Neutral countries: Sweden
In: Labour research, Volume 28, p. 258-259
ISSN: 0023-7000
2081 results
Sort by:
In: Labour research, Volume 28, p. 258-259
ISSN: 0023-7000
In: Current History, Volume 9_Part-2, Issue 3, p. 424-427
ISSN: 1944-785X
In: Romanian journal of international affairs, Volume 8, Issue 1-2, p. 283-290
ISSN: 1224-0958
In: IHRA series vol. 2
In: Journal of Cold War studies, Volume 21, Issue 4, p. 208-230
ISSN: 1531-3298
The post-Cold War era has led to a proliferation of scholarship on U.S. policy toward four neutral European countries—Austria, Finland, Switzerland, and Sweden—during the Cold War. This article provides a survey of the latest literature on U.S. policy toward these four countries as well as general comments about the U.S. government's approach to European neutrality from 1945 to 1991.
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 9, Issue 1, p. 177-187
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, p. 7-8
In: Foreign affairs, Volume 35, p. 57-71
ISSN: 0015-7120
In: Yearbook of Finnish foreign policy, p. 27
ISSN: 0355-0079, 1456-1255
This collection analyzes how rival states used neutral territories as sites of clandestine competition during the Second World War and the Cold War. It also examines how neutral governments coped with challenges to national sovereignty posed by international spies, corrupt officials, and foreign assassins.
In: International review of the Red Cross: humanitarian debate, law, policy, action, Volume 5, Issue 57, p. 623-629
ISSN: 1607-5889
The termination of captivity for reasons of health is one of the rights of prisoners of war stipulated by the Geneva Conventions.Article 109 of the Third Convention lays down that Parties to the conflict are bound to send back to their own country, regardless of number or rank, seriously wounded and seriously sick prisoners of war.The same article stipulates that the belligerent Parties shall endeavour to make arrangements for the "accommodation in neutral countries", as a subsidiary solution, of all cases where captivity should be terminated for humanitarian reasons, but where, for military motives, the States concerned are unable to agree to repatriation. We are here above all thinking of aged prisoners, of those who have undergone a long period of captivity or of those whose mental health has deteriorated.
In: Journal of contemporary history, Volume 16, Issue 1, p. 213-228
ISSN: 1461-7250
In: Security studies, Volume 10, Issue 4, p. 1-57
ISSN: 0963-6412
World Affairs Online
In: Worldview, Volume 8, Issue 2, p. 7-11
To justify Nikita Khrushchev's removal from office, the new Kremlin leaders have cited this grievous fault: during the Aswan Dam celebrations in May 1964 he granted a Hero of the Soviet Union award to President Nasser of the United Arab Republic without first securing approval from the Supreme Soviet's Presidium. This example may or may not take a major place in the catalogue of Khrushchev's purported mistakes, but the award itself points up the attention Gamel Abdel Nasser still receives in world politics after a decade of controversy and uncertainty about his international status. Russian medals— and American corn—do not prove Nasser's arrival as a leader with significant standing, although great power recognition contributes to that status. That proof depends upon the rank he may gain as the leader of the nonaligned world.