Suchergebnisse

Littlejohn reviews The Victorian Translation of China: James Legge's Oriental Pilgrimage by Norman J. Girardot.

Subject of this article is the legal research on crime of kidnapping or hostage- keeping forransom in jurisdiction of Code of Canons of Oriental Churches. Dogmatic and legal analysis ofnorms of the present code shows that can. 1445 and can. 1451 CCEO of 1990, alike can. 1370and can. 1397 Code of Canon Law (CIC of 1983), provide the possibility to punish perpetratorsof kidnapping or hostage – keeping for ransom of cleric persons, as well as any other person.Regarding this crime, penal sanctions upon CCEO of 1990 are heavier than these, which can beordered based on CIC of 1983.Aside from mentioned offences, Canon Law of Oriental Churches penalizes physical or psychicaltortures, so offender who kidnap or keep hostages with tortures will be liable for this crime.According to Canon Code of Oriental Churches, solely the court can order penalties, so likewisein polish penal law. However, due to specific ecclesiastic community, the nature of penal sanctionsis spiritual.

SOMMARIO: 1. Premessa - 2. La realtà ecclesiale e i riti - 3. La Chiesa armena gregoriana - 4. la Chiesa copta d'Egitto - 5.La Chiesa etiope e la Chiesa eritrea - 6- La Chiesa siro-giacobita - 7. La Chiesa siriaca orientale o malankarese - 8. La Chiesa assiro-orientale o caldea.
The Ancient Oriental Churches and their conformity to the calcedonese faith
ABSTRACT: Historical and doctrinal genesis of the non-chalcedon Churches and their current consistency. The recent clarification about the Christology of many of these Churches, especially in documents common with the Catholic Church.

RESUMEN: En nuestra contribución analizaremos la génesis y posterior desarrollo, en el marco de las controversias doctrinales de los siglos V y VI, de una institución eclesiástica especifica de la iglesia de Constantinopla, el sínodo ἐνδημοῦςα, inicialmente una reunión de obispos subordinada al azar de los encuentros, luego un concilio permanente formado por los obispos presentes en la capital de la Pars Orientis del Imperio (del que los mismos obispos a menudo se servían como instrumento para dirimir conflictos de tipo teológico o jurisdiccional), y finalmente una institución de la Iglesia Imperial. Utilizando una serie de fuentes hasta ahora no tomadas en consideración por los estudiosos que se han dedicado al tema, y a la luz de las más recientes contribuciones sobre el episcopado tardoantiguo, analizaremos su utilización político-eclesiástica por parte del poder imperial y de la jerarquía religiosa en los enfrentamientos entre los titulares de las principales sedes supra-metropolitanas del Oriente y con los poderes laicos. ; ABSTRACT: In the present paper, we will analyze the origin and subsequent development of a specific ecclesiastical institution of the church of Constantinople, the ἐνδημοῦςα Synod, within the framework of the doctrinal controversies of the 5th and 6th centuries. At first it was a random meeting of bishops, later to become a permanent council formed by the bishops present in the capital of the Pars Orientis of the Empire, which was often used as an instrument to settle conflicts of a theological or jurisdictional nature, and finally, an institution of the Imperial Church. Using a series of sources not yet taken into consideration by the scholars and in light of the most recent contributions on the Late Antique episcopate, we will study its political-ecclesiastical deployment by the imperial power and the religious hierarchy on the confrontations between the holders of the main supra-metropolitan seats of the East and the secular powers.

En nuestra contribución analizaremos la génesis y posterior desarrollo, en el marco de las controversias doctrinales de los siglos V y VI, de una institución eclesiástica especifica de la iglesia de Constantinopla, el sínodo ἐνδημοῦςα, inicialmente una reunión de obispos subordinada al azar de los encuentros, luego un concilio permanente formado por los obispos presentes en la capital de la Pars Orientis del Imperio (del que los mismos obispos a menudo se servían como instrumento para dirimir conflictos de tipo teológico o jurisdiccional), y finalmente una institución de la Iglesia Imperial. Utilizando una serie de fuentes hasta ahora no tomadas en consideración por los estudiosos que se han dedicado al tema, y a la luz de las más recientes contribuciones sobre el episcopado tardoantiguo, analizaremos su utilización políticoeclesiástica por parte del poder imperial y de la jerarquía religiosa en los enfrentamientos entre los titulares de las principales sedes suprametropolitanas del Oriente y con los poderes laicos. ; In the present paper, we will analyze the origin and subsequent development of a specific ecclesiastical institution of the church of Constantinople, the ἐνδημοῦςα Synod, within the framework of the doctrinal controversies of the 5th and 6th centuries. At first it was a random meeting of bishops, later to become a permanent council formed by the bishops present in the capital of the Pars Orientis of the Empire, which was often used as an instrument to settle conflicts of a theological or jurisdictional nature, and finally, an institution of the Imperial Church. Using a series of sources not yet taken into consideration by the scholars and in light of the most recent contributions on the Late Antique episcopate, we will study its political-ecclesiastical deployment by the imperial power and the religious hierarchy on the confrontations between the holders of the main supra-metropolitan seats of the East and the secular powers.

O Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium legisla sobre o processo ordinário (e extraordinário) para a designação dos bispos das Igrejas orientais e sobre o respectivo método, que é duplo: por lista ou por eleição directa. Exprimindo opiniões e reflexões pessoais, que julga úteis e oportunas, o autor faz-se eco de observações, queixas, reivindicações e protestos das Igrejas orientais sobre este processo canónico. ; The Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium legislates on the ordinary (and extraordinary) process for the designation of bishops in the oriental Churches and on the respective method, which is twofold: by list or by direct election. By expressing personal opinions and reflections, felt to be useful and opportune, the author makes himself an echo of observations, complaints, demands and protests in oriental Churches with regard to this canonical process.