Military Ethics
In: Journal of military ethics, Band 8, Heft 4, S. 307-309
ISSN: 1502-7589
1624 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of military ethics, Band 8, Heft 4, S. 307-309
ISSN: 1502-7589
In: Marine corps gazette: the Marine Corps Association newsletter, Band 100, Heft 8, S. 44
ISSN: 0025-3170
In: Airpower journal: APJ ; the professional journal of the United States Air Force, Band 8, Heft 4, S. 15-25
ISSN: 0897-0823
In: Journal of military ethics, Band 6, Heft 4, S. 257-258
ISSN: 1502-7589
In: Forthcoming, Military Ethics and Leadership (Bril)
SSRN
In: Journal of military ethics, Band 22, Heft 3-4, S. 168-184
ISSN: 1502-7589
In: Parameters: the US Army War College quarterly, Band 26, Heft 2
ISSN: 2158-2106
In: Parameters: journal of the US Army War College, Band 26, Heft 2, S. 102-108
ISSN: 0031-1723
In: Journal of military ethics, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 81-93
ISSN: 1502-7589
In: Journal of military ethics, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 231-242
ISSN: 1502-7589
In: Journal of military ethics, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 2-3
ISSN: 1502-7589
In: Peace and conflict: journal of peace psychology ; the journal of the Society for the Study of Peace, Conflict, and Violence, Peace Psychology Division of the American Psychological Association, Band 11, Heft 1, S. 41-46
ISSN: 1078-1919
A reply to Beyond Precision (Roblyer) the author delineating five obstacles facing the development of a practical model of military ethics. The objectivity of the Just War theory principle of "good effects outweighing the bad effects" is questioned since the determination of the legitimate balance between good and bad effects is a subjective process. Organizationally, the hierarchical structure of the military blocks & punishes the transmission of unwanted information, & often absolves top decision makers of direct responsibility. The power, distance & durability of weaponry effects are in actuality uncontrollable by the military. Nondistinctive combatants are confused with noncombatant civilians, reducing incentive to reduce collateral casualties. The psychological effects of distance warfare & post hostility disparagement dehumanize opponents, creating a dichotomous "us/them" mentality. The wider context & justifications of military decision making far outweigh the ability of individual "reasonable commanders" to adhere to moral standards through international agreements or military protocols. Since the current U.S. political climate is closed to serious consideration of social science recommendations by those in power, the opportunity for development of military ethics is limited. 5 References. J. Harwell
In: Journal of military ethics, Band 5, Heft 4, S. 241-242
ISSN: 1502-7589
In: Peter Olsthoorn (2011) 'Intentions and Consequences in Military Ethics,' Journal of Military Ethics, 10(2), pp. 81-93.
SSRN
In: Peace and conflict: journal of peace psychology ; the journal of the Society for the Study of Peace, Conflict, and Violence, Peace Psychology Division of the American Psychological Association, Band 11, Heft 1, S. 41-46
ISSN: 1532-7949