Suchergebnisse

Historicizing untimeliness / Kristin RossThe lessons of Jacques Rancière : knowledge and power after the storm / Alain Badiou -- Sophisticated continuities and historical discontinuities, or, why not protagoras? / Eric Méchoulan -- The classics and critical theory in postmodern France : the case of Jacques Rancière / Giuseppina Mecchia -- Rancière and metaphysics / Jean-Luc Nancy -- What is political philosophy? contextual notes / Etienne Balibar -- Rancière in South Carolina / Todd May -- Political agency and the ambivalence of the sensible / Yves Citton -- Staging equality : Rancière's theatrocracy and the limits of anarchic equality / Peter Hallward -- Rancière's leftism, or politics and its discontents / Bruno Bosteels -- Jacques Rancière's ethical turn and the thinking of discontents / Solange Guénoun -- The politics of aesthetics : political history and the hermeneutics of art / Gabriel Rockhill -- Cinema and its discontents / Tom Conley -- Politicizing art in Rancière and Deleuze : the case of postcolonial literature / Raji Vallury -- Impossible speech acts : Jacques Rancière's Erich Auerbach / Andrew parker -- Style indirect libre / James swenson -- The method of equality : an answer to some questions -- Jacques Rancière

Dieser Sammelband diskutiert aus einer politiktheoretischen Perspektive das Denken Jacques Rancières. Dabei widmen sich die Beiträge insbesondere dem Verhältnis von Demokratie, Herrschaft und Staatlichkeit. Aus unterschiedlichen Perspektiven identifizieren und erörtern sie zunächst zentrale theoretische Konzepte. Im Anschluss wird Rancières Denken über einen Vergleich mit anderen herrschafts- und staatskritischen Denker*innen des Politischen in einen dissensuellen Zwischenraum versetzt, um Verbindungslinien, Spannungen und Konvergenzen zwischen Rancières politischer Theorie und anderen demokratie- und politiktheoretischen Arbeiten des 20. und 21. Jahrhunderts herauszuarbeiten. Die Beiträge des Bandes konzentrieren sich hier auf messianische, republikanische, poststrukturalistische und deliberative Ansätze. In einem letzten Zugang unterziehen die Beiträge Rancières politisches Denken einer kritischen Lektüre durch queer-feministische, postkoloniale und anarchistische Theoretisierungen, um Leerstellen auszuleuchten und damit mit Rancière gegen Rancière zu denken. Mit Beiträgen von Marvin Dreiwes, Matthias Flatscher, Mareike Gebhardt, Johannes Haaf, Anastasiya Kasko, Alexander Kurunczi, Christian Leonhardt, Thomas Linpinsel, Niklas Plätzer, Kenneth Rösen, Luca Sagnotti, Sergej Seitz, Anna-Terese Steffner de Marco und Carolin Zieringer.

now discusses the chronic nature of my particular fragmented and unfinished path by Rancière's work, which I will organise on the basis of some of the images which, in my view, play an important role in his argument. I hope that this image album and the skewed speech from them can be useful for the discussion of the sense or political use of the images and, more generally, for the discussion of aesthetic/political relations. Clella Lacasa, M. (2011). The image policy in Jacques Rancière. RES Publica. 26: 91-109. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/51312 ; 91 109 26 ; now discusses the chronic nature of my particular fragmented and unfinished path by Rancière's work, which I will organise on the basis of some of the images which, in my view, play an important role in his argument. I hope that this image album and the skewed speech from them can be useful for the discussion of the sense or political use of the images and, more generally, for the discussion of aesthetic/political relations. Clella Lacasa, M. (2011). The image policy in Jacques Rancière. RES Publica. 26: 91-109. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/51312 ; Senia ; now discusses the chronic nature of my particular fragmented and unfinished path by Rancière's work, which I will organise on the basis of some of the images which, in my view, play an important role in his argument. I hope that this image album and the skewed speech from them can be useful for the discussion of the sense or political use of the images and, more generally, for the discussion of aesthetic/political relations. Clella Lacasa, M. (2011). The image policy in Jacques Rancière. RES Publica. 26: 91-109. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/51312 ; Someto hoy a discusión la crónica de mi particular recorrido fragmentario e inacabado por la obra de Rancière, que organizaré a partir algunas de las imágenes que, en mi opinión, juegan un papel importante en su argumenta ción. Espero que este álbum de imágenes y el discurso tramado a partir de ellas puedan ser de alguna utilidad para el debate acerca del sentido ...

Es handelt sich bei dem vorliegenden Buch um die erste umfassende Einführung zu Rancières ästhetischem Denken und seiner Relevanz für die Kunstpraxis. Jacques Rancière hat die Frage der Gleichheit in den Mittelpunkt der Kunstbetrachtung gestellt und damit international gerade an Kunsthochschulen Furore gemacht. Volkmar Mühleis widmet sich eingehend Rancières ästhetischem Denken und befragt es erstmals kritisch im Rahmen der Kunstpraxis. Dabei zeigt sich zum einen die besondere Qualität von Rancières Ansatz für den Kunstdiskurs – der stets die Freiheit, aber kaum ihre Bedingung, die Gleichheit, verhandelte –, zum andern aber auch seine Schwächen. So operiert Rancière mit einem medialen Begriff, der kaum den Anforderungen technologischer Kritik heutzutage standhält. Wenn er ästhetische Erfahrung in Anspruch nimmt, ohne zu klären, was Erfahrung hier im Einzelnen heißt, so verbleibt er seinem emanzipatorischen Gedankengut nach in einer rationalistischen Tradition. Mit Blick auf die Schriften von Bernard Stiegler, Bernhard Waldenfels und Käte Meyer-Drawe zeigt Volkmar Mühleis, wie diese besondere Qualität von Rancières ästhetischem Denken auf ganz andere Art die gegenwärtige Debatte bereichern kann.

The French philosopher Jacques Rancière has influenced disciplines from history and philosophy to political theory, literature, art history, and film studies. His research into nineteenth-century workers' archives, reflections on political equality, critique of the traditional division between intellectual and manual labor, and analysis of the place of literature, film, and art in modern society have all constituted major contributions to contemporary thought. In this collection, leading scholars in the fields of philosophy, literary theory, and cultural criticism engage Rancière's work, illuminating its originality, breadth, and rigor, as well as its place in current debates. They also explore the relationships between Rancière and the various authors and artists he has analyzed, ranging from Plato and Aristotle to Flaubert, Rossellini, Auerbach, Bourdieu, and Deleuze. The contributors to this collection do not simply elucidate Rancière's project; they also critically respond to it from their own perspectives. They consider the theorist's engagement with the writing of history, with institutional and narrative constructions of time, and with the ways that individuals and communities can disturb or reconfigure what he has called the "distribution of the sensible." They examine his unique conception of politics as the disruption of the established distribution of bodies and roles in the social order, and they elucidate his novel account of the relationship between aesthetics and politics by exploring his astute analyses of literature and the visual arts. In the collection's final essay, Rancière addresses some of the questions raised by the other contributors and returns to his early work to provide a retrospective account of the fundamental stakes of his project. Contributors. Alain Badiou, Étienne Balibar, Bruno Bosteels, Yves Citton, Tom Conley, Solange Guénoun, Peter Hallward, Todd May, Eric Méchoulan, Giuseppina Mecchia, Jean-Luc Nancy, Andrew Parker, Jacques Rancière, Gabriel Rockhill, Kristin Ross, James Swenson, Rajeshwari Vallury, Philip Watts

12 The Actuality of The Ignorant Schoolmaster -- With Andrea Benvenuto, Laurence Cornu and Patrice Vermeren Le Télémaque, 2005 -- 13 Losing Too Is Still Ours: An Interview about the Thwarted Politics of Literature -- With Martin Jalbert Cahiers littéraires Contre-jour, 2005 -- 14 The Indecisive Affect -- With Patrice Blouin, Élie During and Dork Zabunyan Critique, 2005 -- 15 The New Anti-Democratic Discourse -- With Amador Fernández-Savater Archipélago, 2006 -- 16 Art of the Possible -- With Fulvia Carnevale and John Kelsey Artforum, 2007 -- 17 Another Type of Universality

A partir de un recorrido por las imágenes que han jugado un papel relevante en la obra de J. Rancière y, en particular, de un grupo de imágenes en que se representa el rostro o el cuerpo de la mujer, se establece una comparación entre las estéticas de J. Rancière y J. F. Lyotard. Recurriendo al estudio sobre la imaginación apocalíptica de M. Jay y a las críticas de Rancière a la concepción apocalíptica del tiempo se contraponen dos imágenes enfrentadas de una misma figura femenina desdoblada. Estas dos visiones del cuerpo de la mujer, dos versiones de la figura-madre, corresponden a dos concepciones distintas de la política de las imágenes. ; Taking as a starting point the images that have played an outstanding role in J. Rancière's work, especially in a group of images where the woman's face or body is portrayed, a comparison is drawn between the aesthetics of J. Rancière and J. F. Lyotard. If we turn to M. Jay's study about apocalyptic imagination and Rancière's critique to the apocalyptic concept of time, we find that two images in conflict of the same split female figure are opposed. These two visions of the woman's body, two versions of the mother figure, correspond to two different concepts of the politics of image.