Suchergebnisse

The modern museum field actors – the founders, curators and visitors – their existence environment is influenced by network society and virtuality culture. Digital media expression in the museum is the media interaction, according to which the different concepts of museum 0.0, 1.0 and 2.0 were defined in this research. Museality is effective only when all the elements of the museum are adapted to the appropriate cultural level of the museum and communication happens taking into account the interests of partners. Systemic contradictions which became obvious show that the trends of the expression in the digital media in Lithuanian government institutions, museums and society do not always match. The research revealed that during the Soviet times, the museum 0.0 concept was dominant in Lithuanian museums communication strengthened by the control of communist regime and formed by the traditional media expression, and the needs of the industrial society. After the restoration of independence, the application of digital media in Lithuanian museums corresponded to the prolonged expectations peak of Gartner methodology, which has resulted in late massive stage in the application of digital media – the plateau of productivity. The research concerning characteristics of social networking tools in Lithuanian museum websites, visits to them, and in Facebook social media accounts and museums clustering results show that the majority of Lithuanian museums perform the communication in virtual space not according to the to the participatory museum 2.0 concept, which corresponds to the needs of networking society, but according to museum 1.0 concept, which is characteristic to the transition period from an industrial to networking society. The research showed that digital media expression in Lithuania is influenced by historical, legal - political context, technological possibilities and the appropriate application of digital media in Lithuanian museums and society.

The modern museum field actors – the founders, curators and visitors – their existence environment is influenced by network society and virtuality culture. Digital media expression in the museum is the media interaction, according to which the different concepts of museum 0.0, 1.0 and 2.0 were defined in this research. Museality is effective only when all the elements of the museum are adapted to the appropriate cultural level of the museum and communication happens taking into account the interests of partners. Systemic contradictions which became obvious show that the trends of the expression in the digital media in Lithuanian government institutions, museums and society do not always match. The research revealed that during the Soviet times, the museum 0.0 concept was dominant in Lithuanian museums communication strengthened by the control of communist regime and formed by the traditional media expression, and the needs of the industrial society. After the restoration of independence, the application of digital media in Lithuanian museums corresponded to the prolonged expectations peak of Gartner methodology, which has resulted in late massive stage in the application of digital media – the plateau of productivity. The research concerning characteristics of social networking tools in Lithuanian museum websites, visits to them, and in Facebook social media accounts and museums clustering results show that the majority of Lithuanian museums perform the communication in virtual space not according to the to the participatory museum 2.0 concept, which corresponds to the needs of networking society, but according to museum 1.0 concept, which is characteristic to the transition period from an industrial to networking society. The research showed that digital media expression in Lithuania is influenced by historical, legal - political context, technological possibilities and the appropriate application of digital media in Lithuanian museums and society.

The modern museum field actors – the founders, curators and visitors – their existence environment is influenced by network society and virtuality culture. Digital media expression in the museum is the media interaction, according to which the different concepts of museum 0.0, 1.0 and 2.0 were defined in this research. Museality is effective only when all the elements of the museum are adapted to the appropriate cultural level of the museum and communication happens taking into account the interests of partners. Systemic contradictions which became obvious show that the trends of the expression in the digital media in Lithuanian government institutions, museums and society do not always match. The research revealed that during the Soviet times, the museum 0.0 concept was dominant in Lithuanian museums communication strengthened by the control of communist regime and formed by the traditional media expression, and the needs of the industrial society. After the restoration of independence, the application of digital media in Lithuanian museums corresponded to the prolonged expectations peak of Gartner methodology, which has resulted in late massive stage in the application of digital media – the plateau of productivity. The research concerning characteristics of social networking tools in Lithuanian museum websites, visits to them, and in Facebook social media accounts and museums clustering results show that the majority of Lithuanian museums perform the communication in virtual space not according to the to the participatory museum 2.0 concept, which corresponds to the needs of networking society, but according to museum 1.0 concept, which is characteristic to the transition period from an industrial to networking society. The research showed that digital media expression in Lithuania is influenced by historical, legal - political context, technological possibilities and the appropriate application of digital media in Lithuanian museums and society.

The modern museum field actors – the founders, curators and visitors – their existence environment is influenced by network society and virtuality culture. Digital media expression in the museum is the media interaction, according to which the different concepts of museum 0.0, 1.0 and 2.0 were defined in this research. Museality is effective only when all the elements of the museum are adapted to the appropriate cultural level of the museum and communication happens taking into account the interests of partners. Systemic contradictions which became obvious show that the trends of the expression in the digital media in Lithuanian government institutions, museums and society do not always match. The research revealed that during the Soviet times, the museum 0.0 concept was dominant in Lithuanian museums communication strengthened by the control of communist regime and formed by the traditional media expression, and the needs of the industrial society. After the restoration of independence, the application of digital media in Lithuanian museums corresponded to the prolonged expectations peak of Gartner methodology, which has resulted in late massive stage in the application of digital media – the plateau of productivity. The research concerning characteristics of social networking tools in Lithuanian museum websites, visits to them, and in Facebook social media accounts and museums clustering results show that the majority of Lithuanian museums perform the communication in virtual space not according to the to the participatory museum 2.0 concept, which corresponds to the needs of networking society, but according to museum 1.0 concept, which is characteristic to the transition period from an industrial to networking society. The research showed that digital media expression in Lithuania is influenced by historical, legal - political context, technological possibilities and the appropriate application of digital media in Lithuanian museums and society.

The modern museum field actors – the founders, curators and visitors – their existence environment is influenced by network society and virtuality culture. Digital media expression in the museum is the media interaction, according to which the different concepts of museum 0.0, 1.0 and 2.0 were defined in this research. Museality is effective only when all the elements of the museum are adapted to the appropriate cultural level of the museum and communication happens taking into account the interests of partners. Systemic contradictions which became obvious show that the trends of the expression in the digital media in Lithuanian government institutions, museums and society do not always match. The research revealed that during the Soviet times, the museum 0.0 concept was dominant in Lithuanian museums communication strengthened by the control of communist regime and formed by the traditional media expression, and the needs of the industrial society. After the restoration of independence, the application of digital media in Lithuanian museums corresponded to the prolonged expectations peak of Gartner methodology, which has resulted in late massive stage in the application of digital media – the plateau of productivity. The research concerning characteristics of social networking tools in Lithuanian museum websites, visits to them, and in Facebook social media accounts and museums clustering results show that the majority of Lithuanian museums perform the communication in virtual space not according to the to the participatory museum 2.0 concept, which corresponds to the needs of networking society, but according to museum 1.0 concept, which is characteristic to the transition period from an industrial to networking society. The research showed that digital media expression in Lithuania is influenced by historical, legal - political context, technological possibilities and the appropriate application of digital media in Lithuanian museums and society.

The modern museum field actors – the founders, curators and visitors – their existence environment is influenced by network society and virtuality culture. Digital media expression in the museum is the media interaction, according to which the different concepts of museum 0.0, 1.0 and 2.0 were defined in this research. Museality is effective only when all the elements of the museum are adapted to the appropriate cultural level of the museum and communication happens taking into account the interests of partners. Systemic contradictions which became obvious show that the trends of the expression in the digital media in Lithuanian government institutions, museums and society do not always match. The research revealed that during the Soviet times, the museum 0.0 concept was dominant in Lithuanian museums communication strengthened by the control of communist regime and formed by the traditional media expression, and the needs of the industrial society. After the restoration of independence, the application of digital media in Lithuanian museums corresponded to the prolonged expectations peak of Gartner methodology, which has resulted in late massive stage in the application of digital media – the plateau of productivity. The research concerning characteristics of social networking tools in Lithuanian museum websites, visits to them, and in Facebook social media accounts and museums clustering results show that the majority of Lithuanian museums perform the communication in virtual space not according to the to the participatory museum 2.0 concept, which corresponds to the needs of networking society, but according to museum 1.0 concept, which is characteristic to the transition period from an industrial to networking society. The research showed that digital media expression in Lithuania is influenced by historical, legal - political context, technological possibilities and the appropriate application of digital media in Lithuanian museums and society.

The modern museum field actors – the founders, curators and visitors – their existence environment is influenced by network society and virtuality culture. Digital media expression in the museum is the media interaction, according to which the different concepts of museum 0.0, 1.0 and 2.0 were defined in this research. Museality is effective only when all the elements of the museum are adapted to the appropriate cultural level of the museum and communication happens taking into account the interests of partners. Systemic contradictions which became obvious show that the trends of the expression in the digital media in Lithuanian government institutions, museums and society do not always match. The research revealed that during the Soviet times, the museum 0.0 concept was dominant in Lithuanian museums communication strengthened by the control of communist regime and formed by the traditional media expression, and the needs of the industrial society. After the restoration of independence, the application of digital media in Lithuanian museums corresponded to the prolonged expectations peak of Gartner methodology, which has resulted in late massive stage in the application of digital media – the plateau of productivity. The research concerning characteristics of social networking tools in Lithuanian museum websites, visits to them, and in Facebook social media accounts and museums clustering results show that the majority of Lithuanian museums perform the communication in virtual space not according to the to the participatory museum 2.0 concept, which corresponds to the needs of networking society, but according to museum 1.0 concept, which is characteristic to the transition period from an industrial to networking society. The research showed that digital media expression in Lithuania is influenced by historical, legal - political context, technological possibilities and the appropriate application of digital media in Lithuanian museums and society.

The modern museum field actors – the founders, curators and visitors – their existence environment is influenced by network society and virtuality culture. Digital media expression in the museum is the media interaction, according to which the different concepts of museum 0.0, 1.0 and 2.0 were defined in this research. Museality is effective only when all the elements of the museum are adapted to the appropriate cultural level of the museum and communication happens taking into account the interests of partners. Systemic contradictions which became obvious show that the trends of the expression in the digital media in Lithuanian government institutions, museums and society do not always match. The research revealed that during the Soviet times, the museum 0.0 concept was dominant in Lithuanian museums communication strengthened by the control of communist regime and formed by the traditional media expression, and the needs of the industrial society. After the restoration of independence, the application of digital media in Lithuanian museums corresponded to the prolonged expectations peak of Gartner methodology, which has resulted in late massive stage in the application of digital media – the plateau of productivity. The research concerning characteristics of social networking tools in Lithuanian museum websites, visits to them, and in Facebook social media accounts and museums clustering results show that the majority of Lithuanian museums perform the communication in virtual space not according to the to the participatory museum 2.0 concept, which corresponds to the needs of networking society, but according to museum 1.0 concept, which is characteristic to the transition period from an industrial to networking society. The research showed that digital media expression in Lithuania is influenced by historical, legal - political context, technological possibilities and the appropriate application of digital media in Lithuanian museums and society.

In this article sustainable development concept is viewed as a Dialogue of values – alternative for sustainable development as Ethical Consensus and Technical Consensus approaches, as proposed by sociologist Blake D. Ratner. This alternative of sustainable development interfere with fundamental values of media system – freedom, equal rights, and diversity. Assessing perspectives of sustainable development, as a dialogue of values realization in broad social – cultural, politic – economic, environmental fields, it is important to understand impact of media factor, which is critically important in modern word. The quality of the whole media system and the quality of media content affects understanding and implementation of sustainability ideas in politics of the state and wide society. Responsible, complex and creative representation of sustainability and its issues in the media would increase knowledge in broad societies, and would affect both public and political agenda in sustainable way. Alternatively, media work without deep understanding and rich representation of sustainability puts in doubt perspectives of sustainability. It is argued, that news culture, driven by drama, conflict, personalities and some other "news values" is a major barrier for sustainability communication in media field and puts in doubt perspective of sustainable development as a Dialogue of values.

In this article sustainable development concept is viewed as a Dialogue of values – alternative for sustainable development as Ethical Consensus and Technical Consensus approaches, as proposed by sociologist Blake D. Ratner. This alternative of sustainable development interfere with fundamental values of media system – freedom, equal rights, and diversity. Assessing perspectives of sustainable development, as a dialogue of values realization in broad social – cultural, politic – economic, environmental fields, it is important to understand impact of media factor, which is critically important in modern word. The quality of the whole media system and the quality of media content affects understanding and implementation of sustainability ideas in politics of the state and wide society. Responsible, complex and creative representation of sustainability and its issues in the media would increase knowledge in broad societies, and would affect both public and political agenda in sustainable way. Alternatively, media work without deep understanding and rich representation of sustainability puts in doubt perspectives of sustainability. It is argued, that news culture, driven by drama, conflict, personalities and some other "news values" is a major barrier for sustainability communication in media field and puts in doubt perspective of sustainable development as a Dialogue of values.

In this article sustainable development concept is viewed as a Dialogue of values – alternative for sustainable development as Ethical Consensus and Technical Consensus approaches, as proposed by sociologist Blake D. Ratner. This alternative of sustainable development interfere with fundamental values of media system – freedom, equal rights, and diversity. Assessing perspectives of sustainable development, as a dialogue of values realization in broad social – cultural, politic – economic, environmental fields, it is important to understand impact of media factor, which is critically important in modern word. The quality of the whole media system and the quality of media content affects understanding and implementation of sustainability ideas in politics of the state and wide society. Responsible, complex and creative representation of sustainability and its issues in the media would increase knowledge in broad societies, and would affect both public and political agenda in sustainable way. Alternatively, media work without deep understanding and rich representation of sustainability puts in doubt perspectives of sustainability. It is argued, that news culture, driven by drama, conflict, personalities and some other "news values" is a major barrier for sustainability communication in media field and puts in doubt perspective of sustainable development as a Dialogue of values.

In this article sustainable development concept is viewed as a Dialogue of values – alternative for sustainable development as Ethical Consensus and Technical Consensus approaches, as proposed by sociologist Blake D. Ratner. This alternative of sustainable development interfere with fundamental values of media system – freedom, equal rights, and diversity. Assessing perspectives of sustainable development, as a dialogue of values realization in broad social – cultural, politic – economic, environmental fields, it is important to understand impact of media factor, which is critically important in modern word. The quality of the whole media system and the quality of media content affects understanding and implementation of sustainability ideas in politics of the state and wide society. Responsible, complex and creative representation of sustainability and its issues in the media would increase knowledge in broad societies, and would affect both public and political agenda in sustainable way. Alternatively, media work without deep understanding and rich representation of sustainability puts in doubt perspectives of sustainability. It is argued, that news culture, driven by drama, conflict, personalities and some other "news values" is a major barrier for sustainability communication in media field and puts in doubt perspective of sustainable development as a Dialogue of values.

Decisions in public policy are not an end in themselves: in general, they are intended to regulate society, i.e. members of society are submitted with particular rights, obligations, possibilities, restrictions, etc. However, in order to know which decisions will reach their addressees best and will allow attaining the result sought, it is necessary for policy makers to know how the society and particular addressees are ready to accept them. Especially this is acute in the field of family policy: here, the decision on family policy instruments is important and may be effective only when it is accepted by families/individuals (especially speaking about instruments aimed at increase of fertility). The article is based on a presumption that communication between policy makers and the society is of a great importance seeking for a purposive public policy. The article is composed of two main parts. The first part presents theoretical background for analysis of communication between decision makers and society in the field of family policy. First, it develops the main characteristics of communication models between policy makers and society in general; highlights possible role of media in different models of the mentioned communication, and, finally, it lists peculiarities in connection with a particular topic of political communication, i.e. communication on the issues of family policy. The second part seeks to disclose the nature and main characteristics of communication between politics and society on the family policy issues in Lithuania. To this end, the article presents a media content analysis covering almost 1000 publication in the most popular internet news website in Lithuania on two issues directly related to family policy: economic and social situation of families with 3 and more children and economic and social guarantees for families with children.[.]

Decisions in public policy are not an end in themselves: in general, they are intended to regulate society, i.e. members of society are submitted with particular rights, obligations, possibilities, restrictions, etc. However, in order to know which decisions will reach their addressees best and will allow attaining the result sought, it is necessary for policy makers to know how the society and particular addressees are ready to accept them. Especially this is acute in the field of family policy: here, the decision on family policy instruments is important and may be effective only when it is accepted by families/individuals (especially speaking about instruments aimed at increase of fertility). The article is based on a presumption that communication between policy makers and the society is of a great importance seeking for a purposive public policy. The article is composed of two main parts. The first part presents theoretical background for analysis of communication between decision makers and society in the field of family policy. First, it develops the main characteristics of communication models between policy makers and society in general; highlights possible role of media in different models of the mentioned communication, and, finally, it lists peculiarities in connection with a particular topic of political communication, i.e. communication on the issues of family policy. The second part seeks to disclose the nature and main characteristics of communication between politics and society on the family policy issues in Lithuania. To this end, the article presents a media content analysis covering almost 1000 publication in the most popular internet news website in Lithuania on two issues directly related to family policy: economic and social situation of families with 3 and more children and economic and social guarantees for families with children.[.]

Decisions in public policy are not an end in themselves: in general, they are intended to regulate society, i.e. members of society are submitted with particular rights, obligations, possibilities, restrictions, etc. However, in order to know which decisions will reach their addressees best and will allow attaining the result sought, it is necessary for policy makers to know how the society and particular addressees are ready to accept them. Especially this is acute in the field of family policy: here, the decision on family policy instruments is important and may be effective only when it is accepted by families/individuals (especially speaking about instruments aimed at increase of fertility). The article is based on a presumption that communication between policy makers and the society is of a great importance seeking for a purposive public policy. The article is composed of two main parts. The first part presents theoretical background for analysis of communication between decision makers and society in the field of family policy. First, it develops the main characteristics of communication models between policy makers and society in general; highlights possible role of media in different models of the mentioned communication, and, finally, it lists peculiarities in connection with a particular topic of political communication, i.e. communication on the issues of family policy. The second part seeks to disclose the nature and main characteristics of communication between politics and society on the family policy issues in Lithuania. To this end, the article presents a media content analysis covering almost 1000 publication in the most popular internet news website in Lithuania on two issues directly related to family policy: economic and social situation of families with 3 and more children and economic and social guarantees for families with children.[.]