Suchergebnisse

Ende 2017 sorgte eine diszipliniert durchgezogene Wahlallianz der beiden linken Parteien CPN-UML (Communist Party of Nepal – Unified Marxist-Leninist) und CPNMC (Communist Party of Nepal – Maoist Centre) für eine grundlegende Veränderung der politischen Machtverhältnisse. Seit 2002, als der inzwischen abgesetzte König Gyanendra putschte, hatte es keine Partei mehr geschafft, eine absolute Mehrheit zu erringen. Selbst die damalige Mehrheit des NC (Nepali Congress) war aufgrund interner Machtkämpfe eher brüchig gewesen. Im Prinzip begann die Phase instabiler Regierungen bereits im November 1994. Was als klassisches Gerangel zwischen linken Parteien erscheinen mag, blockiert jedoch das Regierungshandeln auf allen Ebenen, das viele lokale Bevölkerungsgruppen so dringend bräuchten.

Aus taiwanesischer Sicht

This document contains the draft Chapter 2 NCP of the IPBES Global Assessment on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Governments and all observers at IPBES-7 had access to these draft chapters eight weeks prior to IPBES-7. Governments accepted the Chapters at IPBES-7 based on the understanding that revisions made to the SPM during the Plenary, as a result of the dialogue between Governments and scientists, would be reflected in the final Chapters. IPBES typically releases its Chapters publicly only in their final form, which implies a delay of several months post Plenary. However, in light of the high interest for the Chapters, IPBES is releasing the six Chapters early (31 May 2019) in a draft form. Authors of the reports are currently working to reflect all the changes made to the Summary for Policymakers during the Plenary to the Chapters, and to perform final copyediting.

A few critiques define the present step of PM Oli as a "U" turn and regression in the way of Nepalese politics and prosperity that the people of Nepal have ever sought. In the general election in 2017 AD NCP has attained nearly two third of majority in the parliament in Nepalese political history after the election in 2015 B.S. when Nepali Congress had attained two third of majority.

AbstractDespite its theoretical significance, Paul Grice's CP, as the heart of classic and neo-Gricean pragmatics, has been a bone of contention for the last four decades for both Western and Eastern scholarship. This study addresses the contribution of four Chinese pragmaticians to the anti-CP principles: Guanlian Qian, Meizhen Liao, and Yameng Liu and Chunshen Zhu, focusing on the latter two. We briefly discuss Liao's Goal Principle (GP) and Liu and Zhu's Non-Cooperative Principle (NCP), which challenge Grice's CP head-on. It points out that Liao's GP is loaded with neo-Gricean pragmatic value as an alternative interpretation of CP but is not deemed "more applicable" as they claim, and that the NCP of Liu and Zhu, based on their CP query, sheds some light on neo-Gricean pragmatics and rhetoric, and yet calls for suspicion of their NCP as an "antistrophos/counterpart rhetoric-principle." We maintain that cooperation in CP suggests pragma-philosophical cooperativeness or cooperationality between rational humans and that it applies to pragmatics and rhetoric alike, as well as to forensic, daily, and rhetorical utterances. It seems that so-called "non-cooperation in cooperation" or "cooperation in non-cooperation" is only logico-semantic non-cooperation, deeply rooted in the soil of pragma-philosophical cooperativeness or cooperationality.