Suchergebnisse

An important feature of present-day interna tional relations can be found in the activities of the large num ber of international organizations, both governmental and non governmental. These activities, based on the joint participa tion of members or affiliates in three or more states, involve a multilateral approach to operational problems, as opposed to a bilateral approach where only two partners are concerned. At present, one person in seven who obtains financial help for study abroad does so through an international organization. The multilateral approach also has an important effect on the international movement of persons through the meetings, courses, and expert missions which are arranged under such auspices. Another important function of international organi zations lies in the studies and research they undertake or spon sor based on information obtained from many countries. This facilitates an over-all view of problems and solutions on a re gional or world-wide scale. In this way, the effective opera tion of bilateral as well as multilateral programs can be encour aged. There is, however, no question in the foreseeable future of multilateral programs displacing bilateral programs. Each should complement the other. For the present, the problem, if any, lies in the need for co-ordinating efforts directed towards the solution of urgent world problems.

Integrated (city-wide) development concepts serve as orientation frameworks for future evolvement of a city considering multilateral interests. The implementation of these concepts requires diverse negotiation processes including stakeholders from politics, administration, but also with market actors and a multilayered civil society. Why and how these negotiation processes between and with these actors on the city-wide level are designed is the subject of this dissertation.

This paper examines the rationale for multilateral agreements to limit investment subsidies. The welfare ranking of symmetric multilateral subsidy games is shown to depend on whether or not investment levels are friendly, raising rival profits in total, and/or strategic complements, raising rival profits at the margin. In both Cournot and Bertrand competition, when spillovers are low and competition is intense (because goods are close substitutes), national-welfare-maximizing governments will over-subsidize investment, and banning subsidies would improve welfare. When spillovers are high, national governments under-subsidize from a global welfare perspective, but the subsidy game is welfare superior to non-intervention.

This paper examines the rationale for multilateral agreements to limit investment subsidies. The welfare ranking of symmetric multilateral subsidy games is shown to depend on whether or not investment levels are "friendly", raising rival profits in total, and/or strategic complements, raising rival profits at the margin. In both Cournot and Bertrand competition, when spillovers are low and competition is intense (because goods are close substitutes), national-welfare-maximizing governments will over-subsidize investment, and banning subsidies would improve welfare. When spillovers are high, national governments under-subsidize from a global welfare perspective, but the subsidy game is welfare superior to non-intervention.

When it comes to supporting democracy and human rights initiatives internationally, Brazil, India, Indonesia, South Africa, South Korea and Turkey present a range of behaviors. A review of voting patterns at the United Nations over six years, coupled with an analysis of each country's behavior at other international organizations, reveals an enduring cleavage for and against external interference in internal affairs. South Korea and Turkey, anchored for decades in Western security alliances, are sympathetic to most multilateral human rights initiatives. Brazil positions itself as a fence-sitter as it seeks political autonomy and regional and global leadership. India, South Africa and Indonesia are squarely in the non-interventionist camp, though all three recently have taken some positive steps. Adapted from the source document.

The year saw the closing of six long-standing missions & the initiation of four new ones, which brought the total number of multilateral peace missions conducted in 2002 to 48. The trend towards smaller, short-term, & mandate-specific peace missions continued in 2002. This was highlighted in the Balkans & in Timor-Leste where the increasingly stable political & security situations allowed for a significant reduction of the international presence. In 2002, prompted by developments in its security & defense policies, the European Union began preparing for a scheduled 2003 takeover of the UN Mission in Bosnia & Herzegovina & Task Force Harvest. Another significant development was the emphasis of political & peace-building operations, illustrated by the launch of the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan & the UN Mission in Angola. 1 Table. Adapted from the source document.

Although the political salience of nuclear disarmament has fallen dramatically since the end of the Cold War, the threat posed by nuclear weapons today remains at least as great as it was before 1989. The growing number of states either armed with or actively developing nuclear weapons programmes has placed existing control and monitoring frameworks under strain. In this article, Baroness Williams, a long time campaigner for multilateral nuclear disarmament, discusses the nature of today's nuclear threat and particularly the political challenge presented by states whose behaviour is not predictable. If further proliferation is to be prevented, the international community must renew its efforts at implementing a robust regime of control. The IAEA must be given the authority and the resources necessary to conduct inspections anywhere in the world without prior warning. At the same time, the world's nuclear states powers must begin genuine efforts at disarmament.

THE DIFFICULTIES AFRICA IS GOING THROUGH ARE ILLUSTRATED IN THE GAP BETWEEN ITS GROWING DEPENDENCE ON INTERNATIONAL AUTHORITIES AND THE CONTINUAL WEAKENING OF THE MEANS AT ITS DISPOSAL TO MAKE ITSELF HEARD IN THESE BODIES. FOR TWENTY YEARS, AFRICA WAS CAUGHT UP IN THE NORTH-SOUTH DIALOGUE. IN THE 1980S, THE BREAKING-OFF OF THE DIALOGUE AND THE BREAKING-UP OF THE THIRD WORLD DEPRIVED IT OF MEANS FOR COLLECTIVE ACTION. THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN NORTH AFRICA AND BLACK AFRICA HAS GROWN MORE PRONOUNCED AS FIRST THE GLOBALIZATION OF MARKETS AND THEN THE CHANGES IN EAST-WEST RELATIONS CAUSED THE LATTER TO FALL VICTIM TO A PROCESS OF DOUBLE MARGINALIZATION. IN THESE CONDITIONS, A CONSENSUS SEEMS TO BE DEVELOPING WHICH HOLDS THAT MULTILATERAL DIPLOMACY IS NOT WHAT IS MOST IMPORTANT FOR AFRICA AND THAT THE REAL QUESTION IS TO KNOW HOW TO INVOLVE THE ENTIRE POPULATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. THERE IS THUS A RETURN TO THE OVERALL ISSUE OF GRASSROOT ORGANIZATIONS AND ESSENTIAL NEEDS AS OUTLINED IN THE 1970S.

Multilateral Matters is the quarterly publication of the Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS), analyzing the most recent developments regarding multilateralism by our team. It covers articles on relevant economic and political issues as well as programmed and latest publications from the research center. The objective of the newsletter is to promote the research being done by our centre, raising awareness of the many events that we hold on a regular basis.

Multilateral Matters is the quarterly publication of the Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS), analyzing the most recent developments regarding multilateralism by our team. It covers articles on relevant economic and political issues as well as programmed and latest publications from the research center. The objective of the newsletter is to promote the research being done by our centre, raising awareness of the many events that we hold on a regular basis.

Multilateral Matters is the quarterly publication of the Centre for Multilateralism Studies (CMS), analyzing the most recent developments regarding multilateralism by our team. It covers articles on relevant economic and political issues as well as programmed and latest publications from the research center. The objective of the newsletter is to promote the research being done by our centre, raising awareness of the many events that we hold on a regular basis.