Suchergebnisse

The state is obliged to strive for the realization of justice for traditional fishing communities. Traditional communities are fishing communities whose traditional rights are still recognized in carrying out fishing activities or other legal activities in certain areas located in archipelagic waters following the international law of the sea. Coastal space areas and small islands that indigenous/traditional communities have managed from the obligation to have location permits and management take national interests and laws and regulations into account. Article 26 A of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2014 makes it easy for outsiders to control small islands that regulate the use of small islands and surrounding coasts through investment forms based on a ministerial permit that must prioritize the national interest. Positive law must protect traditional fishing communities and indigenous peoples. This research aims to analyze the regulation of fishermen's protection from deprivation of their rights in earning a living and livelihood. The research method used is normative research, meaning the implementation of legal provisions in the form of legislation in activities for certain legal events in the community, especially the fishing community. Normative research refers to and examines laws and regulations related to the research being conducted. The research locations cover coastal areas throughout Indonesia, especially Banda Aceh, Padang, Jakarta, Semarang, Surabaya, Manado, Kupang, Ternate, and Mataram. The state can provide knowledge, guidance, and protection for fishermen from various actions of deprivation of their rights to earn a living and protection such as piracy, the practice of fishing theft, abuse of trawling, transshipment activities, threats, and violence by foreign parties to Indonesian fishers. The central government and local governments are obliged to provide facilities for guaranteeing fishing areas or fishing coverage areas that are safe and do not overlap with other fields. ; Negara berkewajiban mengupayakan terwujudnya keadilan bagi masyarakat nelayan tradisional. Masyarakat tradisional adalah masyarakat perikanan yang masih diakui hak tradisionalnya dalam melakukan kegiatan penangkapan ikan atau kegiatan lainnya yang sah di wilayah tertentu yang berada di perairan kepulauan mengikuti hukum laut internasional. Wilayah pesisir dan pulau-pulau kecil yang dikelola masyarakat adat/tradisional dari kewajiban izin lokasi dan pengelolaannya memperhatikan kepentingan nasional dan peraturan perundang-undangan. Pasal 26 A Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2014 memberikan kemudahan bagi pihak luar untuk menguasai pulau-pulau kecil yang mengatur pemanfaatan pulau-pulau kecil dan pesisir sekitarnya melalui bentuk penanaman modal berdasarkan izin menteri yang harus mengutamakan kepentingan nasional. Hukum positif harus melindungi masyarakat nelayan tradisional dan masyarakat adat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peraturan perlindungan nelayan dari perampasan haknya dalam mencari nafkah dan penghidupan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif, artinya penerapan ketentuan hukum berupa peraturan perundang-undangan dalam kegiatan untuk peristiwa hukum tertentu dalam masyarakat, khususnya masyarakat nelayan. Penelitian normatif mengacu pada dan mengkaji peraturan perundang-undangan yang terkait dengan penelitian yang dilakukan. Lokasi penelitian meliputi wilayah pesisir di seluruh Indonesia, khususnya Banda Aceh, Padang, Jakarta, Semarang, Surabaya, Manado, Kupang, Ternate, dan Mataram. Negara dapat memberikan pengetahuan, pembinaan, dan perlindungan bagi nelayan dari berbagai tindakan perampasan hak untuk mencari nafkah dan perlindungan seperti perompakan, praktik pencurian ikan, penyalahgunaan trawl, kegiatan transshipment, pengancaman, dan kekerasan oleh pihak asing kepada nelayan Indonesia. Pemerintah pusat dan pemerintah daerah wajib menyediakan fasilitas untuk menjamin wilayah penangkapan ikan atau wilayah jangkauan penangkapan ikan yang aman dan tidak tumpang tindih dengan bidang lain.

Governance reforms should be coupled with a passion for bureaucratic reform. Good Governance must be done in an effective, clean and efficient so as to ensure the welfare and freedom of the life of the nation. The development dynamics of community life must be balanced with the development tingkal laws to regulate behavior in public life. The institutional and system rules experiencing rapid changes that aim to serve the needs of the community with excellent service then takes the free will / discretionary / Freis Emmersen owned by officials of state administration in implementing the government. Modern legal system of the country familiar with the term discretionary / Freies ermessen the free will which is owned by officials of state administration which can be used in certain circumstances. The use of discretion in the administration of government by officials of the state administration should pay attention to the rules of law that is in accordance with the intended use of such discretion is not contrary to the provisions of the legislation, based on the General Principles of Good Governance (Good Governance Principles), based on objective reasons, does not give rise to a conflict of interest; and based on good faith towards the ideals of the nation and state in the preamble of the 1945 Constitution.

Governance reforms should be coupled with a passion for bureaucratic reform. Good Governance must be done in an effective, clean and efficient so as to ensure the welfare and freedom of the life of the nation. The development dynamics of community life must be balanced with the development tingkal laws to regulate behavior in public life. The institutional and system rules experiencing rapid changes that aim to serve the needs of the community with excellent service then takes the free will / discretionary / Freis Emmersen owned by officials of state administration in implementing the government. Modern legal system of the country familiar with the term discretionary / Freies ermessen the free will which is owned by officials of state administration which can be used in certain circumstances. The use of discretion in the administration of government by officials of the state administration should pay attention to the rules of law that is in accordance with the intended use of such discretion is not contrary to the provisions of the legislation, based on the General Principles of Good Governance (Good Governance Principles), based on objective reasons, does not give rise to a conflict of interest; and based on good faith towards the ideals of the nation and state in the preamble of the 1945 Constitution.

The Regional Representative Council (hereafter called DPD) is one of the top state institutions that is directly elected in the General Election. In general, the members of the Regional Representative Council of the Republic of Indonesia (hereafter called DPD RI) are tasked with bringing up the interests and aspirations of the people in the regions to the central government as well as having the authority to carry out supervision in the regions. Supervision in question is the supervision of the implementation of laws, and the results of DPD supervision are submitted to the House of Representatives (hereafter called DPR) as a material for consideration for follow-up. Based on this background, this research was conducted with the aim of describing how DPD RI's supervisory function mechanism on the implementation of regional autonomy in Bali Province and what obstacles DPD RI faces in supervising regional autonomy in Bali Province. This research was conducted using a normative legal research method with a statutory approach. The results of this study showed that DPD RI oversight function is implemented with three mechanisms, namely the absorption of aspirations in the community, conveying aspirations through the preparation of reports and problem inventory lists, and submission of the results of supervision to DPR. While the obstacles faced by DPD RI in supervising regional autonomy in Bali Province are the weak authority of DPD RI compared to its legitimacy, the cooperation pattern between DPD and related regional government agencies that has not been clearly regulated, and the lack of support and community participation for participate in supervising after the enactment of a law.

Since the fall of the New Order regime, the courage to sue the state began to reverberate dipentas unitary national politics. The emergence of the idea of a federal state (united state) is the antithesis of the implementation of regional autonomy in Indonesia based on Law No.5 of 1974 on the Principles of Local Government is in the very setralisti. Through these legal instruments are the restraints and the dominance of local independence done so strict and systematic. Though conceptually the real regional autonomy is the freedom of movement (of expression) should be given to the autonomous regions to conduct their own initiatives to manage the interests of society in the region. Therefore there is a presumption that the imposition of the concept of regional autonomy through the form of a unitary state did not take the welfare of people in the region because the laws on local government implementation of the new order which is conceptually very repressive, also followed well as the behavior of authoritarian governments, harassing human rights, setralisme power sucking resources into the central region. To overcome this, then the solution is the democratization and decentralization of power through regional autonomy the broadest, not by changing the form of the state of federalism, but by changing the way state officials are concerned interestexistence of regions including the utilization of natural resources equity and pluralism (diversity) regions. This is where the importance of regional autonomy as one of the vanguard of the unitary Republic of Indonesia guard.Keywords: Unitary - Federal - Regional Autonomy

This research is conducted to find out the causal factor soft the non optimal and retardation of the development of the borderarea in the Sanggau regency which was done by the government, seen from the perspective of the political decentralization. This research is aimed to describe and analyze the implementation of the political decentralization and the roles of central and local government's in the border area development with its determinant factors. The research uses qualitative research design. Library study, observation and purposive sampling interview are used as the data collection technique. Furthermore, the data is validated by using data reduction, data display ,triangulation, verification, and inference which is analyzed qualitatively. The basic theory and analysis in this research is the theory of decentralization in which giving/delivering power and authority from central government to the local government; such as political, fiscal, and administrative authorities. This term refers to the decentralization in the development field, its form can be in deconcentration and devolution. The result of the research shows that the development of the border area done by the government is not yet optimal. One of its indicators is the lack of basic infrastructure in Sanggau regency. However, there are some supporting factors in the development of the border area such as strategic geographical location, natural resources potential, and the support from local communities. In other hand, the constraint factors are the lack of potential will, government's commitment, limited financial budget, investment climate that is relatively less conducive, low quality of human resources, the local products that have not been competitive yet, and no laws and legal institution that are needed.

Undang-Undang No. l Tahun 1974 In people's lives there is still a frequent way of marriage which is a violation of Law , especially article 2 paragraph 2, namely: "Each marriage is recorded according to the applicable laws and regulations". The definition of violation in the law, known as siri marriage. In this case the law must be understood as a set of rules governing, controlling society. Law in this sense is not part of the community system, but control of the community system. Law in this sense is not part of the community system, but control of the community system. According to Gustav Radbruch law must contain three basic values, namely: 1. Value of justice (philosophical aspect). The validity of the law is justified on the basis of human philosophical beliefs. 2. Value of certainty (juridical aspect). The law is enforced because it is determined by the state (gemeenschap), namely by the government and the people's representative council. 3. Value of benefits (sociological aspects). The validity of the law is due to social reality (society as a whole). In a sociological and philosophical view, siri marriage is relatively acceptable to the community, but judicially cannot be justified because it will have an impact on the low legal awareness of the community. Marriage recording does not determine the validity of a marriage, but only states that the marriage event actually happened, so it is merely administrative. Thus, the marriage is legitimate because it is carried out in accordance with religious law but has a weakness, namely the absence of a recording as referred to in article 2 paragraph 2 of Undang-Undang No. l Tahun 1974 . In reality the registration of marriages brought more good than bad in living in a society, so carrying out the registration of the marriage would be in line and not in conflict with religious norms

AbstrakSNI merupakan bentuk nyata keinginan pemerintah dalam memberikan perlindungan kepada konsumen. UU No. 8 tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen tidak menyatakan secara jelas standar dan syarat yang harus dipenuhi pelaku usaha pengaturan hukum perlindungan konsumen terhadap produk SNI wajib dalam perundang-undangan di Indonesia, pertanggungjawaban pelaku usaha terhadap produk yang tidak memenuhi kewajiban SNI, dan upaya perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen Air Minum Dalam Kemasan (AMDK) dengan menganalisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020. Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen melalui SNI wajib megacu kepada Undang Undang No. 20 Tahun 2014 tentang Standardisasi dan Penilaian Kesesuaian. Pengaturan standardisasi wajib juga dapat ditemukan di dalam UU Nomor 3 tahun 2014 tentang Perindustrian dan UU Nomor 7 tahun 2014 tentang Perdagangan. Pada dasarnya, UU Standardisasi dan Penilaian Kesesuaian merupakan derivatif dari Pasal 9 ayat 1 huruf (a) UU No. 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Pertanggungjawaban pelaku usaha terhadap produk yang tidak memenuhi kewajiban SNI adalah mengacu pada pertanggungjawaban produk (product liability). Pelaku usaha dapat diminta pertanggungjawabannya secara perdata dengan memberikan ganti rugi kepada konsumen dengan merujuk kepada Undang Undang Perlindungan Konsumen berkenaan dengan kerugian yang ditimbulkan. Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen Air Minum Dalam Kemasan (AMDK) dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020 sudah tepat sebab berdasarkan fakta yang terungkap dipersidangan dan ternyata air minum dalam kemasan Merek Sanford dapat dimanfaatkan oleh konsumen baik dikonsumsi maupun dijual kepada pihak lain dan konsumen telah mendapatkan manfaatnya serta konsumen mendapatkan keterangan informasi yang benar, jelas dan jujur mengenai kondisi barang, yang diperdagangkan tersebut. Kata Kunci: Pertanggungjawaban, Pelaku Usaha, SNI. AbstractSNI is a tangible form of the government's desire to provide protection to consumers. UU no. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection does not clearly state the standards and requirements that must be met by business actors, regulating consumer protection laws for mandatory SNI products in Indonesian legislation, business actors' accountability for products that do not meet SNI obligations, and legal protection efforts for consumers. Bottled Drinking Water (AMDK) by analyzing the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020. Legal protection for consumers through SNI must refer to Law no. 20 of 2014 concerning Standardization and Conformity Assessment. Mandatory standardization arrangements can also be found in Law number 3 of 2014 concerning Industry and Law number 7 of 2014 concerning Trade. Basically, the Law on Standardization and Conformity Assessment is a derivative of Article 9 paragraph 1 letter (a) of Law no. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. The responsibility of business actors for products that do not meet SNI obligations refers to product liability. Business actors can be held civilly responsible by providing compensation to consumers by referring to the Consumer Protection Act regarding the losses incurred. Legal protection for bottled drinking water (AMDK) consumers in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020 is correct because based on the facts revealed in court and it turns out that drinking water in the Sanford brand can be used by consumers, both consumed and consumed. sold to other parties and consumers have benefited and consumers have received correct, clear and honest information regarding the condition of the goods being traded. Keywords: Accountability, Business Actor, SNI ; AbstrakSNI merupakan bentuk nyata keinginan pemerintah dalam memberikan perlindungan kepada konsumen. UU No. 8 tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen tidak menyatakan secara jelas standar dan syarat yang harus dipenuhi pelaku usaha pengaturan hukum perlindungan konsumen terhadap produk SNI wajib dalam perundang-undangan di Indonesia, pertanggungjawaban pelaku usaha terhadap produk yang tidak memenuhi kewajiban SNI, dan upaya perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen Air Minum Dalam Kemasan (AMDK) dengan menganalisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020. Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen melalui SNI wajib megacu kepada Undang Undang No. 20 Tahun 2014 tentang Standardisasi dan Penilaian Kesesuaian. Pengaturan standardisasi wajib juga dapat ditemukan di dalam UU Nomor 3 tahun 2014 tentang Perindustrian dan UU Nomor 7 tahun 2014 tentang Perdagangan. Pada dasarnya, UU Standardisasi dan Penilaian Kesesuaian merupakan derivatif dari Pasal 9 ayat 1 huruf (a) UU No. 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Pertanggungjawaban pelaku usaha terhadap produk yang tidak memenuhi kewajiban SNI adalah mengacu pada pertanggungjawaban produk (product liability). Pelaku usaha dapat diminta pertanggungjawabannya secara perdata dengan memberikan ganti rugi kepada konsumen dengan merujuk kepada Undang Undang Perlindungan Konsumen berkenaan dengan kerugian yang ditimbulkan. Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen Air Minum Dalam Kemasan (AMDK) dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020 sudah tepat sebab berdasarkan fakta yang terungkap dipersidangan dan ternyata air minum dalam kemasan Merek Sanford dapat dimanfaatkan oleh konsumen baik dikonsumsi maupun dijual kepada pihak lain dan konsumen telah mendapatkan manfaatnya serta konsumen mendapatkan keterangan informasi yang benar, jelas dan jujur mengenai kondisi barang, yang diperdagangkan tersebut. Kata Kunci: Pertanggungjawaban, Pelaku Usaha, SNI. AbstractSNI is a tangible form of the government's desire to provide protection to consumers. UU no. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection does not clearly state the standards and requirements that must be met by business actors, regulating consumer protection laws for mandatory SNI products in Indonesian legislation, business actors' accountability for products that do not meet SNI obligations, and legal protection efforts for consumers. Bottled Drinking Water (AMDK) by analyzing the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020. Legal protection for consumers through SNI must refer to Law no. 20 of 2014 concerning Standardization and Conformity Assessment. Mandatory standardization arrangements can also be found in Law number 3 of 2014 concerning Industry and Law number 7 of 2014 concerning Trade. Basically, the Law on Standardization and Conformity Assessment is a derivative of Article 9 paragraph 1 letter (a) of Law no. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. The responsibility of business actors for products that do not meet SNI obligations refers to product liability. Business actors can be held civilly responsible by providing compensation to consumers by referring to the Consumer Protection Act regarding the losses incurred. Legal protection for bottled drinking water (AMDK) consumers in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020 is correct because based on the facts revealed in court and it turns out that drinking water in the Sanford brand can be used by consumers, both consumed and consumed. sold to other parties and consumers have benefited and consumers have received correct, clear and honest information regarding the condition of the goods being traded. Keywords: Accountability, Business Actor, SNI