Suchergebnisse

For the first time in history, the 21st ASEAN-Republic of Korea (ROK, hereinafter, Korea) Summit was held via videoconference on November 20, 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Normally, the Summit would have been held in the ASEAN Chair country, which in this case was Viet Nam. Key discussion topics during the Summit were largely on the review of the current status of the ASEAN-Korea cooperation and future areas for collaboration. In line with this, President Moon Jae-in announced the 'New Southern Policy Plus (NSP Plus) Strategy', which has turned into another important step forward reinforcing and strengthening the ASEAN-ROK Strategic Partnership. ASEAN leaders indeed welcomed this new initiative and looked forward to the implementation to foster closer cooperation in coming years. To give a brief overview, the NSP Plus lays out the seven key areas of cooperation, focusing on comprehensive public health, human resources, and future industries. Leaders of ASEAN and Korea concluded the Summit by agreeing to work together and take the lead in the post-COVID-19 era through the ASEAN Comprehensive Recovery Framework (ACRF) and its Implementation Plan as well as the NSP Plus Strategy.

The Second Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation agreed on 6 May 2021 to compensate, on an autonomous basis, the 'social devaluation' suffered by the direct victim as a result of his permanent exclusion from the world of work. In that regard, the Court recognises the existence of the extra-trimonial share of the occupational impact. The lockdown linked to the health crisis will therefore have had the merit of raising judges' awareness of the importance of the social dimension of work and of recalling that beyond. ; La deuxième chambre civile de la Cour de cassation accepte le 6 mai 2021 d'indemniser, à titre autonome, la « dévalorisation sociale » subie par la victime directe en raison de son exclusion permanente du monde du travail. En cela, la Cour reconnaît l'existence de la part extrapatrimoniale de l'incidence professionnelle. Le confinement lié à la crise sanitaire aura donc eu le mérite de faire prendre conscience aux juges de l'importance de la dimension sociale du travail et de rappeler qu'au-delà …

Liability for Damages to Humans Derived from Vaccination against COVID-19. -- Abstract: This paper addresses different liability cases that the application of the COVID-19 vaccine can generate. ; Fil: Caramelo Díaz, Gustavo D. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Cátedra Contratos Civiles y Comerciales. Buenos Aires, Argentina ; Fil: Caramelo Díaz, Gustavo D. Universidad Nacional de Avellaneda (UNDAV). Departamento de Ciencias Sociales. Cátedra Derecho de los Contratos. Buenos Aires, Argentina ; Dossier Vacunación COVID-19. -- Resumen: En este trabajo se evalúan los distintos supuestos de responsabilidad a los que puede dar lugar la aplicación de las vacunas contra el COVID-19.

El artículo aborda la temática de las fronteras (materiales y simbólicas) en su dimensión vinculada a las migraciones internacionales. La perspectiva teórica asumida se apoya en el concepto de representaciones sociales, interesándonos en aquellas que construye la sociedad hospitante o receptora, en este caso, se hace énfasis en miembros del sistema judicial en la provincia de Mendoza, Argentina. Con este objetivo, se presenta y analiza algunos de resultados de una investigación de índole cualitativa en cuyo marco se realizaron entrevistas a integrantes del Poder Judicial mendocino. ; This article addresses the subject of borders (material and symbolic) in its dimension linked to international migrations. The assumed theoretical perspective is based on the concept of social representations, interested in those built by the host or receiving society, in this case, focusing on members of the judicial system in the province of Mendoza, Argentina. With this objective, we present and analyze some of the results of a qualitative research in which we conducted interviews with members of the judiciary in Mendoza.

International audience ; At the start of 2020, twenty months after the US "withdrawal", the Iranian nuclear deal is still alive. Since May 2018, the course of things has not been what Washington hoped for. The United States has overestimated its ability to impose its will on the two targets of this "withdrawal" - Iran and the Europeans (E3 / EU). Neither Iran nor the Europeans have given in. The first has shown its resilience and, even more, a remarkable ability to manage the crisis triggered by Donald Trump. Europeans, willingly cataloged as incapable, had a central role in this dossier, in 2018 and 2019. In less than 2 years, the dossier has been profoundly transformed. There was still, in 2015, essentially a nuclear proliferation issue. It has since been greatly enriched and now intersects with several other major international security issues: transatlantic tensions, the Gulf and Middle East conflicts, the evolution of the distribution of power between the major international players and that of the system. collective security. This does not facilitate the appearance of a solution and makes the effort complex to identify its prospects for development complex. ; Début 2020, vingt mois après le « retrait » américain, l'accord nucléaire iranien est encore en vie. Depuis mai 2018, le cours des choses n'a pas été celui qu'espérait Washington. Les États-Unis ont surestimé leur capacité d'imposer leur volonté aux deux cibles de ce « retrait » - l'Iran et les Européens (E3 /UE). Ni l'Iran, ni les Européens n'ont cédé. Le premier a montré sa résilience et, plus encore, une remarquable capacité à gérer la crise déclenchée par Donald Trump. Les Européens, volontiers catalogués comme incapables, ont eu dans ce dossier tout au contraire un rôle central, en 2018 et en 2019. En moins de 2 ans, le dossier s'est profondément transformé. Il était encore, en 2015, essentiellement un dossier de prolifération nucléaire. Il s'est depuis fortement enrichi et recoupe désormais plusieurs autres grands dossiers de sécurité ...

International audience ; At the start of 2020, twenty months after the US "withdrawal", the Iranian nuclear deal is still alive. Since May 2018, the course of things has not been what Washington hoped for. The United States has overestimated its ability to impose its will on the two targets of this "withdrawal" - Iran and the Europeans (E3 / EU). Neither Iran nor the Europeans have given in. The first has shown its resilience and, even more, a remarkable ability to manage the crisis triggered by Donald Trump. Europeans, willingly cataloged as incapable, had a central role in this dossier, in 2018 and 2019. In less than 2 years, the dossier has been profoundly transformed. There was still, in 2015, essentially a nuclear proliferation issue. It has since been greatly enriched and now intersects with several other major international security issues: transatlantic tensions, the Gulf and Middle East conflicts, the evolution of the distribution of power between the major international players and that of the system. collective security. This does not facilitate the appearance of a solution and makes the effort complex to identify its prospects for development complex. ; Début 2020, vingt mois après le « retrait » américain, l'accord nucléaire iranien est encore en vie. Depuis mai 2018, le cours des choses n'a pas été celui qu'espérait Washington. Les États-Unis ont surestimé leur capacité d'imposer leur volonté aux deux cibles de ce « retrait » - l'Iran et les Européens (E3 /UE). Ni l'Iran, ni les Européens n'ont cédé. Le premier a montré sa résilience et, plus encore, une remarquable capacité à gérer la crise déclenchée par Donald Trump. Les Européens, volontiers catalogués comme incapables, ont eu dans ce dossier tout au contraire un rôle central, en 2018 et en 2019. En moins de 2 ans, le dossier s'est profondément transformé. Il était encore, en 2015, essentiellement un dossier de prolifération nucléaire. Il s'est depuis fortement enrichi et recoupe désormais plusieurs autres grands dossiers de sécurité ...

Timor-Leste's independence was forged at a time when international developmental theory had rejected top down approaches and recognised the importance of participatory approaches. When the United Nations and a multitude of bilateral and multilateral non-government organisations arrived in Timor-Leste in 1999 it was hoped that the international intervention would at last produce a development success story. But independence also brought the realisation that dreams for an independent Timor-Leste varied, often according to the dreamer's generation. Three generations of Timorese: the political elite, a younger generation of independence activists (gerasaun foun) and today's youth of independent Timor-Leste, each bring their own experiences and face different challenges in Timor-Leste. Today stark contrasts between the values of customary life and those of the modernising world place both community leaders and young Timorese at a crossroads. The experiences of the Timorese are unique, but this book reflects a broader analysis about how aid-influenced processes of development can work in greater harmony with people to realise their own visions of the future of the nation.

Critical comment on the measures taken in the field of justice by the federal government during the COVID 19 crisis ; Commentaire critique des mesures prises en matière de justice par le gouvernement fédéral en période de crise COVID 19

[EN] The following Expert Court Report is based on the experience of research of the signatories in relation to the exhumations of mass graves of the Civil War (1936-1939) and the postwar period, in the context of the "movement for the recovery of historical memory" that is taking place in Spain since 2000. This movement has focused its demands on the search of the missing persons and has launched a cycle of exhumations of mass graves derived from the Civil War and the Dictatorship. In this Report, the exhumations of the 21st century are used as indicators of the persistence over time of the politics and cultures of fear installed in Spanish society, beyond the deep political and institutional transformations that occurred in the country after the death of Francisco Franco. It was presented as part of the documentation of Fausto Canales' Laws uit against Spain on September 15th, 2012 in the European Court of Human Rights. ; [ES] El siguiente informe pericial se basa en la experiencia de investigación de los firmantes en exhumaciones de fosas comunes de la Guerra Civil (1936-1939) y la postguerra, en el contexto del "movimiento para la recuperación de la memoria histórica" que está teniendo lugar en España desde el año 2000. Este movimiento ciudadano ha centrado sus demandas en la búsqueda de desaparecidos y ha puesto en marcha un ciclo de exhumaciones de fosas comunes producidas en el contexto bélico y en la dictadura franquista. En este peritaje se utilizan las exhumaciones del siglo XXI como indicadores de la persistencia en el tiempo de las políticas y culturas del miedo instaladas en la sociedad española, más allá de las profundas transformaciones políticas e institucionales acaecidas en el país tras la muerte de Francisco Franco. Fue presentado como parte de la documentación de la demanda de Fausto Canales contra España el 15 de septiembre de 2012 en el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos.

Klimaschutzpolitik wird regelmäßig von einer Instrumentendebatte begleitet: Soll wirkungsklares Ordnungsrecht oder flexible indirekte Steuerung eingesetzt werden, um ökologischen und ökonomischen Herausforderungen gerecht zu werden? Angesichts des nahenden Kohleausstiegs steht neben Verstromungsverboten nach Vorbild des Atomausstiegs auch eine staatliche Bepreisung von Kohle oder CO2 im Raum. So könnten fossile Brennstoffe durch ökonomischen Druck nach und nach aus dem Strommarkt gedrängt werden. Das wirft juristische Fragen auf: Welche besonderen Anforderungen stellt das Verfassungsrecht an ökonomische Anreizinstrumente? Wie lässt sich deren gegenüber dem Ordnungsrecht ungewissere Wirkung freiheitsgrundrechtlich abbilden? Und wann schlägt die steuernde Verteuerung eines Verhaltens in eine verbotsgleiche Erdrosselung um?

International audience ; At the start of 2020, twenty months after the US "withdrawal", the Iranian nuclear deal is still alive. Since May 2018, the course of things has not been what Washington hoped for. The United States has overestimated its ability to impose its will on the two targets of this "withdrawal" - Iran and the Europeans (E3 / EU). Neither Iran nor the Europeans have given in. The first has shown its resilience and, even more, a remarkable ability to manage the crisis triggered by Donald Trump. Europeans, willingly cataloged as incapable, had a central role in this dossier, in 2018 and 2019. In less than 2 years, the dossier has been profoundly transformed. There was still, in 2015, essentially a nuclear proliferation issue. It has since been greatly enriched and now intersects with several other major international security issues: transatlantic tensions, the Gulf and Middle East conflicts, the evolution of the distribution of power between the major international players and that of the system. collective security. This does not facilitate the appearance of a solution and makes the effort complex to identify its prospects for development complex. ; Début 2020, vingt mois après le « retrait » américain, l'accord nucléaire iranien est encore en vie. Depuis mai 2018, le cours des choses n'a pas été celui qu'espérait Washington. Les États-Unis ont surestimé leur capacité d'imposer leur volonté aux deux cibles de ce « retrait » - l'Iran et les Européens (E3 /UE). Ni l'Iran, ni les Européens n'ont cédé. Le premier a montré sa résilience et, plus encore, une remarquable capacité à gérer la crise déclenchée par Donald Trump. Les Européens, volontiers catalogués comme incapables, ont eu dans ce dossier tout au contraire un rôle central, en 2018 et en 2019. En moins de 2 ans, le dossier s'est profondément transformé. Il était encore, en 2015, essentiellement un dossier de prolifération nucléaire. Il s'est depuis fortement enrichi et recoupe désormais plusieurs autres grands dossiers de sécurité ...