Suchergebnisse

Das politische Denken Jacques Rancières verspricht eine theoretische Auflehnung gegen die neoliberale Verwaltung des universalen Sachzwangs. Der Beitrag diskutiert seine Version einer radikalen Demokratietheorie aus der Perspektive der dialektischen Gesellschaftstheorie und -kritik im Anschluss an Adorno und untersucht sein Denken in Bezug auf die Feindbilder des dialektischen Denkens: Ontologie und Positivismus. Rancières Theorie radikaler Demokratie wird identifiziert als verdinglichtes Denken, das Konflikt als sozialanthropologische Konstante in einer positivistischen Ontologie des Sozialen theoretisch fixiert.

The following text emerges as a result of accepting the challenge that Jacques Ranciere's issued in one of his texts, where the French philosopher, echoing Jean Borreil's words in L'Artiste Roi, describes the philosophical situation today as the one that takes a stand against Plato. Therefore, the challenge consists of suggesting an interpretation of his political, pedagogical and artistic theory as the places of Ranciere's thought that develop within an implicit debate with and against Plato. ; El siguiente texto surge como consecuencia de aceptar un reto lanzado por el propio Jacques Rancière en unos de sus textos. En dicho texto, el filósofo francés, haciéndose eco de unas palabras de Jean Borreil en L'Artiste Roi, caracteriza la situación filosófica actual como aquella que se desarrolla posicionándose frente a Platón. La tarea que realizaremos en este texto consistirá en abordar la obra de Rancière desde este prisma, preguntándonos en qué medida elige a Platón contra Platón. El reto, por tanto, es proponer una lectura de su teoría política, pedagógica y artística como aquellos lugares del pensamiento rancierano en los que se desarrollan en un debate implícito con y contra Platón.

Tests and exams are more or less unquestioned parts of academic life. In his book on the "ignorant schoolmaster", the French educator Joseph Jacotot, Jacques Rancière argues for a radical critique of the disciplinary effects of these instruments of state education and thereby also rejects on anarchist grounds all progressive attempts of educational reform. In this early text, he already fully formulates the principle of "axiomatic equality", which will play a fundamental role in his later writings. My paper reconstructs Rancière's position, partly by tracing it back to its Foucauldian roots, and argues that although it is too spontaneist and thus voluntarist, Rancière's intervention poses an important challenge for every reflection on critical educational practice today.

"Tests and exams are more or less unquestioned parts of academic life. In his book on the 'ignorant schoolmaster', the French educator Joseph Jacotot, Jacques Rancière argues for a radical critique of the disciplinary effects of these instruments of state education and thereby also rejects on anarchist grounds all progressive attempts of educational reform. In this early text, he already fully formulates the principle of 'axiomatic equality', which will play a fundamental role in his later writings. The author's paper reconstructs Rancière's position, partly by tracing it back to its Foucauldian roots, and argues that although it is too spontaneist and thus voluntarist, Rancière's intervention poses an important challenge for every reflection on critical educational practice today." (author's abstract)