Judicial Reform
In: Jiang Huiling (Thomas Stutsman trans.), Judicial Reform, in CHINA'S JOURNEY TOWARD THE RULE OF LAW (Cai Dingjian & Wang Chenguang eds., 2010)
4904 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Jiang Huiling (Thomas Stutsman trans.), Judicial Reform, in CHINA'S JOURNEY TOWARD THE RULE OF LAW (Cai Dingjian & Wang Chenguang eds., 2010)
SSRN
Judicial reform is currently a hotly debated topic in Brazil. The call for reform of the Brazilian judiciary, however, is anything but new. The Brazilian judiciary has been in a state of crisis since colonial days, and despite numerous attempts at reform, it remains in crisis. With the privatization of Brazil's state-owned enterprises, the growth of Mercosur, the urgent need to make Brazilian firms competitive in world markets, the emphasis upon attracting foreign investment, and the opening of Brazil's economy to foreign competition, Brazilian political leadership began to focus upon ways to reform Brazil's malfunctioning judicial system. Unfortunately, the proposed reforms are unlikely to cure the underlying problems of Brazil's judiciary, which are deeply embedded in a complex of constitutional, procedural, structural, economic, political, and cultural problems that are likely to be resolved, if at all, only over a period of many years.
BASE
In: Stanford law & policy review, Band 13, Heft 1, S. 119-180
ISSN: 1044-4386
President Nixon has several times in the recent past publicly recognized a growing national attitude-the American people, as a class, are losing confidence in the ability of their governments to govern. And this unfortunate lack, or at least diminution of confidence, is nowhere more evident than in the way the average citizen views the courts of this country.
BASE
SSRN
In: (2014) Akungba Law Journal, pp. 67-90
SSRN
In: State Government: journal of state affairs, Band 22, S. 232-236
ISSN: 0039-0097
In: American political science review, Band 9, Heft 3, S. 529-542
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: American political science review, Band 9, S. 529-542
ISSN: 0003-0554
In: Demokratizatsiya: the journal of post-Soviet democratization, Band 30, Heft 4, S. 453-461
ISSN: 1940-4603
World Affairs Online
In: Studies of the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law volume 1
In: Nomos eLibrary
In: Internationales Recht
Das Großherzogtum Luxemburg strebt in der laufenden Legislaturperiode eine weitreichende Reform der Justizorganisation an. Mit dem "Conseil national de la Justice" und dem "Cour suprême" werden neue Institutionen geschaffen, die eine Diskussion um Aufgaben, Verantwortung und Unabhängigkeit der Justizorgane erforderlich machen. Der Tagungsband "Judicial Reforms in Luxembourg and Europe" leistet einen Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion. Behandelt werden Fragen zu Verfassungsrecht und Zugang zum Recht vor dem Hintergrund der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention. Besonderes Augenmerk liegt auf den prozessualen Implikationen der vorgesehenen Institutionen. Erfahrungen aus den Mitgliedstaaten werden rechtsvergleichend in den Blick genommen.Mit Beiträgen von: Remo Caponi, Georgios Dimitropoulos, Rusen Ergec, Leny de Groot-van Leeuwen, Burkhard Hess, Luc Heuschling, Sevérine Menétrey, Christos Rozakis, Anja Seibert-Fohr, Marcel Storme, Sophie Turenne, Stefaan Voet
SSRN
Working paper
In: Policy studies journal: the journal of the Policy Studies Organization, Band 11, Heft 4, S. 712-714
ISSN: 1541-0072
Book Reviewed in this articlePhilip L. Dubois (editor) The Analysis of Judicial Reform (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books; D.C. Heath and Company, 1982); 221 pp.; ISBN 0‐669‐04480‐6; $23.95.Philip L. Dubois (editor) The Politics of Judicial Reform (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books; D.C. Heath and Company, 1982); 187 pp.; ISBN 0‐669‐04478‐4; $24.95 cloth.
Blog: Verfassungsblog
On September 11, 2024, the Senate of Mexico approved the controversial judicial reform. The ruling party, MORENA, achieved adopting the judicial reform thanks to a qualified majority in Congress and Senate. In this blogpost, we show that the way in which the judiciary reform was passed in the Senate cannot be considered as "expressing the will of the people". We suggest that the very way in which the Senate vote came to pass is undermining one main justification of the judiciary reform, namely that it will lead to a judiciary "of the people".