The article reveals the legislative fundamentals of the administrative-and-procedural status of parents and other legal representatives as participants in the administrative proceedings, the subject of which are the minor, as well as the institution of administrative responsibility of parents and other minors' legal representatives. It analyzes the problems of bringing them to justice, substantiates the necessity to improve the system of administrative penalties for the subjects, as well as to include different in nature and legal consequences sanctions into the list of administrative penalties ; В статье раскрываются законодательные основы административно-процессуального статуса родителей или иных законных представителей как участников производства по делам об административных правонарушениях, субъектом которых являются несовершеннолетние, а также института административной ответственности родителей или иных законных представителей несовершеннолетних, анализируются проблемы привлечения их к ответственности, обосновывается необходимость совершенствования системы административных наказаний в отношении рассматриваемых субъектов, включения в перечень административных наказаний разных по характеру и правовым последствиям санкций
The subject. The paper deals with the search for the place of judicial administrative procedural law in the system of Russian law.The purpose of the paper is to identify is the judicial administrative procedural law an independent branch of Russian law.Methodology. The author uses the methods of analysis and synthesis, as well as dialectic approach. The formal-legal interpretation of the Code of Administrative Proceedings, the Code of Administrative Offences, the Commercial Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and is also used.The main results and scope of their application. The adoption of the Code of Administrative Proceedings in Russia in 2015 revealed many problems in science and legislation. A legislative decision to adopt the Code of Administrative Proceedings is considered as a political decision taken without a proper scientific basis and contrary to established scientific doctrine. Definitions of such basic concepts as "administrative process", "administrative dispute", "administrative justice", and others have not been developed in the period up to 2015 and to date, There is a mention of "administrative legal proceedings" as one of the types, along with civil, criminal and constitutional types of legal proceedings, in the Constitution of the Russian Federation. But administrative procedural legislation is referred to the joint jurisdiction of the Russian Federation and the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, in contrast to other procedural laws, in the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Representatives of the science of civil procedural law, with reference to legal theorists, called judicial administrative procedural law (which is referred to the Code of Administrative Proceedings) the secondary formation, a sub - branch of the fundamental (profiling) branch of civil procedural law. The purpose of judicial administrative procedural law – enforcement of substantive law and conflict resolution in the field of administrative and other public relations. It is noted that the public-legal dispute is not limited to the interaction of the citizen with the executive power. Civil procedural regulation of judicial review of cases arising from public relations is a procedural mechanism of judicial protection of constitutional rights, freedoms and legitimate interests. The Code of Administrative Proceedings lowers the status of cases arising from public legal relations to the status of cases arising from administrative legal relations. Representatives of the science of administrative law and procedure, on the contrary, believe that the adoption of the Code of Administrative Proceedings becomes the final act in the formation of a new branch of law – administrative judicial law, although it is a political decision and it's rules are practically copied from the Civil Procedure Code. At the same time, it is recognized that the Code of Administrative Proceedings needs scientific support, which still needs to be created. An alarming factor is the fact that some scientists propose to include cases concerning imposition of administrative sanctions in the this forming branch of law, although it mixes in fact disputes between individuals and a public entity and imposition of administrative sanctions to the offender by the court.Conclusions. It is premature to say that judicial administrative procedural law has emerged as an independent branch of Russian law. Prospects for further development of administrative proceedings are very uncertain due to the high proportion of subjective, political factors in the legislative process. ; Рассматривается поэтапное движение законодательства и научной мысли от неупорядоченного выделения «административных» дел, рассматриваемых судом, к единым процессуальным правилам. Обосновывается авторская точка зрения, что полярные мнения в науке, в совокупности с противоречивыми и непоследовательными действиями законодателя, в настоящее время не позволяют утверждать о наличии новой отрасли права, предметом которой стало бы рассмотрение различных административных дел. Одного лишь законодательного шага – принятия Кодекса административного судопроизводства – при существующей терминологической путанице, неопределенности с предметом и методами регулирования, недостаточно для утверждения новой отрасли права.
В настоящее время вопрос об одном из основных институтов судопроизводства – административном – стоит весьма остро. Это объясняется множеством различных объективных и субъективных причин, но, в первую очередь, тем, что значительно расширились возможности судебного контроля над действиями публичной администрации и ее должностных лиц. Они не имеют каких-либо ограничений, поэтому практически любой вопрос, находящийся в ведении органов публичной администрации, может быть передан на рассмотрение соответствующего суда в соответствии с установленными законодательством правилами подведомственности и подсудности. Объективное существования института административной юстиции, необходимость исследования его составных положений и потребность дальнейшего законодательного регулирования явились основной целью настоящей работы, чья научная новизна, таким образом, заключается в раскрытии сущности функции судебного контроля в рамках уже вступившего в законную силу Кодекса административного судопроизводства РФ, которая заключается в проверке законности и обоснованности действий органов, должностных лиц, наделенных властными полномочиями, в ходе рассмотрения судами дел, отнесенных к компетенции последних. В статье выявляются особенности правового регулирования административного судопроизводства. Автор исследует проблемные аспекты административного судопроизводства, к которым можно отнести следующее: универсальный перечень категорий административных дел, определение подведомственности административных дел, отсутствие законодательного определения понятия «административное судопроизводство» и др. ; Nowadays the question about one of the basic institutes of justice – administrative – is very acute. This is due to various objective and subjective reasons, but primarily for those that have greatly expanded the possibilities of judicial control over the actions of the public administration and its officials. They do not have any restrictions, so almost any issue under the jurisdiction of the public administration organs may be transferred to the appropriate court in accordance with the established law rules of jurisdiction and cognizance. Objective existence of the Institute of administrative justice, the need to study its constituent provisions, and the need for further legislative regulation were the main objectives of the present work. So the scientific novelty of the work lies in the discovery of the essence of judicial control in the framework of an enforceable code of administrative procedure of the Russian Federation, which is to verify the legality and validity of actions of institutions, authority officials, in the course of consideration by courts of causes related to the competence of the latter. The article reveals the peculiarities of legal regulation of administrative procedure. The author explores the problematic aspects of administrative proceedings, which include a universal list of categories of administrative cases, determination of jurisdiction of administrative cases and the lack of a legal definition of «administrative court proceedings».
The article is about the features of the socio-economic control as a form of social control. The author reveals specific methods of socio-economic control, which applicable to different control objects. Particular attention is paid to methods of solving problems arising in the implementation of socio-economic control.
The study of the constitutional and legal basis of the status of migrants will allow to determine and summarize the rights and obligations of these persons, which significantly affect the formation of legal social order. This article discusses the constitutional, legal and administrative basis of the status of migrants, regulated by the legislation of the Russian Federation. Considering the issue of the current state of the migration legislation of the Russian Federation, the theoretical aspect of migration as the mobilization of people to change their permanent residence is highlighted. The causes of this phenomenon and the classification of categories of migrants are determined. The definitions of external and internal migrants are differentiated, on the basis of which the constitutional norms of foreign persons who entered the territory of the Russian Federation are further studied. According to Federal laws, the basic rights and obligations of immigrants who entered the Russian Federation for different definitions of reasons and circumstances are distinguished. The article considers the administrative and legal basis of the status of migrants in the context of a violation of the rule of law according to the norms of the Code of administrative violations. The Institute of citizenship is singled out as a status that directly affects the scope of individual rights and freedoms, which allows it to be singled out as a special status of a migrant. In conclusion, the above topic is summarized
Cilj ovog rada jest objasniti pojam i ulogu stranke za svo vrijeme trajanja upravnog postupka. Dakle, u ovom će se radu razmatrati aktualno pravo Republike Hrvatske koje se odnosi na institut stranke u upravnom postupku. U prvom dijelu rada govori se o samom upravnom postupku, tijeku upravnog postupka te o diferencijaciji pojmova upravnog postupka i upravnog spora. Također, navode se načela općeg upravnog postupka s posebnim naglaskom na ona načela koja se izravno odnose na položaj i prava stranke u upravnom postupku. U radu se pozornost usmjerava na institut stranke prilikom čega se analizira pojam te vrste stranke, pretpostavke za njihovo djelovanje te mogućnosti koje stranke imaju tijekom upravnog postupka. Uz analizu položaja stranke u upravnom postupku, pozornost se usmjerava i na ograničenja koja stranke imaju prema posebnim propisima te opravdanost istih. ; The aim of this paper is to explain the concept and role of the party in the entire administrative procedure. Therefore, this paper will consider the current law of the Republic of Croatia relating to the institute of a party in administrative proceedings. The first part of the paper discusses the administrative procedure itself, the course of the administrative procedure and the differentiation of the concepts of administrative procedure and administrative dispute. Also, the principles of general administrative procedure are stated, with special emphasis on those principles that directly relate to the position and rights of the party in the administrative procedure. The paper focuses on the institute of the party, which analyzes the concept of this type of party, the preconditions for their actions and the possibilities that the parties have during the administrative procedure. In addition to the analysis of the position of the party in the administrative procedure, attention is also focused on the restrictions that the parties have under special regulations and their justification.
в статье представлена административная ответственность как один из основных институтов административного права ; а также рассматривается понимание сущности законодательства Российской Федерации ; регулирующего вопросы привлечения к административной ответственности. ; The article presents administrative responsibility as one of the main institutions of administrative law ; as well as an understanding of the essence of the legislation of the Russian Federation regulating the issues of bringing to administrative responsibility.
Cover-title. ; First ed. published the same year under title: Polnoe sobranīe podrobnykh programm sushchestvui︠u︡shchikh russkikh politicheskikh partīĭ. ; Mode of access: Internet.
The article deals with issues of the administrative-legal regulatory impact on the control and supervision of the state management, which is an objective necessity for activity as the subjects of the market economy, and the state as a whole, and defines its general, public nature in all social-economic formations. That is why the state may not be in the side from this type of activity and considering the control and supervision as a priority government function through laws and other normative legal acts of the administrative-legal nature in the various spheres of economy. ; В статье рассматриваются вопросы административно-правового регулятивного воздействия на контроль и надзор в государственном управлении, объективная необходимость которого для жизнедеятельности как субъектов рыночной экономики, так и государства в целом и определяет его всеобщий, публичный характер при всех общественно-экономических формациях. Именно поэтому государство не может находиться в стороне от этого вида деятельности и рассматривает контроль и надзор как приоритетную функцию государственного управления посредством законов и иных нормативных правовых актов административно-правового характера в различных сферах экономики.
Мнения о том, что при применении административного ареста нарушаются некоторые статьи Конституции РФ и положения Европейской конвенции о защите прав человека не справедливы. Конституция РФ допускает возможность ограничения прав на свободу и личную неприкосновенность лишь в той мере, в какой это необходимо в определенных его целях, и лишь в установленном законом порядке, что также не противоречит Конвенции о защите прав человека и основных свобод, в соответствии с которой содержание под стражей лица, осужденного компетентным судом, является допустимым отступлением от запрета лишения свободы. Административное наказание в виде административного ареста является одним из способов государственного принуждения, применяемого к наиболее злостным правонарушителям. Правоприменители в лице судей имеют достаточно эффективное средство влияния на оперативную обстановку в городах и населенных пунктах страны. ; The opinion that the procedure of applying an administrative arrest violates some articles of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and some provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights is unreasonable. The Constitution of the Russian Federation entertains a possibility of limitation of the right to liberty and security of a person when it is required according to the procedures provided by the legislation, in accordance with the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which says that detention of a person convicted by an authorized court is a permitted violation of the prohibition on deprivation of liberty. Administrative penalty as a form of administrative arrest is one of the methods of public enforcement applied to the most malicious offenders. Executors of law represented by judges have a quite effective instrument to control the situation in cities and towns of the country.
