Suchergebnisse

Um der gestiegenen wirtschaftlichen Bedeutung des Landes gerecht zu werden, beschloss der Nationale Volkskongress der Volksrepublik China, bis 2020 ein marktwirtschaftlich orientiertes Zivilgesetzbuch zu schaffen. Erster Schritt war der Erlass der General Rules of Civil Law im März 2017, eines neuen Allgemeinen Teils für das Zivilrecht. Im Rahmen einer Tagung der Forschungsstelle für chinesisches Recht an der Universität Augsburg diskutierten chinesische und deutsche Rechtswissenschaftler im Juli 2017 Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede der Rechtsordnungen sowie deren gesellschaftliche und politischen Hintergründe. Ein besonderes Augenmerk wurde auf die Teilbereiche Allgemeine Rechtsprinzipien, natürliche und juristische Personen, Recht der Willenserklärungen und das Haftungsrecht gelegt. Die Ergebnisse präsentiert der nun vorliegende Tagungsband. Er konzentriert sich auf verschiedene Teilbereiche der Reform und stellt diese aus chinesischer und bisweilen auch aus deutscher Perspektive dar. Außerdem enthält der Band den originalen chinesischen Gesetzestext der General Rules of Civil Law, sowie eine synoptisch dazu dargestellte englisch- und deutschsprachige Übersetzung des Gesetzestextes.Mit Beiträgen vonProf. Dr. Hao Li; Prof. Dr. Thomas M.J. Möllers; Prof. Dr. Hongjie Man; Prof. Dr. Raphael Koch; Finn Mrugalla; Prof. Dr. Tong Zhang; Prof. Dr. Michael Kort; Dr. Tianfan Wang; Qiangzhi Hu; Prof. Dr. Guangyu Fu; Dr. Jing Jin; Dr. Jieqiong Li

PAPUA bukan hanya soal nama tetapi penyematan suatu identitas makna bagi generasi di level manapun. Saya tidak akan larut dalam pemekaran yang dianggit secara politik dan publik menyantapnya penuh gairah, karena secara ekologis wilayah Papua tidak akan mekar. Papua tidak akan merambah negara tetangga yang secara teritorial memiliki batas kenegaraan yang terekam dalam kosmopilitan dunia. Pemekaran adalah agenda politik yang bersambut secara kemasyarakatan untuk dikemas sebagai munculnya pemerintahan daerah baru dengan wilayah yang semakin menyempit. Biarlah itu bergerak dalam ranah yang wajal santun dan penuh ketulusan dengan memperhatikan hak asal-usul serta tradisiwarga Papua. Kekuatan politiktidak boleh mengabaikan, bahkan wajib mengamankan kekuatan adat agar identitas termiliki dan terwakili dalam pengelolaan pemerintahan.

As a country of mega biodiversity, Indonesia is also vulnerable to biopiracy target. To prevent biopiracy, it is crucial to protect the country's genetic resources. In order to protect genetic resources and to prevent biopiracy, Indonesia has included the requirement of Disclosure of Origin (DO) in The Indonesian Patents Act, 2016 by imposing patent applicants to disclose the origins of genetic resources in Patent application. This paper critically analyses the Patents Act to highlight key issues that undermine the country's efforts to combat biopiracy. The principal findings are that there are significant problems with implementing DO provisions of the Act in the fight against bio piracy. The effectiveness of the legislation remains questionable and some important sections of the Act lack clarity. The purported regulatory framework under the Act to enforce DO and to help deal with biopiracy is ill defined and human resources are inadequate. The paper concludes that to combat biopiracy effectively Indonesia needs to review its legislative and institutional framework on DO and consider establishing a National Anti-Biopiracy Commission.

Small Medium Entreprises (SMEs) and Cooperative have not received a proper law protection in facing trade liberation of ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) and economic globalized world. In 2015 AEC has been established that would bring a huge change in Southeast Asia regionS and definitely will have a wide impact to business people in Indonesia. SMEs and Cooperative contribute to more than 90 percent of total Indonesian national economy. However, they are weak on investment and information technology and management skill as well as competition law among ASEAN Member States. Economic policies do not give a sufficient protection to SMEs and Cooperative. This article tries to seek solutions for SMEs problems especially their legal structure in order to enhance their competitiveness. This article argues that the government can provide legal protection by reforming SMEs economic sectors similar to the AEC's priority sectors by which the Indonesian' SMEs would become world class corporate.

PILPRES 9 Juli 2014 telah dihelat dan WNI terpanggil untuk datang menentukan sekaligus memenangkan pilihanya. Hasilnya diumumkan KPU pada 22 Juli 2014 yang untuk selanjutnya panggung politik diperlihatkan melalui mekanisme hukum di MK. Kita semua mengetahui apa yang kemudian terjadi dan siapa yang sepatutnya memimpin RI sesuai dengan putusan lembaga perpilpresan yang dilantik 20 Oktober 2014. Publik menyimak bahwa Pasangan Prabowo-Hatta dan Jokowi-JK sama-sama mengusung tema lingkungan untuk diperhatikan dengan kesungguhan jiwanya

Plant variety protection is a relatively new concept for many Indonesians. It was developed because of the patent regime's failure to provide appropriate protection for new plant varieties. This new sui generis legislation for the protection of plant varieties was enacted in response to Article 27.3(b) of the TRIPS Agreement, which requires WTO Members to provide an effective sui generis law for the protection of new plant varieties. This paper analyses the current state of plant variety protection in Indonesia. It covers the threshold of protection, the subject, scope, right and obligation of breeders, exceptions to infringement, farmers' rights and local varieties. It also analyses the current policy to revise the Plant Variety Protection Act and the underlying reasons for this, including Indonesia's national interest and its international and bilateral commitments. The main focus of the paper explores why such policy is not broadly compatible with the Indonesian agricultural tradition of seed sharing. Accordingly, this paper explores the tradition of seed sharing in Indonesian culture known as adat. In addition, it explores the likely implication of such protection for national agricultural innovation.

Salah satu penyebab seringnya terjadinya konflik antara pengusaha dan buruh dalam hubungan industrial adalah pengusaha sering memosisikan buruh sbagai "orang" luar. Buruh dianggap bukan bagian dari keluarga dari keluarga besar perusahaan.