Suchergebnisse

In connection to the process of the public administration reforms which take place in most of the European countries and also in connection to the "European administrative space", the issues of studying and mutually comparing administrative systems of various European countries, especially EU member countries, become more and more topical. They focus not only on purposeful and effective mutual use of experience in administrative systems improvements, but also on improving orientation in the already mentioned "European administrative space". There is nodue attention devoted so far to the systematic study of administrative systems of (other) European countries. Most of the publications which focus on this issue (mostly study books, study materials, or occassional articles) describe it only on a "descriptive" (mostly simplified) level. The cause of this lies in (apart from time and financial demands) significant complexity of the given issue, in terminological complications and in difficulties of getting adequate (essentially necessary) factography and in practically non-existing adequate methodology. Legal comparative jurisprudence and comparative studies of political systems might inspire onewhen developing the methodology. Even under the current situation, it would be efficient to pay more attention to the comparative studies of the structure of administrative systems, or to some selected areas of the public administration, for example to personnel systems in the public administration, financing public administration or administration of the public property. A thorough "stock -taking" of all the materials which have ever been published about this matter (even in different contexts) in our country orabroad might serve as a basis of these fragmented studies.

El ensayo examina tres aspectos de la decapitación de Luis XVI para demostrar como ésta simbolizó una transformación del principio de legitimidad política, a la vez que impactó en el desarrollo de las concepciones modernas de justicia formal y justicia sustantiva. La decapitación es considerada una metáfora de la transferencia de soberanía del rey a la ciudadanía, y es analizada poniendo énfasis en los discursos convencionales de Saint Just y Condorcet, y sus distintas concepciones de legalidad y legitimidad. Estas dos líneas de pensamiento son posteriormente analizadas como el fundamento de dos de las tendencias surgidas de la Revolución Francesa: los derechos humanos y el totalitarismo en sus versiones modernas. ; Th is essay examines three aspects of the beheading of king Louis XVI to show how it symbolized the transformation of the legitimacy principle of the body politic, and the development of modern formal and substantive justice. Th e beheading is seen as a metaphor of the transference of sovereignty from the king to the people. Louis Capet's is analyzed focusing on the speeches of Saint Just and Condorcet, and their opposing conceptions of legality and legitimacy. Th ese two threads are considered as fundamentals of two of the trends developed as part of the legacy of the French Revolution: the modern approach to human rights and totalitarianism.

No hi ha una xifra fiable de quants menors estrangers no acompanyats que es troben entre nosaltres. Les causes són que el Registre de Menors No Acompanyats, previst legalment, no funciona com caldria. Els menors visibles es troben en situació de desemparament; en conseqüència, tenen el dret de rebre protecció pública i la nostra Administració, tant estatal com autonòmica, té l'obligació de protegirlos. Totes les Administracions han de respectar en tot moment l'"interès superior del menor", convertint-se en principi rector de les Administracions públiques en matèria de menors d'edat. ; There is no reliable figure for the numberof unaccompanied foreign minors amongus. This is due to the Register of Unaccompanied Minors, a legal requirement, not working as it should. "Visible" minors find themselves abandoned; therefore, they have the right to receive public protection, and both the government and regional administrations are obliged to protect them. All public administrations should always heed the "greater interest of the minor", which should be their guiding principle when dealing with minors. ; No existe una cifra fiable de cuantos menores extranjeros no acompañados que se encuentran entre nosotros. Las causas son que el Registro de Menores No Acompañados, previsto legalmente, no funciona como debiera. Los menores visibles se encuentran en situación de desamparo; en consecuencia, tienen el derecho de recibir protección pública y nuestra Administración, tanto estatal como autonómica, tiene la obligación de protegerles. Todas las Administraciones deben respetar en todo momento el "interés superior del menor", convirtiéndose en principio rector de las Administraciones públicas en materia de menores de edad.

This article examines the relationship between transitional justice and reconciliation in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The author aims to answer the question how, to what extent and on the basis of what mechanisms transitional justice contributes to reconciliation. In the first, descriptive part of the article she introduces the term and the mechanisms of transitional justice, and in the second, analytical part she examines their concrete form in Bosnia and Herzegovina and their contribution to the process of reconciliation, which is understood here as a renewal of relationships between individuals and a recognition of one's own responsibility for past wrongs. The author concludes that transitional justice contributes to the reconciliation process only in a limited way because of its low trustworthiness, its low visibility and the overly small investments in its measures. To bring about a societal change transitional justice needs to be implemented better, in a more thorough and sensitive way and especially visibly, above all in terms of restorative justice and truth telling. Adapted from the source document.

The 14th century has traditionally been considered a century of crisis, unrest and political breakdown around Europe, given the preponderance of wars, civil clashes and skirmishes with external enemies. In the Kingdom of Valencia, too, we can find these constant struggles for land and power, yet at the same time, just like all over Europe, we can also witness the gradual growth of the institutions of administration, governance and justice spearheaded by the Crown and the different political actors. Indeed, this process of political development did not preclude violence, but it did establish the foundations of a powerful institutional system which gained ground throughout the 15th century. ; Tradicionalment s'ha considerat el segle xiv com una centúria de crisi, desordre i descomposició política a escala europea, atesa la preponderància de les guerres i els enfrontaments civils o contra enemics externs. Al regne de València, en efecte, també es comprova aquella presència constant de les lluites pel territori i pel poder, però alhora, com també arreu d'Europa, es pot observar un progressiu creixement de les institucions d'administració, govern i justícia impulsades per la Corona i pels diversos actors polítics. De fet, aquest procés de desenvolupament polític no evità la violència, però establí les bases del poderós entramat institucional que es consolidà al llarg del segle xv.

The paper analyzes the influence of neoconservative concepts of the 1990's on the foreign policy strategy of the George W. Bush administration after 9/11. The text begins with a short presentation of the neoconservative movement, particularly its second generation. The paper then compares neoconservative concepts from the 1990's with principal documents of the Bush administration & shows their influence. The next part of the text presents the factors able to explain this influence. These factors are the specific long-term evolution of central institutions in the USA, the special decision-making process of the administration, the managerial style of president Bush & also the impact of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Adapted from the source document.

Contemporary normative debates about justice increasingly revolve around the problem of extending the principles of justice (and corresponding theories) beyond the level of the nation-state, to which they have been for a long time confined. The article below discusses several authors from the wide and heterogenous politico-philosophical current of liberal egalitarianism, which can be considered one of the leading contemporary schools of thought, or the mainstream. There are two interrelated goals in this enterprise: First, to show how varied and cross-cutting the normative landscape of justice is, even within this specific current. Second, since I concentrate on the problem of extending the principles and theories of justice to supra-state levels, the universality (or the "cosmopolitan reach") of these ideas stands out as one of the most interesting features of these discussions. The work of Brian Barry, David Miller, Onora O'Neill and John Rawls exemplify many crucial issues that any theory of justice with cosmopolitan ambitions must cope with. The article concludes that the concept of (universal) human rights seems to be the only value that can buttress any cosmopolitan theories of justice; however, the normative debate over (1) their grounding, scope and corresponding obligations and (2) their connection to a comprehensive account of a good society, i.e. liberal democracy -- and therefore, the acknowledged danger of ethnocentrism -- is still far from being resolved. Adapted from the source document.

The article discusses the normative responses of the tradition of Rawls's political philosophy to the fact that globalization is not working according to the principles of distributive justice and that the existing global distribution of income and wealth is highly unjust. The first section presents the cosmopolitan theories of Charles Beitz and Thomas Pogge, both of whom draw their concepts from Rawls's masterpiece "Theory of Justice". These advocates of the Rawlsian approach see our world as forming one basic global structure that entails complex economic, political and cultural relationships across state borders. These relationships have important distributive implications that require the application of Rawlsian principles of justice at the transnational level. In the second part, Rawls's work developed in "The Law of Peoples", which is the extension of his own approach to the transnational domain, is critically examined. Its major notions (Society of Peoples, liberal and decent peoples, outlaw states and burdened societies, etc.), as well as the reasons for rejecting this approach from a cosmopolitan point of view are closely analyzed. In the third part, globalism and statism are conceived of as two main paradigms of current debate on global and international justice. The article concludes with the thesis that Rainer Forst's conception of transnational justice may provide the possible transcendence of this opposition. Adapted from the source document.

A partir de 2011 se ha reforzado el gobierno económico de la UE a través de seis instrumentos legislativos, el llamado Six Pack, que supone fundamentalmente una reforma de la supervisión de la política presupuestaria de los Estados miembros. Más recientemente el Tratado de estabilidad, coordinación y gobernanza de UE de marzo de 2012 (TECGUE) establece un conjunto de normas destinadas a promover la disciplina presupuestaria a través de un pacto presupuestario a reforzar la coordinación de sus políticas económicas y a mejorar la gobernanza de la zona del euro. En el presente trabajo se analiza si este modelo basado en una estricta disciplina presupuestaria es compatible con los postulados del Estado social, y más concretamente con los principios de justicia del gasto público. En efecto, a partir de la reforma del art. 135 de la Constitución Española, el principio de estabilidad presupuestaria debe ser interpretado coordinadamente con otros principios constitucionales que en el momento presente están plenamente vigentes y pueden adquirir una nueva función: la de actuar como límite y medida del objetivo de estabilidad presupuestaria. Del mismo modo se analizan los principios de coordinación entre las políticas presupuestarias y de endeudamiento de los Estados miembros en un Estado con una pluralidad de Haciendas, como es el caso español. ; From 2011 onwards, the Economic Governance of the EU on the Member States has been strengthened through six main instruments of legislation, the so-called Six Pack, which is primarily a supervision reform of the Member States budgetary policy. More recently Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance of EU from March 2012 (TECGUE) establishes a set of rules aimed to promote the budgetary discipline through a fiscal pact, to strengthen the coordination of their economic policies and to improve governance within the euro area. In this paper we analyze whether this model based on a strict budgetary discipline is well-matched with the tenets of the welfare state, and more specifically with the public spending principles of justice. Indeed, since the reform of art. 135 of the Spanish Constitution, the principle of budgetary stability should be interpreted in coordination with other constitutional principles which at present are in full force and can acquire a new role: to operate as a boundary and a extent of the budgetary stability objective. Similarly, principles of coordination between the General Government Debt and Budgetary Policies of the Member States within a state with a plurality of Public Finances, such as the Spanish case, have been also analyzed.