originality, breadth, and rigor, as well as its place in current debates. They also explore the relationships between Rancière and the various authors and artists he has analyzed, ranging from Plato and Aristotle to Flaubert, Rossellini, Auerbach, Bourdieu, and Deleuze. The contributors to this collection do not simply elucidate Rancière's project; they also critically respond to it from their own perspectives. They consider the theorist's engagement with the writing of history, with institutional and narrative constructions of time, and with the ways that individuals and communities can disturb or reconfigure what he has called the "distribution of the sensible." They examine his unique conception of politics as the disruption of the established distribution of bodies and roles in the social order, and they elucidate his novel account of the relationship between aesthetics and politics by exploring his astute analyses of literature and the visual arts. In the collection's final essay, Rancière addresses some of the questions raised by the other contributors and returns to his early work to provide a retrospective account of the fundamental stakes of his project. Contributors. Alain Badiou, Étienne Balibar, Bruno Bosteels, Yves Citton, Tom Conley, Solange Guénoun, Peter Hallward, Todd May, Eric Méchoulan, Giuseppina Mecchia, Jean-Luc Nancy, Andrew Parker, Jacques Rancière, Gabriel Rockhill, Kristin Ross, James Swenson, Rajeshwari Vallury, Philip Watts

A partir de un recorrido por las imágenes que han jugado un papel relevante en la obra de J. Rancière y, en particular, de un grupo de imágenes en que se representa el rostro o el cuerpo de la mujer, se establece una comparación entre las estéticas de J. Rancière y J. F. Lyotard. Recurriendo al estudio sobre la imaginación apocalíptica de M. Jay y a las críticas de Rancière a la concepción apocalíptica del tiempo se contraponen dos imágenes enfrentadas de una misma figura femenina desdoblada. Estas dos visiones del cuerpo de la mujer, dos versiones de la figura-madre, corresponden a dos concepciones distintas de la política de las imágenes. ; Taking as a starting point the images that have played an outstanding role in J. Rancière's work, especially in a group of images where the woman's face or body is portrayed, a comparison is drawn between the aesthetics of J. Rancière and J. F. Lyotard. If we turn to M. Jay's study about apocalyptic imagination and Rancière's critique to the apocalyptic concept of time, we find that two images in conflict of the same split female figure are opposed. These two visions of the woman's body, two versions of the mother figure, correspond to two different concepts of the politics of image.

The following text emerges as a result of accepting the challenge that Jacques Ranciere's issued in one of his texts, where the French philosopher, echoing Jean Borreil's words in L'Artiste Roi, describes the philosophical situation today as the one that takes a stand against Plato. Therefore, the challenge consists of suggesting an interpretation of his political, pedagogical and artistic theory as the places of Ranciere's thought that develop within an implicit debate with and against Plato. ; El siguiente texto surge como consecuencia de aceptar un reto lanzado por el propio Jacques Rancière en unos de sus textos. En dicho texto, el filósofo francés, haciéndose eco de unas palabras de Jean Borreil en L'Artiste Roi, caracteriza la situación filosófica actual como aquella que se desarrolla posicionándose frente a Platón. La tarea que realizaremos en este texto consistirá en abordar la obra de Rancière desde este prisma, preguntándonos en qué medida elige a Platón contra Platón. El reto, por tanto, es proponer una lectura de su teoría política, pedagógica y artística como aquellos lugares del pensamiento rancierano en los que se desarrollan en un debate implícito con y contra Platón.

Dieses Büchlein versteht sich als Beitrag zur Filmtheorie. Es geht aus von Jacques Rancières Schriften zum Film und von deren Beziehung zu seinem Politikbegriff der unfundierten Subjektivierung im Streit. Eine Grundlosigkeit, auf die Film und Politik jeweils ihre Erscheinungen gründen, steht im Fluchtpunkt des Büchleins.

Overview of the special issue on Jacques Ranciere and Critical Theory, along with some additional thoughts.

This proposal considers analyzing certain meanings that the expression politics of fiction has in its double meaning in the literary thought of Jacques Rancière. The aim is to draw the conceptual map of a contradictory thought, as literature itself, that escapes the logic reason / action. I will attend the two dimensions in which this statement would be working and that I consider affect what would be the strong core of his thought, that is to say, to the concept of equality. The politics of fiction in Rancière is, at the same time, an aesthetic of equality. In this way, we can answer the question that lies at the bottom of this double statement, and that rests on the perplexity that its concept of equality awakens: What does it do, how does it work, in short, how does his concept of equality act? ; Este trabajo propone analizar los sentidos que la expresión política de la ficción tiene en su doble acepción en el pensamiento literario de Jacques Rancière. Para tal fin, voy a atender a dos dimensiones en las que estaría funcionando este enunciado y que considero afectan a lo que sería el núcleo fuerte de su pensamiento, es decir, al concepto de igualdad. La política de la ficción en Rancière es, al tiempo, una estética de la igualdad. De este modo, podremos responder a la pregunta que se sitúa en el fondo de este enunciado doble, y que descansa sobre la perplejidad que su concepto de igualdad despierta: ¿Qué hace, cómo funciona, en definitiva, cómo actúa su concepto de igualdad?This proposal considers analyzing certain meanings that the expression politics of fiction has in its double meaning in the literary thought of Jacques Rancière. The aim is to draw the conceptual map of a contradictory thought, as literature itself, that escapes the logic reason / action. I will attend the two dimensions in which this statement would be working and that I consider affect what would be the strong core of his thought, that is to say, to the concept of equality. The politics of fiction in Rancière is, at the same time, an aesthetic of equality. In this way, we can answer the question that lies at the bottom of this double statement, and that rests on the perplexity that its concept of equality awakens: What does it do, how does it work, in short, how does his concept of equality act?

Rezension zu Gebhardt, Mareike (Hg.): Staatskritik und Radikaldemokratie. Das Denken Jacques Rancières. Baden-Baden: Nomos 2020.

In this essay our framework will be Jacques Rancière's aesthetic perspective as mainly presented in his work Malaise dans l'esthétique to examine the critical role that certain works or artistic practices can play in the production and transformation of social space. In his book the philosopher presents an extreme defense of aesthetics in its most political dimension, where art is not political by the messages and feelings it conveys, but by the reconfiguration of the particular sensorium it produces. We are interested in exploring and thinking artistic practices in regard to their ability to work as a mechanism that offers an opportunity for critical analysis on certain political issues. What makes the political be present in an artistic work or practice, as a constituent part of the aesthetic experience, is not its content or the discourse it supports, but how it does it. To clarify this assumption, among the examples that we will analyze is the video/installation 12 vecinas of the Puerto Rican artist Marisol Plard. ; En este ensayo tomaremos como guía el pensamiento estético de Jacques Rancière tal y como se presenta principalmente en su obra Malaise dans l'esthétique para examinar críticamente el rol que pueden jugar ciertas obras o prácticas artísticas en la producción y transformación del espacio social. En su libro el filósofo presenta una defensa a ultranza de la estética en su dimensión más política, donde el arte no es político por los mensajes y sentimientos que transmite, sino por la reconfiguración del sensorium particular que produce. Nos interesa explorar y pensar las prácticas artísticas que funcionan como un mecanismo dispuesto a ofrecer una oportunidad de reflexión crítica sobre ciertos temas políticos. Lo que hace que lo político esté presente en una obra o práctica artística como parte constitutiva de la experiencia estética, no es su contenido ni el discurso que apoya, sino cómo lo hace. Para aclarar este supuesto, entre los ejemplos que analizaremos está la video/instalación 12 vecinas de la artista puertorriqueña Marisol Plard.

The photographer Hiroshi Sugimoto decided once to push his camera's focal length to twice-infinity while shooting urban landscapes. He interpreted the resulting blur as an erosion-test of modernity that would only be survived by the super large buildings of architectural landmarks. His related series "Architectures" serves as the analytical a erimage for reflecting on Jacques Rancière's concept of the Distribution of the Sensible and his aesthetic-political thought. This article discusses key elements of his theory in opposition to Sugimotos very own visual interface between politics and aesthetics, exposing a problematic and romantic lack of technicality and mediality in Rancière's tableau of visual regimes. Serving also as a retrospective on what has been an ongoing conversation with Siegfried Mattl about Jacques Rancière, aesthetics, cinema, photography, romanticism and liberty this text remains necessarily indecisive since the colloquist has sadly passed away recently. ; The photographer Hiroshi Sugimoto decided once to push his camera's focal length to twice-infinity while shooting urban landscapes. He interpreted the resulting blur as an erosion-test of modernity that would only be survived by the super large buildings of architectural landmarks. His related series "Architectures" serves as the analytical a erimage for reflecting on Jacques Rancière's concept of the Distribution of the Sensible and his aesthetic-political thought. This article discusses key elements of his theory in opposition to Sugimotos very own visual interface between politics and aesthetics, exposing a problematic and romantic lack of technicality and mediality in Rancière's tableau of visual regimes. Serving also as a retrospective on what has been an ongoing conversation with Siegfried Mattl about Jacques Rancière, aesthetics, cinema, photography, romanticism and liberty this text remains necessarily indecisive since the colloquist has sadly passed away recently.

This paper proposes a conversation between Jacques Rancière and feminist care ethicists. It argues that there are important resonances between these two bodies of scholarship, thanks to their similar indictments of Western hierarchies and binaries, their shared invitation to "blur boundaries" and embrace a politics of "impropriety", and their views on the significance of storytelling/narratives and of the ordinary. Drawing largely on Disagreement, Proletarian Nights, and The Ignorant Schoolmaster: Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation, I also indicate that Rancière's work offers crucial and timely insights for care ethicists on the importance of attending to desire and hope in research, the inevitability of conflict in social transformation, and the need to think together the transformation of care work/practices and of dominant social norms.

Dans l'un de ses ouvrages les plus récents, Les Bords de la fiction, Jacques Rancière reprend la question des limites et des débordements, qu'il avait examinée auparavant dans Aux bords du politique, un livre dont la première édition est parue en 1990. À ce moment-là, le philosophe s'intéressait surtout à la topographie métaphorique construite dans la pensée politique, c'est-à-dire à l'usage des métaphores spatiales, parmi lesquelles l'on trouve celle du bord. Presque trente ans plus tard, la réflexion s'est déplacée, par contre, au domaine de la fiction littéraire. Mon but dans cet article est de rapprocher ces deux moments de l'oeuvre de Rancière afin d'y trouver un arrière-plan commun à partir duquel continuer à penser le nouage du littéraire et du politique. Pour ce faire, je propose d'analyser quelques oeuvres littéraires écrites au fil des années 1990 (le moment clé autour duquel s'articule Aux bords du politique) dont les titres font référence à l'enjeu des bords o des débordements : le Journal du dehors et La vie extérieure d'Annie Ernaux, ainsi que le roman Vivir afuera, de l'écrivain argentin Rodolfo Fogwill. Quel imaginaire topographique mettent-elles en place ? Et quelle est la signification politique des métaphores spatiales dont elles se servent ? ; En una de sus obras más recientes, Los bordes de la ficción, Jacques Rancière retoma la cuestión de los límites y desbordamientos, que ya había examinado anteriormente en su libro En los bordes de lo político, cuya primera edición data de 1990. En aquel momento, al filósofo le interesaba sobre todo la topografía metafórica construida por el pensamiento político, es decir, el uso que este hacía de las metáforas espaciales, entre las cuales destaca la del borde. Casi treinta años más tarde, la reflexión se ha desplazado, en cambio, al ámbito de la ficción literaria. Mi objetivo en este artículo es el de hacer dialogar estos dos momentos de la obra de Rancière, con el fin de encontrar un trasfondo común a partir del cual seguir pensando la relación entre lo literario y lo político. Para ello, propongo analizar algunas obras literarias escritas en la década de los noventa (momento en torno al cual orbita En los bordes de lo político) cuyos títulos hacen referencia a la cuestión de los bordes o los desbordes: el Diario de afuera y La vida exterior de Annie Ernaux, y la novela Vivir afuera, del escritor argentino Rodolfo Fogwill. ¿Qué imaginario topográfico construyen y cuál es la significación política de las metáforas espaciales a las que recurren?

En una de sus obras más recientes, Los bordes de la ficción, Jacques Rancière retoma la cuestión de los límites y desbordamientos, que ya había examinado anteriormente en su libro En los bordes de lo político, cuya primera edición data de 1990. En aquel momento, al filósofo le interesaba sobre todo la topografía metafórica construida por el pensamiento político, es decir, el uso que este hacía de las metáforas espaciales, entre las cuales destaca la del borde. Casi treinta años más tarde, la reflexión se ha desplazado, en cambio, al ámbito de la ficción literaria. Mi objetivo en este artículo es el de hacer dialogar estos dos momentos de la obra de Rancière, con el fin de encontrar un trasfondo común a partir del cual seguir pensando la relación entre lo literario y lo político. Para ello, propongo analizar algunas obras literarias escritas en la década de los noventa (momento en torno al cual orbita En los bordes de lo político) cuyos títulos hacen referencia a la cuestión de los bordes o los desbordes: el Diario de afuera y La vida exterior de Annie Ernaux,y la novela Vivir afuera, del escritor argentino Rodolfo Fogwill. ¿Qué imaginario topográfico construyen y cuál es la significación política de las metáforas espaciales a las que recurren? ; Dans l'un de ses ouvrages les plus récents, Les Bords de la fiction, Jacques Rancière reprend la question des limites et des débordements, qu'il avait examinée auparavant dans Aux bords du politique, un livre dont la première édition est parue en 1990. À ce moment-là, le philosophe s'intéressait surtout à la topographie métaphorique construite dans la pensée politique, c'est-à-dire à l'usage des métaphores spatiales, parmi lesquelles l'on trouve celle du bord. Presque trente ans plus tard, la réflexion s'est déplacée, par contre, au domaine de la fiction littéraire. Mon but dans cet article est de rapprocher ces deux moments de l'œuvre de Rancière afin d'y trouver un arrière-plan commun à partir duquel continuer à penser le nouage du littéraire et du politique. Pour ce faire, je propose d'analyser quelques œuvres littéraires écrites au fil des années 1990 (le moment clé autour duquel s'articule Aux bords du politique) dont les titres font référence à l'enjeu des bords o des débordements : le Journal du dehors et La vie extérieure d'Annie Ernaux, ainsi que le roman Vivir afuera, de l'écrivain argentin Rodolfo Fogwill. Quel imaginaire topographique mettent-elles en place ? Et quelle est la signification politique des métaphores spatiales dont elles se servent ?

El presente trabajo explora las tareas de la investigación crítica, que de acuerdo con una lectura dialéctica negativa de la relación Rancière/Foucault, expresa la actualidad de la pregunta kantiana y la cuestión de la filosofía. ¿Qué es la crítica? ¿Para qué la filosofía? ¿Qué es pensar hoy? Ambas cuestiones sirven para desplegar lo núcleos tensores y afinidades que ambos filósofos articulan en torno a esa rigurosa e indócil experiencia reflexiva que denominamos filosofía y su campo privilegiado en el caso de los aparatos teórico-conceptuales de ambos, a saber: el objeto de lo político. ; This paper explores the main tasks of critical research, which according to a negative dialectial reading of Rancière/Foucault link, targets the actuality of Kant's question and the question of philosophy. What is Critique? Why Philosophy? What is Thinking today? This in order to deploy the central conflicts and affinities between the two philosophers, articulated within this rigorous and unruly reflective experience that we call philosophy and it s privileged field in the case of both theoretical and conceptual universes, namely: the object of politics.

The democratic leadership literature emphasises those leadership practices that involve dialogue and communication within the frame of reference of existing organizational structures, discourses and hierarchies. Our contribution is to problematise this approach to democracy from the perspective of the work of Jacques Rancière, which highlights the importance of dissensus, that is to say a breaking away from organizational structures and hierarchies. We argue that this allows us to conceptualise collective leadership in a postfoundational way that connects a critique of individual and organization-bound leadership to a democratic logic, in particular through Rancière's analysis of the myth of the murder of the shepherd. This also enables us to study radically disruptive, non-hierarchical and pre-dialogic dimensions of leadership that may destruct as well as construct. Two democratic leadership practices are outlined: contingent acts of leadership and the practice of radical contestation. Our argument is that both practices of democratic leadership can be deployed as radical ruptures and disruptions of organizational orders, beyond dialogue.