Suchergebnisse

This paper aims to analyze how Juan Goytisolo (Barcelona, 1931) combines together the narrative practices of television and his performative and metanarrative writing in La saga de los Marx (1993). The author uses that hybrid prose for two principal purposes: on one hand he criticizes the figure of Karl Marx and the dictatorial application of his theories by some governments, claiming for the need to avoid the widespread ahistorical vision created by the too often announced "end of History"; and, on the other hand, emphasizing the ironic approach inherited from Cervantes, he paradoxically uses some audiovisual genres ‒such as documentaries, docudramas, TV series and talk shows‒ to revitalize literature in a postmodern society that relies too much on technologies. ; En el presente artículo nos proponemos analizar cómo se imbrican en La saga de los Marx (1993), del escritor Juan Goytisolo (Barcelona, 1931), los lenguajes propios del medio televisivo y la prosa performativa y metanarrativa del autor barcelonés, sorteando las insidias de dicha hibridación, y combinándola con una cáustica crítica a la figura de Karl Marx y con las dictaduras derivadas de una lectura distorsionada de sus teorías. Goytisolo consigue no sólo reivindicar la necesidad de no rendirse a una conciencia ahistórica fomentada por el tan manido concepto de "final de la Historia", sino que, en una vuelta de tuerca de raigambre cervantina ‒llevada paradójicamente a cabo aprovechando elementos típicos de géneros audiovisuales como el documental, el docudrama, las series de televisión y el talk show-, logra revitalizar lo literario en el ámbito de una sociedad posmoderna dominada por la tecnología.

This paper aims to analyze how Juan Goytisolo (Barcelona, 1931) combines together the narrative practices of television and his performative and metanarrative writing inLa saga de los Marx(1993). The author uses that hybrid prose for two principal purposes: on one hand he criticizes the figure of Karl Marx and the dictatorial application of his theories by some governments, claiming for the need to avoid the widespread ahistorical vision created by the too often announced "end of History"; and, on the other hand, emphasizing the ironic approach inherited from Cervantes, he paradoxically uses some audiovisual genres -such as documentaries, docudramas, TV series and talk shows- to revitalize literature in a postmodern society that relies too much on technologies. ; En el presente artículo nos proponemos analizar cómo se imbrican enLa saga de los Marx(1993), del escritor Juan Goytisolo (Barcelona, 1931), los lenguajes propios del medio televisivo y la prosa performativa y metanarrativa del autor barcelonés, sorteando las insidias de dicha hibridación, y combinándola con una cáustica crítica a la figura de Karl Marx y con las dictaduras derivadas de una lectura distorsionada de sus teorías. Goytisolo consigue no sólo reivindicar la necesidad de no rendirse a una conciencia ahistórica fomentada por el tan manido concepto de "final de la Historia", sino que, en una vuelta de tuerca de raigambre cervantina -llevada paradójicamente a cabo aprovechando elementos típicos de géneros audiovisuales como el documental, el docudrama, las series de televisión y eltalk show-,logra revitalizar lo literario en el ámbito de una sociedad posmoderna dominada por la tecnología.

El asunto RS es una de las últimas sentencias dictadas por el Tribunal
de Justicia en el marco de la desatendida saga rumana sobre el Estado de
Derecho. Junto a otros homólogos europeos, el Tribunal Constitucional rumano
está cuestionando abiertamente algunos postulados básicos sobre los que se
asienta el ordenamiento jurídico europeo. Se suma a un creciente número de jurisdicciones
constitucionales que está impugnando la concepción luxemburguesa
del principio de primacía y su autoridad interpretativa. Se valen para ello de una
preocupante articulación de la identidad nacional en unos términos incompatibles
para la eficacia, la uniformidad y la coherencia del Derecho de la Unión. Este artículo
pretende abordar una serie de desencuentros judiciales entre el TC rumano
y el TJUE, con especial atención al caso RS, en los que se evidencian las perniciosas
consecuencias de la correosa crisis del Estado de Derecho para los principios
más elementales del sistema jurídico europeo.
RS gaia Auzitegiak emandako azken epaietako bat da, Zuzenbide
Estatuari buruzko aintzat ez hartutako errumaniar sagaren esparruan. Europako
beste homologo batzuekin batera, Errumaniako Konstituzio Auzitegia argi eta
garbi ari da zalantzan jartzen Europako ordenamendu juridikoaren oinarri diren
postulatuetako batzuk. Jurisdikzio konstituzionalen kopuru gero eta handiagoari
gehitu behar zaio, hori Luxenburgoko lehentasunaren printzipioa eta haren interpretazio-
ahalmena aurkaratzen ari baita. Horretarako, Europar Batasuneko
Zuzenbidearen eraginkortasunerako, uniformetasunerako eta koherentziarako bateraezinak
diren identitate nazionalaren artikulazio kezkagarriaz baliatzen dira. Artikulu
honek Errumaniako KAren eta EBJAren arteko hainbat desadostasun judizial
jorratu nahi ditu, arreta berezia jarriz SA kasuari, horietan agerian geratzen baitira
Zuzenbide Estatuaren krisi latzak Europako sistema juridikoaren printzipio elementalenetan
eragindako ondorio kaltegarriak.
The RS case is one of the latest rulings issued by the Court of
Justice in the neglected Romanian rule of law saga. Together with other European
counterparts, the Romanian Constitutional Court is openly questioning some basic
postulates on which the European legal order is based. It joins a growing number
of constitutional jurisdictions that are challenging the Luxembourgian conception
of the principle of primacy and its interpretative authority. They use for this purpose
a worrying articulation of national identity in terms that are incompatible with the
effectiveness, uniformity and coherence of Union law. This article aims to address
a series of judicial disagreements between the Romanian Constitutional Court and
the CJEU, with particular attention to the RS case, in which it becomes evident
the pernicious consequences of the tough crisis of the rule of law for the most
elementary principles of the European legal system.

This artiele is an analysis of the topie of violenee as treated in the writings of Marx whieh are anterior to 1845, that is, those whieh eorrespond to his earlier periodo The results of this study are eompared with those whieh derive from an analysis of the same topie as treated in Marx's later works. Whereas in the writings of Marx whieh postdate 1845 violenee is a topie whieh derives from others as a result of the eharaeteristies whieh historieal evolution adopts aeeording to the essential postulates of historieal materia-lism, in his earlier writings the topie of violenee presents itself in a more unpredietable, more romantie and less elaborate manner. This type of violenee is manifested in Marx's writings whieh appeared before 1845 by his verbal virulenee: .filthy selfishness», «immorality», «monstruosity», .helotism of the workers and of the eapitalists-, «universal exploitation of the social being of mano, etc . The topie of violenee as «revolutionary indignation» is mueh elearer in Marx the young man, preeisely beeause his system laeks at this moment those .Marx;st. postulates whieh pretend to be a seientifie lesson of history. When, a,fter 1845, Marx comes upon what he believes to be the seientifie key of history, his tones lose their virulenee: there still remains violenee, but it is violenee whieh will be brought about by history in suecessive situations. This violenee will not be the key of revolution, sinee revolution, aeeording to Marx, presents itself as an inevitable evolution. The violenee found in the earlier writings of Marx -whieh is easier to understand than the later type- explains the reason why, sinee several years ago, these ea'rlier works find a wider audienee within intelleetual and politieal milieux which desire to «reeonquer- Marx, taking away the monopoly enjoyed at the present moment by the Soviet Communists.

Editeur autorise diffusion de la version scané de l'article ; International audience ; The text sets out from a fourfold concept of Eurocentrism developed in postcolonial studies and global history. Against this backdrop, it traces the treatment of non-Western societies throughout Marx's work. His 1853 articles on India are shown to be Eurocentric in every respect. They are partially based on a travel narrative by François Bernier. Bernier's text is analyzed in some detail as one of Marx's sources. Marx's treatment of the 1857-59 Indian rebellions also displays Eurocentric features. His writings on British colonialism, in Ireland, however, begin to break with the Eurocentric mold. The Marxian critique of political economy, in contrast, teems with Orientalist motifs. Marx's late work is quite different in this respect: in the excerpts from his reading that he made from 1879 on, as well as in his discussions with the Russian Social Revolutionaries, he breaks with Eurocentrism. The development of Marx's thought shows that the hasty dismissal of him often observed in postcolonial studies is not carefully thought out. Yet the fact remains that Marxists who attempt to think global capitalism, historical progress and contingent development have something to learn from postcolonial studies.