Nell'ultimo decennio del XX secolo la vecchia dicotomia tra "governo del popolo" e "governo per il popolo" fu adattata al sistema istituzionale dell'Unione Europea in termini di opposizione tra una input legitimacy fondata sulla investitura democratica dei rappresentanti, e una output legitimacy fondata sulla capacità delle politiche governative di ottenere risultati.
Abstract. The article explores the significance held by political myths for legitimacy and politics. To that end, we examine political myth in line with the contemporary theory of political myth, which understands political myths as an integral part of all political communities that is not inherent to just authoritarian and totalitarian regimes. Every political community has their own stories/narratives that are accepted by most of the population and form the base of the legitimacy of the political order, whether it be a democratic or a non-democratic political order. In the final part of the article, we examine which narratives had such a legitimising power by analysing the political speeches of Franjo Tuđman while he was in office. Keywords: legitimacy, politics, political myth, political speech analysis, Tuđman.
This paper addresses the issue of legal pluralism and the plurality of legal systems starting from the book 'The legacy of pluralism. The continental jurisprudence of Santi Romano, Carl Schmitt and Costantino Mortati'. In particular, through the valuable leitmotif introduced by the Authors, consisting of the double relationship between 'juristic and political conceptions of law' and between 'matter and nomic force', the contribution of the doctrine following the publication of 'L'ordinamento giuridico' by Santi Romano is analysed, with particular attention to the comparison with Carl Schmitt and Costantino Mortati, focusing on the axiological innovation of the Republican Constitution.
The monastic and hagiographical contents of Hilary's Sermon on the Life of Honoratus (430-431) have received substantial consideration. Much less attention has been paid to the role the sermon played in the specific context of Arles. In this article, I will focus attention on the social and political dimension of the text and will argue that Hilary's main purpose was to justify his election as bishop of Arles. Hilary portrayed Honoratus as the ideal bishop and exploited the similarities between the two in order to present himself as the suitable successor.
Editors: Jan. 1922- Giangastone Bolla and others ; Includes section "Libri e riviste." ; Beginning with v. 11, in two parts separately paged ; Mode of access: Internet.
Il lavoro offre una ricostruzione storica ed empirica delle logiche legittimanti nelle unità politiche complesse – sovrannazionale e multinazionale federativo. L'Unione europea e l'URSS sono i due casi studio analizzati nei quali la legittimità viene strumentalizzata dalla prospettiva classica del conflitto sociale. Mentre la dimensione sociale ne è considerata il quadro per la strumentalizzazione. La legittimità europea e i suoi canali di legittimazione sono ricostruiti empiricamente, mentre la legittimità sovietica è analizzata nel quadro della retorica intorno alle politiche sociali su un ricco materiale propagandistico. La legittimità sovrannazionale europea avviene in due direzioni – al livello dei Paesi membri e al livello sovrannazionale. Una sfida per l'Ue è, come risulta, è quella di conciliare i due discorsi contradditori, mirando il cittadino come desinatario principale delle sue logiche legittimanti. Nel caso dell'URSS si ha un discorso abbondante rivoltosi direttamente al cittadino, di sostanza gravemente ideologica, che però non riesce a sostenere la legittimità dell'URSS nel momenti delle grandi fratture economiche. Il lavoro rappresenta una combinazione metodologica della classica scienza politica e studi dell'integrazione regionale, cui concetto del driver della regionalizzazione aiuta a strumentalizzare la legittimità politica come meta da raggiungere. ; The work provides a historical reconstruction of the logical and empirical legitimating in complex political units - supranational and federative multinational. The European Union and the USSR are the two case studies analyzed, which legitimacy is exploited from the classical perspective of social conflict. While the social dimension is taken as the framework for the exploitation. The European legitimacy and its legitimacy channels are reconstructed empirically, while the Soviet legitimacy is analyzed in the context of the rhetoric surrounding the social policies based on the rich propagandistic material. The European supranational legitimacy occurs in two directions – at the level of Member states and supranationally. A challenge for the EU is, as it turns out, to reconcile the two contradictory discourses, targeting citizens as the main addressee of its legitimizing logics. In the case of the USSR, its abundant speech targeting directly the citizens, with a serious ideological substance, fails to uphold the Soviet legitimacy in the great economic fractures. The work is a methodological combination of classical political science and regional integration studies, which concept of regionalization drivers is helpful to frame the political legitimacy as a goal.
L'intento di questo articolo è quello di analizzare il significato ideologico e la funzione propagandistica delle principali caratteristiche iconografiche dei ritratti ufficiali dell'imperatore Federico II di Svevia in affreschi, sculture, monete e sigilli. Prima di tutto, per fare questo, si sono dovuti individuare gli aspetti fondamentali della suddetta iconografia relativa a Federico II. Dopo questo, il passo successivo è stato quello di provare a delineare quale messaggio politico si voleva propagandare attraverso di essi: un'idea, cioè, di legittimità e sacralità fondato sulla "renovatio" dell'Antico Impero Romano e sul valore sacro delle leggi. Un messaggio, quindi, alternativo a quello che era basato sul rito dell'incoronazione sostenuto dal papato. ; The aim of this article is to analyse the ideological significance and the propagandistic function of the main iconographic characteristics of the official portrayals of the Emperor Frederick II of Swabia on frescos, sculptures, coins and seals. First of all, in order to do this, the fundamental aspects of this iconography related to the Emperor Frederick had to be singled out. After that, the next step was to try to outline which political significance was meant to be propagandized through it: a message, that is, of legitimacy and sacredness founded on the "renovatio" of the ancient Roman Empire and upon the sacred value of the laws. An alternative message, therefore, to that which was based on the coronation rite advocated by the papacy.
"Compilato per cura di una società di magistrati, professori di diritto e giureconsulti del regno." ; Subtitle varies: v. 1-23, Raccolta generale delle decisioni delle corti di cassazione e di appello in materia civile . ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Supersedes Annali di giurisprudenza. cf. List of the serial publications of foreign governments ; FOR COMPLETE RECORD SEE CHECKLIST
Magistrska diplomska naloga nosi naslov Odločanje Sodišča Evropske unije o pristojnosti. V nalogi sem sprva opisala temeljna načela, ki so vodilo delovanja Sodišča Evropske unije, ter se seznanila z njihovo uporabo in razlago v praksi. Ugotovila sem, da med pravnim redom Evropske unije in pravnimi redi držav članic velja načelo nadrejenosti ter da je pravni red Evropske unije superioren. Sledilo je raziskovanje, kako Sodišče Evropske unije odloča o pristojnosti, pri čemer sem spoznala, da ima Sodišče Evropske unije zelo pomembno vlogo, ko odloča o razmejitvi pristojnosti med državo članico ter Evropsko unijo. S sodno prakso namreč riše mejo med avtonomnostjo države članice ter posegi v njeno avtonomnost s strani Evropske unije. Nato sem opisala in spoznavala kakšne so njegove pristojnosti ter kakšni so postopki, ki jih Sodišče Evropske unije uporablja pri svojem odločanju. Ugotovila sem, da je temeljna naloga Sodišča Evropske unije skrbeti za enotno razlago in uporabo prava Evropske unije. Ugotovila sem, da Sodišče Evropske unije skozi sodno prakso čedalje bolj širi svoje pristojnosti in krepi svojo vlogo v razmerju do držav članic, čeprav v praksi vse države članice temu niso prav naklonjene. Na koncu naloge sem opisala in pojasnila, kako so se pristojnosti Sodišča Evropske unije okrepile po sprejemu Lizbonske pogodbe, ter poskušala poiskati razlike ter podobnosti med sistemom delitve oblasti v Evropski uniji ter sistemom delitve oblasti v zvezni državi, predvsem s strani odločanja Sodišča Evropske unije ter njegovih pristojnosti. ; In this assignment, I first described the fundamental principles that constitute the functioning of the Court of Justice of the European Union, and took note of their application and interpretation into practice. I have discovered that the principle of superiority is applied between the legal order of Member States and the rule of European Union in which the legal order of the European Union is superior. This was followed by a study of how the European Court of Justice decides on jurisdiction, and I realized that the Court of Justice of the European Union plays a very important role in deciding on the delimitation of competences between a Member State and the European Union. Through its case-law the Court of Justice of the European Union draws the boundary between the autonomy of a Member State and interference with Member States' autonomy by the European Union. I then described and learned about what its competences are and what are the procedures used by the Court of Justice of the European Union in its decision-making. I have found out that the fundamental task of the Court of Justice of the European Union is to ensure uniform interpretation and application of European Union law. I have found that the Court of Justice of the European Union increasingly expands its jurisdiction through jurisprudence and strengthens its role vis-à ; -vis Member States, although in practice all Member States do not favor this right. At the end of the thesis, I described and explained how the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union was strengthened after the adoption of the Lisbon Treaty, and sought to find differences and similarities between the system of division of power in the European Union and the system of division of power in the federal state, notably through the decision-making of the Court and its powers.