Occasional Report
In: Science & global security: the technical basis for arms control, disarmament, and nonproliferation initiatives, Band 10, Heft 1, S. 81-83
ISSN: 1547-7800
544 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Science & global security: the technical basis for arms control, disarmament, and nonproliferation initiatives, Band 10, Heft 1, S. 81-83
ISSN: 1547-7800
In: Science & global security: the technical basis for arms control and environmental policy initiatives, Band 10, Heft 1, S. 81-84
ISSN: 0892-9882, 1048-7042
In: Science & global security: the technical basis for arms control, disarmament, and nonproliferation initiatives, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 123-129
ISSN: 1547-7800
In: Science & global security: the technical basis for arms control and environmental policy initiatives, Band 13, Heft 3, S. 209-217
ISSN: 0892-9882, 1048-7042
A net assessment of the benefits/losses of arms control treaties in terms of military significance was required in response to the START Resolution of Ratification. The response by the Executive Branch belabored smaller issues, avoided accomplishments and didn't carry out the net assessment.
In: Science & global security: the technical basis for arms control, disarmament, and nonproliferation initiatives, Band 4, Heft 2, S. 253-259
ISSN: 1547-7800
AIMS—To examine the volume and potential impact of gastroenterology research outputs from 1985 to 1998 from 14 developed countries; the overlap with research in cancer, infectious diseases, and genetics; and the funding sources for this research. To determine if countries' research outputs correlated with their burden of corresponding diseases and inputs to their research. METHODS—Selective retrieval of papers from the Science Citation Index and manual look up of a sample to determine funding sources. Classification of journals by four categories of research level (clinical/basic) and potential impact (low/high). RESULTS—Gastroenterology represents about 8% of world biomedical research but over 11% in Italy, Japan, and Spain. Its potential impact is highest (but declining) for the USA. It has increased noticeably in most European countries, particularly in Finland. Gastroenterology research has become more clinical in Japan, Spain, Australia, and the Netherlands but more basic in Canada, Germany, Finland, Israel, and South Africa. Funding comes primarily from national governments, followed by national private non-profit sources and industry but little industrial funding occurs in some countries. There is a strong and positive correlation between reported deaths from gastrointestinal neoplasms and countries' outputs of research in gastrointestinal oncology. CONCLUSIONS—Bibliometric analysis can reveal differences between countries in their research in a subject when a common methodology is applied to an international database. Variations in research methods in different countries can plausibly explain some of the variation in the potential impact of the work. Keywords: bibliometrics; funding; impact; mortality; research
BASE
Aims—To determine the sources of funding for UK gastroenterology research papers and the relative impact of papers funded by different groups and of unfunded ones. Methods—UK gastroenterology papers from 1988-94 were selectively retrieved from the Science Citation Index by means of a specially constructed filter based on their title keywords and journal names. They were looked up in libraries to determine their funding sources and these, together with their numbers of authors, numbers of addresses, and research category (clinical/basic) were considered as input parameters to the research. Output parameters analysed were mean journal impact category, citation counts by papers, and the frequency of citation by a US patent. Results—Gastroenterology papers comprise about 7% of all UK biomedical research and 46% of them have no acknowledged funding source. One quarter of the papers acknowledged government support, and a similar fraction a private, non-profit source; 11% were funded by the pharmaceutical industry. The papers acknowledging funding had significantly more impact than the others on all three measures. The citing patents had six times more UK inventors than the average for all US Patent and Trademark Office patents in the relevant classes and were mostly generic in application. Conclusion—The variation in impact of papers funded by different sources can mostly be explained by a simple model based on the input factors (numbers of funding bodies, numbers of authors, numbers of addresses, and research type). The national science base in gastroenterology is important for the underpinning of UK invented patents citing to it.
BASE
In: International journal of refugee law, Band 4, Heft 2, S. 216-216
ISSN: 1464-3715
In: The major gifts report: monthly ideas to unlock your major gifts potential, Band 21, Heft 12, S. 8-8
ISSN: 2325-8608
In: Management report for nonunion organizations, Band 18, Heft 3, S. 5-6
ISSN: 1530-8286
In: Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (forthcoming)
SSRN
In: International journal of refugee law, Band 3, Heft 2, S. 272-272
ISSN: 1464-3715