Political Interventions in the Administration of Justice
In: Quarterly journal of political science: QJPS, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 5-38
ISSN: 1554-0634
166257 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Quarterly journal of political science: QJPS, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 5-38
ISSN: 1554-0634
In: The journal of psychology: interdisciplinary and applied, Band 8, Heft 1, S. 23-52
ISSN: 1940-1019
In: The Indian journal of public administration: quarterly journal of the Indian Institute of Public Administration, Band 45, Heft 3, S. 501-507
ISSN: 0019-5561
In: Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, Band 19, Heft 3, S. 393
In: Vienna online journal on international constitutional law: ICL-Journal, Band 5, Heft 4, S. 620-622
ISSN: 1995-5855, 2306-3734
In: ICSID review: foreign investment law journal, Band 13, Heft 2, S. 426-439
ISSN: 2049-1999
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 183-184
ISSN: 1471-6895
In: American political science review, Band 49, Heft 2, S. 402-415
ISSN: 1537-5943
Of all the countries that have so far fallen under the rule of communism, Czechoslovakia is undoubtedly the one whose prewar system of government and ways of life and traditions approximated most nearly those of a typical Western European nation. This is particularly true of the administration of justice. Thus Czechoslovakia furnishes an ideal setting for a case study of the impact of the Marxist-Leninist conception of the administration of justice on a previously Western-oriented community.
In: The political quarterly: PQ, Band 12, S. 179-189
ISSN: 0032-3179
In: State Government: journal of state affairs, Band 7, S. 69-71
ISSN: 0039-0097
In: New England Journal of Internaitional Law and Comparative Law, Band 17, Heft 121
SSRN
In: Indian journal of public administration, Band 20, Heft 1, S. 157-186
ISSN: 2457-0222
In: Indian journal of public administration, Band 8, Heft 2, S. 161-172
ISSN: 2457-0222
In: China Human Rights Report 2018, Taipei: Taiwan Foundation for Democracy (2019), pp. 83-112
SSRN
In: Policy studies journal: an international journal of public policy, Band 10, Heft 4, S. 668-679
ISSN: 0190-292X
Innovation in judicial administration has proceeded slowly for many reasons. The attitudes of judges not inclined by training toward management, the tradition of judicial independence, & the separation of powers are examined as contributing factors inhibiting judicial modernization. Federal judicial reform has depended historically on the leadership of a Chief Justice who is willing to use the office to dramatize & promote the issues. The most recent period of dramatic change in judicial administration, from 1969 to 1981, is reviewed with focus on the strategies for change employed by Chief Justice Warren E. Burger. 9 References. HA.