TEMA: NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
In: Stat & styring, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 23-23
ISSN: 0809-750X
56 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Stat & styring, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 23-23
ISSN: 0809-750X
In: Stat & styring, Band 19, Heft 2, S. 53-54
ISSN: 0809-750X
In: Stat & styring, Band 28, Heft 2, S. 2-6
ISSN: 0809-750X
In: Tidsskrift for psykisk helsearbeid, Band 20, Heft 3, S. 187-198
ISSN: 1504-3010
In: Arctic review on law and politics, Band 9, S. 332-334
ISSN: 2387-4562
In: Arctic review on law and politics, Band 12, S. 172-178
ISSN: 2387-4562
Graham White's recent book, entitled Indigenous Empowerment through Co-management: Land Claims Boards, Wildlife Management, and Environmental Regulation, is a balanced, accessible, and honest discussion of a very complex realm of Crown-Indigenous relations and institutions in Canada. The book is very well researched and clearly communicated by one of Canada's leading experts on the topic. Co-management has been the subject of scholarly attention for many years in Canada; however, perspectives vary widely with respect to appropriateness and effectiveness. White's book is a bold project that tackles the complexities, sensitivities, and diverse contexts head-on. It ought to be at the top of the reading list for all academics, practitioners, and government officials with an interest in modern treaties.
In: Norsk statsvitenskapelig tidsskrift, Band 27, Heft 4, S. 253-256
ISSN: 1504-2936
In: Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidskrift: The Nordic journal of cultural policy, Band 14, Heft 1-2, S. 102-119
ISSN: 2000-8325
In: Arctic review on law and politics, Band 13
ISSN: 2387-4562
This article reviews and compares Canadian and Russian approaches to Arctic fisheries management through a three-part format. First, the complex array of laws and policies applicable to Arctic fisheries is described for each country. How Canada and Russia have addressed international fishery issues is also highlighted, including their participation in the 2018 Central Arctic Ocean Fisheries Agreement. Second, commonalities in fisheries governance approaches are summarized, including national commitments to implement precautionary and ecosystem approaches. Finally, contrasts in Arctic fisheries management are discussed. Major differences include the greater devolution of management responsibilities by Canada to Indigenous communities through land-claim agreements and co-management arrangements and Russia's greater success in formalizing bilateral fisheries management arrangements with its neighbours.
In: Arctic review on law and politics, Band 10, S. 130-134
ISSN: 2387-4562
On October 3, 2018, the so-called "Arctic Five plus Five" concluded the Agreement to Prevent Unregulated High Seas Fisheries in the Central Arctic Ocean (CAOFA, CAOF Agreement or Ilulissat Agreement). The CAOFA establishes a precautionary framework for the regulation of fisheries in the high seas of the central Arctic Ocean (CAO), including a temporary moratorium on unregulated commercial fishing. The purpose of this debate article is not to discuss the CAOFA's provisions on fisheries as such, but to take a look at a number of interesting and novel provisions concerning the interests of indigenous and local communities, particularly with respect to incorporation of indigenous and local knowledge into science-based fisheries management in the CAO.
In: Tidsskrift for omsorgsforskning, Band 9, Heft 2, S. 21-36
ISSN: 2387-5984
In: Policy notes / CICERO 2006,1
In: Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidskrift: The Nordic journal of cultural policy, Band 22, Heft 2, S. 381-384
ISSN: 2000-8325
In: Arctic review on law and politics, Band 9, S. 359-376
ISSN: 2387-4562
The impacts of climate change on marine resources are well known and demand mitigation and adaptation measures in order to protect the ecosystems. This entails more than simply altering management practices; it requires altering goal setting and managing transitions to new ecosystemic conditions. In the European Union, the main legal tool for protection of the marine environment is the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Greece, as a member state of the European Union, has transposed the Marine Strategy Framework Directive into its national legal order and has developed legal structures to protect its marine resources from various threats, including climate change.
The present paper aims to present the legal and policy management tools in Greece, relevant to implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive and climate change adaptation. For methodological reasons, the paper is divided into two parts: The first part deals with those legal tools that apply to an initial assessment of the environmental quality of Greek marine waters, while the second part analyzes legislative activities pertinent to the design and implementation of programs and measures. The aim of the national legislation is to maintain the ecosystemic integrity of the marine waters of Greece and to preserve the unique characteristics of the aquatic environment with respect to present and future generations. However, the analysis shows that a holistic legal framework demands explicit provisions for climate change impacts, while the existing framework focuses primarily on anthropogenic pressures on the marine environment.