Search results

This Although the pros that register on the Civil Procedure Code andadministrative –principally singled specialized part of administrative disputesand procedures before the judiciary-, but he did not devoid of many of the gapsexposed by the applications later.And is the subject of the distribution of jurisdiction between the ordinaryadministrative and judicial authorities most important of these gaps and themost complex, distribution, although it put arbiter between specialists, but didnot constitute a precision and clarity are spent on the intensification of conflictsbetween the judicial authorities, and to eliminate the presence of conflict isproof of this.In this presentation we refer to one administrative disputes that provokedconsiderable controversy in the courtyard of the judiciary topics, the subject ofdisputes, public facilities, by searching in the most important criteria adoptedby the Algerian legislature to determine the jurisdiction of the qualitative inthese disputes, especially as he did not make individually jurisdiction of theadministrative by the judiciary never make it, but also of the jurisdiction of theordinary courts in our study, relying on laws and jurisprudence.

Examines the jurisdiction, both contentious and advisory, of the ICJ as a specific permanent international court or tribunal. This title also covers the jurisdiction of: the World Court, that is, the ICJ and PCIJ - both contentious and advisory jurisdiction, the leading International Administrative Tribunals, and the ECHR, ICSID tribunals

This edited volume reports the antecedents, foundations, organization, basic principles, and challenges to fourteen European constitutions. They include countries with long-lasting and recently amended constitutions, decentralized or unitary, with different political systems and institutional settings.

Michael W. McConnell and Nathan S. Chapman detail the theological, political, and philosophical underpinnings of religious disestablishment in the United States - and how they relate to modern controversies over school funding, accommodation, public prayer, and public religious symbols. They argue that the clause is not a thumb on the scale for secularism in public matters (let alone the opposite) but a constitutional commitment for Americans of all religious commitments - and none - to agree to disagree about matters of faith.

How 'free' is the free movement of persons? This collection of essays reconsiders the fundamentals of EU free movement law. Through different examples - posted workers, social security, Brexit, and Union citizenship - each chapter revisits the categories, and the resulting boundaries, that have become entrenched in these laws.