Governmental behavior in representative democracy: a synthesis of the theoretical literature
In: Public choice, Band 141, Heft 3, S. 447-466
ISSN: 0048-5829
650757 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Public choice, Band 141, Heft 3, S. 447-466
ISSN: 0048-5829
In: The Indian economic journal, Band 56, Heft 4, S. 154-171
ISSN: 2631-617X
In: Behavioral & social sciences librarian, Band 26, Heft 4, S. 1-19
ISSN: 1544-4546
In: Maastrcht Graduate School of Governance Working Paper No. 2008/WP002
SSRN
Working paper
In: Matatu, Band 34, Heft 1, S. 159-171
ISSN: 1875-7421
In: Women: a cultural review, Band 17, Heft 1, S. 78-97
ISSN: 1470-1367
In: The International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic, and Social Sustainability: Annual Review, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 129-138
In: NWSA journal: a publication of the National Women's Studies Association, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 106-125
ISSN: 1527-1889
In: Twin research, Band 5, Heft 3, S. 196-205
ISSN: 2053-6003
In: The Journal of social, political and economic studies, Band 25, Heft 3, S. 369-370
ISSN: 0278-839X, 0193-5941
In: Shofar: a quarterly interdisciplinary journal of Jewish studies ; official journal of the Midwest and Western Jewish Studies Associations, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 168-169
ISSN: 1534-5165
In: Journal of peace research, Band 35, Heft 3, S. 381-400
ISSN: 1460-3578
Conflict over scarce resources, such as minerals, fish, water, and particularly territory, is a traditional source of armed struggle. Recently, wideranging claims have been made to the effect that environmental degradation will increase resource scarcity and therefore contribute to an increase in armed conflict. So far, there has been much controversy and little relevant systematic study of this phenomenon. Most scholarship on the relationship between resources, the environment, and armed conflict suffers from one or more of the following problems: (1) there is a lack of clarity over what is meant by `environmental conflict'; (2) researchers engage in definitional and polemical exercises rather than analysis; (3) important variables are neglected, notably political and economic factors which have a strong influence on conflict and mediate the influence of resource and environmental factors; (4) some models become so large and complex that they are virtually untestable; (5) cases are selected on values of the dependent variable; (6) the causality of the relationship is reversed; (7) postulated events in the future are cited as empirical evidence; (8) studies fail to distinguish between foreign and domestic conflict; and (9) confusion reigns about the appropriate level of analysis. While no publications are characterized by all of these problems, many have several of them. This article identifies a few lights in the wilderness and briefly outlines a program of research.
In: Journal of women's history, Band 10, Heft 1, S. 174-182
ISSN: 1527-2036
In: Journal of peace research, Band 35, Heft 3, S. 381-400
ISSN: 0022-3433
In: Shofar: a quarterly interdisciplinary journal of Jewish studies ; official journal of the Midwest and Western Jewish Studies Associations, Band 16, Heft 2, S. 95-97
ISSN: 1534-5165