Suchergebnisse

This research investigates the interaction between the effects of wording and other elements of framing on public attitudes toward asylum policies. In particular, we focus on the labels of asylum-seekers and the discourse about the recent refugee crisis in Europe. In 2015 and 2016, we conducted two survey-experiments in Hungary where mass migration was the major issue on the political agenda at the time of the surveys. The salience of the issue was manipulated in both studies. Earlier findings have indicated that even words with the same meaning could prompt different interpretations in specific contexts. In contrast, we show that even large effects of wording, even if they are driven by differential meaning, can be suppressed by other elements of framing. The paper with the scientific results of this collection are currently under anonymous review. After the review process, the author of this collection will be revealed.

Mass migration, as it appears in the 21st century, is one of the greatest challenges of our globalized world. The unanswered questions of European Union (EU) immigration policy that emerged over the past few decades have become more pressing than ever. One of these urgent questions is: how can we provide for a developing European economy in an era of demographic decline in a way that it is based on the opportunities opened up by legally regulated forms of migration. A second question is: how can the EU ensure the safety of the newly arriving people in need and, at the same time, keep away illegal migrants and eliminate criminal activities related to migration. The European Union is destined to spread the principles of peace and unconditional respect for human rights not only within its own borders, but also on a global scale, when engaging in international affairs. In addition to observing human rights, however, the EU must also take into account all security considerations that are pertinent in guaranteeing the free movement of its citizens within the Member States.

The EU is bound to respect the national identities of Member States. States might, at occasions, define their national identities in ways that breach inclusive constitutional values (e.g. equality) protected under TEU Article 2. The assumption behind the recognition of diverse constitutional identities is the peaceful coexistence of both, which is challenged by illiberal national developments. Instead, we see a zero-sum game between the constitutional recognition of exclusive values (e.g. dominant ethnicity or religion) and inclusive constitutional values; every gain by the proponents of emergent authoritarianism translates to a loss on the side of constitutional democracy. While exclusive norms appear in virtually every constitutional system, a critical mass of exclusive values can lead to the hollowing out of a democratic order, both on the national and on the supranational level. To try to draw the line where this shift happens, we are relying on the limits of toleration, and recognition, of exclusive norms and identity elements of minority communities in liberal theories of multiculturalism (e.g. Raz, Taylor, Kymlicka). We think that the case of illiberal minorities raise structurally similar theoretical questions, insights, and experiences than the dilemma defined above, the challenge of illiberal Member States undermining EU fundamental values.

Agriculture has been and probably will be a significant branch in the south part of the Great Plain in the future as well. Besides the mass products, and in many cases instead of them when forming the agricultural structure, this region has to pay more attention to the branches that were important in the past. Hungarian experts who are famous in foreign countries as well deal with these branches and they provide excellent products. The rules referring to these products are more liberal in the market places of the European Union and their development is not controlled by strict quota systems. In the south part of the Great Hungarian Plain a lot of unique products of excellent quality are produced. Here in this essay we would like to find the answer to the question how the two significant products of the southern part of the Great Hungarian Plain can provide the families with an income that they can live on. We aim at the economical examination of the asparagus grown in Homok and of the cucumber grown in Méhkerék. To do this we will apply the so called Standard Gross Margin. The agriculture of the states of the European Union is measured with the help of this method. It can also help us in the future to decide whether the different farms belonging to families are economically viable in Hungary. ; A Dél-Alföldi Régióban a mezőgazdaság mindig is jelentős ágazat volt, s ez előreláthatólag így marad a jövőben is. A tömegtermékek előállítása mellett és gyakran helyett a régiónak nagyobb hangsúlyt kell fektetnie a mezőgazdasági struktúra kialakításakor azokra az ágazatokra, melyek nagy múltra tekintenek vissza, magyar művelői nemzetközileg is elismert szakértelemmel rendelkeznek és kitűnő minőségű termékeket produkálnak. Az ilyen termékek szabályozása az Európai Unió piacain is liberálisabb, fejlesztésüket kevésbé köti a merev kvótarendszer. A Dél-Alföldi Régióban számos sajátos, kitűnő minőségű, speciális terméket állítanak elő. Munkánkban arra keressük a választ, hogy a Dél-Alföldi Régió két jelentős kertészeti kultúrája hogyan biztosítja a család megélhetéséhez szükséges jövedelmet. Ennek érdekében célul tűztük ki a Homoki spárga és a Méhkeréki uborka termesztésének ökonómiai vizsgálatát a Standard Fedezeti Hozzájárulás módszer segítségével. Az Európai Unióban a tagállamok mezőgazdasági termelés hatékonysága mérésének ez az egyik módszere amely Magyarországon is a jövőben segítséget nyújthat a családi gazdaságok életképességének eldöntéséhez.