Options for National Parks and Reserves for Adapting to Climate Change
In: Environmental management: an international journal for decision makers, scientists, and environmental auditors, Band 44, Heft 6, S. 1033-1042
ISSN: 1432-1009
494123 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Environmental management: an international journal for decision makers, scientists, and environmental auditors, Band 44, Heft 6, S. 1033-1042
ISSN: 1432-1009
In: Environmental management: an international journal for decision makers, scientists, and environmental auditors, Band 45, Heft 1, S. 145-154
ISSN: 1432-1009
In: McGill Journal of Sustainable Development Law, Band 18, Heft 1
SSRN
The Appalachian National Park Association drafted a number of petitions and resolutions favoring the establishment of a national forest reserve and/or a national park in the southern Appalachians. Petitions were circulated among citizens and then presented with resolutions to various state legislators. By 1900, almost 5000 petitions had been signed, and 210,000 pieces of printed matter had been sent out by the association.
BASE
In: Global citizens. Environmentalism
"October 6, 1931." ; "These regulations supersede regulations for the national military parks, July 30, 1915, which have been completely revised"--P. 1. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
In: Westview library of federal departments, agencies, and systems
Since the first edition of this book was published ten years ago, the U.S. national park system has more than doubled in size, and the National Park Service (NPS) has been subjected to more political manipulation than at any time since the agency was established in 1916. Before 1972, no NPS director had ever been removed for political reasons; sinc
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015051342700
Shipping list no.: 87-598-P. ; At head of title: General management plan, development concept plan, environmental assessment. ; Bibliography: p. 87-88. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
In: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/2819
National Parks bear greater implications than simply preserving or conserving pockets of landscape. They evoke values of conservation versus development, livelihood economics, environmental stewardship and personal enrichment; they fulfil positions in relation to the national and the international stage. Social characteristics are revealed though this comparative study of Banff National Park and the Cairngorms National Park. Perceptions of space, place and boundaries crucially imply different meanings to the people living inside the national park boundaries and those living outside the boundaries. 'Insiders' are long-term permanent residents for whom being in the park is a practical activity; 'outsiders' include scientists, conservationists, bureaucrats, and tourists, who take various ideological positions regarding the park's purpose. Both sides take a serious interest in the park and how it is managed and regard it as a place where they are 'at home'. Groups within these spaces considers their values and rights superior to others and conflict often arises. Non-violent means of gaining power as theorized by Foucault and Bourdieu, employing knowledge and discourse, are highly suggestive in the study of national parks. Discourse of nature is strategically significant as it influences purpose and policy that drive government's decisions on how the park will be managed - in this way discourse shapes the culture of how we use nature. Knowledge, as symbolic capital and as the basis for truth, sparks divisiveness - in particular scientific knowledge versus experiential knowledge. Changes to the exclusive North American model, such as those instituted in the Caimgorms, mark the increased social utility and inclusive nature of national parks. The challenge remains for park managers to reconcile values connected with nationalism and environmental ethics with values connected with local livelihoods.
BASE
As the US National Park Service marks its centennial in 2016, parks and protected areas worldwide are under increasing threat from a variety of factors, including storms and fires of greater severity, plant and animal extinctions, the changing attitudes of a public that has become more urbanized, and the political pressures of narrow special interest groups. In the face of such rapid environmental and cultural changes, Science, Conservation, and National Parks gathers a group of renowned scholars including Edward O. Wilson, Jane Lubchenco, Thomas Dietz, and Monica Turner, among many others who seek to address these problems and, in so doing, to secure a future for protected areas that will push forward the frontiers of biological, physical, and social science in and for parks. Examining the major challenges of parks and protected areas throughout the world, contributors provide answers to a number of key conservation questions, such as: How should stewardship address climate change, urban encroachment and pollution, and invasive species? How can society, especially youth, become more engaged with nature and parks, and are there models to guide interactions between parks and their neighbors? What are appropriate conservation objectives for parks in the Anthropocene? Charting a course for the parks of the next century, this book is certain not only to catalyze the continued evolution of US park conservation policy, but also to be an inspiration for parks, conservation, and management worldwide
In: Contemporary geographies of leisure, tourism, and mobility
In: Contemporary Geographies of Leisure, Tourism and Mobility Ser.
In 1872 Yellowstone was established as a National Park. The name caught the public's imagination and by the close of the century, other National Parks had been declared, not only in the USA, but also in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. Yet as it has spread, the concept has evolved and diversified. In the absence of any international controlling body, individual countries have been free to adapt the concept for their own physical, social and economic environments. Some have established national parks to protect scenery, others to protect ecosystems or wildlife. Tourism has also been a fundamental component of the national parks concept from the beginning and predates ecological justifications for national park establishment though it has been closely related to landscape conservation rationales at the outset. Approaches to tourism and visitor management have varied. Some have stripped their parks of signs of human settlement, while increasingly others are blending natural and cultural heritage, and reflecting national identities. This edited volume explores in detail, the origins and multiple meanings of National Parks and their relationship to tourism in a variety of national contexts. It consists of a series of introductory overview chapters followed by case study chapters from around the world including insights from the US, Canada, Australia, UK, Spain, France, Sweden, Indonesia, China and Southern Africa. Taking a global comparative approach, this book examines how and why national parks have spread and evolved, how they have been fashioned and used, and the integral role of tourism within national parks. The volume's focus on the long standing connection between tourism and national parks; and the changing concept of national parks over time and space give the book a distinct niche in the national parks and tourism literature. The volume
In promoting a national park in the southern Appalachians, Chase Ambler wrote dozens of editorials and submitted them to newspapers and magazines throughout the east coast. After the editorials were published, the Appalachian National Park Association often reprinted and circulated them as part of their promotional campaign. From notes written on a copy of this one, it appears that 5000 copies of this editorial were made. Chase P. Ambler (1865-1932) was a founding member and long-time secretary of the association. ; Will the Editor please use as much of this as he can. A copy of the paper giving such notice will be appreciated. C. P. Ambler, Secretary. Asheville, N. C. Appalachian National Park* The efforts of the Appalachian National Park Association—the organization which was perfected in Asheville, North Carolina, in November of this year, by citizens of many States, for the purpose of bringing to the attention of Congress the desirability of establishing a great National Park and Forest Preserve in the Southern Appalachian Mountain region, are succeeding far beyond the anticipation of the most urgent supporters of this, great movement. Prominent and influential men in every part of the country have given their aid, numerous newspapers have advocated the project, and as yet no adverse or unfavorable criticism has been heard or written, and it seems practically certain that with a united movement the desired Park can be secured. This unanimous approval and endorsement of the effort to secure this great National Park is but the spontaneous demand of those who are acquainted with the Southern Appalachian region. For where can you And such rare natural beauty as in Western North Carolina and Eastern Tennessee, or, more definitely speaking, in the Great Smoky Mountains, the Balsam Mountains, and the Black and Craggy Mountains? Here are the most beautiful, as well as the highest mountains east of the lofty Western ranges; forty-three mountains of over six thousand (6000) feet in altitude, as well as a great number of inferior height, all clothed with virgin forests and intersected by deep valleys, abounding in brooks, rivers and water-falls, combine to make this region one of unsurpassed attractiveness. Standing upon the summit of one of these lofty mountain heights, the eye often seeks in vain for a bare mountain side, the evidence of the devastating axe—and before one, stretches out a view magnificently beautiful. If, indeed, the National Parks already established have been chosen for their unusual natural beauty, here is a national park conspicuously fine, awaiting official recognition as an addition to the number. The superb forests of the Southern Appalachian system are superior to those of any other section of the United States, and its variety of hardwoods and conifers is wonderful. Professor Gray, the eminent botanist, says that he encountered a greater number of indigenous trees in a trip of thirty miles through Western North Carolina than can be discovered in a trip from Turkey to England, and through Europe, or from the Atlantic coast to the Rocky Mountain Plateau. Here is the home of the rhododendron, the meeting place of the flora of the North and South, and the only place where distinctive Southern mountain trees may be found side by side with those of the North. Here, too, are found trees of from five to seven feet, and even more, in diameter, which tower to a height of one hundred and forty feet, and these patriarchal trees, though innumerable, are greatest in dense forests of many valuable and beautiful varieties. There i.i but one such forest region in Amer ica, and the neglect of the opportunity now put forth in saving it may work irretrievable loss. The increasing scarcity of timber is causing the large areas of forests to be rapidly cleared by those whose principle thoughts are immediate returns by a system which will result in a few years in the extinction of the forests. The National Park alone can prevent this destruction, and surely it should not delay longer. It is also the duty of the National Government as the guardian of the national interests, not the least of which are the rivers which have their head waters in these mountains, to protect their sources, and the water supply of the country. As to the healthfulness of the region, it is a well recognized fact that the plauteau lying between the Great Smoky Mountains and the Blue Ridge is one of the most popular health resorts in the world. Malaria is unknown. It rivals Arizona as a sanitorium; for those suffering from pulmonary troubles there is no better place. No better spot could be found for the establishment of a sanitorium for the sailors and soldiers of our country. The climate is fine the year around, and by reason of the high altitude, the climate in summer is more agreeable than that of regions farther North. For many years, to those wishing to escape the rigors of the Northern winters, this plateau has become a favorite resort. It has one of the best all year climates in the world. The existing National Parks can only be visited in the summer. If a nation park were established in this mountain region, it could be visited and enjoyed the year around. The location is central. It is only 24 hours' ride from New York, Chicago, St. Louis, Toledo and the Gulf States. It is therefore within easy reach of millions of people and a park there could be in fact as well as in name—a National Park. Apart from these natural reasons, the Eastern States are entitled to a National Park. There is no National Park of the character suggested east of the Yellowstone, which is considerably more than 2000 miles from the Atlantic coast, nor is there even a forest preserve east of Western Dakota, which is but a few hundred miles nearer. The government can easily secure a large boundary of this most beautiful and attractive country. These reasons, and many others, have given this movement popular support. Other arguments could be advanced in its favor; but the Appalachian National Park needs no argument, for the mere mentioning of it alone is sufficient to cause approval of the movement. It is therefore sincerely hoped that Congress will immediately take up the matter and establish the Park. The efforts of the Appalachian National Park association are to be commended. Its promoters are moved only for the public good, and should this movement, finally succeed, the thanks of the entire country will be due to them for their earnest efforts.
BASE
By 1901, the Appalachian National Park Association had received endorsements from around the south from associations, colleges, and businesses. The association was formed in 1899 for the purpose of promoting the idea of a national park in the eastern U.S. Although housed in Asheville, North Carolina, the organization was a multi-state effort, attracting representatives from six southern states. ; t The Appniachhei National T^.-:' v i .at has been en&oraaS. sowing pmninent associations, colleges mu\ basin a,., fnm ttie have :. - h resolutions favoring the project: • i Vh.;.'; tlftjlal ,oa- Innuatrial Association, Hontgoaery, Ala. • ^, S* Odell, civil ?$vgi»«trf Port €heet«|*j M, Y, i&flM T)anbury Hon Club, ?>«Bbury#' Conn, tC«« Commercial E«^g&«# , da, - ^»/ ►The State Momal College,- Troy, Ala. , ,.i5 Young Hens' Business League, S] i -aha,;-;, ,. S, C, . »villa Bear* of Trail** Moksonv-*k'u, JpBbe Rutherford county Tfcaehtrs Association, *h Carolina, khe seu^h fctlmtie L^bar Association W%%r Machinery ^oiapany, Knoxville, . I*nJv, * it isens1 Baltic, A.thcns, Ala, . ,_ iBtern Hutual kire ins kJ**iy» Urnnnn, Ohio. ■ ■■- Forestry Association, &§,* York city, k^kra.--- liMirinaft Association for the Advance ent of" Science, New York., XsTiys Ohio y l;Insurance, 8a -, .Saieai, Ohie'i J^Sha- •• h hag company, Salara* Ohio, he . -■ ■■ •' ■'-'-c.c Irt Association hohila '.;--.--. . -. ggmy, goblin, Ala, Ch. tree, iart«rsvlllff Ou, ,,-^.k ■■ a- 'ticJjni^lla^ State Board of H«nlthf f*ncl the idieals*S,fees of heath Carolina, "lie C. 1 a %mA Boara of Tradaf cwnber-X.md, |fd, -The Ragit ■ . aiik ""ills, Gelwtes, '---. ^>The Oainasvi 'rajga, (laiiissvillsg On, a, &gfysjpo*?tv La, '. S, Stoith, Mayor, Athens, /Boar* . cerdelXtfi The .Statf "formal School ank ^acuity, Jacksonville, kla. V '.• of CO! ., .--.-.-a irs, ■■- ige, HA, The RHaetria, conpony, Millt&gawilla, Bouak of .■'--.■, Km :- -:> Nl.» 5| -•-. ' I, : . ■ la ;t -, 8a, Judge. "-,, R| Day, Canton, Ohio, Fraaa noil "01 Royal Arcaanm, Ak:ievkUc, h, *$»
BASE
In: Images of Modern America
Cover Page -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Table of Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- 1. Indians, Explorers, and Pioneers -- 2. The Privileged and the Dreamers -- 3. Era of Development -- 4. Biscayne National Park -- 5. Biscayne Today -- Key to Courtesy Lines.