Suchergebnisse

This article is devoted to the study of the legal status of homeless citizens based on the analysis of legal acts at the international and federal levels. The analysis of the federal documents has shown that the Russian legislative framework contains regulations in which homeless people are subjected to legal discrimination due to lack of registration at their place of residence.

В результате Петровских реформ в Российской империи появились категории населения, представители которых не входили в то или иное сословие. Для их определения в законодательных актах и делопроизводственных документах были введены в оборот такие термины, как «однодворец», «разночинец». Данная статья посвящена определению правового положения однодворцев как специфической категории населения Российской империи. В ней рассматриваются основные проблемы и противоречия, связанные с путями приобретения статуса однодворцев, эволюцией его правового обеспечения, выявлением состава однодворцев, определением их прав и обязанностей. Посредством фактического материала автором подтверждается основное противоречие статуса однодворцев, связанное с его двойственностью. С одной стороны, они приравнивались к крестьянам в том, что были обязаны платить подушную подать в равном размере с принадлежавшими им крестьянами, нести ландмилицкую (пограничную) службу и вести общинный образ жизни, а с другой – обладали правами дворянского состояния, а именно – правом владения крестьянами и землей. Другим противоречием было то, что права благородного сословия для однодворцев были ограничены: купля-продажа (а также иное распоряжение) крестьян и земли была им запрещена. Автор приходит к выводу, что противоречивость правового статуса однодворцев явилась следствием неоднородности этой категории населения, связанной с существованием множества путей к ее пополнению, а также сложности для власти в определении функций данного сословия, менявшихся с течением времени. Проблемы были связаны с отмиранием необходимости содержания ландмилицких полков (традиционной основной гражданской обязанностью однодворцев): в новых условиях власти требовалось четко определить статус данной категории населения, однако ни понизить его до крестьянского, ни повысить до дворянского она не могла, опасаясь критики и недовольства как дворян, так и самих однодворцев. Однодворцам была предоставлена возможность пополнить купеческое сословие, лишаясь при этом земли, а после 1762 г. – и дворянское сословие, увеличивая прослойку мелкопоместного дворянства. Таким образом, однодворцы были промежуточной податной категорией российского общества, находившейся между дворянством и государственным крестьянством, в более точном положении которой к началу XIX в. власть не определилась.
As a result of Peter the Great's reforms, some categories of the population whose representatives were not included into any social estate appeared in the Russian Empire. To denote them in legislative acts and office documents, the terms odnodvorets (plural odnodvortsy) and raznochinets (plural raznochintsy) were introduced. This article is devoted to the determination of the legal status of the odnodvortsy as a specific category of population of the Russian Empire. It examines the main problems and contradictions related to the ways of acquiring the status of odnodvorets, the evolution of its legal definition, the composition of the odnodvortsy, and the determination of their rights and obligations. By means of factual material, the author confirms the main contradiction of the odnodvortsy status, associated with its duality. On the one hand, odnodvortsy were equated with peasants as they were obliged to pay a poll tax in the same amount as the peasants who belonged to them did, to do landmilitia (frontier) service, and to lead a communal life. On the other hand, they had the rights of the noble estate, namely, the right to own peasants and land. Another contradiction was that the rights of the noble estate were limited for the odnodvortsy: the purchase and sale (as well as other disposal) of peasants and land were prohibited to them. The author comes to the conclusion that the inconsistency of the legal status of the odnodvortsy was a consequence of the heterogeneity of this category of the population, associated with the existence of many ways to replenish it and the difficulty for the authorities in determining the functions of this social estate, which changed over time. The problems were connected with the dying out need to maintain landmilitia regiments (the traditional main civic duty of the odnodvortsy): in the new conditions, the authorities needed to clearly determine the status of this category of population, but they could neither lower it to peasants nor raise it to the nobility, fearing criticism and discontent of both the noblemen and the odnodvortsy themselves. Odnodvortsy were given an opportunity to join the merchant estate, losing land in doing so, and after 1762 they were given an opportunity to join the nobility, thus increasing the stratum of gentry. Thus, the odnodvortsy were an intermediate taxable category of Russian society whose place in social structure was between the nobility and the state peasants. By the beginning of the 19th century, the authorities had not determined the status of the Odnodvortsy more precisely.

In this challenging time, when the economic situation is unstable, many companies have to face such a phenomenon as bankruptcy. The procedure is new for our country and, therefore, its implementation is associated with a number of difficulties and issues. Bankruptcy sometimes turns out to be the only civilized way for a legal entity to solve the problem of accumulated debts. This procedure allows reorganizing or liquidating a business in compliance with the interests of the owner and creditors. Bankruptcy as a civil procedure has its own legal and social consequences, fi rst of all, when it comes to the workforce and threats to lay off the organization's staff . As a rule, bankruptcy affects the personnel of an organization or an enterprise and, in this case, it becomes extremely important to respect the labor rights of members of the labor collective at all levels. Dismissal of employees during the liquidation of an enterprise must be carried out strictly in accordance with the articles of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation. The contractual relationship is terminated in stages. Certain categories of workers are of great importance — people with disabilities, pregnant women, underage employees, mothers and fathers involved in raising children without a second parent, etc.

Der Autor, ein führender Mitarbeiter im Apparat des Präsidenten der Republik Aserbeidschan, gibt im ersten Teil seines Beitrags einen detaillierten Überblick über die bisherige Diskussion unter internationalen Völkerrechtlern über den legalen Status von Meeren und Gewässern mit mehr als zwei Anrainern. Er nimmt eine kritische Würdigung der einzelnen Diskussionsbeiträge vor und begründet seine eigene Haltung in dieser Frage. (BIOst-Mrk)

Introduction. The article presents the author's interpretation of the process of constitutional control institutionalization in Russia. The paper highlights the dominant factors and main vectors of the constitutional control transformation in the context of modernizing the political and legal systems of the Russian Federation. The authors pay a particular attention to the specifics of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation functioning in the current system of separation of powers and upholding the sovereignty of the Russian state in the context of contradictory modern processes of political globalization.

Methodology and methods. The theoretical and methodological base of the work includes theses of Russian and foreign scientistsconstitutionalists A. Medushevskiy, V.E. Chirkin, L. Fridman, F. Luscher. The theories of political modernization and globalization (A.Yu. Melvil, S. Lantsov, S. Eisenstadt, S. Huntington, I. Wallerstein, Z. Bauman) were used to analyze the functional specificity of constitutional control institute activities in the conditions of forming a global and regional "risk society", and a new Russian state after the Soviet Union collapse. The empirical base of the study was the following: the Constitution of the Russian Federation; Constitutional and Federal laws of the Russian Federation, other legal documents regulating the activities of state authorities and administration; periodical materials; research results of the leading sociological centers – Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VTsIOM), Levada-Center.

Analysis. The stages of forming the constitutional control institution and its transformation should be considered in the context of modernizing the Russian state, its political and legal systems. At the same time, the inconsistency of the statist model of political modernization in Russia has a significant impact on modern institutional reinforcement and the practice of implementing the principle of separation of powers, including the political and legal status of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. The escalation of internal and external risks and threats to the Russian society and state objectively defines a number of restrictions to the comprehensive disclosure of the constitutional justice political potential.

Discussion. The main discussion dominants in analysing factors and directions of the constitutional control institute transformation in modern Russia are the following: the degree of rootedness of constitutionalism principles and constitutional values in the public consciousness of Russian citizens, and first of all among the ruling elite; the effectiveness of implementing constitutional control in comparison with other types of control – public, civil, parliamentary, etc.; the indicators of performance of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation to strengthen Russia as a legal, democratic state while ensuring stable and safe development of the national society.

Results. The article highlights the main stages of the constitutional control institutionalization in the national history. The interrelation of modernization transformations of Russian society and the state with formation and functioning of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation is traced. The paper presents the dominant vectors of the constitutional control institute transformation in the Russian political and legal space, taking into account real and potential risks and threats in the personality-society-state system.

The purpose of the paper is to find the ways to solve problems that arise in the work of the Federal Labor Inspectorate to improve the effectiveness of its monitoring and supervisory activities. The article examines the legislative and regulatory documents, treats most urgent violations in the field of labor legislation, assesses the risk-oriented approach to determining the entities controlled. Drawing on the assessment of legal acts that regulate the procedure for carrying out inspections, the authors make proposals to amend certain provisions of the current legislation in the area under study. The article proposes an additional determinant of employers' classification for the appointment of a scheduled inspection based on the likelihood of informal registration of workers and informal payments.

The article is devoted to the consideration of the category of success in the coordinates of the status identity of a person in the socio-cultural space. Multilevel correlations of resources, motivations and status in terms of creating the foundation for success in life are revealed. The close relationship between the category of success and status identity is determined by a complex of factors that determine the balance of personal and social in it. In the course of the study, it was found that the determination of the prospects for a person to achieve success is due to his status identity. Status identity captures the proximity of an individual to the distribution of various resources (material values, power and education, access to information), allowing the individual to realize a set of actions aimed at success that must be implemented in physical reality. It has been determined that the individual psychological qualities inherent in a person (abilities, talent, giftedness, motivation and axiological personal system) and sociocultural characteristics (social status, level of education, professional characteristics, level of material well-being, demographic indicators, etc.) contribute to the realization of life success. The resource level and the status identity associated with it largely determine the likelihood of success, but one should not exclude the importance of having personal motivation. An individual's awareness of himself and his own status identity allows him to correctly formulate goals and determine the resources that are necessary to achieve her acquired status as the highest level of status identity. The dynamics of a person's status identity forms a variety of connections with the category of success, which makes the study of success and success in life in their actual forms in the modern sociocultural space particularly relevant

Today people with HIV and AIDS are a social group, which is considered as an object of social work, an object of implementation of social technologies. The special characteristics of this group, their stigmatization and the peculiarities of the socio-legal and socio-medical status have led to the need for a legal and human rights approach in social practice, one of the possible social technologies where there can be social and legal patronage. This article is devoted to the disclosure of the features of the situation in the sphere of the spread of HIV and AIDS in Russia and the Perm Region, the analysis of the technology of social and legal patronage in the work with the group under consideration and the practice of its application in the Perm Region.

The article is about the organizational basis of the innovative scientific and technological centers activity (ISTC) and its legal forms: 1) the organizational structure of the ISTC established in the law; 2) organizational relationship between persons involved in the project implementation, defining as a person's special legal status depending on the ISTC management company's decision (either on granting the status of a project participant to a legal entity, or on concluding an agreement on the implementation of scientific and technological activities with a person without the project participant status). The author, considering the elements of management in the ISTC organizational structure, concludes that there are differences in management relations in the ISTC and in a corporation. The article defines features of the ISTC management system and management subjects' legal status: the management company — a joint-stock company endowed with public legal powers and carrying out general management of the ISTC activities, and the fund — a non-profit organization that acts as the owner or tenant of the property, which is part of the ISTC, as well as making strategic decisions on the ISTC creation and functioning. Analyzing the organizational relationship, the author highlights the legal consequences of the organizational relationship existence between the persons involved in the project implementation.

The article analyzes the doctrinal foundations of technological connection as an institution of energy legislation, as well as its main features and problems of law enforcement. At the same time, the multidimensional nature of this institution is emphasized, in particular, including technological, economic and legal aspects. The expediency of legislative consolidation of the right of access to energy infrastructure for consumers of energy and energy resources, which must be distinguished from factual (technological) actions aimed at its implementation, is shown. The possible cases of denial of access to technological infrastructure and their consequences are analyzed, the need for regulation of such consequences for network and resource transportation organizations is shown. From the doctrinal and law enforcement positions, the question of the legal nature of the technological connection agreement is investigated, while the impossibility of its legal qualification as a sui generis contract is shown. The legal qualification of the contract for technological connection is related to the issue of the customer's right to unilaterally refuse to execute the contract for technological connection, which is an important element of its legal status. When studying the issue of alienation of the right to the connected capacity, it is concluded that its alienation is permissible, provided that mechanisms are created to prevent abuse of the right in this area.

The article examines the issues of the modernization of the system of social services for the population in the framework of the implementation of the Federal Law «On the Basics of Social Services for Citizens in the Russian Federation.» The subject of the analysis is the legal norms governing the specifics of the provision of social services. The innovations in the service system that have occurred within the framework of the adoption of the new legislation of the Russian Federation are considered in detail. Positive changes in social policy required bringing the sphere of legal regulation of the system in line with the modern stage of the development of society. The important innovations are in the legislative requirements to the organization of social services, the parameters for assessing citizens in need, and the determination of per capita indicators for financing the services. However, along with positive aspects, in practice there are some shortcomings concerning, in particular, the imperfection of the delineation of powers between the Russian Federation and its constituent entities, the lack of legal norms on many social services, their clear normative quality indicators, shortcomings in the system for identifying those in need, problems of law enforcement in the sphere of implementation of certain forms of social services, etc. All these issues dictate the need for further improvement of some of its provisions, the introduction of innovative technologies in the field of social services to the population with the study and application of successful domestic practice and foreign experience, as well as further development of methodological and regulatory framework. The substantial component of the modernization of the system is services that increase the vector of social subjectivity of the needy categories of the population and ensure the improvement of their life and social comfort, and the fact that the institutionalization of the system of social services in the service sector contributes to the expansion of its capabilities in modern conditions.