This article deals with the issues of regulation of property relations of spouses in private international law. The article deals with the conflict issues of marriage, as well as the contractual regime of a property of spouses. The article reveals the content of the Minsk and Chisinau conventions on property relations between spouses. In particular, the conventions say that the property relations between spouses are determined by the legislation of the Contracting Party in whose territory they live together. If the husband lives in one Contracting State and the wife in the other and both have the same nationality, the law of the country of which they are nationals governs their property relations. Attention is paid to bilateral agreements on legal assistance to States in the field of property relations between spouses. For example, such an agreement exists between Russia and Estonia, and it helps to resolve various property issues between spouses. The domestic legislation of different States regulates the issue of determining the regime of matrimonial property in different ways. For example, in the States of the Anglo-Saxon legal system and in most Muslim countries there is only a regime of separate property. On the contrary, in the States of the Romano-German legal system, preference is given to the regime of the common property of spouses, and it is possible to establish a different regime of property relations by agreement of the spouses. According to this principle, and developing family law in Russia.
The relevance of the topic of a scientific article is related to the frequent cases in practice when there is a dispute over the application of the law of a particular state. With the help of the analysis of family law and private international law, a circle of subjects of legal relations is established that is connected with maintenance obligations complicated by a foreign element. In modern times there are many problems, in particular, the consequences of the dissolution of a marriage between spouses (one of whom is a foreign citizen) in the presence of minor children are poorly regulated internationally. The main problem in resolving issues related to alimony relations is the definition of applicable law. That is the law of which country (the right of citizenship of the husband's state or the right of citizenship of the wife's state) will be applied to resolve the dispute. In this paper, we will consider existing problems and offer our own vision of ways to solve such problems.
Russian scientists attach great importance to one of the fundamental principles of private international law – the principle of the closest connection. The concept of the closest connection was developed in England on the basis of case law, the rules of which were created by judges in court decisions on specific cases. The legislator has included the principle of closest connection to the civil code, however, in light of the changes it made in the reforms of 2013, the closest connection principle was assigned a secondary role in relation to the principle of characteristic performance. The main purpose of the principle of the closest connection is to find the law and order that can most effectively regulate cross-border relations. The court will have to determine the will of the parties to the contractual relationship, aimed at choosing the right. Therefore, a close relationship is established based on the court's assumption of what right the parties would have chosen if they had considered this issue. The principle of the closest connection, in connection with this approach, often loses its independent significance. Article 1187 of the civil code of the Russian Federation does not specify the conditions of its application, as well as the scope of its action. For this reason, the category of the closest relationship is universal and applies regardless of the nature of the cross-border civil relationship. Russian legislation does not have clear criteria for determining the closest relationship, which may lead to a subjective decision by the court. In this regard, the study of problems related to the application of the principle of the closest connection in judicial practice is undoubtedly relevant.
In the article there is given a general overview of the sources of the international sport law, which is a new dynamically developing branch of law. The author underlines that international sport law unites norms of international law and national legislation regulating sport relations of international nature.
In the article the problems of action of the inherited law are analysed on territories, having litigions legal status. Taking in accodians positions of international law documents, legislation of Ukraine and Russian Federation, the questions of realization and defence of the inherited rights are lighted up. Since March, 2014 in Ukraine because of action of aggressive factors of external and internal character there are territorial changes. In composition Ukraine is territory with litigions status. It above all things is republic Crimea and Sevastopol, separate districts of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions of Ukraine. An author analyses the problems of modern legal status of ARK and Sevastopol. In the field of civil law there was a conflict of Russian and Ukrainian jurisdictions. It negatively will affect property turn, inherited rights. It registers in the article, that annexation of Crimea violates international agreements and norms of international. Including in the complement of RF of Crimea and Sevastopol did not get neither international nor foreign confession, accordingly for other countries and their jurisdictions, including in the field of the inherited right, application on these territories of the Russian legislation will not have law consequences, including in part of relations of property and inheritance. At the same time, on territory of Crimea in certain will be used inherited rights 2 for Ukraine, that also found a reflection in the article. In the case of opening of inheritance to March, 16 of 2014 subject in any case to application civil legislation of Ukraine. ; Проанализированы проблемы действия наследственного закона на территориях, имеющих спорный правовой статус. С учетом положений международно-правовых документов, законодательства Украины и Российской Федерации освещены вопросы осуществления и защиты наследственных прав ; Проаналізовано проблеми дії спадкового закону на територіях, що мають спірний правовий статус. З урахуванням положень міжнародно-правових документів, законодавства України та Російської Федерації висвітлено проблеми реалізації і захисту спадкових прав
In the article the problems of action of the inherited law are analysed on territories, having litigions legal status. Taking in accodians positions of international law documents, legislation of Ukraine and Russian Federation, the questions of realization and defence of the inherited rights are lighted up. Since March, 2014 in Ukraine because of action of aggressive factors of external and internal character there are territorial changes. In composition Ukraine is territory with litigions status. It above all things is republic Crimea and Sevastopol, separate districts of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions of Ukraine. An author analyses the problems of modern legal status of ARK and Sevastopol. In the field of civil law there was a conflict of Russian and Ukrainian jurisdictions. It negatively will affect property turn, inherited rights. It registers in the article, that annexation of Crimea violates international agreements and norms of international. Including in the complement of RF of Crimea and Sevastopol did not get neither international nor foreign confession, accordingly for other countries and their jurisdictions, including in the field of the inherited right, application on these territories of the Russian legislation will not have law consequences, including in part of relations of property and inheritance. At the same time, on territory of Crimea in certain will be used inherited rights 2 for Ukraine, that also found a reflection in the article. In the case of opening of inheritance to March, 16 of 2014 subject in any case to application civil legislation of Ukraine. ; Проанализированы проблемы действия наследственного закона на территориях, имеющих спорный правовой статус. С учетом положений международно-правовых документов, законодательства Украины и Российской Федерации освещены вопросы осуществления и защиты наследственных прав ; Проаналізовано проблеми дії спадкового закону на територіях, що мають спірний правовий статус. З урахуванням положень міжнародно-правових документів, законодавства України та Російської Федерації висвітлено проблеми реалізації і захисту спадкових прав
In the article the problems of action of the inherited law are analysed on territories, having litigions legal status. Taking in accodians positions of international law documents, legislation of Ukraine and Russian Federation, the questions of realization and defence of the inherited rights are lighted up. Since March, 2014 in Ukraine because of action of aggressive factors of external and internal character there are territorial changes. In composition Ukraine is territory with litigions status. It above all things is republic Crimea and Sevastopol, separate districts of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions of Ukraine. An author analyses the problems of modern legal status of ARK and Sevastopol. In the field of civil law there was a conflict of Russian and Ukrainian jurisdictions. It negatively will affect property turn, inherited rights. It registers in the article, that annexation of Crimea violates international agreements and norms of international. Including in the complement of RF of Crimea and Sevastopol did not get neither international nor foreign confession, accordingly for other countries and their jurisdictions, including in the field of the inherited right, application on these territories of the Russian legislation will not have law consequences, including in part of relations of property and inheritance. At the same time, on territory of Crimea in certain will be used inherited rights 2 for Ukraine, that also found a reflection in the article. In the case of opening of inheritance to March, 16 of 2014 subject in any case to application civil legislation of Ukraine. ; Проанализированы проблемы действия наследственного закона на территориях, имеющих спорный правовой статус. С учетом положений международно-правовых документов, законодательства Украины и Российской Федерации освещены вопросы осуществления и защиты наследственных прав ; Проаналізовано проблеми дії спадкового закону на територіях, що мають спірний правовий статус. З урахуванням положень міжнародно-правових документів, законодавства України та Російської Федерації висвітлено проблеми реалізації і захисту спадкових прав
Civil law States that the legal capacity of individuals is defined as the ability of the individual to have rights and obligations. This legal category arises from birth and ceases with death, it characterizes a person as a living being and does not depend on age and health. However, it is necessary to pay attention to the fact that it can be limited by a court decision, in particular in criminal proceedings it can be expressed in deprivation of the right to engage in certain activities, to occupy certain positions. The article reveals the content of legal capacity in private international law, the basic powers included in the legal capacity, in particular, the right to a name, its use and protection, analyzes the foreign legislation concerning the procedure of recognition as missing and the Declaration of a person as dead. The article deals with the conflict issues arising in the foreign and Russian legislation in the regulation of relations included in the content of legal capacity, the study of international legislation characterizing the legal status of the person.
Раздел "Международное право" ; Среди ученых нет однозначного мнения относительно места таможенного права в правовой системе. Под таможенным правом понимают институт административного права, подотрасль административного права, самостоятельную комплексную отрасль административного права либо комплексную отрасль законодательства. Исследование правовой природы показывает, что в современном таможенном праве можно выделить наднациональную (международную) и национальную части. Наднациональная часть включает нормы Таможенного кодекса таможенного союза и иных нормативных актов, которые принимаются международными договорами. Нормы национальной части принимаются законодательными актами страны. Таким образом, таможенное право — комплексная отрасль права, регулирующая общественные отношения в сфере перемещения товаров через таможенную границу Таможенного союза. = Scientists differ in their opinions regarding the place of customs law in the legal system. Customs law is understood as the institute of administrative law, a sub-branch of administrative law, a separate complex branch of administrative law or a complex branch of legislation. The research of its legal nature shows that it is possible to distinguish supranational (international) and national parts within the contemporary customs law. The supranational part includes the Customs Code norms of the Customs Union and other legal acts which are adopted by international treaties. The norms included into the national part are adopted by legislative acts of the country. Thereby, customs law is a complex branch of law regulating public relations in the sphere of movement of goods across the customs border of the Customs Union.
In this article, the author analyzes the issues of bringing criminal norms in accordance with the international treaties of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
In this article, the author analyzes the issues of bringing criminal norms in accordance with the international treaties of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
In the article critical view on the reform of procedural legislation is presented. The issue about the criteria on the basis of which the plaintiffs and the court solve the question about the procedural order of adjustment is viewed; the conclusion about the absence of appropriate criteria is made. The consequences of misqualification of procedural order are viewed: rejecting of acceptance of legal claim or the termination of proceedings in case resulting in the unconditional refusing in the defense of right. The newest judicial practice that gave rise to the tendency of successive breakdowns of courts in hearing of cases as well as in the process of Administrative Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation is analyzed. The addition of norms about the refusal in accepting (administrative) bill of complaint and on termination of proceedings in case of proactive position of court is suggested. ; В статье представлен критический взгляд на реформу процессуального законодательства. Изучается вопрос о критериях, на основании которых истцами и судом решается вопрос о процессуальном порядке рассмотрения спора, сделан вывод об отсутствии надлежащего критерия. Рассматриваются последствия неверного определения процессуального порядка: отказ в принятии искового заявления или прекращение производства по делу, влекущие безоговорочный отказ в защите права. Анализируется новейшая судебная практика, породившая тенденцию последовательного отказа судами в рассмотрении дел и в порядке КАС РФ, и ГПК РФ. Предлагается дополнение норм об отказе в принятии (административного) искового заявления и о прекращении производства по делу проактивной позицией суда.
Раздел I «Актуальные проблемы международного публичного права» ; Настоящая статья посвящена вопросам демократии в современной западной международно-правовой доктрине. В первой части статьи предлагается обзор международно-правовых теорий демократии, вторая часть посвящена взглядам на роль международного гражданского общества в решении проблемы демократического дефицита на международном уровне, в третьей части освещены исследования международного правления. = Present article analyzes the issues of democracy in contemporary Western international law doctrine. Firstly the theories of democracy in international law are discussed, than presented are views on the role of international civil society in the elimination of the democratic deficit at the international level and finally international governance studies are briefed.
The subject of the research is the peculiarities of the implementation of international law in national legal systems, the law enforcement practice of the implementation of international legal obligations of the state, doctrinal approaches to the interaction of the norms of international and domestic law. The purpose of the article is to confirm or disprove the hypothesis that the limits, forms and methods of the ex-ante intrusion of international law into the national legal system are determined not only as a result of the agreed will of States, but also against such will, under the influence of the interests of individual States or their political blocs that occupy a dominant position in an international organization. Methodology. The authors use such general theoretical and specific scientific methods as comparative analysis, generalization, interpretation and classification as well as systemic analysis and formal logical methods. The main results. The forms and methods of intrusion of international law into the legal systems are diversified. International law is not limited to interstate relations. Global processes require the development of new scientific approaches to understanding the processes of intrusion of international law into the legal systems of States. These processes require the study of the forms and methods of the impact of international law and international institutions on the national legal order. States are sometimes forced to implement measures developed in the international implementation mechanism (due to the need for international financial assistance as well as the inability to single-handedly defeat internal corruption, create a favorable international image, etc.). The international legal invasion exist already ex – post through the decisions of international judicial bodies or the assertive recommendations of international organizations. Their demands are made not just to comply with international obligations, but to change national legislation. The implementation of the norms of international law in national legal systems should be carried out at the domestic level just as much as it is necessary to fulfill these international obligations. The law enforcement practice in the state is based solely on national principles of law, and it is unacceptable to comply with the requirements from the outside to change them from the point of view of the independence of the state. It is the exclusive right of each State to determine the content of acts of interpretation of international bodies in relation to the decisions and actions of specific States from the point of view of their national interests. We prove that every state has the important right to determine the limits of the invasion of international law in their national legal system: the contents of implementing legislation; the completeness of implementation of the decisions and recommendations of international bodies and courts; the recognition of the extraterritorial validity of foreign law and forms of its implementation. Conclusions. The fundamental principle of international law- pacta sunt servanda – is transforming into a practical imperative – national legislation must change. This is due to the recognition of the jurisdiction of international judicial bodies. This is due to the extraterritorial effect of foreign law; it is connected with the transnational character of the law of international integration entities. This is due to the inability of individual States to resist exponential corruption. The continuous nature of the intrusion of international law into national legal systems is reflected in the various methods of such interference. The article proves the importance of each state having the right to independently determine the limits of the intrusion of international law into their national legal system. ; Неограниченность международного права только межгосударственными отношениями в результате глобальных процессов требует разработки новых научных подходов к осмыслению процессов вторжения международного права в правовые системы государств, воздействия норм международного права и международных институтов на национальный правопорядок, что и стало целью данной статьи. Опираясь на результаты, в том числе, проводимой в нашей стране конституционной реформы 2020 г., авторами сформулирован ряд выводов, которые охватывают: обоснование трансформации основополагающего принципа международного права – договоры должны соблюдаться – в практически императив – национальное законодательство должно изменяться; определение разнообразия форм вторжения международного права в национальные правовые системы, связанных с признанием юрисдикции международных судебных органов, экстерриториального действия зарубежного права, наднационального характера права интеграционных образований, с невозможностью отдельных государств противодействовать экспоненциальной коррупции исключительно национальными институтами власти. Доказывается значение наличия у каждого государства права самостоятельно определять пределы вторжения международного права в их национальную правовую систему: содержание имплементационного законодательства; полноты исполнения решений и выполнения рекомендаций международных органов и судов; признания экстерриториального действия зарубежного права и выбора форм его исполнения.
The article "Importance of studying international law in the preparation of high-qualified lawyers in Uzbekistan". The article considers the issues of the reform in higher education at the present stage, as well as the role and significance of the international law and European law in training highly qualified lawyers for the government, law enforcement and the private sector in Uzbekistan.
