Suchergebnisse

Series title also at head of t.-p. ; Contains bibliographies. ; Geschichte der gewerblichen Betriebsformen und der zünftigen, städtischen und staatlichen Gewerbepolitik, von Heinrich Sieveking.--Der Wettkempf der gewerblichen Betriebsformen, von Eugen Schwiedland.--Industrielle Standortslehre . von Alfred Weber.--Betriebslehre der kapitalistischen Grossindustrie, von Priedrich Leitner.--Die ökonomische Eigenart der modernen gewerblichen Technik, von M. R. Weyermann.--Arbeitsbedarf und Lohnpolitik der modernen kapitalistischen Industrien, von Otto von Zwiedineck-Südenhorst.--Die Wohnungsproduktion, von Adolf Weber.--Bergbau, von Eberhard Gothein.--Die finanzielle Organisation der kapitalistischen Industrie und die Monopolbildungen, von Th. Vogelstein. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Most of the plates printed on both sides of leaf. ; Text in English and Dutch. ; Presented to both houses of Parliament by the honourable, the minister of mines and industries. ; Bibliography: p.[11]-14. ; Mode of access: Internet.

For the last 20 years, fostering greater transparency in the historically opaque extractive industries has been a governance priority in the sector. It is now time to build on the progress made and unlock greater gains from it. Achieving this requires getting serious about politics. The extractive industries (EI) are at a critical juncture, confronted with major contextual upheaval. A period of significant commodity price volatility is intersecting with the global energy transition and, more recently, the major social, political, and economic repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic–a combination of forces creating both uncertainty and potentially major shifts in how EI are developed and governed. As EI governance practitioners grapple with these shifts, and the challenges and opportunities they bring, transparency will be an essential tool. However, practitioners need to think–and work– more politically as they develop and deploy this tool moving forward to make the most of its potential. Work on EI transparency has achieved important successes over the last two decades. For example, significant commitments to disclosure have been secured, the volume of publicly available information about critical activities has increased considerably, and norms around certain information being in the public domain have been established. There is also a growing library of use cases for this information. However, technical and political factors have–and continue to–limit the full range of benefits that can flow from data disclosures. Unlocking the potential of this critical work will require identifying and reckoning with these factors head-on. This brief is part of the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment's PLUS Politics series, a multi-part series of briefs from CCSI that aims to encourage practitioners to apply a more systematic political lens to their work on governance in the extractive industries.

Other slight variations in title. ; Reports for some years issued in combined numbers. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Issued by the Geological Survey. Section of Mines, 1905; 1906-20 by Dept. of Mines, Mines Branch; 1921-46 by the Bureau's Mining, Metallurgical and Chemical Section (varies slightly). ; Vols. for issued in Parliament. Sessional papers.

Meaningful progress on improving the governance of extractive industries requires actors who have a strong interest in bringing this progress about, "reformers", and who have the power to do so. However, reformers in government often face an uphill battle that can involve major personal, professional and political risks coming from powerful actors who have an interest in maintaining the status quo. To address these risks and help improve the prospects of reformers driving real change on the ground, CCSI has been exploring opportunities for global actors working on EI governance to play a more active role in Empowering and Incentivizing Reformers. In a new think piece, Unlocking the Power of Reformers to Achieve Better Progress on Extractives Governance, we share some key findings on the political challenges facing reformers and ideas for more actively supporting them in addressing these. This piece draws on the input of dozens of experts, including numerous past and present government officials, working on EI governance as well as on insights derived from CCSI's broader activities focused on the Politics of Extractive Industries.

The extractive industries (EI) are at a critical juncture. A period of significant commodity price volatility is intersecting with the global energy transition and, more recently, the major social, political, and economic repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic – a combination of forces creating both uncertainty and potentially major shifts in how EI are developed and governed. As EI governance practitioners grapple with these shifts, and the challenges and opportunities they bring, transparency will be an essential tool. However, practitioners need to think—and work—more politically as they develop and deploy this tool moving forward to make the most of its potential. This discussion piece is one aggregation of perspectives, ideas, and questions coming out of several years of expert consultations, meetings, and interviews undertaken as part of the Executive Session on the Politics of Extractive Industries convened by the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment. The piece focuses on the ways in which political realities can shape the efficacy and impact of efforts to advance various goals through transparency of extractive industries (EI transparency). The authors suggest that more systematic integration of political considerations into the design and implementation of these efforts may minimize risks of "zombie transparency," and reinforce ultimate positive impacts. It should help those seeking to use EI data for specific purposes, such as to reduce corruption and enhance benefit sharing; unpack monolithic terms; account for incentives along the transparency lifecycle; and realize yet more of the potential of information disclosures. This is an introductory piece intended to catalyze and provoke critical thinking, debate, further investigation, and, ultimately, practical experimentation. It will be accompanied by a series of blog posts authored by different members of the Executive Session and other EI experts to explore some of the themes touched on below in greater detail, e.g. through country- or sector-specific lenses.

Considers (86) H. Con. Res. 178, (86) H. Con. Res. 179, (86) H. Con. Res. 180, (86) H. Con. Res. 181, (86) H. Con. Res. 182, (86) H. Con. Res. 183, (86) H. Con. Res. 184, (86) H. Con. Res. 177, (86) H. Con. Res. 189. ; Committee Serial No. 8. Considers H. Con. Res. 177 and related bills, to request President to review Government procurement of domestic minerals with view to increasing procurement to help alleviate economically depressed domestic mining and mineral industries. ; Record is based on bibliographic data in CIS US Congressional Committee Hearings Index. Reuse except for individual research requires license from Congressional Information Service, Inc. ; Indexed in CIS US Congressional Committee Hearings Index Part VII ; Considers (86) H. Con. Res. 178, (86) H. Con. Res. 179, (86) H. Con. Res. 180, (86) H. Con. Res. 181, (86) H. Con. Res. 182, (86) H. Con. Res. 183, (86) H. Con. Res. 184, (86) H. Con. Res. 177, (86) H. Con. Res. 189. ; Committee Serial No. 8. Considers H. Con. Res. 177 and related bills, to request President to review Government procurement of domestic minerals with view to increasing procurement to help alleviate economically depressed domestic mining and mineral industries. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Item 1039-A, 1039-B (microfiche) ; "October 1982." ; At head of title: 97th Congress, 2d Congress. Committee print. ; Mode of access: Internet.