Suchergebnisse

This report presents the results and the methodology of the 2016 implementation of the Media Pluralism Monitor (MPM) in EU-28 countries and in Montenegro and Turkey (MPM2016), carried out by the Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom, EUI. The Media Pluralism Monitor is a comprehensive and balanced tool for assessing risks for media pluralism, composed of 200 variables organized within 20 main indicators and, finally, structured in four thematic areas, encompassing pertinent legal, economic, political and socio-cultural considerations. The results of the MPM2016 implementation confirm again, as a general trend and in line with MPM2015 and MPM2014, that no EU country is immune from risks that are related to media freedom and pluralism.

List of Abbreviations --Preface --Introduction --European Approach to Media Concentration Regulation: The Clash of Values --European Tools I: European Court of Human Rights and the Council of Europe --European Tools II: European Competition Law --European Tools III: Fragmentary EU Legislative Measures --National Tools: Media Concentration Laws in Four Member States --Case for Action at the EU Level? --Solutions to Augment Current EU Action in the Media Pluralism Field --Conclusions --Bibliography --Table of Cases.

The Media Pluralism Monitor (MPM) is a research tool designed to identify potential risks to media pluralism in the Member States of the European Union and in candidate countries. This narrative report has been produced on the basis of the implementation of the MPM carried out in 2020. The implementation was conducted in 27 EU Member States, as well as in Albania, Montenegro, the Republic of North Macedonia, Serbia and Turkey. This project, under a preparatory action of the European Parliament, was supported by a grant awarded by the European Commission to the Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom (CMPF) at the European University Institute.

The Media Pluralism Monitor (MPM) is a research tool designed to identify potential risks to media pluralism in the Member States of the European Union and in candidate countries. This narrative report has been produced on the basis of the implementation of the MPM carried out in 2020. The implementation was conducted in 27 EU Member States, as well as in Albania, Montenegro, the Republic of North Macedonia, Serbia and Turkey. This project, under a preparatory action of the European Parliament, was supported by a grant awarded by the European Commission to the Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom (CMPF) at the European University Institute.

The Media Pluralism Monitor (MPM) is a research tool designed to identify potential risks to media pluralism in the Member States of the European Union and in candidate countries. This narrative report has been produced on the basis of the implementation of the MPM carried out in 2020. The implementation was conducted in 27 EU Member States, as well as in Albania, Montenegro, the Republic of North Macedonia, Serbia and Turkey. This project, under a preparatory action of the European Parliament, was supported by a grant awarded by the European Commission to the Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom (CMPF) at the European University Institute.

The Media Pluralism Monitor (MPM) is a research tool designed to identify potential risks to media pluralism in the Member States of the European Union and in candidate countries. This narrative report has been produced on the basis of the implementation of the MPM carried out in 2020. The implementation was conducted in 27 EU Member States, as well as in Albania, Montenegro, the Republic of North Macedonia, Serbia and Turkey. This project, under a preparatory action of the European Parliament, was supported by a grant awarded by the European Commission to the Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom (CMPF) at the European University Institute.

In April 2023, the Polish National Broadcasting Council, the so-called KRRiT, imposed a high fine on an indipendent media outlet. It was not the first fine of this kind to independent media organisations. The growing number of KRRiT decisions targeting independent media in Poland is the result of the political nature of the procedure for appointing members of the KRRiT and the broad, unclear legal basis for imposing fines. Since 2005, the decisive voice in the composition of the KRRiT was that of the ruling political majority. This blogpost analyzes and criticizes the vague legal framework for KRRiT and the institution's apparent political capture in recent years.

UID/CCI/04667/2016 Projeto Europeu MPM 2016 - Media Pluralism Monitor ; This report presents the results and the methodology of the 2016 implementation of the Media Pluralism Monitor (MPM) in EU-28 countries and in Montenegro and Turkey (MPM2016), carried out by the Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom, EUI. The Media Pluralism Monitor is a comprehensive and balanced tool for assessing risks for media pluralism, composed of 200 variables organized within 20 main indicators and, finally, structured in four thematic areas, encompassing pertinent legal, economic, political and socio-cultural considerations. The results of the MPM2016 implementation confirm again, as a general trend and in line with MPM2015 and MPM2014, that no EU country is immune from risks that are related to media freedom and pluralism. ; publishersversion ; published

El Media Pluralism Monitor (MPM) es una herramienta diseñada para identificar los potenciales riesgos para el pluralismo mediático en los estados miembros de la Unión Europea. Esta informe se ha elaborado en el marco de la primera implementación paneuropea del MPM, realizada en 2016, con financiación procedente de las medidas preparatorias del Parlamento Europeo. La implementación se llevó a cabo en los 28 estados miembros de la UE, Montenegro y Turquía con el apoyo económico de la Unión Europea al Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom (CMPF) de la European University Institute ; The Media Pluralism Monitor (MPM) is a tool designed to identify potential risks to media pluralism in the member states of the European Union. This report has been prepared in the framework of the first pan-European implementation of the MPM, carried out in 2016, with funding from the preparatory measures of the European Parliament. The implementation was carried out in the 28 EU member states, Montenegro and Turkey with the financial support of the European Union to the Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom (CMPF) of the European University Institute

This report presents the results and the methodology of the 2017 implementation of the Media Pluralism Monitor (MPM) in the EU-28 countries and in Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYRoM), Serbia and Turkey (MPM2017). The MPM is a tool developed by the Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom (CMPF) at the European University Institute to assess the risks to media pluralism in a given country. The MPM project is co-funded by the European Union. The MPM focuses its analysis on news and current affairs. Different news media are covered: legacy media (print, radio and audiovisual), with their online editions; native digital media (and, to some extent, search engines and social media in the context of market plurality). The MPM further considers different types of media: public service, commercial, and non-profit community media.

The Internet has become an essential tool for various life-related purposes, and it is an instrument necessary for the proper enjoyment of a series of rights—including the right to access knowledge and information and the right to communicate. This new paradigm also implies that all people should have access to the Internet at affordable conditions, and any restrictions should be strictly limited and proportionate. As a consequence, any regulatory and policy measures that affect the Internet and the content that flows over it should be consistent with basic rights and liberties of human beings. This paper intends to discuss the unique nature of the access to networked services as well as the corresponding connection with the concept of pluralism. In particular, the growing importance of digital media is challenging the traditional notion of pluralism. In this context, the question of access it is thus paramount in order to guarantee an effective protection of freedom of expression and information.On this ground, the paper examines how Internet content governance is posing provocative and fascinating regulatory issues directly related to the growing possibilities offered by computer-mediated communication. This debate is not simply "technical", but also political, legal and social since it involves sustainable and value-oriented solutions, but also - more importantly - the awareness of the human rights dimension of Internet regulation. The possible answers to these issues are at the center of the ongoing discussion concerning the regulation of digital content and communication technologies. Drawing upon comparative and case study material, this paper analyses the functional relationship between modern communication technologies, legislative reforms in the area of digital communications, and constitutional freedoms.