Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
2521672 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
SSRN
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 41, Heft 2, S. 430-433
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: The Japanese annual of international law, Heft 8, S. 1-8
ISSN: 0448-8806
Towards a Universal Justice? Putting International Courts and Jurisdictions into Perspective -- Copyright -- Contents -- Foreword -- List of Contributors -- Part 1: The Growing Role of International Courts and Jurisdictions: The Permanent Court of International Justice, the International Court of Justice, and Beyond -- 1: Introduction -- 2: From Absence to Abundance: Tracing the Development and Impact of International Courts -- 3: The Cases Where the International Court of Justice Lacked Jurisdiction: A Brief Analysis and Commentary
This Article provides the first application of the emerging mixed jurisdiction jurisprudence to a comparative analysis of international law. Such a comparative law analysis is important today as the growth and increasing vitality of international juridical, administrative and legislative institutions is placing demands on international law not previously experienced. International law is unsure where to look for help in coping with these new stresses. In significant part this isolation can be attributed to a general view among international law scholars that international law is sui generis, and hence there is little to be gained from national legal systems. This Article seeks to rectify this problem by showing substantial congruence between international law and those national legal systems that may share many characteristics. The Article argues that those states that fit best with international law are those that have been classified as mixed jurisdictions. The result of this showing will be to open international law to the lessons leaned over the centuries by such mixed jurisdictions as Scotland, Louisiana, Quebec, South Africa and Israel.
BASE
International Law and New Wars examines how international law fails to address the contemporary experience of what are known as 'new wars' - instances of armed conflict and violence in places such as Syria, Ukraine, Libya, Mali, the Democratic Republic of Congo and South Sudan. International law, largely constructed in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, rests to a great extent on the outmoded concept of war drawn from European experience - inter-state clashes involving battles between regular and identifiable armed forces. The book shows how different approaches are associated with different interpretations of international law, and, in some cases, this has dangerously weakened the legal restraints on war established after 1945. It puts forward a practical case for what it defines as second generation human security and the implications this carries for international law
In: Studien zum ausländischen und internationalen Privatrecht 273
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 15, S. 62-69
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: International human rights law review, Band 4, Heft 1, S. 53-80
ISSN: 2213-1035
The interests of justice are embedded in Article 53 (1) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Rome Statute). They give the Prosecutor the right to decline to initiate an investigation or suspend a prosecution. In these cases, the interests of justice act as a basis for the Prosecutor to refrain from any action. This article argues that due to their non-positivist character, the interests of justice could serve as the platform also of prosecutorial action, acting as the legal vehicle for a broad interpretation of the Rome Statute in the name of justice. Nevertheless, such broad, interests of justice-instigated interpretation, cannot but have positivism as its outmost limit. The Rome Statute is an international criminal law instrument and international criminal law is governed by the legality principle, which narrows any hermeneutical endeavors. Along these lines, this article examines the nexus between the expansive interpretational interests of justice function and its limits by referring to cases where the International Criminal Court (icc) was called to endorse or not a broad interpretation of notions included in the Rome Statute. The article examines cases arising from situations referred to the icc by States and by the un Security Council.
In: Polish Yearbook of International Law, Band 37, S. 125-141
SSRN
In: Oxford monographs in international law
This is a review of the recent development of international criminal law, and explores solutions to key problems of official communities, universal jurisdiction, the International Criminal Court and the stance of the US, seeking to clarify how justice can best be done in a system of sovereign states.