Suchergebnisse

The position of victims on international criminal scene has considerably progressed since the first international militaries tribunals were created in 1945. Even if the victims don't properly have the status of « parties » in international criminal trial, their participation in trial is henceforth a guarantee, with substantial rights. The scale of these rights, at different steps of the procedure, clarifies the way the international criminal judge interpreted the proportional dispositions of international positive laws. The role of victims is more, at the first time, to « confirm » international « public action » than exercise themselves this action to establish accused guilty or not. Their role is finally reinforced during the presentation of civil claims, by supplementary way of intervention, and more widely in search of full satisfaction. At that moment, victims become real « civil parties » with full international juridical capacity to claim their right. So, because of their actions, the victims appear in a "double" posture, vindicatory (repression) and repairing (compensation). The targeted and achieved aim was to show today what was the place of the victims in front of the international penal jurisdictions. ; La position des victimes sur la scène pénale internationale a considérablement évolué depuis la mise en place des tous premiers tribunaux militaires internationaux en 1945. Même si les victimes n'ont pas, à proprement parler, le statut de « partie » au procès pénal international, leur participation au procès est désormais une garantie, avec des droits substantiels. L'étendue de ces droits, aux différentes phases de la procédure, clarifie la manière dont les dispositions correspondantes du droit positif international sont interprétées par le juge pénal international. La fonction des victimes tient, dans un premier temps, davantage à « corroborer l'action publique » internationale qu'à pouvoir déclencher par elles-mêmes cette action destinée à établir la culpabilité ou non des personnes, objets du ...

The position of victims on international criminal scene has considerably progressed since the first international militaries tribunals were created in 1945. Even if the victims don't properly have the status of « parties » in international criminal trial, their participation in trial is henceforth a guarantee, with substantial rights. The scale of these rights, at different steps of the procedure, clarifies the way the international criminal judge interpreted the proportional dispositions of international positive laws. The role of victims is more, at the first time, to « confirm » international « public action » than exercise themselves this action to establish accused guilty or not. Their role is finally reinforced during the presentation of civil claims, by supplementary way of intervention, and more widely in search of full satisfaction. At that moment, victims become real « civil parties » with full international juridical capacity to claim their right. So, because of their actions, the victims appear in a "double" posture, vindicatory (repression) and repairing (compensation). The targeted and achieved aim was to show today what was the place of the victims in front of the international penal jurisdictions. ; La position des victimes sur la scène pénale internationale a considérablement évolué depuis la mise en place des tous premiers tribunaux militaires internationaux en 1945. Même si les victimes n'ont pas, à proprement parler, le statut de « partie » au procès pénal international, leur participation au procès est désormais une garantie, avec des droits substantiels. L'étendue de ces droits, aux différentes phases de la procédure, clarifie la manière dont les dispositions correspondantes du droit positif international sont interprétées par le juge pénal international. La fonction des victimes tient, dans un premier temps, davantage à « corroborer l'action publique » internationale qu'à pouvoir déclencher par elles-mêmes cette action destinée à établir la culpabilité ou non des personnes, objets du ...

The position of victims on international criminal scene has considerably progressed since the first international militaries tribunals were created in 1945. Even if the victims don't properly have the status of « parties » in international criminal trial, their participation in trial is henceforth a guarantee, with substantial rights. The scale of these rights, at different steps of the procedure, clarifies the way the international criminal judge interpreted the proportional dispositions of international positive laws. The role of victims is more, at the first time, to « confirm » international « public action » than exercise themselves this action to establish accused guilty or not. Their role is finally reinforced during the presentation of civil claims, by supplementary way of intervention, and more widely in search of full satisfaction. At that moment, victims become real « civil parties » with full international juridical capacity to claim their right. So, because of their actions, the victims appear in a "double" posture, vindicatory (repression) and repairing (compensation). The targeted and achieved aim was to show today what was the place of the victims in front of the international penal jurisdictions. ; La position des victimes sur la scène pénale internationale a considérablement évolué depuis la mise en place des tous premiers tribunaux militaires internationaux en 1945. Même si les victimes n'ont pas, à proprement parler, le statut de « partie » au procès pénal international, leur participation au procès est désormais une garantie, avec des droits substantiels. L'étendue de ces droits, aux différentes phases de la procédure, clarifie la manière dont les dispositions correspondantes du droit positif international sont interprétées par le juge pénal international. La fonction des victimes tient, dans un premier temps, davantage à « corroborer l'action publique » internationale qu'à pouvoir déclencher par elles-mêmes cette action destinée à établir la culpabilité ou non des personnes, objets du ...

The ITLOS Yearbook 2017 provides information on the composition, jurisdiction, procedure and organization of the Tribunal and reports on its judicial activities in 2017, in particular on the Judgment delivered by the Special Chamber in Case No. 23. The Yearbook is prepared by the Registry of the Tribunal. Le TIDM Annuaire 2017 fournit des informations essentielles concernant la composition, la compétence, la procédure et l'organisation du Tribunal. Il donne également un aperçu des activités judiciaires du Tribunal au cours de l'année 2017, en particulier en ce qui concerne l'arrêt rendu par la Chambre spéciale dans l'affaire no. 23. L' Annuaire est rédigé par le Greffe du Tribunal

The application of the criminal international jurisdiction in the Pinochet case left an important precedent in the area of the fight against impunity, as shown by the procedure brought into play by the Spanish Audiencia Nacional and also by the Cour d'Assises of Paris, with the enforcement of the passive personality principle. Actually, with the international arrest warrant for extradition issued by the Spanish judicial authorities, which made possible the arrest of Pinochet in London; the denial of his immunity by the House of Lords and the judgment in absentia in France of his military organization, the international law has a before and an after. The international criminal law is under lined as the juridical foundation of the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the legal authorities of a state. It allows the application as well of the universal jurisdiction principle as of the passible personality principle, both used, in this precise case, with the objective to exercise an international justice. ; L'application de la compétence internationale pénale dans l'affaire Pinochet à laissé un précédent important dans le domaine de la lutte contre l'impunité, comme le démontre la procédure mise en œuvre par l'Audiencia Nacional d'Espagne, ainsi que par la Cour d'Assises de Paris avec application du principe de la personnalité passive. En effet, avec le mandat d'arrêt international aux fins d'extradition émis par les autorités judiciaires espagnols, qui a permis l'arrestation de Pinochet à Londres, la négation de son immunité par la chambre des Lords et le jugement par défaut en France de son administration militaire, le droit international connait un avant et in après. Le droit international pénal est ainsi mis en exergue en tant que fondement juridique de la compétence extra-territoriale des Etats. Il permet d'utiliser tant le principe de la compétence universelle que celui. Il permet d'utiliser tant le principe de la compétence universelle que celui de la personnalité passive, toutes deux appliquées, dans cette ...

The establishment of exclusive jurisdiction rules in civil and commercial matters is widely accepted in comparative private international law. These rules are generally presented as being based on the implication of State sovereignty, either because its territory is physically involved or because the dispute concerns the functioning of the State public services. In addition to these legal arguments there is a series of practical considerations that support the justification of the court's exclusive jurisdiction, such as the necessary coincidence between the forum and the jus. However, an open question is whether the arguments, put forward to explain the adoption of these rules of jurisdiction, are really convincing, especially in a highly integrated judicial area, based on mutual trust and cooperation, such as the European Union. The rationality of exclusive fora is indeed criticized in some of the concerned areas, since the preponderance of the state element in a matter does not require the adoption of an exclusive jurisdiction rule. Moreover, the rules on exclusive jurisdiction may give rise to practical problems when implemented, and we are witnessing a profound change, at European level, of the exclusive forum provided in intellectual property matters. Under these conditions, it is appropriate to question the future and even the relevance of the survival of these rules. An alternative system of jurisdiction, based on cooperation and fluid dialogue between judges, is conceivable in the European judicial area, making it possible to avoid the court's exclusive jurisdiction in certain targeted matters. ; La consécration des règles de compétence exclusive en matière civile et commerciale est largement admise en droit international privé comparé. Elles sont généralement présentées comme étant fondées sur l'implication de la souveraineté de l'État, soit parce que son territoire est physiquement en cause soit parce que le litige concerne le fonctionnement des services publics de l'État. À ces arguments juridiques, ...

The establishment of exclusive jurisdiction rules in civil and commercial matters is widely accepted in comparative private international law. These rules are generally presented as being based on the implication of State sovereignty, either because its territory is physically involved or because the dispute concerns the functioning of the State public services. In addition to these legal arguments there is a series of practical considerations that support the justification of the court's exclusive jurisdiction, such as the necessary coincidence between the forum and the jus. However, an open question is whether the arguments, put forward to explain the adoption of these rules of jurisdiction, are really convincing, especially in a highly integrated judicial area, based on mutual trust and cooperation, such as the European Union. The rationality of exclusive fora is indeed criticized in some of the concerned areas, since the preponderance of the state element in a matter does not require the adoption of an exclusive jurisdiction rule. Moreover, the rules on exclusive jurisdiction may give rise to practical problems when implemented, and we are witnessing a profound change, at European level, of the exclusive forum provided in intellectual property matters. Under these conditions, it is appropriate to question the future and even the relevance of the survival of these rules. An alternative system of jurisdiction, based on cooperation and fluid dialogue between judges, is conceivable in the European judicial area, making it possible to avoid the court's exclusive jurisdiction in certain targeted matters. ; La consécration des règles de compétence exclusive en matière civile et commerciale est largement admise en droit international privé comparé. Elles sont généralement présentées comme étant fondées sur l'implication de la souveraineté de l'État, soit parce que son territoire est physiquement en cause soit parce que le litige concerne le fonctionnement des services publics de l'État. À ces arguments juridiques, ...

The establishment of exclusive jurisdiction rules in civil and commercial matters is widely accepted in comparative private international law. These rules are generally presented as being based on the implication of State sovereignty, either because its territory is physically involved or because the dispute concerns the functioning of the State public services. In addition to these legal arguments there is a series of practical considerations that support the justification of the court's exclusive jurisdiction, such as the necessary coincidence between the forum and the jus. However, an open question is whether the arguments, put forward to explain the adoption of these rules of jurisdiction, are really convincing, especially in a highly integrated judicial area, based on mutual trust and cooperation, such as the European Union. The rationality of exclusive fora is indeed criticized in some of the concerned areas, since the preponderance of the state element in a matter does not require the adoption of an exclusive jurisdiction rule. Moreover, the rules on exclusive jurisdiction may give rise to practical problems when implemented, and we are witnessing a profound change, at European level, of the exclusive forum provided in intellectual property matters. Under these conditions, it is appropriate to question the future and even the relevance of the survival of these rules. An alternative system of jurisdiction, based on cooperation and fluid dialogue between judges, is conceivable in the European judicial area, making it possible to avoid the court's exclusive jurisdiction in certain targeted matters. ; La consécration des règles de compétence exclusive en matière civile et commerciale est largement admise en droit international privé comparé. Elles sont généralement présentées comme étant fondées sur l'implication de la souveraineté de l'État, soit parce que son territoire est physiquement en cause soit parce que le litige concerne le fonctionnement des services publics de l'État. À ces arguments juridiques, ...

This paper gives an overview of the new rules introduced by the Code of Private International Law (Act of 16 July 2004) in the field of jurisdiction (when do Belgian courts have jurisdiction) and recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. ; Cette contribution fait le point sur les règles introduites par le Code de droit international privé (Loi du 16 juillet 2004) à propos des règles de compétence internationale (tant générales que spéciales) et du statut des jugements étrangers (reconnaissance et exécution des jugements étrangers)

The ITLOS Yearbook 2021 provides information on the composition, jurisdiction, procedure and organization of the Tribunal and reports on its judicial activities in 2021, in particular concerning Cases Nos. 28 and 29. The Yearbook is prepared by the Registry of the Tribunal. Le TIDM Annuaire 2021 fournit des informations sur la composition, la compétence, la procédure et l'organisation du Tribunal et rend compte des activités judiciaires de celui-ci au cours de l'année 2021, en particulier en ce qui concerne les affaires Nos. 28 et 29. L' Annuaire est préparé par le Greffe du Tribunal

Preliminary Material -- Introduction /Philippe Gautier -- Introduction /Philippe Gautier -- Opening Statement of the President of the Tribunal, Judge Vladimir Golitsyn -- The Tribunal's Jurisprudence and Its Contribution to the Rule of Law /David Anderson -- The Tribunal's Jurisprudence and Its Contribution to the Rule of Law /José Luís Jesus -- The Precautionary Approach in the Advisory Opinion Concerning the Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area /Elsa Kelly -- The Tribunal's Jurisprudence and Its Contribution to the Rule of Law /Jin-Hyun Paik -- The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and the Rule of Law /Tullio Treves -- The Contribution of the Tribunal to the Progressive Development of International Law /Shunji Yanai -- The Elaboration of Due Diligence Obligations as a Mechanism to Ensure Compliance with International Legal Obligations by Private Actors /Doris König -- The Contribution of the Tribunal to the Progressive Development of International Law /Francisco Orrego Vicuña -- The Principle of Due Regard /Bernard H. Oxman -- The Contribution of the Tribunal to the Progressive Development of International Law /Tullio Scovazzi -- The Impacts of the Tribunal's Jurisprudence on the Development of International Law /Yoshifumi Tanaka -- The Contribution of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea to the Progressive Development of International Law /Peter Tomka -- The Tribunal and the Rule of Law /Alan Boyle -- La contribution du Tribunal international du droit de la mer au développement du droit international général – les dix dernières années /Alain Pellet -- The Indispensable Contributions of the Tribunal: A Practitioner's View /Paul S. Reichler -- Understanding the Advisory Jurisdiction of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea /Michael Wood -- L'amélioration des méthodes de travail de la justice internationale – Le point de vue de la Cour internationale de Justice /Ronny Abraham -- L'amélioration des méthodes de travail du Tribunal international du droit de la mer /Joseph Akl -- The efta Court's Working Methods /Carl Baudenbacher -- L'amélioration des méthodes de travail de la justice internationale /Jean-Pierre Cot -- Improving Working Methods in International Adjudication /Albert J. Hoffmann -- L'amélioration des méthodes de travail de la justice internationale /Tafsir Malick Ndiaye -- Programme of the Symposium 5–6 October 2016 -- Programme du colloque 5–6 Octobre 2016 -- List of Speakers -- Liste des intervenants -- List of Participants/Liste des participants -- Index.

Mode of access: Internet. ; French, English, German, Italian. ; "Servant d'organe à l'International law association."

Intro; New Challenges to International Law: A View from The Hague; Copyright; Table of Contents; Introduction; Compulsory Jurisdiction of the Court under the Optional Clause; The Hague Academy of International Law and the Development of the Settlement of Disputes as a Global Mechanism; The Constitutional Role of the ICJ within the UN System; Mediation as an Alternative for International Dispute Settlement; Vers une nouvelle philosophie pour la justice pénale internationale; What Is There to Find for a Criminal Lawyer in the Peace Palace?; The PCA, the Hague Courts and the Yukos case

3 Applying International Investment Law to Disputed Maritime Zones: A Case Study of the Falklands (Malvinas)4 The Falklands/Malvinas and China in 1982 and Today: Some Legal and Diplomatic Observations; International Criminal Law; 5 Risky Business: Witnesses and Africa's ICC Withdrawal; 6 The (In)Admissibility of Unlawfully Obtained Evidence at the International Criminal Court; International Trade Law; 7 The Legal Consequences of Brexit from an International Economic Law Perspective; About the Editorial Board