Suchergebnisse

It means that the principle of coordination of private and public interests is not isolated (independent), in some cases it has to be based upon general principles of law. It is stated that the consolidation of the balance of interests in the laws may change with regard to peculiarities of economic development of the state.

It means that the principle of coordination of private and public interests is not isolated (independent), in some cases it has to be based upon general principles of law. It is stated that the consolidation of the balance of interests in the laws may change with regard to peculiarities of economic development of the state.

It means that the principle of coordination of private and public interests is not isolated (independent), in some cases it has to be based upon general principles of law. It is stated that the consolidation of the balance of interests in the laws may change with regard to peculiarities of economic development of the state.

It means that the principle of coordination of private and public interests is not isolated (independent), in some cases it has to be based upon general principles of law. It is stated that the consolidation of the balance of interests in the laws may change with regard to peculiarities of economic development of the state.

Law of Immovable Cultural Heritage: Issuing and Analysis of Coherent Legislation SUMMARY When Lithuania retrieved her independence, the new life norms strongly affected protection of the inheritance. Former Soviet memorial security was evaluated as incongruous with Lithuanian reaches. Still in 1988 the movement created in Lithuania was interested in her historical past and raised problems associated with security of the heritage, analyzed its work. The opinion of the public changed radically. The object of the research – the law on protection of immovable cultural heritage and acts associated with it. The aim of the work – to analyze properly the law on protection of immovable cultural properties and compares it with the law of 1994. The task of the work: 1. to analyze an acceptance of the new law on protection of immovable cultural properties; 2. to compare the law of 1994 with the new law on protection of immovable cultural properties accepted in 2004; 3. to overlook under juridical acts of the law; 4. to analyze problems associated with implementation of the law. On the 13th of May in 2001 the government of Lithuanian Republic confirmed conception prepared by memorial security committee and Cultural ministry, which intended to create new security law of immovable cultural properties during 2001 – 2002. On the 28th of September in 2004 that law was accepted. It had been prepared for three years and was necessary for independent Lithuanian Republic. It was committed for the preservation of statehood and history – for children, our Lithuanian guests and us. One of the most important attitudes of new law of Immovable Cultural Heritage is the direct responsibility of the institutes and municipalities. The system created under this law allows to avoid extra reformation, warrants an accounting of cultural values, combines interests of the community and owners, urbanistic development and security of the inheritance. The Law of Immovable Cultural Heritage is intended to secure predial cultural inheritance for future generations, to create conditions for community to know and use it, to give strong juridical base for preservation and security reform.

Law of Immovable Cultural Heritage: Issuing and Analysis of Coherent Legislation SUMMARY When Lithuania retrieved her independence, the new life norms strongly affected protection of the inheritance. Former Soviet memorial security was evaluated as incongruous with Lithuanian reaches. Still in 1988 the movement created in Lithuania was interested in her historical past and raised problems associated with security of the heritage, analyzed its work. The opinion of the public changed radically. The object of the research – the law on protection of immovable cultural heritage and acts associated with it. The aim of the work – to analyze properly the law on protection of immovable cultural properties and compares it with the law of 1994. The task of the work: 1. to analyze an acceptance of the new law on protection of immovable cultural properties; 2. to compare the law of 1994 with the new law on protection of immovable cultural properties accepted in 2004; 3. to overlook under juridical acts of the law; 4. to analyze problems associated with implementation of the law. On the 13th of May in 2001 the government of Lithuanian Republic confirmed conception prepared by memorial security committee and Cultural ministry, which intended to create new security law of immovable cultural properties during 2001 – 2002. On the 28th of September in 2004 that law was accepted. It had been prepared for three years and was necessary for independent Lithuanian Republic. It was committed for the preservation of statehood and history – for children, our Lithuanian guests and us. One of the most important attitudes of new law of Immovable Cultural Heritage is the direct responsibility of the institutes and municipalities. The system created under this law allows to avoid extra reformation, warrants an accounting of cultural values, combines interests of the community and owners, urbanistic development and security of the inheritance. The Law of Immovable Cultural Heritage is intended to secure predial cultural inheritance for future generations, to create conditions for community to know and use it, to give strong juridical base for preservation and security reform.

Law of Immovable Cultural Heritage: Issuing and Analysis of Coherent Legislation SUMMARY When Lithuania retrieved her independence, the new life norms strongly affected protection of the inheritance. Former Soviet memorial security was evaluated as incongruous with Lithuanian reaches. Still in 1988 the movement created in Lithuania was interested in her historical past and raised problems associated with security of the heritage, analyzed its work. The opinion of the public changed radically. The object of the research – the law on protection of immovable cultural heritage and acts associated with it. The aim of the work – to analyze properly the law on protection of immovable cultural properties and compares it with the law of 1994. The task of the work: 1. to analyze an acceptance of the new law on protection of immovable cultural properties; 2. to compare the law of 1994 with the new law on protection of immovable cultural properties accepted in 2004; 3. to overlook under juridical acts of the law; 4. to analyze problems associated with implementation of the law. On the 13th of May in 2001 the government of Lithuanian Republic confirmed conception prepared by memorial security committee and Cultural ministry, which intended to create new security law of immovable cultural properties during 2001 – 2002. On the 28th of September in 2004 that law was accepted. It had been prepared for three years and was necessary for independent Lithuanian Republic. It was committed for the preservation of statehood and history – for children, our Lithuanian guests and us. One of the most important attitudes of new law of Immovable Cultural Heritage is the direct responsibility of the institutes and municipalities. The system created under this law allows to avoid extra reformation, warrants an accounting of cultural values, combines interests of the community and owners, urbanistic development and security of the inheritance. The Law of Immovable Cultural Heritage is intended to secure predial cultural inheritance for future generations, to create conditions for community to know and use it, to give strong juridical base for preservation and security reform.